johnwk
08-07-2009, 09:49 PM
It seems only too obvious that one of the most sacred and personal inalienable rights of mankind is the liberty to be in complete control of any decision making which affects a person’s personal health care needs. It should also be noted that our federal Constitution’s preamble states in crystal clear language the very purpose of our federal Constitution is to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”. And yet, without a power being delegated by the people of the various States to our federal government to tax for, spend on and then regulate the health care needs of people living within the various united States, our President and various members of Congress are feverishly at work preparing legislation to do exactly that: tax for, spend on and assume a federal control over one of the people’s most sacred and personal inalienable rights ___ their right to be in complete control of meeting their personal health care needs as each sees fit!
And now that concerned Americans are rising up and objecting to an orchestrated attack upon a fundamental inalienable right, they are labeled as being an “angry mob” by their hired public servants in Washington who have taken it upon themselves to not only ignore our written Constitution, but are contemplating a use of federal force to assume a power over a fundamental inalienable right of mankind which has not been consented to by the people via the prescribed manner which is articulated in Article V of the Constitution of the united States.
Indeed, let us not forget that our mob in Washington which includes every Senator and Representative of the united States and every judicial Officer, and even our beloved President Obama, are bound by Oath to support “this Constitution“, meaning the Constitution of the United States, and not one they make up in their minds to conform to tyrannical legislative acts designed to subjugate the limited powers granted to Congress by the Constitution.
Let us recall the eloquent words of Chief Justice Marshall when he elaborated upon our constitutionally limited system of government with reference to powers delegated to Congress and powers retained by the people as articulated in our Constitution:
"The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing; if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts allowed are of equal obligation. It is a proposition too plain to be contested, that the constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it; or, that the legislature may alter the constitution by an ordinary act.
Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.
If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law: if the latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts, on the part of the people, to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.
Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void." ____ MARBURY v. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
For America’s freedom loving people to not rise up and confront public servants who are actively engaged in a concerted effort to exercise a power not granted, especially when that power takes aim at a fundamental inalienable right, would be the first step in submitting to despotism and conceding the power in question.
Neither Obama, nor any member of Congress can establish from the debates during which time our Constitution was framed and ratified, that it was the intention of our founding fathers to grant power to Congress to tax for, spend on and meddle in the personal health care needs of the people living within their respective state borders. As a matter of fact, Federalist No. 45 summarized the limited powers granted to our federal government as follows:
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.
The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State."
And if the above is not clear enough for President Obama and those in Congress who are attempting to subjugate the documented intentions under which our Constitution was adopted, let me remind them that our Constitution’s Tenth Amendment was specifically adopted to confirm a constitutionally limited system of government
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people."
Expounding upon our Constitution is not a matter of “interpretation” as some would have us believe…it is a task of “documentation”! Enemies of our constitutional system wish to ignore the recorded intentions for which our Constitution was adopted in order to then be free to make the Constitution mean whatever they wish it to mean.
JWK
America, we have a problem, we have been attacked from within! We are being destroyed from within by a group of domestic enemies who have managed to seize political power and whose mission is in fact to bring “change” to America ___ the dismantling of our military defensive power; the disarming of law abiding citizens, the allowance of our borders to be overrun by foreign invaders, the destruction of our manufacturing capabilities; the looting of our federal treasury; the brainwashing of our nation’s children in government operated schools; the creation of an iron fisted control unauthorized by our written Constitution over free enterprise and even our personal health care needs; the devaluation of our nation’s currency, and, the future enslavement of our children and grand children via unbridled debt and inflation.
And now that concerned Americans are rising up and objecting to an orchestrated attack upon a fundamental inalienable right, they are labeled as being an “angry mob” by their hired public servants in Washington who have taken it upon themselves to not only ignore our written Constitution, but are contemplating a use of federal force to assume a power over a fundamental inalienable right of mankind which has not been consented to by the people via the prescribed manner which is articulated in Article V of the Constitution of the united States.
Indeed, let us not forget that our mob in Washington which includes every Senator and Representative of the united States and every judicial Officer, and even our beloved President Obama, are bound by Oath to support “this Constitution“, meaning the Constitution of the United States, and not one they make up in their minds to conform to tyrannical legislative acts designed to subjugate the limited powers granted to Congress by the Constitution.
Let us recall the eloquent words of Chief Justice Marshall when he elaborated upon our constitutionally limited system of government with reference to powers delegated to Congress and powers retained by the people as articulated in our Constitution:
"The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing; if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction between a government with limited and unlimited powers is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts allowed are of equal obligation. It is a proposition too plain to be contested, that the constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it; or, that the legislature may alter the constitution by an ordinary act.
Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.
If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law: if the latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts, on the part of the people, to limit a power in its own nature illimitable.
Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void." ____ MARBURY v. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)
For America’s freedom loving people to not rise up and confront public servants who are actively engaged in a concerted effort to exercise a power not granted, especially when that power takes aim at a fundamental inalienable right, would be the first step in submitting to despotism and conceding the power in question.
Neither Obama, nor any member of Congress can establish from the debates during which time our Constitution was framed and ratified, that it was the intention of our founding fathers to grant power to Congress to tax for, spend on and meddle in the personal health care needs of the people living within their respective state borders. As a matter of fact, Federalist No. 45 summarized the limited powers granted to our federal government as follows:
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.
The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State."
And if the above is not clear enough for President Obama and those in Congress who are attempting to subjugate the documented intentions under which our Constitution was adopted, let me remind them that our Constitution’s Tenth Amendment was specifically adopted to confirm a constitutionally limited system of government
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people."
Expounding upon our Constitution is not a matter of “interpretation” as some would have us believe…it is a task of “documentation”! Enemies of our constitutional system wish to ignore the recorded intentions for which our Constitution was adopted in order to then be free to make the Constitution mean whatever they wish it to mean.
JWK
America, we have a problem, we have been attacked from within! We are being destroyed from within by a group of domestic enemies who have managed to seize political power and whose mission is in fact to bring “change” to America ___ the dismantling of our military defensive power; the disarming of law abiding citizens, the allowance of our borders to be overrun by foreign invaders, the destruction of our manufacturing capabilities; the looting of our federal treasury; the brainwashing of our nation’s children in government operated schools; the creation of an iron fisted control unauthorized by our written Constitution over free enterprise and even our personal health care needs; the devaluation of our nation’s currency, and, the future enslavement of our children and grand children via unbridled debt and inflation.