PDA

View Full Version : Can we take WND seriously?




buffalokid777
09-04-2009, 12:19 AM
I have grown so tired of WND trying to co-opt the Liberty movement for their own purposes.

I think those of us who have been around here for awhile remember Farrah's deragatory remarks against RP during the last presidential election.

check this out

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=108798


Obama czar: Bush may be behind 9/11
Signed 'truther' statement organized by conspiracy website

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: September 03, 2009
3:14 pm Eastern


By Aaron Klein
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


TEL AVIV – President Obama's controversial "Green Jobs" adviser, Van Jones, signed a statement that alleges the Bush administration may have deliberately allowed the 9/11 attacks, perhaps as a pretext for war.

The Gateway Pundit blog found Jones' name among 100 signatories of notable American citizens in the 9/11 statement, which called for an investigation and the formation of an independent inquiry to determine whether members of the Bush administration were involved in the attacks.

Jones signed the 2004 statement as the director of the Ella Baker Human Rights Center. The statement, facilitated by the 911truth.org conspiracy website, calls for "immediate public attention to unanswered questions that suggest that people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war."

(Story continues below)




Blame U.S. 'imperialism'

Last week, WND reported one day after the 9/11 attacks, Jones led a vigil that expressed solidarity with Arab and Muslim Americans as well as what he called the victims of "U.S. imperialism" around the world.

Jones was the leader and founder of a radical group, the communist revolutionary organization Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM. That group, together with Jones' Elle Baker Center for Human Rights, led a vigil Sept. 12, 2001, at Snow Park in Oakland, Calif.

STORM's official manifesto, titled, "Reclaiming Revolution," surfaced on the Internet.

A WND review of the 97-page treatise found a description of the Oakland vigil, which drew hundreds and articulated an "anti-imperialist" line, according to STORM's own description.

The radical group's manual boasted the 9/11 vigil was held to express solidarity with Arab and Muslim Americans and to mourn the civilians killed in the terrorist attacks "as well as the victims of U.S. imperialism around the world."

"We honored those who lost their lives in the attack and those who would surely lose their lives in subsequent U.S. attacks overseas," STORM's manifesto recalls.

Also, WND obtained a press release of Jones' vigil, dated Sept. 11, 2001, and titled, "People Of Color Groups Gather to Stand In Solidarity With Arab Americans and to Mourn the East Coast Dead."

"Anti-Arab hostility is already reaching a fever pitch as pundits and common people alike rush to judgment that an Arab group is responsible for this tragedy," stated Jones in the release hours after the 9/11 attacks.

"We fear that an atmosphere is being created that will result in official and street violence against Arab men, women and children," he said.

Last week, Fox News drew attention to a section of STORM's manual that describes Jones' organization as having a "commitment to the fundamental ideas of Marxism-Leninism."

"We agreed with Lenin's analysis of the state and the party," reads the manifesto. "And we found inspiration in the revolutionary strategies developed by Third World revolutionaries like Mao Tse-tung and Amilcar Cabral."

Cabral is the late Marxist revolutionary leader of Guinea-Bissau and the Cape Verde Islands.

WND previously reported Jones named his son after Cabral and reportedly concludes every e-mail with a quote from the communist leader.

Apparently this idiot Farrah who is seeking to co-opt the Liberty movement for his own RINO ends, doesn't undrestand, that fiscal conservatism is NOT spending trillions on maintaining an empire. WE CAN NUKE ANY COUNTRY ON THIS PLANET INTO OBLIVION. Yet this idiot thinks America can be overrun by muslims on rafts and we need to take action.
What a numbskull.

kahless
09-04-2009, 12:35 AM
Whats wrong with the article quoted?

emazur
09-04-2009, 12:40 AM
Jerome Corsi writes for them and he's pretty good. He's also a Constitution Party member. I've also seen a number of anti-Fed stories on WND - Chuck Norris did one fairly recently

buffalokid777
09-04-2009, 12:54 AM
Jerome Corsi writes for them and he's pretty good. He's also a Constitution Party member. I've also seen a number of anti-Fed stories on WND - Chuck Norris did one fairly recentlyI like Chuck and Corsi but, but Farrah thinks we should blow America's resources on the middle east. He rallies against Obamacare (Which I have no problem with), but instead of wasting our tax dollars on Obamacare, he has no problem wasting taxpayers money on blowing up the middle east. That is NOT a fiscal conservative, THAT IS A RINO.

Military adventurism, and empire building, is a waste of money just like socialist health care. Farrah is a RINO and not a conservative. Also I remember ever nasty word he said about Ron Paul during the presidential election. If you think he is one of us, you have another thing coming. He is seeking to use us for his purposes.

ClayTrainor
09-04-2009, 12:59 AM
I've learned not to take anything that comes from WND seriously until i confirm it with more credible sources.

buffalokid777
09-04-2009, 01:13 AM
I've learned not to take anything that comes from WND seriously until i confirm it with more credible sources.

me too, Farah discredited himself with me when he spoke out against Ron Paul because he was against wasting money blowing up the middle east. We could nuke the middle east in a heartbeat. They are no threat to the US. How could a middle eastern country invade us? On rafts? Most have no significant air force or navy to reach America.

Reason
09-04-2009, 01:17 AM
WND is almost as bad as Alex Jones.

They mix legit with illegitimate hence tainting the small amount of legit.

They also have a weird fetish for the out of context "national security force" quote too...

buffalokid777
09-04-2009, 01:28 AM
WND is almost as bad as Alex Jones.

They mix legit with illegitimate hence tainting the small amount of legit.

They also have a weird fetish for the out of context "national security force" quote too...


I disagree,

WND is MUCH WORSE than Alex Jones.

Alex Jones I think is well meaning but uses sensationalism to get rating which dilutes the truth he tells.

For example, Alex likes to say the bankers stole 24 trillion which is absolutely false.

here is the Bloomberg article he always shows on prison planet.tv to justify it

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aY0tX8UysIaM

23.7 trillion is the figure the bankers are floating in this article they would like to steal.

13.8 trillion is the figure the US government has commited for them to steal.

4.8 trillion is the figure they have already stolen. (Which is bad enough)

I wish Alex would report the facts and not use sensationalism for ratings, he hurts his own credibility when he says the bankers have stole 24 trillion.

Alex puts out lot of good info but kills his credibility by using sensationalism and not sticking to the facts.

Imperial
09-04-2009, 01:28 AM
Jerome Corsi writes for them and he's pretty good. He's also a Constitution Party member. I've also seen a number of anti-Fed stories on WND - Chuck Norris did one fairly recently

Jerome Corsi engages in too much hyperbole. I used to use him in competitive debate for an impact for my case just because it relied on painting a dystopia in the event of a terrorist attack on NYC. Its entire premise was not well-founded though.