PDA

View Full Version : The Disinformer's Gambit: The Tactics of Disinformers




FrankRep
09-09-2009, 06:59 PM
SOURCE:
http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/smashthestate@yahoogroups.com/8877270.html



The Disinformer's Gambit: The Tactics of Disinformers
How to Recognize COINTELPRO Tactics & Government Shills

Written By: John Perna


In the game of chess there exists a term; which describes a maneuver, a stratagem, and a ploy; using different pieces working together, to accomplish a secret purpose. This is called a gambit.

Those who hope to build totalitarian control over freedom loving people, also use many gambits. BUT, the chess player has the advantage of always knowing which pieces are on the other side. Those who would defend liberty have no such luxury.

The most treacherous player in the gambit is the false patriot.

The false human rights activist will present himself as a defender of liberty, BUT he will spend most of his time attacking the defenders of liberty, under numerous pretenses. The false human rights activist will attempt to re-direct attention in every direction EXCEPT at those, who are building tyranny. The false human rights activist will attempt to re-direct attention to an entire race, a religion, a large group with a few problems, or even against freedom activists. This is essentially the very old military strategy of the creation a "decoy to draw enemy fire." The ultimate success of this deception is to cause defenders of liberty to "fire" on non-combatants, or even to "fire" on their own friends, and allies. In addition, the false human rights activist will neutralize the efforts of the defenders of liberty.

The false patriot, like every other player in the gambit, will neutralize the efforts of the defenders of liberty by:

1. Deceiving the defenders of liberty into supporting hoaxes. Any time that a simple request for evidence results in vitriolic personal attacks, or an attempt to censor, with no attempt to address the issue, you can be sure that you are dealing with a hoax.

2. Dividing the defenders of liberty into fighting each other by creating strife among patriots.

3. Deceiving the defenders of liberty into creating class struggle by promoting ethnic hatred.

4. Attempting to waste the time of human rights activists, by forcing them to respond to personal attacks, or endless debate about trivia.

5. ABOVE ALL: Accusing the most effective patriots of being false opposition.

THE GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMERS:

Always accuse your adversary of whatever is true about yourself.

It is VERY simple. Those who spend their time fighting tyranny, are freedom activists.

Those who spend their time fighting freedom activists are working for the advancement of tyranny.

The false human rights activist will generally proclaim himself to be a religious zealot; such as a Christian conservative, but he will not adhere to the principles of his proclaimed religion, in his own actions. He might even; incomprehensibly, be an ally of another player in the gambit; who is an atheist, or a socialist, or even a Satanist.

(There is no implication here that an atheist cannot be in favor of freedom. This is mentioned only to show that often "strange bed fellows" are working together to oppose freedom activists)

In one group he might attempt to appear to be a Christian conservative. In another group he might present himself as a Marxist, or even as an Al Qaeda supporter. The false human rights activist; and those whom he deceives into promoting hoaxes, will reduce the credibility of all freedom activists. Those who have heard outlandishly ridiculous "conspiracy theories" will have a tendency to dismiss all "conspiracy theories" without serious examination. The false human rights activist will compose letters of praise, to himself, and post them as if they were anonymous correspondence supposedly received by himself.

The atheist, or socialist will supply a fervent, and obvious, opposition to the defenders of liberty. This player, in the gambit, will make a strong frontal attack on everything that the defenders of liberty do. The atheist, or socialist will implement the same goals; that are listed above. The atheist, or socialist will play on the existence of outlandishly ridiculous "conspiracy theories" to encourage people to dismiss all "conspiracy theories" without serious examination. The atheist, or socialist may infest patriotic, and religious, groups for no apparent reason. The main reasons are to disrupt, to get the group deleted, or to waste the time of human rights activists.

Even though DISINFORMERS make it a practice of accusing the most effective freedom activists of being false opposition, you will notice that there are certain admitted government apologists, who are never accused. This is because certain admitted government apologists are also players in the gambit. The admitted government apologist will attempt to portray the defenders of liberty as subversives, as unreliable, and as outlandishly mentally unstable. The admitted government apologist will play on the existence of outlandishly ridiculous "conspiracy theories" to encourage people to dismiss all "conspiracy theories" without serious examination.

The admitted government apologist will use documents from the FBI, or other government sources, as his authority.

Another player in the gambit, is the pretended neutral. The pretended neutral will take almost none of the above actions, but will work in the background, until a vital move is needed. The pretended neutral will occasionally "vouch" for the other players in the gambit. The pretended neutral may even be the moderator of a group. When the pretended neutral is the moderator of a group, he will take no action, as long as the other players in the gambit are "holding their own". If the other players in the gambit are NOT "holding their own", THEN he will intervene; perhaps even by banning the most effective defenders of liberty.

The most effective defenders of liberty will be caught between all of these different players in the gambit. One dead "give away" is the fact that these different players in the gambit frequently are unable to conceal their support for one another; in spite of their alleged differences. The alleged religious zealot/patriot might be great friends with ONE PARTICULAR atheist/socialist. The false human rights activist; who is always accusing the most effective patriots of being false opposition, might be great friends with the admitted government apologist; whom he never accuses. The false human rights activist will even join the egroup that is run by the admitted government apologist, and will participate, and support, the admitted government apologist, in his own group.

If you will study the tactics used by the FBI COINTELPRO program. THEN you will recognize FBI COINTELPRO immediately.


Visit:
http://bcn.boulder.co.us/environment/vail/ifanagentknocks.html


Take note of the following paragraph:


"The FBI COINTELPRO program was initiated in 1956. Its purpose, as described later by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, was "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" of those individuals and organizations whose ideas or goals he opposed. Tactics included: falsely labeling individuals as informants; infiltrating groups with persons instructed to disrupt the group; sending anonymous or forged letters designed to promote strife between groups; initiating politically motivated IRS investigations; carrying out burglaries of offices and unlawful wiretaps; and disseminating to other government agencies and to the media unlawfully obtained derogatory information on individuals and groups."

If you understand the meaning of the tactic "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" you will understand that the person who is most likely of being a Fed, is the one who involves patriots in activities that have no effect on those who are building tyranny, and activities that will destroy the credibility of the patriots.

Those who are building tyranny would love to convince people that we are all a bunch of paranoid nuts, so that we will we unable to warn people about the building of tyranny.

Those who are building tyranny would be more capable of convincing people that we are paranoid nuts, if they could convince a segment of the patriots to run
around telling people that the clouds, and the street signs, are out to get us, or that we should ban water.

If you understand the meaning of the tactic "infiltrating groups with persons instructed to disrupt the group; sending anonymous or forged letters designed to promote strife between groups" OR OF: "disseminating to other government agencies and to the media unlawfully obtained derogatory information on individuals and groups." THEN you will know that a campaign of personal attacks on the real patriots is a part of the FBI COINTELPRO program.

If you understand the meaning of the tactic of falsely labeling individuals as informants THEN you will know that the person; who is most likely to be a fed,
is the one who calls the real patriot a fed. It is a common tactic of FBI COINTELPRO to try to be THE FIRST ONE MAKE THE ACCUSATION.

THE GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMERS:

Always accuse your adversary of whatever is true about yourself.

Totalitarians use misfits to disrupt free speech on the internet. Vladimir Lenin coined term "useful idiots" to describe those westerners who would assist in building the totalitarian agenda. They cannot debate the truth with their lies. So they just try to drown the truth out. They get a team of shills to crowd us out with trivia, vulgar gutter offensiveness, exasperating small talk and crazy accusations.

The New World Order trains their "useful idiots" well. Personal attacks are their general technique.

FrankRep
09-09-2009, 07:04 PM
Examples:


FBI files on the John Birch Society
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=209336

G. Edward Griffin is "Controlled Opposition"
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?p=2168165#post2168165

InterestedParticipant
09-09-2009, 07:21 PM
The Disinformer's Gambit: The Tactics of Disinformers
How to Recognize COINTELPRO Tactics & Government Shills

5. ABOVE ALL: Accusing the most effective patriots of being false opposition.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA


Well, at least you guys have a sense of humor! I just can't stop laughing.

I guess they didn't like the Controlled Ops thread, eh? Maybe they should retain some of the Rand Corporation IO guys, because in all seriousness, this stuff is weak. The public is far more advanced than these guys realize.

PS. Look, if you're going to address this subject matter, then at least start referring to the .MIL PsyWar training manuals in the public record.... then tie that in with Womser's book on foundations and Dodd's testimony to the Reece Committee. C'mon, no one is going to buy this 'containment vectoring' anymore. These tactics worked in the Soviet Union but they ain't going to cut it anymore in a networked society of the west. You guys are just rerunning the same crap, and it is more than a disappointing.