PDA

View Full Version : "Defense" Secretary Gates Angry Media Not Censored to Government Tastes




clb09
09-04-2009, 12:58 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090904/pl_politico/26759


Defense Secretary Robert Gates is objecting “in the strongest terms” to an Associated Press decision to transmit a photograph showing a mortally wounded 21-year-old Marine in his final moments of life, calling the decision “appalling” and a breach of “common decency.”

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20090904/capt.baed03297d424d5e972b9428219e1ddf.afghanistan_ death_of_a_marine_ny208.jpg?x=284&y=345&q=85&sig=jH9YsO9a7QZsvdZU.5MmPA--

acptulsa
09-04-2009, 01:05 PM
On the one hand, I'd have refrained out of respect for his poor family. On the other, I have hours of WWII propaganda at home and they sure didn't shy away from showing dead GIs when they thought it served their purposes. Not one bit.

Reason
09-04-2009, 01:10 PM
Death has a tendency to encourage a depressing view of war.
~Donald Rumsfeld


http://nbm.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451b8c069e20120a5483a0f970b-pi

Personally, I applaud the AP for taking a stand on this.

If pictures like this were shown more often the American sheeple wouldn't find it so easy to bury their heads in the sand.

clb09
09-04-2009, 01:12 PM
YouTube - Reality of War (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFpAh57n1f4)

MelissaWV
09-04-2009, 03:32 PM
I think there's a big piece of this missing, and that is that the family asked this not be shown. I also give credit to Gates for not demanding something be done. You can be disgusted, but you can't use the Gov's rather heavy heel to force things not to air.

I find it tasteless to be showing these pictures when the family specifically asked they not be shown.

I don't think it should be outlawed, either.

clb09
09-04-2009, 03:43 PM
I think there's a big piece of this missing, and that is that the family asked this not be shown. I also give credit to Gates for not demanding something be done. You can be disgusted, but you can't use the Gov's rather heavy heel to force things not to air.

A private company, Associated Press, and the private family had a deal which apparently the AP broke.

I get uncomfortable when the "Defense" Secretary and the full weight of the Department of "Defense" decide that these private parties should adhere to the unconstitutional rules of the Federal apparatus.

SimpleName
09-04-2009, 03:45 PM
You would think the AP would at least blur their faces. They should've done what the family was asked. Quite distasteful of them to run it anyway. Saying that, I still prefer the media to show such "hardcore" imagery. You can't ignore it when there is such horrific imagery. It stays instilled in your brain forever.