PDA

View Full Version : New Ron Paul Google Trends Info




The Good Doctor
09-30-2007, 04:16 PM
http://www.google.com/trends?q=Ron+Paul%2CFred+Thompson%2CRudy+Guiliani% 2C+Mitt+Romney%2CJohn+McCain&ctab=0&geo=all&date=2007&sort=0

I had Huckabee in there but I changed it to McCain. And funny thing is if you change it and add Huckabee he gets more searches than even the Ghoul!

Just wanted to show that we are moving up. And more people are getting interested.

terlinguatx
09-30-2007, 04:18 PM
...

ItsTime
09-30-2007, 04:20 PM
looks like everytime there is a debate there is a big spike for paul. Also looks like paul keeps going up :) Lots of people from FL looking into paul that is a great sign.

Zydeco
09-30-2007, 04:22 PM
And funny thing is if you change it and add Huckabee he gets more searches then even the Ghoul!

Giuliani's candidacy is a fascinating thing, a smokescreen almost entirely establishment-created and funded.

He has not won a single straw poll, indeed will not even show up to any, including Iowa; has 58 Meetup group members, about one-thousandth Ron Paul's support; does very few public speeches or rallies; does a lot of private, big-ticket fundraisers; etc.

And yet the establishment "scientific" polls make him the supposed frontrunner.

Thor
09-30-2007, 04:54 PM
If you add some dems into the mix, the results are interesting..

http://www.google.com/trends?q=Ron+Paul%2CFred+Thompson%2Cobama%2Chillar y+clinton&ctab=0&geo=US&geor=all&date=mtd&sort=0

Salamando
09-30-2007, 04:55 PM
I think you misspelt Giuliani

SewrRatt
09-30-2007, 05:04 PM
I think Fred's big announcement spike and then prompt return to his proper place in the lower-tier shithole he came from is hilarious.

fez2008
09-30-2007, 05:05 PM
If you add some dems into the mix, the results are interesting..

http://www.google.com/trends?q=Ron+Paul%2CFred+Thompson%2Cobama%2Chillar y+clinton&ctab=0&geo=US&geor=all&date=mtd&sort=0

How change happens?

Jan 2004(Jan 20 IOWA primary news - tipping point):
http://www.google.com/trends?q=kerry%2C+edwards%2C+dean&ctab=0&geo=US&geor=all&date=2004-1&sort=0

Feb 2004:
http://www.google.com/trends?q=kerry%2C+edwards%2C+dean&ctab=0&geo=US&geor=all&date=2004-2&sort=0

Noog
09-30-2007, 05:17 PM
As always, he has the least news volume and is still the most searched.

ross11988
09-30-2007, 05:17 PM
looks like obama is doing pretty good in iowa

The Good Doctor
09-30-2007, 05:50 PM
Yeah but I think it auto fixed it. Anyway, my bad. He still isn't getting as many searches as Huckabee.


I think you misspelt Giuliani

specialkornflake
09-30-2007, 08:28 PM
This is likely more accurate:
http://www.google.com/trends?q=Ron+Paul%2C+Fred+Thompson%2C+Giuliani%2C+ Romney%2C+McCain&ctab=0&geo=all&date=2007&sort=0

I wouldn't search for Giuliani, Romney, or McCain by their full name.

jonahtrainer
09-30-2007, 08:50 PM
And funny thing is if you change it and add Huckabee he gets more searches then even the Ghoul!

Giuliani's candidacy is a fascinating thing, a smokescreen almost entirely establishment-created and funded.

He has not won a single straw poll, indeed will not even show up to any, including Iowa; has 58 Meetup group members, about one-thousandth Ron Paul's support; does very few public speeches or rallies; does a lot of private, big-ticket fundraisers; etc.

And yet the establishment "scientific" polls make him the supposed frontrunner.

I thought so also. I was having dinner with a friend and I asked him who he liked and he said Ghoulani. I was floored; I've only seen 1 bumper sticker for him. I guess the ghost has at least 2 supporters.

Yes, my buddy got a slim-jim and the spiel about how only Ron Paul can beat Hitlery because he is anti-war.