PDA

View Full Version : Defunding ACORN faces surprise hurdles




bobbyw24
09-30-2009, 07:46 AM
Defunding ACORN faces surprise hurdles

Stephen Dinan

Congress is rushing to defund the controversial group ACORN, but its efforts might have unintended consequences: Some argue that one version of the effort violates the Constitution, while a growing chorus says a second measure is so broad that it could block major contractors such as the Boeing Co. from getting government jobs.

The Senate has twice adopted amendments cutting off funding for the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now. The House has separately passed the "Defund ACORN Act," which goes beyond ACORN to prohibit funding for any organization that has filed fraudulent paperwork with the government or violated campaign finance laws.

The Senate language might run afoul of the Constitution because it is so narrow and the House measure might be written too broadly, analysts say.

"The Senate language, I think, is plainly unconstitutional," said Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight.

The House version, in contrast, she said, could ensnare many other bad-actor contractors. "The House language from our perspective is delicious," she said.

The constitutional issue stems from the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits bills of attainder - an ancient legal concept that deems a single person or entity guilty and worthy of punishment by legislation.

"It may be that ACORN is guilty of various infractions," said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, New York Democrat, but "Congress must not be in the business of punishing individual organizations or people without trial."

A Congressional Research Service Report agrees that the language may be improper - depending on what motivated the members of Congress. If lawmakers intended to punish ACORN, that could be a problem, CRS said.

But the lawmakers' intent is good governance, said a spokeswoman for Sen. Mike Johanns, the Nebraska Republican who offered the two Senate amendments.

Mr. Johanns' "goal is to protect the taxpayer from waste, fraud and abuse. ACORN is an organization that has a pattern and culture of employees engaging in fraud and other illegal behavior. Receiving federal funding is a privilege, not a right," said spokeswoman Ann Marie Hauser.


http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/30/effort-to-defund-acorn-faces-hurdles/

Wampy
09-30-2009, 07:55 AM
That anyone in congress would claim to be considering the "constitutionality" of any bill is so ridiculously disingenuous as not to be believed, not for a moment.

Somehow I just can’t bring myself to accept lessons on constitutional law from the home of the “interstate commerce” clause.

torchbearer
09-30-2009, 07:57 AM
Actually, they need to first ask, is it constitutional to spend federal money on a specific group like Acorn to begin with... can they please ask that question first.

Wampy
09-30-2009, 07:58 AM
Actually, they need to first ask, is it constitutional to spend federal money on a specific group like Acorn to begin with... can they please ask that question first.

AMEN, so to speak...