Obama finally going to trial over birth certificate / eligibility issue on 1/26/2010

[qh4dotcom]

YouTube - Orly Taitz gets Joy Behar very nervous about the Obama Eligibility case (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNEEcUVbLh8)

5:05 in the above video

YouTube - OBAMA GOING TO TRIAL FINALLY! ON HIS ILLEGAL ALIEN STATUS (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwqnuxT3zl8)

YouTube - OBAMA WILL GO TO TRIAL (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v57nh7okyjo)

YouTube - OBAMA WILL GO TO TRIAL (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ljlqw07Y6eQ)

[squarepusher]

i predict this in offtopic soon

[torchbearer]

i predict this in offtopic soon

I bet it stay here unless it turns into a flame war or zionist thread.

[Vessol]

It will be a kangaroo court that's a show to show how silly "Birthers" are and how Obama is the paragon of truth.

Even if he is an illegal immigrant, the whole issue is a distraction to the more important issues like the economy and the Federal Reserve.

[torchbearer]

It will be a kangaroo court that's a show to show how silly "Birthers" are and how Obama is the paragon of truth.

Even if he is an illegal immigrant, the whole issue is a distraction to the more important issues like the economy and the Federal Reserve.

you can't challenge the pirates in the courts ran by pirates.
so yes. you are correct.

[zach]

so, is this for real?

[torchbearer]

so, is this for real?

i'd like to see the actual docket before I get my hopes up for at least a show trial.

[qh4dotcom]

so, is this for real?

Sure looks like it's for real considering the background of the judge and what he said

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2291996/posts




At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:

1. There will be a trial.

2. It will be heard on the merits.

3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.

4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.

5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.

6. Judge stated that if Obama isn't Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.

[Bruno]

Sure looks like it's for real considering the background of the judge and what he said

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2291996/posts

:cool:

[qh4dotcom]

i predict this in offtopic soon

It's too important to be moved to off-topic...this is political news...imagine the President of the USA going to trial.

[Anti Federalist]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2291996/posts

:rolleyes:

[Pauls' Revere]

i'd like to see the actual docket before I get my hopes up for at least a show trial.

bump.

Got a docket #?

[squarepusher]

8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN ?

[Pauls' Revere]

I'm no lawyer...

http://images.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/08/06/birth_certificate/03118539619.pdf

sure has his name on it, unless this is a different Barrak Hussein Obama?

[squarepusher]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orly_Taitz

Orly Taitz is dual American/Israeli citizenship, who is considered the leader of the "Birther" movement.

I have to ask, if this was know ahead of time by "the elites" behind the scenes, then they would have to know that Biden would eventually become president, if this is true. So, how does he fit into the puzzle?

[devil21]

I just looked on PACER (Fed court info site) and there's 3 open cases against Obama right now, just in California alone. :confused:

These are the ones. Anybody know which is the one the videos reference? Btw, you should see the whole list. Obama has been sued 20 times in Cali alone! All but 3 have been closed.

(Defendent name, court district, case number, date filed, type of suit)
7 OBAMA, BARACK caedce 2:2009cv02472 09/02/2009 440
(PS) Rousay v. Obama


10 OBAMA, BARACK candce 5:2009cv04356 09/17/2009 550
Abpikar v. Obama et al


16 OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN cacdce 8:2009cv00082 01/20/2009 440
Captain Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al
(this one names Michelle Obama defendant too!)

DON'T GET INTO CONSPIRACY TALK. PLEASE KEEP THIS THREAD CLEAN SO IT ISN'T BANISHED TO HOT TOPICS.

[devil21]

8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN ?

Yeah that's the one. Here's the docket report. It's long but interesting read, especially if you know Fed court notations and procedures. If anyone wants to know what anything in particular means, just ask. I'll probably know. It's really long so I have to break it into multiple posts.


Date Filed # Docket Text
01/20/2009 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Robert Mueller, Michael W Hager, Barack H Obama and Condoleeza Rice.(Filing fee $ 350). Filed by Plaintiffs Alan Keyes PhD, Wiley S Drake and Markham Robinson.(lwag) (lwag). (Entered: 01/23/2009)
01/20/2009 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendants Robert Mueller, Michael W Hager, Barack H Obama and Condoleeza Rice. (lwag) (Entered: 01/23/2009)
01/20/2009 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Alan Keyes PhD, Wiley S Drake and Markham Robinson. (lwag) (lwag). (Entered: 01/23/2009)
01/20/2009 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PILOT PROGRAM filed.(lwag) (lwag). (Entered: 01/23/2009)
05/12/2009 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/29/2009. (smi) (Entered: 05/13/2009)
05/18/2009 5 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by plaintiffs upon Barack H Obama served on 2/10/2009, answer due 3/2/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by substituted service, by not indicated statute, upon mail clerk at Department of Justice. Due Dilligence declaration none. Original Summons not returned. (twdb) (Entered: 05/19/2009)
05/27/2009 6 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION held before Judge David O. Carter. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than June 12, 2009 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See order for details. (smi) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
05/27/2009 7 First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Barack H Obama filed by filer-plaitiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Affidavit of process server)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
06/01/2009 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Barack H Obama 7 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as statute in which process was served not cited; name of deft does not exactly match name on complaint. (rla) (Entered: 06/01/2009)
06/02/2009 9 Amendment to First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Barack H Obama 7 filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 06/02/2009)
06/02/2009 10 Amendment to First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Barack H Obama 7 filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Amended affidavit of the process server)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 06/02/2009)
06/10/2009 11 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the following docket entry has been corrected as indicated below: The proof of service filed 5/18/09 answer due deadline should be 4/11/09. Re: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (60 days) 5 (twdb) (Entered: 06/10/2009)
06/10/2009 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as Proof of Service is lacking required information. Please reivew Federal Rules regarding service. (ade) (Entered: 06/10/2009)
06/11/2009 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND Renewed MOTION for Reconsideration of Entry of Default, Renewed MOTION to Correct Notice of Deficiency of Proof of Service, Final Motion for Entry of Default against DefendantBarack H Obama filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 06/11/2009)
06/12/2009 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Extending Order to Show Cause, and Finding as Moot Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification 13 by Judge David O. Carter. In light of plaintiffs' efforts, the Order to Show Cause is extended until 07/13/2009 to permit plaintiffs addirtional time to properly effect service pursuant to FRCivP4(i) as to all defendants. In addition, Plaintiffs' motion is rendered MOOT due to the Court's extension of the Order to Show Cause. (See order for further details) (db) (Entered: 06/12/2009)
06/14/2009 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration, MOTION for Entry of Judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) filed by plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 06/14/2009)
06/22/2009 16 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: SETTING HEARING ON MOTION: Before the Court is a Motion by Plaintiffs for Reconsideration of Order to Show Cause or in the Alternative to Certify Question for Appeal. Court sets this matter for hearing on July 13, 2009 at 8:30a.m. in Courtroom 9D. Plaintiffs are directed to make every effort possible to ensure that all remaining defendants are aware of the hearing and provide documentation that the individual receiving service is authorized to accept on defendants' behalf. (rla) (Entered: 06/22/2009)
07/05/2009 17 OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD, served on 06.28.09.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Affidavit)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 07/05/2009)
07/07/2009 18 STATEMENT OF INTEREST (DeJute, David) (Entered: 07/07/2009)
07/08/2009 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Title page is missing RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents) 17 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (rrp) (Entered: 07/08/2009)
07/11/2009 20 OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD, Barack H. Obama, aka Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro served on 06.29.09.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 07/11/2009)
07/13/2009 21 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendant Barack H. Obama, aka Barack Hussein Obama,II, a/k/a Barack H. Obama,II, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro filed by plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Appendix Appendix to Exhibit B)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 07/13/2009)
07/13/2009 24 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge David O. Carter: RE: MOTION for Reconsideration of Order to Show Cause or in the Alternative to Certify Question for Appeal 15 : Counsel are excused to meet and confer regarding service of Complaint. Counsel return and advised the Court of their agreement to a means of proper service upon President Barack Obama. Court directs plaintiffs to immediately effect service of the Complaint upon a person authorized to accept service at the United States Attorneys Office as to the remaining defendant. Court Reporter: Debbie Gale. (rla) (Entered: 07/17/2009)
07/15/2009 22 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Taitz, Orly) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/24/2009: # 1 Summons Issued) (lwag). (Entered: 07/15/2009)
07/15/2009 23 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: FINDING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AS MOOT 15 : Counts Two and Three of the Original Complaint, as well as all Defendants besides President Obama, are HEREBY VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla) (Entered: 07/16/2009)
07/16/2009 25 MINUTES ( IN CHAMBERS) : ORDER held before Judge David O. Carter re: First Amended Complaint 22 . Plaintiffs are ORDERED to properly serve the First Amended Complaint on or before August 16, 2009 and file Proof of Service of such on or before August 23, 2009. (dg) (Entered: 07/17/2009)
07/17/2009 26 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely RE: MOTION for Default Judgment 21 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (twdb) (Entered: 07/17/2009)
07/30/2009 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD, uponJoseph R Biden served on 7/15/2009, answer due 9/13/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by registered California Process server, by Federal statute. Service accepted by Flabia De La Rosa on behalf of Thomas O'Brien, US Atty. Original Summons not returned. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix, # 2 Appendix)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 07/30/2009)
07/30/2009 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD, uponUNITED STATES OF AMERICA served on 7/15/2009, answer due 9/13/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by registered California process server, by Federal statute. Service accepted by Flabia De La Rosa on behalf of Thomas O'Brien, US atty. Original Summons not returned. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 07/30/2009)

cont'd

[devil21]

07/30/2009 29 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed The Summons and Complaint were served by registered California process server, by Federal statute. Service accepted by Flabia De La Rosa on behalf of Thomas O'Brien US attorney. Original Summons not returned. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 07/30/2009)
07/30/2009 30 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD, uponMichelle LR Obama served on 7/15/2009, answer due 9/13/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by registered California Process server, by Federal statute. Service accepted by Flabia de la Rosa on behalf of Thomas O'Brien, US atty. Original Summons not returned. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 07/30/2009)
07/30/2009 31 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD, uponHillary Rodham Clinton served on 7/15/2009, answer due 9/13/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by registered California process server, by Federal statute. Service accepted by Flabia De La Rosa on behalf of Thomas O'Brien, US atty. Original Summons not returned. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 07/30/2009)
07/30/2009 32 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD, uponRobert M Gates served on 7/15/2009, answer due 9/13/2009. The Summons and Complaint were served by registered California process server, by Federal statute. Service accepted by Flabia De La Rosa on behalf of Thomas O'Brien US atty. Original Summons not returned. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 07/30/2009)
08/01/2009 33 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to all defendants. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 08/01/2009)
08/01/2009 34 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Photocopy of Obama's birth certificate from Kenya)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 08/01/2009)
08/06/2009 35 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato: the documents listed below were improperly filed for the following reasons: Lacks proper notice; improper form and format; counsel failed to identify her Cal. State Bar No.; description of motion conflicts or differs from that which counsel entered on Court's e-docket; therefore, the following document(s) shall be stricken from the record and shall not be considered by the Court: MOTION to Expedite authentication MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate 34 . (rla) (Entered: 08/06/2009)
08/07/2009 36 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Roger E West counsel for Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Interested Party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Changing e-mail to roger.west4@usdoj.gov. Adding Roger E. West as attorney as counsel of record for Defendants for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendants Barack H. Obama, et al. (West, Roger) (Entered: 08/07/2009)
08/18/2009 37 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 08/18/2009)
08/19/2009 38 NOTICE NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING filed by plaintiff Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. (Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 08/19/2009)
08/19/2009 39 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Incorrect event selected, correct event is Review and Incorrect category selected, correct category is Motion RE: Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) DECLINED before US Magistrate Judge MJ Pilot 37 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (rrp) (Entered: 08/19/2009)
08/19/2009 40 NOTICE OF FAILURE BY PLAINTIFFS TO PROPERLY EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS; DECLARATIONS OF DAVID A. DeJUTE AND FLABIA DE LA ROSA filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-5)(West, Roger) (Entered: 08/19/2009)
08/20/2009 41 opposition to magistrate filed by Plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Markham Robinson, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Thomas J Taylor, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Wiley S Drake, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
08/20/2009 42 REFERRAL OF MOTION to Disqualify Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazatohas been filed. Pursuant to GO 08.05 and Local Rule 72-5 MOTION for Review 37 is referred to Judge David O. Carter for determination. (jal) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
08/20/2009 43 Amendment to MOTION to Expedite authentication MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate 34 filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
08/21/2009 44 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER SETTING SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 HEARING ONMOTIONS: (See document for details.) In summary, the Court sets for hearing at 8:00 a.m. on September 8, 2009, (1) the Discovery Motion, (2) the Service Notice, and (3) the Ex Parte Application. All parties are ordered to be present. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla) (Entered: 08/21/2009)
08/24/2009 45 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Vacate Plaintiffs' Voluntary Dismsisal filed by plaintiff Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Memo of Points and Authorities, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Markham Robinson, # 3 Declaration Declaration of Wiley S. Drake, # 4 Declaration Declaration of Elliot Wilson, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Wiley Substitution, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Markham Substitution, # 7 Exhibit Letter from Dr. Taitz, # 8 Exhibit Notice of Dismissal, # 9 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Ex Parte Application)(Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 08/24/2009)
08/24/2009 60 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint - (Discovery) 22 as to Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden and Barack Hussein Obama. (lwag) (Entered: 08/24/2009)
08/26/2009 46 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed 08.25.09. The Summons and Complaint were served by process server, by Federal statute. Service accepted by Patricia Myles, civil process clerk for US attorneys on behalf of all defendants. Original Summons was returned. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 08/26/2009)
08/26/2009 47 DECLARATION of Gary G. Kreep in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION to Vacate Plaintiffs' Voluntary Dismsisal 45 filed by Plaintiffs Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. (Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 08/26/2009)
08/27/2009 48 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7-19.1 Notice to other parties of ex parte application lacking RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Vacate 45 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (twdb) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
08/27/2009 49 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake, re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Vacate Plaintiffs' Voluntary Dismsisal 45 served on August 27, 2009. (Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
08/27/2009 50 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Title page is missing RE: Declaration (Motion related) 47 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (rrp) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
08/28/2009 51 DECLARATION of Gary G. Kreep in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION to Vacate Plaintiffs' Voluntary Dismsisal 45 filed by Plaintiffs Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. (Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 08/28/2009)
08/31/2009 52 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Title page is missing RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents) 49 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (twdb) (Entered: 09/01/2009)
09/01/2009 53 OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake, re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Vacate Plaintiffs' Voluntary Dismsisal 45 served on 8/27/2009. (Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 09/01/2009)
09/02/2009 54 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake, re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Vacate Plaintiffs' Voluntary Dismsisal 45 served on September 2, 2009. (Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 09/02/2009)
09/04/2009 55 NOTICE Declaration regarding Kenian Hospital Birth Certificate of Barack Obama filed by plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration regarding Kenian Hospital Birth Certificate, # 2 Appendix Kenian Hospital Birth Certificate for Barack Obama)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 09/04/2009)
09/04/2009 56 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case ; AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Motion set for hearing on 10/5/2009 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 and 2)(West, Roger) (Entered: 09/04/2009)

Interesting part bolded above. Seems the good Taitz, Esq. doesn't know shit about federal civil procedure. Either that or the magistrate judge was just trying to laugh the case out of court without due process. The birth certificate is the key piece of evidence. That comment indicates badly (laughably even) drawn up documents for filing a motion for such a key piece of evidence.

[devil21]

09/08/2009 57 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR 10/5/2009 at 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (rrp) (Entered: 09/08/2009)
09/08/2009 58 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE NAKAZATOS AUGUST 6, 2009 ORDER AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO RECUSE MAGISTRATE JUDGE NAKAZATO; GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER VACATING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Plaintiffs Motion to Modify the Magistrate Judges August 6, 2009 Order and Motion to Recuse the Magistrate Judge 37 is DENIED. Plaintiffs Robinson and Drakes Ex Parte Application for Order Vacating Voluntary Dismissal 45 is hereby GRANTED. (kh) (Entered: 09/08/2009)
09/08/2009 74 MINUTES OF Hearing re: Discovery; Service Notice and ex Parte Application held before Judge David O. Carter: Court and counsel confer re service of Defendants. Defense counsel states that service has been effectuated. Court and counsel confer regarding Ex Parte Application to Vacate Dismissal filed by Markham Robinson and Wiley S. Drake. Court grants Ex Parte Application. Attorney Gary Kreep added to the case. Court sets Scheduling Conference for October 5, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. Court and counsel confer and set tentative case management dates. Court and counsel confer regarding recusal of Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato. Court denies, without prejudice, Plaintiffs Motion to Recuse the Magistrate Judge. The Court also denies Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of Magistrate Judge Nakazatos August 6, 2009 Order. Court Reporter: Maria Dellaneve. (kh) (Entered: 09/25/2009)
09/10/2009 59 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER Referring Motion to Magistrate Judge held before Judge David O. Carter. Court orders First Amended Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory and Initiation of Discovery,filed by plaintiffs on August 20, 2009 referred to assigned Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato. Accordingly, the noticed hearing date of September 14, 2009 at 8:30 a.m. before this Court is vacated. (db) (Entered: 09/10/2009)
09/10/2009 60 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for LIMITED STAY OF DISCOVERY ; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(West, Roger) (Entered: 09/10/2009)
09/11/2009 61 MEMORANDUM in Opposition TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF LETTERS ROGATORY AND INITIATION OF DISCOVERY filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Interested Party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (West, Roger) (Entered: 09/11/2009)
09/11/2009 62 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Gary G Kreep on behalf of Plaintiffs Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake (Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 09/11/2009)
09/13/2009 63 NOTICE filed by plaintiff Pamela Barnett. (Attachments: # 1 Letter proposed schedule of depositions, notice of motion to disqualify Gary Kreep as a co-counsel due to conflict of interest)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 09/13/2009)
09/14/2009 64 OPPOSITION TO APPLICATION FOR LIMITED STAY OF DISCOVERY re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for LIMITED STAY OF DISCOVERY ; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF 60 filed by Plaintiffs Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application For Limited Stay of Discovery, # 2 Appendix Plaintiffs' Compendium of Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application For Limited Stay of Discovery, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits to Plaintiffs' Compendium of Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application For Limited Stay of Discovery)(Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 09/14/2009)
09/15/2009 65 REVISED OPPOSITION to Ex Parte Application for Limited Stay of Discovery re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for LIMITED STAY OF DISCOVERY ; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF 60 filed by Plaintiffs Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Gary G. Kreep in Support of Filing Plaintiffs' Revised Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application For Limited Stay of Discovery, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Gary G. Kreep in Support of Filing Plaintiffs' Revised Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application For Limited Stay of Discovery, # 3 Appendix Plaintiffs' Compendium of Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application For Limited Stay of Discovery, # 4 Exhibit Exhibits to Plaintiffs' Compendium of Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Revised Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application For Limited Stay of Discovery)(Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 09/15/2009)
09/16/2009 66 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter granting 60 Ex Parte Application for Order for Limited Stay of Discovery. All discovery herein shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants Motion to Dismiss, except for any discovery as to which Plaintiffs can demonstrate, to the satisfaction of Magistrate Judge Nakazato, is necessary for the purpose of opposing the Motion to Dismiss. (ade) (Entered: 09/17/2009)
09/18/2009 67 OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss Case ; AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 56 filed by Plaintiffs Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Plaintiffs' Compendium of Authorities in support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits to Plaintiffs' Compendium of Authorities in support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 09/18/2009)
09/21/2009 68 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Interested Party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.. (West, Roger) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
09/23/2009 70 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: DENYING REQUEST TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE OF COURT 69 : The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla) (Entered: 09/23/2009)
09/23/2009 71 OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Pamela Barnett, served on 09,23.09.. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 09/23/2009)
09/25/2009 72 REPLY MEMORANDUM TO OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY ALL PALINTIFFS EXCEPT DRAKE AND ROBINSON filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Interested Party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment)(West, Roger) (Entered: 09/25/2009)
09/25/2009 73 REPLY MEMORANDUM TO OPPOSITION FILED BY PLAINTIFFS DRAKE AND ROBINSON filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Interested Party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (West, Roger) (Entered: 09/25/2009)
09/26/2009 75 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file Surreply filed by plaintiff Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. Motion set for hearing on 10/1/2009 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 09/26/2009)
09/28/2009 76 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: REQUEST FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO FILE SUR-REPLY 75 : The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion and will give Plaintiffs leave of court to file a surreply not to exceed ten (10) pages to be filed by 5 p.m. on October 1, 2009. Plaintiffs' courtesy copy of the sur-reply shall be delivered to the Court's dropbox on the ninth floor of the Santa Ana courthouse by no later than noon on October 2, 2009. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla) (Entered: 09/28/2009)

[devil21]

09/30/2009 77 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge David O. Carter: On 09/28/09, Court received letter from attorney Philip J Berg requesting Exhibit 7 to Response in Opposition to Motion 69 be sealed as it contains personal identifying information(see Order for specifics). Court orders Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Case (Doc 69) sealed. Plaintiffs shall refile redacted copy of entire Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, including all exhibits by Friday, October 2, 5 p.m. (ln) (Entered: 09/30/2009)
10/01/2009 78 opposition surreply opposition to motion to dismiss re: MOTION to Dismiss Case ; AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 56 filed by Plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua, Defendant Robert Mueller. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter from snator Sessions, # 2 Exhibit Quo Warranto request submitted to Atty Gen Eric Holder, # 3 Exhibit Request for investigations of Obama's background from the office of the Sec of State of KY, # 4 Exhibit Affidavit PI Susan Daniels-Obama's use of SS number of the deceased)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 10/01/2009)
10/01/2009 79 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Sever PLAINTIFFS filed by PLAINTIFFS Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Wiley Drake in Support of Motion for Severance, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 10 in Support of Motion for Severance, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits 1-9 in Support of Motion for Severance, # 4 Declaration Declaration of Gary Kreep in Support of Motion for Severance, # 5 Exhibit Proposed Second Amended Complaint)(Kreep, Gary) (Entered: 10/01/2009)
10/02/2009 80 OPPOSITION filed by Plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua, Defendant Michael W Hager. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Dossier # 3, # 2 Exhibit Dossier #4, # 3 Exhibit Dossier #5, # 4 Exhibit FOIA from Pamela Barnett, # 5 Exhibit Letter from legal counsel to Chairman of Joint Ch. of Staff, # 6 Exhibit Quo Warranto, # 7 Exhibit Easterling et al motion to file under original jurisdiction, # 8 Exhibit Certified mail receipt US Atty District of Columbia Jeffrey Taylor, # 9 Exhibit Dossier #1 no Social Security Numbers)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
10/05/2009 81 MINUTES OF taking under advisement 56 Motion to Dismiss Case ; Motion Hearing held before Judge David O. Carter:; Scheduling Conference held before Judge David O. Carter. Case Management dates are as follows: Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m. File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009 Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009 Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. Court Reporter: Debbie Gale. (ade) (Entered: 10/07/2009)
10/07/2009 82 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Accelerate motion for relief from stay of discovery Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, Motion Hearing, Scheduling Conference,,,,,, 81 filed by plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1st response from US attorney Roger West, # 2 Exhibit 2nd response from the US attorney Roger West)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 10/07/2009)
10/08/2009 83 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: DENYING EX PARTE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY OF DISCOVERY 82 : The Ex Parte Motion is hereby DENIED. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla) (Entered: 10/08/2009)
10/11/2009 84 Request for judicial notice filed by Plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Expanded affidavit by Susan Daniels)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 10/11/2009)

END

Bolded the order entry setting trial date.

One thing I noticed is that the US Gov't filed a motion to dismiss the case and the judge has *not* ruled on that motion yet. Paragraph 81 also states that the motion to dismiss will be held under advisement (on hold) until a later date. It also sets filing deadlines for Summary Judgment motions, which basically means paper filings that argue a case completely without the need for a trial. Last thing I noticed is that this case has ROCKETED through the federal court system. A year from filing of complaint to jury trial is very fast and pretty much unheard of for something of this nature. This case will never go to trial. Either the judge will throw it out from the pending motion to dismiss or will rule on summary judgment filings alone sometime in December. The judge will rule in the gov'ts favor of course because ruling that Obama is not legally eligible for the Presidency will turn this country upside down.

[libertarian4321]

Seems the good Taitz, Esq. doesn't know shit about federal civil procedure. Either that or the magistrate judge was just trying to laugh the case out of court without due process. The birth certificate is the key piece of evidence. That comment indicates badly (laughably even) drawn up documents for filing a motion for such a key piece of evidence.

Perhaps that's because Ms. Taitz got her law degree from a non-accredited online-only "law school?" (Taft Law School)

[Dianne]

This FOX video just kills me. Do you believe showing this birth certificate billboard was an accident:

YouTube - Vegas Obama Birth Certificate billboard LIVE on FOX News Anchors in shock!!! WND (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4Buyu04vP4&feature=rec-LGOUT-exp_stronger_r2-HM)

[rprprs]

...The judge will rule in the gov'ts favor of course because ruling that Obama is not legally eligible for the Presidency will turn this country upside down.

Well, that part happened a long time ago.

But, yeah, this will never fly.

[RevolutionSD]

This is like Clinton going to trial over getting a blow job.

It's meaningless.

Clinton is off dropping bombs and killing innocent people all over the place and they go after him for a victimless crime. Nothing of substance is exposed, nothing changes.

Obama is killing innocent people all over the place and they go after him for a technicality which would make Joe Biden, an equally as evil man, become president. Nothing of substance is exposed, nothing changes.

[erowe1]

This is going to be open and shut. Obama signs an affidavit saying he's a natural born citizen. Judge asks the people suing him if they have evidence to back up their charge that he's lying. They say no. Judge rules in favor of Obama.

[Dianne]

This is like Clinton going to trial over getting a blow job.

It's meaningless.

Clinton is off dropping bombs and killing innocent people all over the place and they go after him for a victimless crime. Nothing of substance is exposed, nothing changes.

Obama is killing innocent people all over the place and they go after him for a technicality which would make Joe Biden, an equally as evil man, become president. Nothing of substance is exposed, nothing changes.


I too do not believe that justice will be served.. It never is for the "little" people. However, what is more important to me than Obama lying about his birth is the cover up by the DNC. And if it is true, that Pelosi and other democratic leaders signed his eligibility certificate with the one line attesting to he being an eligible candidate omitted from the document.... then there should be a large number of Senators, members of Congress and the POTUS along with Biden sitting in jail for a very long time.

By the way, all the articles I have been reading related to Lou Dobbs leaving CNN seem to point at arguments Dobbs and the station have had related to Dobbs' discussion of Obama's citizenship. Why are these stations so sensitive about anyone bringing up the subject? There's an awful lot of people out there in power that certainly act as though there is something to hide.

Lou Dobbs’s Next Home: Fox Business?
By Brian Stelter


Robert Caplin for The New York Times

Lou DobbsThe anchor Lou Dobbs appears to be exploring an exit from CNN, his longtime employer.

Certainly, Fox continues to aggressively bolster its on-air talent, most recently with the hiring of John Stossel, the libertarian investigative journalist from ABC News, for its spin-off channel, Fox Business. Mr. Dobbs, an administration critic who calls himself an independent, met for dinner with Roger E. Ailes, the chairman of Fox News, last month, according to two people with direct knowledge of the meeting.

One of the people said Mr. Dobbs is a potential hire for the Fox Business Network, the ratings starved, two-year-old spin-off of Fox News. Mr. Ailes has shown willingness to raid other networks for Fox Business talent, adding the controversial radio host Don Imus this month and bringing aboard Mr. Stossel in a few weeks.

It is unclear whether Mr. Dobbs is seeking to leave CNN, and a network spokeswoman had no comment on Sunday. Mr. Dobbs has been with CNN since its founding (save for a two-year stint at an upstart Web site Space.com) and anchors the 7 p.m. hour “Lou Dobbs Tonight.” He has evolved over the years from a straight-laced business anchor to an outspoken commentator who rails against illegal immigration and taxpayer bailouts, among other subjects.

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/lou-dobbs-next-home-fox-business/

Mr. Dobbs clashed with others at CNN over the summer when he asked questions about President Obama’s citizenship.But in an interview this year, Jonathan Klein, the president of CNN/U.S., said “Lou’s show is less about Lou’s opinion than ever.”

[Reason]

Where are you getting all that text?

The pdf link is just a single page.

Still haven't seen anything about this from a trustworthy source.

[Truth-Bringer]

This is going to be open and shut. Obama signs an affidavit saying he's a natural born citizen. Judge asks the people suing him if they have evidence to back up their charge that he's lying. They say no. Judge rules in favor of Obama.

Actually there's another case that I believe has far more substance than this one:

Kerchner v. Obama (http://puzo1.blogspot.com)

This link contains some of the details they've based their case on:

Obama Citizenship Facts and Obama Birth Certificate Facts (http://countryfirst.bravehost.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=105&t=127)

[qh4dotcom]

This is going to be open and shut. Obama signs an affidavit saying he's a natural born citizen. Judge asks the people suing him if they have evidence to back up their charge that he's lying. They say no. Judge rules in favor of Obama.

Looks like you didn't hear about the background of the judge and what he said

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2291996/posts




At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:

1. There will be a trial.

2. It will be heard on the merits.

3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.

4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.

5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.

6. Judge stated that if Obama isn't Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.

[emazur]

If it's gonna happen, why ain't it on the front page of WND.com?

[qh4dotcom]

If it's gonna happen, why ain't it on the front page of WND.com?

Good question...but nowhere does it say that the case was dismissed

[erowe1]

Looks like you didn't hear about the background of the judge and what he said

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2291996/posts


I saw that, it was already listed in this thread. Why do you think I didn't? Do you think that a former marine who respects the Constitution would do something unconstitutional like throw Obama out of office when the people accusing him of not being a natural born citizen fail to present any proof that he's lying when he says he is one?

Or are you imagining that this former marine is talking about some other constitution where the burden of proof is on the accused instead of the accuser?

[Zippyjuan]

Latest official information I can find is from October 5th and is the same information being cited in the videos in the first post.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=7428

Carter then essentially cut off further argument saying that he needs more time. He did not make a tentative ruling today. He wants to consider the arguments that have been made both in the written papers and during the hearing.

He turned to plaintiffs and said, I’m most concerned about standing.

To the defendants he said, I’m most concerned about justicability, correct venue, political question, and how far do the courts go.

He turned back to plaintiffs and said, if I rule against you on standing, I would suggest ways to address that issue in the future.

To the audience he said, your applause has not influenced me at all, one way or the other.

To Orly he said, apparently you’ve encouraged people to call me on your blog. Please discourage the phone calls. They don’t help. It was inappropriate for you to do that. However, it won’t bear on my decision.

He then stated, obviously you’ve had no scheduling conference, but we’ll stick by the dates previously set for now.

He thanked everybody and the hearing ended. [emphases added]


So unless there is an update- there was no decision to dismiss or to not dismiss. He has questions about the standing of the plaintiffs- meaning their ability to even bring the charges- as well as questions as to whether he is the proper place to hear the charges.
Any newer info? At this point, it is not ordered over to trial. The link earlier in the thread about "it will go to trial" was from July. It is not in the news because there is no news to report. No decision.

Upcoming scheduled dates (from my same link):


Case Management Dates are as follows:

Motion for Summary Hearing: December 7th 2009 at 8:30 am
File Motion for Summary Judgement: November 16th, 2009
Opposition Motion for Summary Judgement: November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgement: November 30th, 2009

Final Pretrial Conference: January 11th, 2010
Jury Trial: January 26th, 2010



Having a date for trial does not necessarily mean it will go to trial.

[Pepsi]

The judge as not issued his order it, it still can be dismiss

[devil21]

Where are you getting all that text?

The pdf link is just a single page.

Still haven't seen anything about this from a trustworthy source.

Was that directed at me?

If so, it's the docket report from PACER, the federal court case information system.

http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/

[OrigSEOH]

I watched a video a couple of months ago that has been removed from Youtube, of a individual that went to Kenya and found the birth record...but mother is US citizen and from what I learned from the forum discussion that all she has to do is bring the record back and poof US Citizen, just as any US citizen mother would want for there child.

[torchbearer]

I watched a video a couple of moths ago that has been removed from Youtube, of a individual that went to Kenya and found the birth record...but mother is US citizen and from what I learned from the forum discussion that all she has to do is bring the record back and poof US Citizen, just as any US citizen mother would want for there child.

its not just a citizen, but a natural born citizen.
it actually matters where he is born.
at best- he is a dual citizen.
his father was a british citizen, his son would be british.
it would be interesting to see if he applied for foreign aid to go to college.

[qh4dotcom]

I saw that, it was already listed in this thread. Why do you think I didn't? Do you think that a former marine who respects the Constitution would do something unconstitutional like throw Obama out of office when the people accusing him of not being a natural born citizen fail to present any proof that he's lying when he says he is one?

Or are you imagining that this former marine is talking about some other constitution where the burden of proof is on the accused instead of the accuser?

Throwing Obama out of office is not unconstitutional...see the 20th amendment which talks about Congress deciding who becomes president when the President or Vice-president have "failed to qualify".

[OrigSEOH]

Here is a link to the post that I read pertaining to citizenship. Not that I did not enjoy the idea of him getting impeached...I just do not think anything will come of it.

http://www.greenpassion.org/140992-post6.html



its not just a citizen, but a natural born citizen.
it actually matters where he is born.
at best- he is a dual citizen.
his father was a british citizen, his son would be british.
it would be interesting to see if he applied for foreign aid to go to college.

[Danke]

This is going to be open and shut. Obama signs an affidavit saying he's a natural born citizen. Judge asks the people suing him if they have evidence to back up their charge that he's lying. They say no. Judge rules in favor of Obama.

Wouldn't that affidavit have to come from a witness to the birth?

I know I can't honestly declare via affidavit anything about my birth, but my parents could.

[torchbearer]

Would that affidavit have to come from a witness to the birth?

I know I can't honestly declare via affidavit anything about my birth, but my parents could.

doctor or nurse present would be preferable.

[qh4dotcom]

Bump

[qh4dotcom]

The judge as not issued his order it, it still can be dismiss


Latest official information I can find is from October 5th and is the same information being cited in the videos in the first post.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=7428


So unless there is an update- there was no decision to dismiss or to not dismiss. He has questions about the standing of the plaintiffs- meaning their ability to even bring the charges- as well as questions as to whether he is the proper place to hear the charges.
Any newer info? At this point, it is not ordered over to trial. The link earlier in the thread about "it will go to trial" was from July. It is not in the news because there is no news to report. No decision.

Upcoming scheduled dates (from my same link):


Having a date for trial does not necessarily mean it will go to trial.

Orly Taitz just said there will be a trial on January 26th...so sure looks like nothing was dismissed

YouTube - Orly Taitz gets Joy Behar very nervous about the Obama Eligibility case (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNEEcUVbLh8)

5:05 in that video

[devil21]

Did anybody catch Arianna Huffington's article calling for Biden to step down?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/why-joe-biden-should-resi_b_320929.html

If Obama were to be determined ineligible and Biden stepped down, wouldn't that make Hillary president? Hmmm....

[Danke]

Did anybody catch Arianna Huffington's article calling for Biden to step down?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/why-joe-biden-should-resi_b_320929.html

If Obama were to be determined ineligible and Biden stepped down, wouldn't that make Hillary president? Hmmm....

Better, Nancy!!!

Speaker of the House of Representatives

[devil21]

Jeez, I don't know which is worse. If the tin foil theories are correct, then such an outcome would be very, very beneficial to the alleged conspirators.

[justinc.1089]

Ha someone should have a long talk with the Clintons about how Hillary could get to be president if Biden and Obama were out of the way then lol. I bet suddenly the birther movement would get a lot more attention then.

[justinc.1089]

its not just a citizen, but a natural born citizen.
it actually matters where he is born.
at best- he is a dual citizen.
his father was a british citizen, his son would be british.
it would be interesting to see if he applied for foreign aid to go to college.

A friend of mine on myspace posted something like that. He did apply for financial aid, and the records support him being born in Kenya, but I can't remember the details.

[Zippyjuan]

Orly Taitz just said there will be a trial on January 26th...so sure looks like nothing was dismissed



5:05 in that video

Orly also said the debunked Kenyan birth certificate was real and tried to get it admitted as "evidence"- even after it was shown to be a hoax. It is true it has not been dismissed yet- the judge has not issued his ruling in that reguard.

[erowe1]

A friend of mine on myspace posted something like that. He did apply for financial aid, and the records support him being born in Kenya, but I can't remember the details.

Your friend was probably taken in by this hoax:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/occidental.asp

[erowe1]

Wouldn't that affidavit have to come from a witness to the birth?

I know I can't honestly declare via affidavit anything about my birth, but my parents could.

The thing is, Obama has no constitutional or legal obligation to prove anything. The burden of proof is entirely on those who say he is not a natural born citizen. You can't just tell someone, "Unless you provide proof of having been born in the United States, then you cannot qualify as a natural born citizen." The Constitution makes no mention of birth certificates or anything like that.

[Pepsi]

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.

Ryan’s campaign began to crumble on Monday following the release of embarrassing records from his divorce. In the records, his ex-wife, Boston Public actress Jeri Ryan, said her former husband took her to kinky sex clubs in Paris, New York and New Orleans.

Barrack Obama

"It’s clear to me that a vigorous debate on the issues most likely could not take place if I remain in the race," Ryan, 44, said in a statement. "What would take place, rather, is a brutal, scorched-earth campaign – the kind of campaign that has turned off so many voters, the kind of politics I refuse to play."

Although Ryan disputed the allegations, saying he and his wife went to one ‘avant-garde’ club in Paris and left because they felt uncomfortable, lashed out at the media and said it was "truly outrageous" that the Chicago Tribune got a judge to unseal the records.

The Republican choice will become an instant underdog in the campaign for the seat of retiring Republican Senator Peter Fitzgerald, since Obama held a wide lead even before the scandal broke.

"I feel for him actually," Obama told a Chicago TV station. "What he’s gone through over the last three days I think is something you wouldn’t wish on anybody."

The Republican state committee must now choose a replacement for Ryan, who had won in the primaries against seven contenders. Its task is complicated by the fact that Obama holds a comfortable lead in the polls and is widely regarded as a rising Democratic star.

The chairwoman of the Illinois Republican Party, Judy Topinka, said at a news conference, after Ryan withdrew, that Republicans would probably take several weeks to settle on a new candidate.

"Obviously, this is a bad week for our party and our state," she said.

As recently as Thursday, spokesmen for the Ryan campaign still insisted that Ryan would remain in the race. Ryan had defended himself saying, "There’s no breaking of any laws. There’s no breaking of any marriage laws. There’s no breaking of the Ten Commandments anywhere."

http://216.221.102.26/blogger/post/A-real-article-disclosing-Obamas-Kenyan-born-orgins-back-in-2004.aspx


here is the artical from 2004

http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

[qh4dotcom]

The thing is, Obama has no constitutional or legal obligation to prove anything. The burden of proof is entirely on those who say he is not a natural born citizen. You can't just tell someone, "Unless you provide proof of having been born in the United States, then you cannot qualify as a natural born citizen." The Constitution makes no mention of birth certificates or anything like that.

Doesn't he have to prove the Constitutional requirements that he's over 35 years old, lived a minimum of 14 years in the US, etc.?

[wrestlingwes_8]

That first video is great. That lady anchor gets completey OWNED!

[RideTheDirt]

I can see it now!


1/25/2010
Ran Domshill
Barack Obama will not be able to make his court date tomorrow because of the crisis in _________

[squarepusher]

Orly Taitz just said there will be a trial on January 26th...so sure looks like nothing was dismissed

YouTube - Orly Taitz gets Joy Behar very nervous about the Obama Eligibility case (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNEEcUVbLh8)

5:05 in that video

nice video, and ...


who is Barry Soetoro
(http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/13056.htm)?

[jmdrake]

The thing is, Obama has no constitutional or legal obligation to prove anything. The burden of proof is entirely on those who say he is not a natural born citizen. You can't just tell someone, "Unless you provide proof of having been born in the United States, then you cannot qualify as a natural born citizen." The Constitution makes no mention of birth certificates or anything like that.

That's simply not correct. I'm not sure why people always get the burden of proof wrong. If this were a criminal trial then yes, the burden of proof would be on the other side. But this is a civil trial. It only requires a "preponderance of evidence" as opposed to "beyond reasonable doubt". If the burden of proof was as you say then no judge would allow it to come to trial because there would be no chance of winning. Enough doubt has been raised about Obama's birth that he needs to prove the case once and for all.

[WClint]

It looks like we have some obamabots on this forum. I wonder if they are paid by the taxpayers.
http://muffledoar.blogspot.com/

[erowe1]

That's simply not correct. I'm not sure why people always get the burden of proof wrong. If this were a criminal trial then yes, the burden of proof would be on the other side. But this is a civil trial. It only requires a "preponderance of evidence" as opposed to "beyond reasonable doubt". If the burden of proof was as you say then no judge would allow it to come to trial because there would be no chance of winning. Enough doubt has been raised about Obama's birth that he needs to prove the case once and for all.


Fair enough. But even at that standard, those denying that Obama is a natural born citizen still have to provide the preponderance of evidence. They don't have that. Not even close. The fact that there has been "doubt cast" on it is irrelevant. Obama won't have to provide his birth certificate. I think if they really did have a genuine Kenyan birth certificate, then there could be some traction for them. But without that, then the kinds of circumstantial evidence they depend on won't count for anything.

[erowe1]

Doesn't he have to prove the Constitutional requirements that he's over 35 years old, lived a minimum of 14 years in the US, etc.?

No. What president ever had to do that?

And how would one prove all these things if one didn't have a birth certificate at all? Is it now the case that a person is excluded from running for president if they don't have that piece of paper? And if so, when and how did that novel requirement come about?

[pcosmar]

No. What president ever had to do that?



What President has ever had a questionable past, and citizenship elsewhere?

How many have come from nearly complete obscurity with no real accomplishments?

[erowe1]

What President has ever had a questionable past, and citizenship elsewhere?

How many have come from nearly complete obscurity with no real accomplishments?

I don't know of any. But having people question one's past and consider one obscure and without accomplishment are not the makings of a "preponderance of the evidence" that one was born in Kenya.

[Catatonic]

The thing is, Obama has no constitutional or legal obligation to prove anything. The burden of proof is entirely on those who say he is not a natural born citizen. You can't just tell someone, "Unless you provide proof of having been born in the United States, then you cannot qualify as a natural born citizen." The Constitution makes no mention of birth certificates or anything like that.

lol, thats funny. I wonder if illegals can use that argument. "So what if I can't prove I'm a citizen, you can't prove I'm not!"

Anyway isn't this the case that just got thrown out of court as 'frivolous'?

[Arklatex]

Yeah it's happened before, I've heard of Maduro in Honduras was born in Panama but he politically got his way anyway and was President.

[erowe1]

lol, thats funny. I wonder if illegals can use that argument. "So what if I can't prove I'm a citizen, you can't prove I'm not!"


They certainly SHOULD be able to use that argument. You're not suggesting that government agents should be able to demand that anybody they claim to suspect is an illegal immigrant must show them some government issued piece of paper or else be deported without those government agents even having to prove anything are you? Does this requirement to get government issued papers in order to exercise one's God given rights apply to everyone? Or just to people with certain skin colors and accents? Like if I chose not to get a birth certificate for my son, would the state be within its rights to deport him on account of that?

[SelfTaught]

Orly Taitz just said there will be a trial on January 26th...so sure looks like nothing was dismissed

YouTube - Orly Taitz gets Joy Behar very nervous about the Obama Eligibility case (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNEEcUVbLh8)

5:05 in that video

This is a little off topic.

Is it just me or does Orly Taitz look kinda like a transvestite?

[Catatonic]

They certainly SHOULD be able to use that argument. You're not suggesting that government agents should be able to demand that anybody they claim to suspect is an illegal immigrant must show them some government issued piece of paper or else be deported without those government agents even having to prove anything are you? Does this requirement to get government issued papers in order to exercise one's God given rights apply to everyone? Or just to people with certain skin colors and accents? Like if I chose not to get a birth certificate for my son, would the state be within its rights to deport him on account of that?

No, and I am against check points. But how about when social services are used? Like say, education, or free health care? Or even employment?

[lester1/2jr]

who cares if he WAS from another country?

it's a dumb law

[JeNNiF00F00]

who cares if he WAS from another country?

it's a dumb law

Are you joking? Its pertinent that we adhere to the Constitution. This is the PROBLEM with America. We aren't following the Constitution!

[jmdrake]

Fair enough. But even at that standard, those denying that Obama is a natural born citizen still have to provide the preponderance of evidence. They don't have that. Not even close. The fact that there has been "doubt cast" on it is irrelevant. Obama won't have to provide his birth certificate. I think if they really did have a genuine Kenyan birth certificate, then there could be some traction for them. But without that, then the kinds of circumstantial evidence they depend on won't count for anything.

That's a question for judge to decide. Not you, me or anyone else sitting here on the internet. Not unless you actually sat down and read all of the evidence Orly was presenting. There are the statements by his grandmother, the fact that he was allowed to go to an Indonesian public school, the recent headline etc. You wish to dismiss this as "circumstantial evidence". Do you realize that people have been convicted of murder off of nothing but circumstantial evidence? In the Perry March case (http://www.wsmv.com/news/9993510/detail.html) he was convicted of murder even though no weapon or body was ever found. Like I said, a judge wouldn't take the case unless there was some chance, remote as it may be, of the other side winning. It would have been thrown out on a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment. The fact that it's going to trial means that there is enough evidence for a judge to possibly find Obama was not a natural born citizen.

One more thing. You don't have 5th amendment rights in a civil proceeding. That's why Bill Clinton got in trouble. He was forced to testify and that testimony turned out to be perjury. If this goes to trial the judge can force Obama to testify. The judge can also require Obama to turn over a birth certificate. It's all a part of something called "discovery".

Regards,

John M. Drake

[lester1/2jr]

Are you joking? Its pertinent that we adhere to the Constitution. This is the PROBLEM with America. We aren't following the Constitution!

we shold hire the best person for the job regardless of what country they come from. as if them being from america means they will rule in our interest!

[devil21]

BUMP

I just remembered this tonite and looked it up. The case was dismissed.



10-29-09
Full docket text for document 89:
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [56]: (See document for details.) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (rla)

There's more to it and Im looking at it now. Will update in a moment.

[devil21]

The rest of the docket entries since the Motion to Dismiss was granted. The case is being appealed to the US Appeals Court. Pertinent text is bolded.



Filed & Entered: 11/09/2009
Terminated: 12/04/2009
Motion for Reconsideration
Docket Text: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] filed by plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. Motion set for hearing on 11/20/2009 at 09:00 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Declaration of Orly Taitz, # (2) Exhibit Coroners report of Donald Young, Affidavit of Larry Sinclair)(Taitz, Orly)
91 Filed & Entered: 11/13/2009
Request for Judicial Notice
Docket Text: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89][90] filed by plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix Third circuit court of appeals decision)(Taitz, Orly)
92 Filed & Entered: 11/13/2009
Objection/Opposition (Motion related)
Docket Text: OPPOSITION re: MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89][90] filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Interested Party United States of America. (West, Roger)
93 Filed & Entered: 11/16/2009
Terminated: 11/17/2009
Motion for Reconsideration
Docket Text: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] filed by plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. Motion set for hearing on 12/7/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration Declaration of Orly Taitz re basis for the motion for reconsideration, # (2) Declaration Declaration of Orly Taitz, # (3) Declaration Declaration of Orly Taitz re attempt for meet and confer, # (4) Declaration Coroners report and declaration of Donald Young)(Taitz, Orly)
94 Filed & Entered: 11/16/2009
Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Docket Text: NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Plaintiffs Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. Appeal of Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89]. (Filing fee $455, receipt number 09730000000006158038.) (Attachments: # (1) Supplement Representation Statement and Service List, # (2) Supplement 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docking Statement, # (3) Exhibit District Court Order Being Appealed)(Kreep, Gary)
95 Filed & Entered: 11/17/2009
9th CCA Assigned Case Number Notice
Docket Text: NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 09-56827, 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, [94] as to Plaintiff Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake. (dmap)
96 Filed: 11/17/2009
Entered: 11/18/2009
Notice of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112)
Docket Text: NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Incorrect event selected RE: MOTION for Reconsideration [89][93]. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (twdb)
97 Filed & Entered: 11/18/2009
Amendment (Motion related)
Docket Text: Amendment to MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89][93] filed by Plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration Declaration of Orly Taitz re basis for reconsideration, # (2) Declaration Declaration of Orly Taitz re meet and confer, # (3) Declaration Declaration re Larry Sinclair, his affidavit and book, # (4) Affidavit Coroners death cert. Donald Young; Affidavit of Larry Sinclair)(Taitz, Orly)
98 Filed & Entered: 11/19/2009
Objection/Opposition (Motion related)
Docket Text: OPPOSITION TO AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re: MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89] MOTION for Reconsideration re Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89][93] filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Interested Party United States of America. (West, Roger)
99 Filed & Entered: 11/30/2009
Order on Motion for Reconsideration
Docket Text: MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: taking under advisement [90] Motion for Reconsideration. The Court finds matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set December 7, 2009 at 8:30 a.m. is removed from the calendar. Parties will be served with the Courts ruling. (ade)
100 Filed & Entered: 12/03/2009
Miscellaneous Document
Docket Text: letter to judge Carter filed by Plaintiff Pamela Barnett (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Barack Obama background report)(Taitz, Orly)
101 Filed & Entered: 12/04/2009
Order on Motion for Reconsideration
Docket Text: MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Reconsideration by Judge David O. Carter [90]. (See Order for details) (db)
102 Filed: 12/07/2009
Entered: 12/08/2009
USCA Order
Docket Text: ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, [94] filed by Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake, CCA # 09-56827. The court's record reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court shall be held in abeyance pending the district court's resolution of the pending motion. See Leader Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F. 3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 5 days after the district court's ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district court's ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of apeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall served this order on the district court. Order received in this district on 12/07/09. (lr)
103 Filed & Entered: 12/13/2009
Terminated: 12/16/2009
Motion for More Definite Statement
Docket Text: NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. Motion set for hearing on 1/4/2010 at 10:00 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Taitz, Orly)
104 Filed & Entered: 12/16/2009
Order on Motion for More Definite Statement
Docket Text: MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: CLARIFYING ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS OF OCTOBER 29, 2009: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs' Motion for Clarification [103] regarding whether the October 29, 2009 Order was a dismissal with or without prejudice. The Courts dismissal of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint on October 29, 2009 was a dismissal without leave to amend and with prejudice. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla)
105 Filed & Entered: 12/24/2009
Terminated: 01/12/2010
Motion to Transfer Case
Docket Text: NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION to Transfer Case to District of Columbia filed by plaintiff Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. Motion set for hearing on 1/25/2010 at 10:00 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Taitz, Orly)
106 Filed & Entered: 01/05/2010
Objection/Opposition (Motion related)
Docket Text: OPPOSITION Opposition re: First MOTION to Transfer Case to District of Columbia[105] filed by Defendants Michelle LR Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Robert M Gates, Joseph R Biden, Barack Hussein Obama. (DeJute, David)
107 Filed & Entered: 01/08/2010
Reply (Motion related)
Docket Text: REPLY to opposition to motion to transfer filed by Plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. (Taitz, Orly)
108 Filed & Entered: 01/12/2010
Order on Motion to Transfer Case
Docket Text: MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: denying [105] Motion to Transfer Case. Plaintiffs now request that their quo warranto claims be transferred to the District Court of the District of Columbia. As this case has been dismissed as to all claims with prejudice, meaning that there is no longer any action pending before this Court, the Motion to Transfer is DENIED. (ade)
113 Filed: 01/15/2010
Entered: 01/22/2010
USCA Order
Docket Text: ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, [94] filed by Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake, CCA # 09-56827. The response to this court's order reflect that the district court has denied the post-judgment motion and that no amended notice of appeal will be filed to include the order denying the post-judgment motion. Accordingly, briefing resumes. Within 10 calendar days after entry of the order disposing of the post-judgment motion, appellants shall designate any reporter's transcripts or serve on appellees a statement indicating that appellants do not intend to order any transcripts. See 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1(a). If appellants fail to comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellants designate transcripts will be due March 2, 2010. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due April 12, 2010; the ansering brief is due May 12, 2010; and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. Order received in this district on 1/15/2010. (lr)
109 Filed & Entered: 01/17/2010
Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
Docket Text: NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix Service statement, # (2) Appendix representation statement)(Taitz, Orly)
110 Filed & Entered: 01/19/2010
9th CCA Assigned Case Number Notice
Docket Text: NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 10-55084, 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals [109] (cbr)
111 Filed & Entered: 01/20/2010
Designation of Record on Appeal
Docket Text: DESIGNATION of Record on Appeal by Plaintiff Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake re [94] (Kreep, Gary)
112 Filed & Entered: 01/20/2010
Transcript Designation and Order Form to the 9th CCA (A-9)
Docket Text: TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: 7/13/09, 9/8/09, 10/5/09; Court Reporter: Debbie Gale, Maria Dellaneve; Court of Appeals Case Number: 09-56827; Re: [94] (Attachments: # (1) Affidavit Notice of Eratta)(Kreep, Gary)
114 Filed: 01/21/2010
Entered: 01/22/2010
Appeal Fees Paid
Docket Text: APPEAL FEE PAID: re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, [94] as to Plaintiffs Markham Robinson, Wiley S Drake; Receipt Number: 19391, Paid in the amount of $455. (lr)
116 Filed: 01/21/2010
Entered: 01/27/2010
Appeal Fees Paid
Docket Text: APPEAL FEE PAID: re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, [109] as to Plaintiffs Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua; Receipt Number: 19391, Paid in the amount of $455. (lr)
115 Filed & Entered: 01/26/2010
Terminated: 01/26/2010
Notice of Appeal to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Docket Text: NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit filed by plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua. Appeal of Order on Motion for Reconsideration, [99], Order on Motion for Reconsideration, Order on Motion for Entry of Judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) (Interlocutory Appeal),, Order on Motion for Entry of Judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) (Interlocutory Appeal)[23], Motion Hearing, Link Motions to Minutes,,,, [24], Order on Motion to Dismiss Case[89], Order on Motion for Reconsideration[101], Order on Motion for More Definite Statement, [104], Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, [25] (Taitz, Orly)
117 Filed & Entered: 01/27/2010
Notice of Clerical Error (G-11)
Docket Text: NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error The appeal filing fee paid was docketed for the wrong notice of appeal[94]. The appeal filing fee paid has been corrected noitce of appeal[109]. Re: Appeal Fees Paid[114] (lr)
118 Filed & Entered: 01/27/2010
Errata
Docket Text: NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Pamela Barnett. correcting Notice of Appeal to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals,,,, [115] (Taitz, Orly)