Tom29
09-25-2007, 05:32 AM
In the Netherlands we just had an election for chairman of the labour party.
The supposed winner and anti-war candidate lost miracoulusly. The press had to wait 4 hours for the results "due to a technical computer-error" . This reminds me of the results in one of the Ron Paul strawpolls. (Witch one was it?)
A newsarticle (http://www.nisnews.nl/public/250907_1.htm) says:
The election result was only announced yesterday evening around 8 p.m. instead of 4 p.m. The party had had to send the press away from the official presentation in Amsterdam in the late afternoon because the votes could not initially be counted "due to a technical error".
How to prevent voting irregularities when it matters...?
The supposed winner and anti-war candidate lost miracoulusly. The press had to wait 4 hours for the results "due to a technical computer-error" . This reminds me of the results in one of the Ron Paul strawpolls. (Witch one was it?)
A newsarticle (http://www.nisnews.nl/public/250907_1.htm) says:
The election result was only announced yesterday evening around 8 p.m. instead of 4 p.m. The party had had to send the press away from the official presentation in Amsterdam in the late afternoon because the votes could not initially be counted "due to a technical error".
How to prevent voting irregularities when it matters...?