Walter Cronkite dead.

[Steeleye]

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/walter-cronkite-iconic-anchorman-dies/

Heard it over at Free Republic. Naturally, they're bashing him for "losing" Vietnam.

[Cowlesy]

I have no love for Walter Kronkite. He was one of the biggest globalists on the planet.

May he rest in peace.

[Anti Federalist]

I have no love for Walter Kronkite. He was one of the biggest globalists on the planet.

May he rest in peace.

Would it be unkind to wish him burning in hell?

Yeah, I suppose.

Maybe he had a deathbed epiphany.

RIP

[FrankRep]

Hillary and Walter Cronkite - Global Government Advocates

YouTube - Hillary and Walter Cronkite - Not JBS - For World Government (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaS6bLQixkM)

[pcosmar]

Good riddance.

One less Propaganda mouthpiece. The harm done is likely irreparable.

[Dr.3D]

Back in the late 60s, when I was in Radio A School in the military, the instructors used to call him Cralter Wronkite.

I guess there was pretty much a mutual feeling about him in the military at the time.

[Original_Intent]

Good riddance.

[Steeleye]

Back in the late 60s, when I was in Radio A School in the military, the instructors used to call him Cralter Wronkite.


A School? That's Navy, right?

[max]

Cronkite and Macnamara both dead in July 09....i hope they both burn in hell

[Dr.3D]

A School? That's Navy, right?

Yep...

[0zzy]

Lots of hoping for people to burn in hell and good riddance and all that fun stuff.

What is it exactly that Cronkite do to deserve such hate?

[Dr.3D]

What is it exactly that Cronkite do to deserve such hate?

He was another hand puppet for Global Governance.

[Anti Federalist]

Lots of hoping for people to burn in hell and good riddance and all that fun stuff.

What is it exactly that Cronkite do to deserve such hate?

For almost 20 years, 1968 to 1981, he was "the respected voice of TV journalism".

His "presence" as a news reader allowed him unprecedented sway over the opinion shaping realm of what passed for political discourse.

All the while he was shilling for the new world order.

Before the intertubz, he was it, the "go to guy" for millions of people.

That's one reason why the PTB hate the netz so much, it was much easier back in the day.

[PatriotOne]

He also was a member of the Houston chapter of DeMolay, a Masonic fraternal organization for boys.

[0zzy]

So let's spit on his grave and piss him to hell because he was a globalist! HE WAS EVIL! A MASON! ASGSDGASDGASDGDSA

oyvay><.

[bubbleboy]

Wasn't he the voice of the owl, that wicked Molech, at the Bohemian Grove, during they're mock sacrifice of a young human. If I remember correctly, then he was very deceived.

[FrankRep]

Walter Cronkite: "I'm glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan"

Youtube video...
http://tiny.cc/10zy7

[scrosnoe]

Hillary and Walter Cronkite - Global Government Advocates

YouTube - Hillary and Walter Cronkite - Not JBS - For World Government (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaS6bLQixkM)

Best thing about this piece is it is in his own words . . .

May he get the reward he so richly deserves!

top post R3publican (http://r3publican.wordpress.com)

[Athan]

Wow! Looks like I had the son of a bitch figured out pretty wrong!

[scrosnoe]

Cronkite and Macnamara both dead in July 09....i hope they both burn in hell

interesting observation and little doubt as to the outcome of both barring deathbed epiphanies and recognizing the unfathomable grace and mercy possible to each one of us if we but turn and ask and believe . . .

[Bruno]

Walter Cronkite: "I'm glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan"

Youtube video...
http://tiny.cc/10zy7


That is quite interesting. Thanks, FrankRep

[Peace&Freedom]

So let's spit on his grave and piss him to hell because he was a globalist! HE WAS EVIL! A MASON! ASGSDGASDGASDGDSA

oyvay><.

But that's the way it is, July 16, 2009.

[Dr.3D]

So let's spit on his grave and piss him to hell because he was a globalist! HE WAS EVIL! A MASON! ASGSDGASDGASDGDSA

oyvay><.

No, I won't judge him for those things. I will however express my contempt for what he did to further the demise of our country.

Ultimately, there is only one who has the authority to judge him.

[Original_Intent]

But that's the way it is, July 16, 2009.

Well played.

[Conservative Christian]

So let's spit on his grave and piss him to hell because he was a globalist! HE WAS EVIL! A MASON! ASGSDGASDGASDGDSA

oyvay><.

Cronkite was an advocate of socialism and world government---two things that libertarians and traditional conservatives have always staunchly opposed.

So it's not surprising that he wouldn't receive a lot of sympathy amongst some of the more knowledgeable members here. Whereas some of the less knowledgeable members here are apparently trying to evoke misplaced sympathy for him.

[heavenlyboy34]

Cronkite was an advocate of socialism and world government---two things that libertarians and traditional conservatives have always staunchly opposed.

So it's not surprising that he wouldn't receive a lot of sympathy amongst some of the more knowledgeable members here. Whereas some of the less knowledgeable members here are apparently trying to evoke misplaced sympathy for him.

Agreed.:cool:

[0zzy]

Cronkite was an advocate of socialism and world government---two things that libertarians and traditional conservatives have always staunchly opposed.

So it's not surprising that he wouldn't receive a lot of sympathy amongst some of the more knowledgeable members here. Whereas some of the less knowledgeable members here are apparently trying to evoke misplaced sympathy for him.

If one is to believe in a philosophy of socialism and globalism, he is to be happily carried to the gates of hell? Too much misplaced anger, too much judgment.I don't wish anyone to go to hell like this for being a "socialist" and "globalist".

[Anti Federalist]

If one is to believe in a philosophy of socialism and globalism, he is to be happily carried to the gates of hell? Too much misplaced anger, too much judgment.I don't wish anyone to go to hell like this for being a "socialist" and "globalist".

By definition a socialist or globalist will enact, support or carry out policies that result in theft, extortion and violence being brought to bear on their fellow men, all under the umbrella of "official policy".

Nobody is more deserving of a sentence in hell than that.

[Conservative Christian]

If one is to believe in a philosophy of socialism and globalism, he is to be happily carried to the gates of hell? Too much misplaced anger, too much judgment.I don't wish anyone to go to hell like this for being a "socialist" and "globalist".

In your BS opinion.

Very few people in this thread have actually stated that he should be cast to hell, so your over-exaggeration can be summed up quite simply as a straw man argument.

Your claim that there's too much misplaced anger and judgement, is sheer assumption on your part. You don't know if they're angry or not. What you wrongfully determine to be "anger and judgement", appears to be nothing more than insensitivity.

Advocates of socialism and world government murdered over one hundred million people in the 20th Century, and tortured, enslaved and imprisoned tens of millions more.

If that documented fact doesn't raise your ire a bit, then you're a poor excuse for a Ron Paul supporter, if you're even one to begin with.

[Imperial]

By definition a socialist or globalist will enact, support or carry out policies that result in theft, extortion and violence being brought to bear on their fellow men, all under the umbrella of "official policy".

Nobody is more deserving of a sentence in hell than that.

And if they win an election you participate in, you essentially say you will abide by the result.

I don't know how you get "by definition" out of that. If people support the socialists and pay their taxes, is it necessarily theft? Not always.

Government itself is defined as an entity that holds a "monopoly on violence". Does that mean everybody in government is going to Hell for participating in that?



Advocates of socialism and world government murdered over one hundred million people in the 20th Century, and tortured, enslaved and imprisoned tens of millions more.

If that documented fact doesn't raise your ire a bit, then you're a poor excuse for a Ron Paul supporter, if you're even one to begin with.

Does that mean ALL advocates of socialism and world government murdered these poor people? No. Did Walter Cronkite? No.

Have captialists and those advocating nationalists (often two distinct groups, sometimes not) like in Chile kill people too? Sure.

Political philosophy isn't necessarily a good guidestone for morality.

[youngbuck]

In your BS opinion.

Very few people in this thread have actually stated that he should be cast to hell, so your over-exaggeration can be summed up quite simply as a straw man argument.

Your claim that there's too much misplaced anger and judgement, is sheer assumption on your part. You don't know if they're angry or not. What you wrongfully determine to be "anger and judgement", appears to be nothing more than insensitivity.

Advocates of socialism and world government murdered over one hundred million people in the 20th Century, and tortured, enslaved and imprisoned tens of millions more.

If that documented fact doesn't raise your ire a bit, then you're a poor excuse for a Ron Paul supporter, if you're even one to begin with.

pwned~!

[Dr.3D]

Political philosophy isn't necessarily a good guidestone for morality.

Oh, watch using that guidestone word.... LOL...

[BuddyRey]

Maybe he was naively attached to the idea of global government, but at least the guy spoke out against the Vietnam War. That's more than many journalists did in his time.

[0zzy]

In your BS opinion.

Very few people in this thread have actually stated that he should be cast to hell, so your over-exaggeration can be summed up quite simply as a straw man argument.

Your claim that there's too much misplaced anger and judgement, is sheer assumption on your part. You don't know if they're angry or not. What you wrongfully determine to be "anger and judgement", appears to be nothing more than insensitivity.

Advocates of socialism and world government murdered over one hundred million people in the 20th Century, and tortured, enslaved and imprisoned tens of millions more.

If that documented fact doesn't raise your ire a bit, then you're a poor excuse for a Ron Paul supporter, if you're even one to begin with.

Read the post above you.
Read the post below you.

I am speaking about those who are casting him to hell already and spitting on his grave.



Maybe he was naively attached to the idea of global government, but at least the guy spoke out against the Vietnam War. That's more than many journalists did in his time.

Apparently that means nothing if you think differently from the "correct" way of thinking.
Note, thinking, not actually changing policy (as far as I know). My dad watched him all the time, he didn't turn into a socialist nor globalist. So, I just don't understand.

[HRD53]

Read the post above you.
Read the post below you.

I am speaking about those who are casting him to hell already and spitting on his grave.




Apparently that means nothing if you think differently from the "correct" way of thinking.
Note, thinking, not actually changing policy (as far as I know). My dad watched him all the time, he didn't turn into a socialist nor globalist. So, I just don't understand.

Theres nothing to understand. People who condemn the soul of a newsman to hell because they don't agree with his politics are... well... they're crazy. I was going to try to be diplomatic about it, but whats the point really...

[pcosmar]

Lots of hoping for people to burn in hell and good riddance and all that fun stuff.

What is it exactly that Cronkite do to deserve such hate?

It is not my place or responsibility (thankfully) to Judge his eternal soul, or to decide his eternal fate.
I do however, welcome the end of his earthly existence and influence.

Good Riddance.

[pacelli]

Wasn't he the voice of the owl, that wicked Molech, at the Bohemian Grove, during they're mock sacrifice of a young human. If I remember correctly, then he was very deceived.

He was the voice of "dull care" in the cremation of care ceremony.

[inibo]

Sometimes my childhood dies hard.

[Alawn]

Good. The world is a much better place without him.

[acptulsa]

Well, in defense of the man, what white guy wouldn't sell his soul to the devil to sound like Barry White?

[heavenlyboy34]

“It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government [emphasis mine] patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order. But the American colonies did it once and brought forth one of the most nearly perfect unions the world has ever seen.”


-Walter Cronkite, as quoted by David Kramer in his blog.

Cronkite accepting an award for promoting NWO agenda.
YouTube - Hillary and Walter Cronkite - Not JBS - For World Government (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaS6bLQixkM)

[0zzy]

“It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government [emphasis mine] patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order. But the American colonies did it once and brought forth one of the most nearly perfect unions the world has ever seen.”


-Walter Cronkite, as quoted by David Kramer in his blog.

Cronkite accepting an award for promoting NWO agenda.
YouTube - Hillary and Walter Cronkite - Not JBS - For World Government (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaS6bLQixkM)




How much impact did he have with a speech like that?
I think he had much more impact when he opposed the Vietnam War and was in the peak of his career.

[heavenlyboy34]

How much impact did he have with a speech like that?
I think he had much more impact when he opposed the Vietnam War and was in the peak of his career.

Good question. I don't know. :confused::(

[Conservative Christian]

How much impact did he have with a speech like that?
I think he had much more impact when he opposed the Vietnam War and was in the peak of his career.

A heckuva lot more than you do with the BS you're posting here.

You accuse others here of having "Too much misplaced anger, too much judgment"---when in reality YOU have too much misplaced BS sympathy for a man who supported the advocates of a New World Order, who murdered over one hundred million people in the 20th Century alone.

You're seriously starting to sound like a troll from the Democratic Underground.

[0zzy]

A heckuva lot more than you do with the BS you're posting here.

You accuse others here of having "Too much misplaced anger, too much judgment"---when in reality YOU have too much misplaced BS sympathy for a man who supported the advocates of a New World Order, who murdered over one hundred million people in the 20th Century alone.

You're seriously starting to sound like a troll from the Democratic Underground.

You are starting to sound like a conspiracy theorist, wanting every man and woman associated with any misplaced thought to the gates of hell as you piss in their graves. You think you know people by their associations, that you can categorize the world in black and white. You think you are such the intellect and the freedom warrior for standing up against such people, that you know who is bad and who is good. But you make life too simple.

Judge this man for his actions not his thoughts. He never had the influence to kill so many people, he never brainwashed America into believing in globalism or socialism. He was an influential broadcaster, yes, but what do they remember him as? As the man who said we are losing in Vietnam? Gee wizz, only devils are remembered for such things.

But go on, piss on graves, open the express way to hell, be the judge of humanity and of ill thoughts. You're opinion is of importance, as is all of our opinions, and you should continue what you think is right. But I also have a right to believe such questionable remarks on this man are overboard, worthless, and meaningless in the end goal of fighting for freedom.

[Conservative Christian]

You are starting to sound like a conspiracy theorist, wanting every man and woman associated with any misplaced thought to the gates of hell as you piss in their graves. You think you know people by their associations, that you can categorize the world in black and white. You think you are such the intellect and the freedom warrior for standing up against such people, that you know who is bad and who is good. But you make life too simple.

Judge this man for his actions not his thoughts. He never had the influence to kill so many people, he never brainwashed America into believing in globalism or socialism. He was an influential broadcaster, yes, but what do they remember him as? As the man who said we are losing in Vietnam? Gee wizz, only devils are remembered for such things.

But go on, piss on graves, open the express way to hell, be the judge of humanityare and of ill thoughts. You're opinion is of importance, as is all of our opinions, and you should continue what you think is right. But I also have a right to believe such questionable remarks on this man are overboard, worthless, and meaningless in the end goal of fighting for freedom.

^Straw Man Alert!

No "conspiracy theory" to it! Cronkite openly acknowledged that he was working for world government and the New World Order, which murdered over a hundred million people in the 20th century---and tortured, enslaved and imprisoned tens of millions more.

You've also proven yourself a liar by making blatantly false charges against me, as I NEVER stated that I thought Cronkite should "burn in hell".

NOBODY ever stated that you don't have a right to YOUR BS opinion---which is just as "worthless, and meaningless in the end goal of fighting for freedom" as any other opinion stated in this thread!

You're the one who came into this thread like a Democratic Underground troll and starting arguing and taking exception to opinions you don't agree with. You drew first blood, then have the gall to claim others are somehow trying to prevent you from having your opinion.

Defending a man who fronted for mass murderers, is COMPLETELY "worthless, and meaningless in the end goal of fighting for freedom"! Now if you REALLY want to do something worthwhile for freedom, why don't you run along to another thread, instead of inciting and continuing YOUR worthless arguments against opinions you don't agree with!

[0zzy]

^Straw Man Alert!

No "conspiracy theory" to it! Cronkite openly acknowledged that he was working for world government and the New World Order, which murdered over a hundred million people in the 20th century---and tortured, enslaved and imprisoned tens of millions more.

You've also proven yourself a liar by making blatantly false charges against me, as I NEVER stated that I thought Cronkite should "burn in hell".

NOBODY ever stated that you don't have a right to YOUR BS opinion---which is just as "worthless, and meaningless in the end goal of fighting for freedom" as any other opinion stated in this thread!

You're the one who came into this thread like a Democratic Underground troll and starting arguing and taking exception to opinions you don't agree with. You drew first blood, then have the gall to claim others are somehow trying to prevent you from having your opinion.

Defending a man who fronted for mass murderers, is COMPLETELY "worthless, and meaningless in the end goal of fighting for freedom"! Now if you REALLY want to do something worthwhile for freedom, why don't you run along to another thread, instead of inciting and continuing YOUR worthless arguments against opinions you don't agree with!

The conspiracy was pointed at you believing I was a "democratic underground troll," whatever the hell that means.

My posts are directed at those who are wishing him to hell and want to spit on his grave [okay okay, they never said they wanted to spit on his grave]. Why call me a liar? Read the first page and you shall find:



Would it be unkind to wish him burning in hell?

Cronkite and Macnamara both dead in July 09....i hope they both burn in hell


(Macnamara actually influenced policy, his hand pressed the button, this I could understand moreso).

Please, stop swinging your sword if you don't wish to see blood. I didn't intend to cause such a ruckus for thinking the comments above were overboard.

[LibertyEagle]

Ozzy,

It used to be the case that when someone worked to overthrow our form of government, it was called treason. That was exactly what Cronkite had been doing for many years. That is what world government is, because it would replace our own.

[Todd]

You are starting to sound like a conspiracy theorist, wanting every man and woman associated with any misplaced thought to the gates of hell as you piss in their graves. You think you know people by their associations, that you can categorize the world in black and white. You think you are such the intellect and the freedom warrior for standing up against such people, that you know who is bad and who is good. But you make life too simple.

Judge this man for his actions not his thoughts. He never had the influence to kill so many people, he never brainwashed America into believing in globalism or socialism. He was an influential broadcaster, yes, but what do they remember him as? As the man who said we are losing in Vietnam? Gee wizz, only devils are remembered for such things.

You can predict a whole lot by associations people have...No conspiracy theory needed. It's called institutional analysis. Maybe you should try it.

[Dr.3D]

You can predict a whole lot by associations people have...No conspiracy theory needed. It's called institutional analysis. Maybe you should try it.

Yep, what's that ole saying again, "If you lay down with dogs, you are bound to wake up with fleas."?

[pcosmar]

Interesting.

http://original.antiwar.com/solomon/2009/07/20/beyond-the-hype-cronkite-and-the-vietnam-war/

But facts are facts, and history is history – including what Cronkite actually did as TV’s most influential journalist during the first years of the Vietnam War. Despite all the posthumous praise for Cronkite’s February 1968 telecast that dubbed the war "a stalemate," the facts of history show that the broadcast came only after Cronkite’s protracted support for the war.

In 1965, reporting from Vietnam, Cronkite dramatized the murderous war effort with enthusiasm. "B-57s – the British call them Canberra jets – we’re using them very effectively here in this war in Vietnam to dive-bomb the Vietcong in these jungles beyond Da Nang here," he reported, standing in front of a plane. Cronkite then turned to a U.S. Air Force officer next to him and said: "Colonel, what’s our mission we’re about to embark on?"

"Well, our mission today, sir, is to report down to the site of the ambush 70 miles south of here and attempt to kill the VC," the colonel replied.

Cronkite’s report continued from the air. "The colonel has just advised me that that is our target area right over there," he said. "One, two, three, four, we dropped our bombs, and now a tremendous G-load as we pull out of that dive. Oh, I know something of what those astronauts must go through."

Next, viewers saw Cronkite get off the plane and say: "Well, colonel, it’s a great way to go to war."

The upbeat report didn’t mention civilians beneath the bombs.

[jmdrake]

Read the post above you.
Read the post below you.

I am speaking about those who are casting him to hell already and spitting on his grave.


Hmmmm..... The common view of hell where satan lives. Walter Cronkite said he was "happy to be at the right hand of satan". So could these people just be wishing him well? Just an observation.




Apparently that means nothing if you think differently from the "correct" way of thinking.
Note, thinking, not actually changing policy (as far as I know). My dad watched him all the time, he didn't turn into a socialist nor globalist. So, I just don't understand.

And there are some who listen to Sean Hannity and don't become neocons. That still doesn't change the fact that Conkrite purposefully influenced the political debate for the detriment of this country. He didn't get the award from a globalist think tank just for regurgitating the news.

I will say this. Sometimes people buy into globalist agendas and don't even know it. How many of the people that supported NAFTA really want a North American Union? How many people supported cap and trade without realizing they were really supporting a world wide carbon tax? I'll admit I was once fooled by both of those frauds, although I woke up to NAFTA MANY years ago. I'm sure there are people who support the Patriot Act without understanding the ramifications. The purpose globalists in the media is NOT to get everyone to agree that globalism is good. They just need enough people to support the plan 1 agenda item at a time.

[HRD53]

I don't know too much about his personal beliefs. Seeing that he's not a policy maker, I never really paid much attention to him.

I just like how everyone on here is shitting all over him, but then if you mention Dennis Kucinich its a lovefest (not all of you, but a lot of you)... What the hell is that? It must be because Dennis Kucinich would never want to strenghten the United Nations like that scumbag Cronkite, right? :rolleyes:

[jmdrake]

I don't know too much about his personal beliefs. Seeing that he's not a policy maker, I never really paid much attention to him.

I just like how everyone on here is shitting all over him, but then if you mention Dennis Kucinich its a lovefest (not all of you, but a lot of you)... What the hell is that? It must be because Dennis Kucinich would never want to strenghten the United Nations like that scumbag Cronkite, right? :rolleyes:

I'm sorry. Did I miss Cronkite advocating getting rid of the federal reserve before he died? :rolleyes:

[LibertyEagle]

I don't know too much about his personal beliefs. Seeing that he's not a policy maker, I never really paid much attention to him.
No, he only was the source of the news (ie. slant) that the American people received for many years. Do you think his personal beliefs just might have been reflected in his reporting?


I just like how everyone on here is shitting all over him, but then if you mention Dennis Kucinich its a lovefest (not all of you, but a lot of you)... What the hell is that? It must be because Dennis Kucinich would never want to strenghten the United Nations like that scumbag Cronkite, right? :rolleyes:
Hhmmm... I don't like traitors and i consider someone actively working to overthrow the form of government that our Founders gave us, to be such.

As far as Kucinich is concerned, some of us applaud his stance on the WOT and the Federal Reserve. However, most of us also take a firm stance against his socialist stand on most of the other issues. There is no reason you can't work with someone to get good bills passed, such as HR1207, on which you agree, but still not agree with them on most everything else.

[HRD53]

I'm sorry. Did I miss Cronkite advocating getting rid of the federal reserve before he died? :rolleyes:

Oh okay, so if he agrees with us on a couple of issues, he's alright. :rolleyes: By the way Cronkite was against the war in Iraq from the beginning, so is he alright now?

[HRD53]

There is no reason you can't work with someone to get good bills passed, such as HR1207, on which you agree, but still not agree with them on most everything else.

I totally agree with that. I guess my point was i find it odd that there was such an extreme distaste for Cronkite (which i totally understand) and yet Kucinich gets far more love than i would have ever imagined when i first started logging on to ronpaulforums.com

[0zzy]

Oh okay, so if he agrees with us on a couple of issues, he's alright. :rolleyes: By the way Cronkite was against the war in Iraq from the beginning, so is he alright now?

I believe that not all men are inherently evil, even if they subscribe to the view of socialism. One who agrees on one or two of the issues is generally more pleasing to me as we have common ground we can both work towards.

But that's just me...

[LibertyEagle]

Oh okay, so if he agrees with us on a couple of issues, he's alright. :rolleyes:

Is it an either/or issue with you? Why can't he have a good stance on the WOT and the Federal Reserve and work with him on those issues, and have rotten stances on just about everything else, so not work with him on those?

Overall, Kucinich is a socialist, so I'm not a fan. But, I do admire a couple of his stances that I have already mentioned. Why not work with him in getting bills against those two things, passed?

[jmdrake]

Oh okay, so if he agrees with us on a couple of issues, he's alright. :rolleyes: By the way Cronkite was against the war in Iraq from the beginning, so is he alright now?

Kucinich is right on the war, NAFTA, the WTO, the federal reserve, the department of homeland inSecurity, the unPatriotic act, Iran, Gaza etc. I'm not the world's best mathematician, but that's more than a couple (two). Cronkite didn't get his aware from a globalist organization for nothing. Post a clip of Kucinich getting a similar award if you want to continue to make the comparison.

Regards,

John M. Drake