"Libertarian", Glenn Beck, Fox News Case For Sarah Palin

[ItsTime]

YouTube - Family Guy - "Come on!" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDhThhrd_UY)

:D

[sevin]

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/20/b832400bde33865f326979672bc63c84.jpg (http://www.threadbombing.com/details.php?image_id=4165)

[RonPaulVolunteer]

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/20/b832400bde33865f326979672bc63c84.jpg (http://www.threadbombing.com/details.php?image_id=4165)

Now THAT'S just DYING for a caption...

"The "PATRIOT" Act..."

[ItsTime]

commmmmmmmmmmmmmmmme on

[tron paul]

I want Obama out of office, or to at least win 2012 by a small margin.

Palin is the best way to do this.

Go Palin!

[Kludge]

A lesson in compromise: http://www.bobbarr2008.com/

[tron paul]

A lesson in compromise: http://www.bobbarr2008.com/

Barr aside, blaming the process isn't the best excuse.

Gov. Palin doesn't need to compromise with anyone. Money is pouring into SarahPAC.

You know she's 10X bigger on Facebook than RP, right? Why ignore, resent, or provoke that much raw energy instead of doing something positive with it?

We need to get on board Team Sarah and start steering it towards fiscal conservative and libertarian social directions.

[acptulsa]

Gov. Palin doesn't need to compromise with anyone.

And if only she hadn't, you wouldn't feel the need to spam on her behalf daily. We'd already approve.

As it is, we all make informed choices--and you wind up in the minority. Which makes some of us wonder how well informed you are.


You can't relate, but that's OK. Someone has to pay off my self-forgiven, renounced debt, and a hard working sucker seems like a good fit for that job.

Thanks, Boxer!

But then again... Barnum said you can fool some of the people all of the time. Note the emphasis. Not that many fools here.

[jsu718]

A lesson in compromise: http://www.bobbarr2008.com/

Because had it been a hard line Libertarian, the numbers would have been enough to make a difference? Would have been enough for hope and change?

[tron paul]

And if only she hadn't, you wouldn't feel the need to spam on her behalf daily. We'd already approve.

As it is, we all make informed choices--and you wind up in the minority. Which makes some of us wonder how well informed you are.


But then again... Barnum said you can fool some of the people all of the time. Note the emphasis. Not that many fools here.

Ah, you feel Palin compromised herself by running with McCain. She did have to nod approval at whatever his platform was. That's what Veeps do.

But that gained her national exposure. Her regional popularity went global.

Palin isn't going to go to Duke med school. But she's a winner and a potential anti-obama superweapon.

ps All your bait, nastiness, and personal attacks make you smell like a troll. do you want to discuss issues or pick fights?

[Kludge]

Because had it been a hard line Libertarian, the numbers would have been enough to make a difference? Would have been enough for hope and change?

Nope. However, Barr campaigned on compromise. Barr was going to swoop in with his professional campaign staff, reach out to the Dems, and piggyback on the momentum brought on by Ron Paul. His numbers were mediocre, and on par with radicals of years past.

Do you really get hope for change in a pro-war social conservative who endorsed John McCain?

We might as well be campaigning for Obama.

[acptulsa]

Ah, you feel Palin compromised herself by running with McCain. She did have to nod approval at whatever his platform was. That's what Veeps do.

But that gained her national exposure. Her regional popularity went global.

Opportunists are a dime a dozen in politics. What we need is some people with convictions and with courage.


ps All your bait, nastiness, and personal attacks make you smell like a troll.

Ah, yes. The line as old as the 'net. I'm not a troll for spamming, but you're a troll for getting sick of my spam. Yadda.

[ItsTime]

Money is pouring into her pac? hahahaha What is it 700,000 in the last six months? Get back to me in December and see if money is still "pouring in".

[LibertyEagle]

Opportunists are a dime a dozen in politics. What we need is some people with convictions and with courage.

^^ This.

[tron paul]

Opportunists are a dime a dozen in politics. What we need is some people with convictions and with courage.



Ah, yes. The line as old as the 'net. I'm not a troll for spamming, but you're a troll for getting sick of my spam. Yadda.

I believe and hope, like millions of others, that Palin might posses both convictions and courage.

However, both convictions and courage are a dime a dozen compared to electability.

See Goldwater, Barry vs Reagan, Ronald for the canonical example.

We've been discussing who is going to play the electable Reagan to Paul's principled Goldwater for a couple years now.

I think it could be Palin. I know, I'm setting myself up to be disappointed. Oh well.

PS Spam is unsolicited commercial electronic mail. Trolling is picking a fight online.

Which one of us doing that? How does bashing and negativity towards Sarah Palin help the rEVOLution?

Is she a threat to Ron Paul? Are the Tea Parties getting too big and popular?

Do you want her supporters to go away, pick another team, and not join the rEVOLution?

Why?

[coyote_sprit]

Barr aside, blaming the process isn't the best excuse.

Gov. Palin doesn't need to compromise with anyone. Money is pouring into SarahPAC.

You know she's 10X bigger on Facebook than RP, right? Why ignore, resent, or provoke that much raw energy instead of doing something positive with it?

We need to get on board Team Sarah and start steering it towards fiscal conservative and libertarian social directions.

Just because something is 10x more abundant then something else doesn't make it useful. Take for instance idiots, FaceBook is a cesspool of idiots and you need only to look at a list of hacked FaceBook passwords to see that.

[StudentForPaul08]

Ok we are talking about Sarah Palin here. She has no true understanding about free-market economics, or civil liberties, let alone her foreign policy ideas are neo-con. Enough said.

[mediahasyou]

Ah, you feel Palin compromised herself by running with McCain. She did have to nod approval at whatever his platform was. That's what Veeps do.

But that gained her national exposure. Her regional popularity went global.

Palin isn't going to go to Duke med school. But she's a winner and a potential anti-obama superweapon.

ps All your bait, nastiness, and personal attacks make you smell like a troll. do you want to discuss issues or pick fights?

if you are trying to push palin agenda here, you are wasting your time. this community is very resistant to sheeple propaganda.

however, i highly recommend http://theobamaforum.com/ if you wish to recruit sheep to your flock. :)

good luck young shepherd.

[coyote_sprit]

http://i27.tinypic.com/v63sc8.jpg

[speciallyblend]

if you are trying to push palin agenda here, you are wasting your time. this community is very resistant to sheeple propaganda.

however, i highly recommend http://theobamaforum.com/ if you wish to recruit sheep to your flock. :)

good luck young shepherd.

who are you;)?? i wish i could be like you. i wear my heart on my sleeve and im to passionate! i get riled up to easy;)

[ItsTime]

But guys you are missing the biggest points!

YouTube - Family Guy - "Come on!" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDhThhrd_UY&feature=player_embedded)

[sparebulb]

But she's a winner and a potential anti-obama superweapon.

Personally, I make it a policy to stay away from stuff that comes out of Rush Limbaugh's ass. I also make it a policy not to take political advice from an obese, drug-addicted, impotent neocon.

[speciallyblend]

Personally, I make it a policy to stay away from stuff that comes out of Rush Limbaugh's ass. I also make it a policy not to take political advice from an obese, drug-addicted, impotent neocon.

ouch but i hear you;)

[ClayTrainor]

But guys you are missing the biggest points!

YouTube - Family Guy - "Come on!" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDhThhrd_UY&feature=player_embedded)

great point!

Sarah Palin 2012!

[South Park Fan]

I believe and hope, like millions of others, that Palin might posses both convictions and courage.

However, both convictions and courage are a dime a dozen compared to electability.

See Goldwater, Barry vs Reagan, Ronald for the canonical example.

We've been discussing who is going to play the electable Reagan to Paul's principled Goldwater for a couple years now.

I think it could be Palin. I know, I'm setting myself up to be disappointed. Oh well.

PS Spam is unsolicited commercial electronic mail. Trolling is picking a fight online.

Which one of us doing that? How does bashing and negativity towards Sarah Palin help the rEVOLution?

Is she a threat to Ron Paul? Are the Tea Parties getting too big and popular?

Do you want her supporters to go away, pick another team, and not join the rEVOLution?

Why?

And we all know how libertarian the Reagan Presidency was. :rolleyes:

[speciallyblend]

And we all know how libertarian the Reagan Presidency was. :rolleyes:

hey every time i see your id. i think have you visited south park Colorado? you should it is just over the mtn here where i am at;) its a cute lil town. I wonder how the kids going to south park elementary feel;)

[tron paul]

Personally, I make it a policy to stay away from stuff that comes out of Rush Limbaugh's ass. I also make it a policy not to take political advice from an obese, drug-addicted, impotent neocon.

Rush as 10 million listeners. Palin has 10 million supporters. There's sure to be lots of overlap.

But Rush isn't the Dick Cheney style, evil genius behind the Palin throne. That's just a talking point created by Obama-protecting Kossaks to help people invalidate Palin's obvious, palpable popularity.

Even if he was, the focus on his bodily functions is curious.

Rush is treading carefully on the subject of Sarah. He knows that some gorillas are bigger than him. Not many are, but Palin is one.

[tron paul]

And we all know how libertarian the Reagan Presidency was. :rolleyes:

Yes, Reagan was less libertarian, and more electable, than Goldwater. That was my point.

Outside of die-hard, more-individualist-than-thou debating circles, Reagan is widely regarded as heralding an age of comparative libertarianism. Reagan restored the damage Carter, etc had done to the economy, which we liked, leading to his re-election landslide. He did not appear in a philosophical vacuum for us to judge according to the strictest interpretation of John Hospers.

Left wing libertarians hate him for unfounded charges of warmongering, but he did cut taxes, start the gold and silver eagle program, validate Chicago economists, etc.

There's just no pleasing some people.

You know that Ron Paul was one of Reagan's delegates, the first one from Texas in fact, right?

You think Ron Paul would have been in the Reagan Library for the first debate, getting his foot in the door, if he and Nancy didn't go way back to the old school?

Yes, she despises McCain. But still.

[ClayTrainor]

Yes, she [nancy reagan] despises McCain. But still.

Nancy Reagan endorses John McCain
Former first lady throws her support behind her 'good friend'

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23797059/

[acptulsa]

Left wing libertarians hate him for unfounded charges of warmongering...

http://www.historyguy.com/Grenada.html

http://www.mahalo.com/manuel-noriega

Don't tell me, let me guess. Police actions, right?

[PaulaGem]

I want Obama out of office, or to at least win 2012 by a small margin.

Palin is the best way to do this.

Go Palin!

Sorry, I'd rather support the real thing than a counterfit, I'll stick with Dr. Paul.

[speciallyblend]

Yes, Reagan was less libertarian, and more electable, than Goldwater. That was my point.

Outside of die-hard, more-individualist-than-thou debating circles, Reagan is widely regarded as heralding an age of comparative libertarianism. Reagan restored the damage Carter, etc had done to the economy, which we liked, leading to his re-election landslide. He did not appear in a philosophical vacuum for us to judge according to the strictest interpretation of John Hospers.

Left wing libertarians hate him for unfounded charges of warmongering, but he did cut taxes, start the gold and silver eagle program, validate Chicago economists, etc.

There's just no pleasing some people.

You know that Ron Paul was one of Reagan's delegates, the first one from Texas in fact, right?

You think Ron Paul would have been in the Reagan Library for the first debate, getting his foot in the door, if he and Nancy didn't go way back to the old school?

Yes, she despises McCain. But still.

can you copy and paste your paycheck? i bet it is signed by sarah palin. give it up man your not gonna win any rpf members over to sarah palin. why don't you wait till she runs and stop wasting your time. when i hear Ron Paul endorse sarah palin(NOT) .Then i will stand behind you and sarah palin! oppps let me rephrase that maybe! i doubt that will happen,but having an open mind i wll say never say never. sarah palin will not run for president! there is 0 excuses for quitting a term she never finished! that alone gives me 0 trust in her! she cannot handle the heat in the kitchen in alaska but she can handle it for prez?? sorry there is nothing you can say that will change my opinion of a quitter! sorry no excuses accepted! i do not care what you say or pundits or the failed gop says. this woman couldn't even finish her elected position! At least i know how to kill a 2012 sarah palin run. i will just sue her so she will quit! the fact she tried to use that as a reason is laughable. i quit to save you money. well do us a favor sarah quit now and you save our country money!;) as well as her supporters and mine since i will not support her but i will spend money to campaign against her! so the best way for sarah palin to save her money, your money and my money and our country's money! Don't run!

good luck with sarah palin. i wish you well!

[tron paul]

Nancy Reagan endorses John McCain
Former first lady throws her support behind her 'good friend'

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23797059/

Try looking deeper. Sometimes people know exactly what they are talking about when they make very specific claims.


While these details may be new, the semi-scandal of McCain's truncated first marriage is definitely old news (though a British paper did its best to resurrect the issue last month). But what we loved best about the Los Angeles Times story today was the details about the Reagan family — friends with John and Carol McCain — and how they treated him after the divorce. They rallied around Carol, arranged for a White House job for her, and then gave John the cold shoulder for years. And when Nancy endorsed John for the presidency in March of this year, it was during a brief five-minute photo op. This is all she said:

"Ronnie and I always waited until everything was decided, and then we endorsed. Well, obviously this is the nominee of the party."

Man, she's still got it!

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/07/la_times_questions_mccains_div.html

[tron paul]

can you copy and paste your paycheck? i bet it is signed by sarah palin. give it up man your not gonna win any rpf members over to sarah palin. why don't you wait till she runs and stop wasting your time. when i hear Ron Paul endorse sarah palin(NOT) .Then i will stand behind you and sarah palin! oppps let me rephrase that maybe! i doubt that will happen,but having an open mind i wll say never say never. sarah palin will not run for president! there is 0 excuses for quitting a term she never finished! that alone gives me 0 trust in her! she cannot handle the heat in the kitchen in alaska but she can handle it for prez?? sorry there is nothing you can say that will change my opinion of a quitter! sorry no excuses accepted! i do not care what you say or pundits or the failed gop says. this woman couldn't even finish her elected position! At least i know how to kill a 2012 sarah palin run. i will just sue her so she will quit! the fact she tried to use that as a reason is laughable. i quit to save you money. well do us a favor sarah quit now and you save our country money!;) as well as her supporters and mine since i will not support her but i will spend money to campaign against her! so the best way for sarah palin to save her money, your money and my money and our country's money! Don't run!

good luck with sarah palin. i wish you well!

Accusations of AstroTurfing? Ahh, that takes me back to when RP was the insurgent campaign, fighting unfair, idiotic suggestions of synthetic support.

If Palin signs mine, I guess your paycheck is signed by Mitt Romney, her only rival for the 2012 GOP Presidential Primaries. Go on, tell us how Mitt is better than Sarah.

[tron paul]

http://www.historyguy.com/Grenada.html

http://www.mahalo.com/manuel-noriega

Don't tell me, let me guess. Police actions, right?

Communists, Russians, and other Eurasians have no business in our hemisphere. Pardon me while I weep for the dead CommiesOKdone. If only we had a few more like Cuba. *sheds bitter tear for Che and Allende*

It's called the Monroe Doctrine.

The is the New World. All the Old World CRAP stays in the Old World. We have declared our Independence from it.

Butt out. Or else our Navy turns your Navy into coral reefs and you suddenly become happy and satisfied with staying back home.

[ItsTime]

Will you vote for her if Glenn Beck cries some more?

YouTube - Glenn Beck: The Weepening: Cry For America (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oumQl8neO6w)

[LibertyEagle]

Yes, Reagan was less libertarian, and more electable, than Goldwater. That was my point.

Outside of die-hard, more-individualist-than-thou debating circles, Reagan is widely regarded as heralding an age of comparative libertarianism. Reagan restored the damage Carter, etc had done to the economy, which we liked, leading to his re-election landslide. He did not appear in a philosophical vacuum for us to judge according to the strictest interpretation of John Hospers.

Left wing libertarians hate him for unfounded charges of warmongering, but he did cut taxes, start the gold and silver eagle program, validate Chicago economists, etc.

There's just no pleasing some people.

You know that Ron Paul was one of Reagan's delegates, the first one from Texas in fact, right?

You think Ron Paul would have been in the Reagan Library for the first debate, getting his foot in the door, if he and Nancy didn't go way back to the old school?
Yes, but when it was found that Reagan was mostly talk, Dr. Paul no longer supported him. You are leaving that out.

You know, I almost did a back flip when Reagan was first elected and I do think he was light years better than Carter. I also realize that he couldn't get a lot of the stuff done that he wanted to get done, with a Democratic Congress. However, at the end of the day, he increased the size and scope of government.


Yes, she despises McCain. But still.
Who is "she"? Because Nancy Reagan ENDORSED John McCain.

[jkm1864]

Communists, Russians, and other Eurasians have no business in our hemisphere. Pardon me while I weep for the dead CommiesOKdone. If only we had a few more like Cuba. *sheds bitter tear for Che and Allende*

It's called the Monroe Doctrine.

The is the New World. All the Old World CRAP stays in the Old World. We have declared our Independence from it.

Butt out. Or else our Navy turns your Navy into coral reefs and you suddenly become happy and satisfied with staying back home.




Hey do Yourself a favor go to another forum. The people here are very educated about the problems in this country. We don't want another politician that says they will make things better then turn around and shred the constitution. Why don't You read it some time and You will learn most of us are third party all the way. The demoncraps and the republitards are all traitors in our book and even if they put a republican in Libertarian colors We will know. You are trying to convince people that payed 100% attention to the primaries and guess what if She tries to act like a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist but says otherwise We will find out... Another point people here do not support the terrorist state of Israel so if You are trying to sell some neocon war doctrine We won't fall for it....


So please stop wasting our time because in the end You are just wasting Your time.

[thechitowncubs]

Hey do Yourself a favor go to another forum. The people here are very educated about the problems in this country. We don't want another politician that says they will make things better then turn around and shred the constitution. Why don't You read it some time and You will learn most of us are third party all the way. The demoncraps and the republitards are all traitors in our book and even if they put a republican in Libertarian colors We will know. You are trying to convince people that payed 100% attention to the primaries and guess what if She tries to act like a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist but says otherwise We will find out... Another point people here do not support the terrorist state of Israel so if You are trying to sell some neocon war doctrine We won't fall for it....


So please stop wasting our time because in the end You are just wasting Your time.

Hear hear!

[DFF]

Sarah Palin wasn't even qualified to be Governer of Alaska, muchless President of the US. All this crap about her lately is nothing but a heap of Swine Flueesque propaganda to manipulate the masses into somehow believing she's relevant and has support. Wake up call: she's neither relevant, nor outside the confines of some remote town in Alaska, has any support whatsoever.

[tron paul]

Hey do Yourself a favor go to another forum. The people here are very educated about the problems in this country. We don't want another politician that says they will make things better then turn around and shred the constitution. Why don't You read it some time and You will learn most of us are third party all the way. The demoncraps and the republitards are all traitors in our book and even if they put a republican in Libertarian colors We will know. You are trying to convince people that payed 100% attention to the primaries and guess what if She tries to act like a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist but says otherwise We will find out... Another point people here do not support the terrorist state of Israel so if You are trying to sell some neocon war doctrine We won't fall for it....


So please stop wasting our time because in the end You are just wasting Your time.

Is Ron Paul "third party all the way?" Is Kokesh? Is Schiff? No. So why attack me?

Because you hate Palin, beyond anything rational like mere disagreement?

Congrats on become a moderator. Oh wait, you're not. Hooray!

I never mentioned Israel; your assumptions = epic fail.

Why not read my old posts before making a fool of yourself?

Because you're lazy. Intellectually lazy. Someone says "Palin" and all your preconceptions are instantly mobilized, without benefit of research or analysis.

Or paragraph spacing, making for a textbook rant.:o

[tron paul]

Yes, but when it was found that Reagan was mostly talk, Dr. Paul no longer supported him. You are leaving that out.

You know, I almost did a back flip when Reagan was first elected and I do think he was light years better than Carter. I also realize that he couldn't get a lot of the stuff done that he wanted to get done, with a Democratic Congress. However, at the end of the day, he increased the size and scope of government.


Who is "she"? Because Nancy Reagan ENDORSED John McCain.

I already rejected evaluating Reagan in a theoretical vacuum, absent historical context. He's more libertarian than Carter and Bush, etc. Dr. Paul is still proud of serving with Reagan, that's why they still use the photo of them laughing it up together. And I'm sure he's still friends with Nancy.

You don't the situation between Nancy & McCain either?

Wow, did we ever fail in publicizing opposition research! Of all people that should know:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showpost.php?p=2214176&postcount=33

[tron paul]

Sarah Palin wasn't even qualified to be Governer of Alaska, muchless President of the US. All this crap about her lately is nothing but a heap of Swine Flueesque propaganda to manipulate the masses into somehow believing she's relevant and has support. Wake up call: she's neither relevant, nor outside the confines of some remote town in Alaska, has any support whatsoever.

Try reading the news sometime.

Just because you hate Palin doesn't mean she has no support.

Team Sarah has 80,000 vetted members. She's 10 times bigger than RP on Facebook.

Donations are pouring into SarahPAC. And she hasn't even left Alaska yet.

Your emotions are not an excuse to deny reality.

[acptulsa]

Team Sarah has 80,000 vetted members. She's 10 times bigger than RP on Facebook.

Facebook numbers aren't exactly some kind of gold standard...

[someperson]

I doubt many, if any, individuals who visit a forum such as this, in earnest, genuinely despise personalities such as Ms. Palin. It is infinitely more likely, I would think, that it is her policy choices that draw ire from those here. Please separate personality, party, and label from policy. It might be good to recognize this before assuming the individuals here hold some kind of childish, personal vendetta against her (like anyone really cares about her after the election other than those within the usual neoconservative circles, who have become pathetically, desperately clingy to any individual who holds any semblance of a chance at redeeming their backward ideology).

Equating distaste of her policy choices with the old neoconservative talking point known as "derangement syndrome;" yes, one must be deranged to believe a surge (code for sending more individuals to their death, to be maimed, or to become murderers with PTSD) in Afghanistan isn't a great idea. Ms. Palin believes it's a great idea... Mr. Obama obviously agrees.

I'll quote my previous post of some other misgivings that I, and perhaps other individuals here, have about just her foreign policy choices.



Incidentally, I may as well list some of the other issues with her foreign policy, ignoring the rest of her problematic policy issues.

She believes we should not leave Iraq, as that's "defeat" (that mentality worked great for the soldiers of the Vietnam era). She believes we can leave when Iraq has a fully functional government, likely modeled after the one we pretend we have, with a national security force powerful and capable enough of stifling internal dissent to our imposed vision. Sounds great.

She believes in Obama's policy that more troops are required in Afghanistan. She thought a surge in Afghanistan would be a good thing; surge is, of course, code for send more individuals to die, be maimed, or become murderers with PTSD for life.

She believes Iran, cosigner of the NPT, which I believe hasn't initiated war with anyone in hundreds of years, should not be able to develop nuclear energy fearing the weapons, even though there are plenty of nuclear weapons that remain unaccounted for from the USSR, and Pakistan, a country we seem intent on further destabilizing, already has them.

Q: Do you think Georgia would be worth it to the US to go to war if Russia were to invade?
A: Smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a larger power is something for us to be vigilant against. We've got to be cognizant of what the consequences are if a larger power is able to take over smaller democratic countries. And we have got to be vigilant. We have got to show the support, in this case, for Georgia. The support that we can show is economic sanctions perhaps against Russia, if this is wha it leads to. It doesn't have to lead to war and it doesn't have to lead to a Cold War, but economic sanctions, diplomatic pressure, counting on our allies to help us do that in this mission of keeping our eye on Russia and Putin and some of his desire to control and to control much more than smaller democratic countries. His mission, if it is to control energy supplies coming from and through Russia, that's a dangerous position for our world to be in, if we were to allow that to happen.

That sounds like a great position for a non-interventionist Ron Paul Republ----- neoconservative. We have to make the world safe for democracy like good old Woodrow Wilson. As Ron Paul suggested, a nation is less likely to war with those it trades with, more likely to war with those it sanctions. This nation needs to stay out of the internal affairs of other nations.

She believes we need to do as Obama has done, and invade Pakistan to stop "the terrorists," whoever they are, this time. Is it still the taliban? who knows? As long as the propaganda still works in convincing the populace that they're evil and "out to get us" from thousands of miles away, give or take an ocean, it doesn't matter, right?

I could go on, but there's too many.

What can be derived about her foreign policy from all this?
It advocates nation building.
It advocates sanctions.
It advocates meddling in the internal affairs of other nations.
It advocates maintaining allies over neutrality.
It advocates war to bring about peace and stability.

If it's not a perfect match, it's close enough for me. This is neoconservative foreign policy.
If one knowingly chooses to accept and support such an ideology, well...

Throw god and prayers into the mix in order to subdue those religious individuals of conscience into becoming mindless supporters, and wow... you just have to be in awe of the audacity of this hope.