PDA

View Full Version : I Received a Threat! Received a YouTube Threat over my military video!




btalex1990
09-25-2009, 04:18 PM
My YouTube Account is under attack by a fake complainer over a truth video I mirrored.

If you are apart of the media please help bring out whats happening to me over a disgrunted person. Please bring out what YouTube is doing to me.

Heres the publicly released Google Email:

Relayed message to me from youtube:

Dear USWGO,

This is to notify you that we have received a privacy complaint from an
individual regarding your content:

-------------------------------------------------------------
Video URLs: YouTube - WeAreChange Ohio Investigates Military Checkpoints - Mirrored Backup (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k73QKNgynY)
The information reported as violating privacy is at 5:48
-------------------------------------------------------------

We would like to give you an opportunity to remove or edit your video so
that it no longer violates the privacy of the individuals involved. Please
edit or remove the material reported by the individual within 48 hours of
today's date. If no action is taken, the video will then come in for
review by the YouTube staff and be prohibited from being uploaded again.

Protecting a person's privacy is protecting their personal safety. When
uploading videos in the future, please remember not to post someone else's
image or personal information without their consent. Personal information
includes things such as names, phone numbers and email addresses. For more
information, please review our Community Guidelines at
http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines and our Safety Center at
http://www.youtube.com/t/safety
Regards,


The YouTube Team


Relay this blog entree to your blog if you are against YouTube Censorship attacks/Threats!

Heres a screenshot for those that wants to see the email with their own eyes.

http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/1326/youtubecomplaintattack.png
By uswgoadmin (http://profile.imageshack.us/user/uswgoadmin) at 2009-09-25

torchbearer
09-25-2009, 04:28 PM
duplicate the video on as many accounts as possible. keep backups, and re-up as many times as needed.
maybe some other people will copy the video.

Arklatex
09-25-2009, 04:34 PM
listen to torchbearer

Warrior_of_Freedom
09-25-2009, 04:44 PM
listen to arklatex

angelatc
09-25-2009, 05:03 PM
Get a lawyer. YOu're allowed to film public servants doing their jobs.

torchbearer
09-25-2009, 05:05 PM
Get a lawyer. YOu're allowed to film public servants doing their jobs.

the government isn't pulling his vid, a private company is taking it down.
I say- replicate it as many times as possible.

newbitech
09-25-2009, 05:26 PM
just cover their faces with a black box.


better yet just cover his eyes with red splotches his mouth with zipper and make sure he looks like a freak that he is.

btalex1990
09-25-2009, 05:30 PM
just cover their faces with a black box.

good idea, we will call it the black cube video....oops I said something offensive might as well take down this post, lol.

Man! People these days will report your video over anything, especially if it makes the president look bad! :rolleyes:

Obamas doing a great job! Nothing is wrong with this country at all! Ignore the military down the streets! Nothing to See here! Move along!

Wampy
09-25-2009, 05:33 PM
Just a quick question having nothing to do with the youtube issue. Were they doing anything other than traffic control?

btalex1990
09-25-2009, 05:51 PM
Just a quick question having nothing to do with the youtube issue. Were they doing anything other than traffic control?

Well they obey orders from the police department I think! They also just stand around waiting for something to happen and I am not really sure what stuff they are suppose to do there other then traffic control. Maybe they are stationed there for future martial law and civil revolts?

Wampy
09-25-2009, 05:54 PM
There is really nothing strange or new about the NG helping with traffic, crowd control, and disaster relief. The video did no seem to show any of them doing anything unusual. Again, nothing to do with youtube problem.

LibForestPaul
09-25-2009, 05:57 PM
There is really nothing strange or new about the NG helping with traffic, crowd control, and disaster relief. The video did no seem to show any of them doing anything unusual. Again, nothing to do with youtube problem.

Serious? Traffic National Guard?

Wampy
09-25-2009, 06:01 PM
Yeah, absolutely. Nothing strange about it at all. Big events and such. Frees up the cops to do cop things rather than directing traffic.

newbitech
09-25-2009, 06:05 PM
Yeah, absolutely. Nothing strange about it at all. Big events and such. Frees up the cops to do cop things rather than directing traffic.

humor me,

to do things like what?

edit: well you are a new poster I don't want to come across as arrogant.

just consider that cops at events get paid double time to stand around and do nothing for 90% of the time if not more.

So why not get the national guard to stand around and do nothing for free?

That is really why they are there, IMO. What scares most folks is the tactical gear they bring with them. As if they were preparing to subdue ALL of those people. Also, the blurring of the lines is sort of like conditioning people to accept things like what we see going on in Pitts. That's a full blown military response right there in Pitts. With people wearing Police gear.

So we have Military acting like cops. And we have cops acting like military. You don't see anything wrong with that?

zach
09-25-2009, 06:10 PM
I have my own account... how do I post videos that aren't mine onto my video list?

Dr.3D
09-25-2009, 06:39 PM
My theory as to why there has been a complaint is because the fellow you were talking to was not supposed to be talking to the media. It's an order all military personnel get when in the military.

I believe the fellow doing the complaining is doing it only to cover his own ass. He knows when those in command above him see this video, they may come down on him for participating in it.

When I was in the military, I was told never to give statements to the media and you-tube may now be considered as media.

Wampy
09-25-2009, 07:59 PM
So we have Military acting like cops. And we have cops acting like military. You don't see anything wrong with that?

As long as the military are not engaging in police activities, it is legal and has been done for a long time. I don't sweat that.

Cops acting like the military, THAT is another discussion entirely. Cops wearing a full combat load makes me a lot more nervous than the military directing traffic.

Look, these G summits have been followed by the rock throwing crazies for a long time. Pittsburgh needs all the cops it can get it hands on with the reasonable expectation that these protests will be violent just like all the other G protests. The NG fills the gaps with traffic control and not law enforcement stuff, that allows all the cops to do what they have to do when trouble starts. That does not worry me.

The conduct of the police is my concern. I think it is a big stretch to turn the presence of the NG into some kind of military coup of Pittsburgh thing. The rock throwing psychos are the prob. The cops who lose their cool are the prob. The NG is the least of my worries.

pcosmar
09-25-2009, 08:07 PM
As long as the military are not engaging in police activities, it is legal and has been done for a long time. I don't sweat that.

Cops acting like the military, THAT is another discussion entirely. Cops wearing a full combat load makes me a lot more nervous than the military directing traffic.

Look, these G summits have been followed by the rock throwing crazies for a long time. Pittsburgh needs all the cops it can get it hands on with the reasonable expectation that these protests will be violent just like all the other G protests. The NG fills the gaps with traffic control and not law enforcement stuff, that allows all the cops to do what they have to do when trouble starts. That does not worry me.

The conduct of the police is my concern. I think it is a big stretch to turn the presence of the NG into some kind of military coup of Pittsburgh thing. The rock throwing psychos are the prob. The cops who lose their cool are the prob. The NG is the least of my worries.

NOPE
The G20 is the problem. They are the instigators.
They should be thrown out of the country, or better yet [Redacted]. :mad:

jkr
09-25-2009, 08:14 PM
[Redacted]

i second it...

Liberty Rebellion
09-25-2009, 08:16 PM
As long as the military are not engaging in police activities, it is legal and has been done for a long time. I don't sweat that.

Cops acting like the military, THAT is another discussion entirely. Cops wearing a full combat load makes me a lot more nervous than the military directing traffic.

Look, these G summits have been followed by the rock throwing crazies for a long time. Pittsburgh needs all the cops it can get it hands on with the reasonable expectation that these protests will be violent just like all the other G protests. The NG fills the gaps with traffic control and not law enforcement stuff, that allows all the cops to do what they have to do when trouble starts. That does not worry me.

The conduct of the police is my concern. I think it is a big stretch to turn the presence of the NG into some kind of military coup of Pittsburgh thing. The rock throwing psychos are the prob. The cops who lose their cool are the prob. The NG is the least of my worries.

The rock throwing crazies usually turn out to be supported by the government. They give the cops a reason to crack down and to declare de facto martial law at every subsequent globalist gathering.

Dr.3D
09-25-2009, 08:53 PM
The rock throwing crazies usually turn out to be supported by the government. They give the cops a reason to crack down and to declare de facto martial law at every subsequent globalist gathering.

And what happens is, they put a few radicals into a peaceful demonstration and those radicals get violent in hopes of getting those in the demonstration to do the same, when and if they can get enough other people doing as they did, those same radicals are with much fanfare and drama, picked up by the police and then the brutality begins. (tear gas, bean bag bullets, etc....)

Wampy
09-25-2009, 10:57 PM
The rock throwing crazies usually turn out to be supported by the government. They give the cops a reason to crack down and to declare de facto martial law at every subsequent globalist gathering.

I just don't buy the conspiracy angle. A lot of the typical groups that attend these things are known for the violence. In this case, you've got socialists inside the building and out.

Meanwhile, you have the 9/12 protests. None of them broke out into violence. Forget the g-20 and the NWO and blah, blah, blah... These (we, as the case may be) folks were actually protesting the government, the congress, the president. The 9/12ers are the one's that the socialists, statists, big spenders would want to muzzle and crack down on. Where were the government plants during all those protests? Where was the violence to provide an excuse for a crack down? The only people who got hurt during those protests were not even injured by cops, just beaten by SEIU union members. You want a conspiracy? Obama says he wants his union blue shirts to start going to town halls to keep order, and within 48 hours you have union members beating presumed health care opponents.

Not cops, not MPs...... Racketeering union mobsters. It's not all that shadowy and sneaky. It's usually pretty straight forward. Leftist protests tend to get violent because they have many nut jobs among them. With the exception of some anti-abortion protests, those who are not in the socialist set tend to have peaceful protests. That's all, pretty simple. No plots required.

The really ironic thing is that the socialists are protesting other socialists in Pittsburgh. Hell, I say herd 'em all into the same building and them them have it out.

I was listening to an interview done with two young female students who took their group to the protests. When asked about the violence, they said they did not have anything to do with it, but understood it and just could not bring themselves to say it was wrong. The best they could do is hem and haw and change the subject.

Whether they say they respect the mother earth, or want to help the poor, or "it's for the children", they really have little respect for anyone. They are just drinking the worker's paradise kool-aide and learning that there is no respect, no rules, just the "cause". I take it to that "kool-aide" level since "the revolution" has brought nothing but poverty and human rights abuses to every place it has been tried. It's easy to see. If these kids actually traveled outside the county, they could see for themselves.

I take that back. They would simply blame capitalism for the miseries of the world, never mind most of the world is dominated by governments who are socialists, theocrats, or just flat out dictators. All the suffering in those places is because some glimmer of pseudo-capitalism exists somewhere. If the whole world was 100% socialist, it would all be better.

Famine in Africa is because of greedy capitalists, or capitalist cased global warming, or some other lame excuse. It's not. It's because they have tin pot dictators and socialists and theocrats destroying farms and farmland. They destroy the economies with corruption and greed. They destroy the land with constant conflict and oppression. No one can afford the farming tools we use here because the socialist take all the wealth for themselves. The socialist won't build irrigation, won't allow others to. When the evil and greedy capitalists donate food and supplies, the socialists steal the shipments to feed their thugs, buy their loyalty, and they live it up.

China may have a growing economy, until it blows up like Russia, but try telling that to the workers and farmers outside of Beijing. Ask them what a worker's paradise feels like. These little mobsters in Pittsburgh have no idea, and the worst part is that it is willful ignorance. The reality is all around to see. They can put down their little humanist studies books anytime and look for themselves.

You know what else I find very telling? I have yet to see one news outlet accuse the G protesters of being "astroturf" or "paid" or "manufactured" or "fake". I have yet to hear any broadcaster call them racists or accuse them of just not liking Obama. Not a peep. How many here participated in any town halls or 9/12 protests? You are the ones that the MSM attacked, called racist, dismissed. You are the ones that Pelosi and Reid marginalized and disparaged. You are the threat, and yet no violence at the protests. I have yet to hear any prominent democrat dismiss or marginalize the Pittsburgh protesters. I may have missed it, but I have been looking. That is where the violence is though.

No, no government plants needed. No plot required. These people are just psycho nut jobs.

Humph! And they call 9/12ers and health care opponents racist terrorists... Anybody ever notice that the places in the worst shape are the big cities, where socialists have been in charge for decades?

WOW! I went on, didn't I? Ok, I'll shut up for a bit! LOL!

newbitech
09-25-2009, 11:36 PM
Wampy, like you said, its right in front of your face. This is not some whacked out conspiracy nut crazed thing we are concerned about here. At least you realize the G protesters are not the same as 9/12 protesters. I won't go into a lot of detail, but you will also probably want to explore how and why the 9/12 protesters are not going to be the same as the revolution protesters. Anyways, back to the topic. You have to give credit to the concerns expressed in this thread and here is why.

YouTube - National Guard Confiscating Guns in New Orleans (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm5PC7z79-8)

couple of quick points about the video.
1.) These are police AND military acting in the same capacity. Martial Law. You see it is never the military taking order from the cops. That is simply not how the chain of command works. We could bring up the question of jurisdiction, but under martial law, that point is moot. It is ALWAYS the police taking orders from the military command when ever the military is present. ALWAYS.
2.) Dry land homes in secure neighborhoods were canvassed.
3.) Both military and cops would not hesitate to break the law and kill an American if they were ordered to do so. This is the culture of "Law Enforcement" personnel. Yes an argument can be made that some individuals would disobey that order, but it is pretty clear from videos like these which side the culture of "Law Enforcement" both domestic police and domestic military come down on. And its not a secret conspiracy. It happens every day in plane site in the open.
4.) This culture and policy persist no matter the circumstances. Whether its a natural disaster like a Hurricane or round of peaceful political dissent or something as benign as a sporting event, the orders still stand.
5.) There is no clear distinction between the military and the police, and that is a violation IMO of the spirit of the constitution 3rd amendment concerning the quartering of soldiers in times of peace or war, and a direct violation of posse comitatus.

Wampy
09-26-2009, 12:08 AM
OH! Now New Orleans was a totally different story. I will absolutely agree that was a constitutional cluster F***. Of course, that was a CF from start to finish. I don't have time for another long rant right now, but we can talk about that one and I won't be quite so nice about the intervention on this one. Obviously it was not a permanent occupation, and it was quite a situation, but I just don't accept that as an excuse to tear up the constitution.

I don't recall the NG playing police like that after hurricane Andrew, for instance, but I may simply not remember it.

newbitech
09-26-2009, 12:25 AM
OH! Now New Orleans was a totally different story. I will absolutely agree that was a constitutional cluster F***. Of course, that was a CF from start to finish. I don't have time for another long rant right now, but we can talk about that one and I won't be quite so nice about the intervention on this one. Obviously it was not a permanent occupation, and it was quite a situation, but I just don't accept that as an excuse to tear up the constitution.

I don't recall the NG playing police like that after hurricane Andrew, for instance, but I may simply not remember it.

thats cool, no need to get into a big ole argument. I will concede that it is really easy exaggerate police and military intervention. I would love to know what it is like to be able to trust cops and the mixing up of cops and military. But I have some personal experience with both and being on "the wrong side" of the law.

I am not ashamed of what I have done, but my "attitude" has definitely changed, to borrow a common police reason for enacting threats of violence.

I see a much bigger picture. Do a search for MIAC on this forum. That's one of the reasons why the guys in this vid were asking the MP about homeland security.

Lot to explore in this area. PM me if you start a thread and want to strike up some convo about the subject.

Wampy
09-26-2009, 12:46 AM
LOL! Oh, we probably won't argue too much. My background is on the military/law enforcement side, but I'm guessing we'll probably agree on quite a few things. I may not be on so much this weekend, but I bookmarked this page, and I will read up as you suggested. I'm actually not terribly familiar with the acronym you mentioned, believe it or not. A fresh thread down that direction might be a good discussion. Lord knows this poor thread is a little off topic now. Have a good night! I will read up and get back!

hugolp
09-26-2009, 03:17 AM
Is this really happening in the US?

I am just shocked. You have the military in the streets.

BillyDkid
09-26-2009, 05:49 AM
Why are there check points in Ohio???

newbitech
09-26-2009, 12:17 PM
LOL! Oh, we probably won't argue too much. My background is on the military/law enforcement side, but I'm guessing we'll probably agree on quite a few things. I may not be on so much this weekend, but I bookmarked this page, and I will read up as you suggested. I'm actually not terribly familiar with the acronym you mentioned, believe it or not. A fresh thread down that direction might be a good discussion. Lord knows this poor thread is a little off topic now. Have a good night! I will read up and get back!


I'll see if I can conjure up some new information on fusion centers.

btalex1990
09-26-2009, 05:28 PM
If my mirror gets taken down over one complaint then anybody can takedown any video I wanted to over 1 complaint and that would create a youtube civil war.

Wampy
09-26-2009, 05:53 PM
I'll see if I can conjure up some new information on fusion centers.

After some preliminary look ups, I realized I knew more that I thought. I may have forgotten the name and the acronym, but I remember the infamous report quite well! Kind of inspired me to check up on any recent policy changes, or proposed ones, that I have missed and pertain to police/military cooperation.

btalex1990
09-28-2009, 08:50 AM
Well because of enough resistance, enough of people mirroring it and threatening to remirror the video and people downloading offline copies of them, and video responses as well which adds weight to the video youtube decided the video I'm mirroring is not worth the trouble and decided not to remove it either that or the liar that claimed there was a privacy violation got caught during the complaint process.

So I WIN!!!!!! This time! And I'm going to have to be more careful of where I share my videos unless I want to go down fighting censorship all the way.

squarepusher
09-28-2009, 09:51 AM
Well because of enough resistance, enough of people mirroring it and threatening to remirror the video and people downloading offline copies of them, and video responses as well which adds weight to the video youtube decided the video I'm mirroring is not worth the trouble and decided not to remove it either that or the liar that claimed there was a privacy violation got caught during the complaint process.

So I WIN!!!!!! This time! And I'm going to have to be more careful of where I share my videos unless I want to go down fighting censorship all the way.

good job, you put up a strong fight

LibForestPaul
09-30-2009, 06:06 PM
Famine in Africa is because of greedy capitalists, or capitalist cased global warming, or some other lame excuse. It's not. It's because they have tin pot dictators and socialists and theocrats destroying farms and farmland. They destroy the economies with corruption and greed. They destroy the land with constant conflict and oppression. No one can afford the farming tools we use here because the socialist take all the wealth for themselves. The socialist won't build irrigation, won't allow others to. When the evil and greedy capitalists donate food and supplies, the socialists steal the shipments to feed their thugs, buy their loyalty, and they live it up.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4169557.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angolan_Civil_War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Central_African_Republic

PDA1
09-30-2009, 06:15 PM
Got a link?