UsaToday:Ron Paul's Web of support: He's an 'online natural'

[findmemonkey]

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2007/06/ron_pauls_web_o.html

I am tired of these parrots and their pessimism, the truth and Ron Paul can and will win.
"Delany concludes, by the way, that "purist" candidates such as Paul don't get elected president."

His traffic is on the rise following the daily show, I suspect it will rise higher after tonight debate

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?site0=ronpaul2008.com&site1=http://www.joinrudy2008.com/&site2=www.barackobama.com&site3=www.hillaryclinton.com&site4=www.mittromney.com/&y=p&z=1&h=400&w=700&range=7d&size=Large&url=ronpaul2008.com

[Bison]

For a guy who they say has no chance, Congressman Paul is sure getting some good press lately. Its better to build up his support slow and steady. Four or five months from now people will be sick to death of looking at the "top tier" candidates.

Its Ron Pauls message that eventually gets people hooked. The only message the others have is "more of the same".

[joenaab]

I think there are two trends going on simultaneously that will continue to create this massive groundswell of support:

1. Exposure to Ron Paul, his message, his charm, his intengrity. I think 4 out of 5 people who see/hear him are won over instantly, and so few people have yet to be exposed.

2. More people breaking away permanently from MSM and MS politicians, - the "disenchanted" or "disenfranchised" masses. This group is growing and RP is their candidate. They fall out for a variety of reasons: anti-war, anti-immigration, anti-global govt, 9/11 Truth, anti-North American Union, anti-Federal Reserve, anti-FDA, anti-Internet regulation, etc. etc.

If we promote RP while simultaneously promoting the issues that MSM doesn't cover, the support base will grow and grow.