NWO: More wars or fewer wars?

[YumYum]

Will we have fewer wars if there is a New World Order? Europe seems more at peace and acts like one big happy family since the formation of the European Union and the introduction of the Euro. Wars take money, and when we have a world currency, the NWO can cut back on the money supply to the nations that are threatening to attack another nation, thus preventing a war.

On the other hand, the New World Order and its World Reserve Bank could get us into a perpetual, never ending WW III, by financing every country till they collapse, and man has wiped himself off the face of the Earth: except for the elite of course; whoever that may be.

[pcosmar]

League of nations=FAIL
United Nations=FAIL

War is the health of the state.

We've always been at war with Eastasia.
:(

[Sandman33]

Nah, You won't see many more wars...just one more big one. The Antichrist is already here. Every nation has accepted him, gifts like the nobel peace prize have been bestowed upon him, and he's about to end the soveregnty of all nations especially this one. Which will cause the final war.

Then three years of peace.

Then shit meets fan.

[pcosmar]

They just won't be called wars.
We will call them ,,,Peacekeeping Missions.

Yeah, that's the ticket.

[Zippyjuan]

If the elite wipes everybody out there is nobody to make things for them or for them to make money off. The elite make more money and have more stability (fewer threats to themselves) during economically prosperous times. Wars have been in decline for a while now.

[Sandman33]

They just won't be called wars.
We will call them ,,,Peacekeeping Missions.

Yeah, that's the ticket.


Yeah...gonna have to "keep that peace" until your unruly microchipped populace is down to a global 500 mil level.

Just like the Georgia Guidestones tell you.