PDA

View Full Version : Wesley Clark Says Neocons Plan To Overthrow 7 countries in the next 5 years.




AlexAmore
06-03-2007, 03:33 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB3bJb4w3JY

This is an Excerpt from an Interview given by Amy Goodman from Democracy Now. She spends an hour with retired four-star General Wesley Clark. Here is a snippet of what he has to say about the War on Iraq, and the wars we may see in the future.

...About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, "Sir, you've got to come in and talk to me a second." I said, "Well, you're too busy." He said, "No, no." He says, "We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq." This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, "We're going to war with Iraq? Why?" He said, "I don't know." He said, "I guess they don't know what else to do." So I said, "Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?" He said, "No, no." He says, "There's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq." He said, "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can take down governments." And he said, "I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail."

So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said, "Oh, it's worse than that." He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, "I just got this down from upstairs" -- meaning the Secretary of Defense's office -- "today." And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." I said, "Is it classified?" He said, "Yes, sir." I said, "Well, don't show it to me." And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, "You remember that?" He said, "Sir, I didn't show you that memo! I didn't show it to you!"

AMY GOODMAN: I'm sorry. What did you say his name was?

GEN. WESLEY CLARK: I'm not going to give you his name.

AMY GOODMAN: So, go through the countries again.

GEN. WESLEY CLARK: Well, starting with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya, then Somalia and Sudan, and back to Iran.
-------------------------------------------------------
Now if you look at this letter from Project for a New American Century, you will see they have been planning the Iraq war for many many years (probably before 1998!):
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm. Look at the men who wrote the letter and are subsequently part of PNAC:
- Donald Rumsfeld
- Paul Wolfowitz - Former United States Deputy Secretary of Defense during the administration of President George W. Bush, he was a principal "architect" of the Iraq War. On June 1, 2005 he was appointed president of the World Bank Group, but resigned on May 17, 2007.
- Robert P. Zoellick - United States Deputy Secretary of State, resigning on July 7, 2006. Before holding this position, he served as U.S. Trade Representative, from February 7, 2001 until February 22, 2005. President George W. Bush nominated Zoellick on May 30, 2007 to replace Paul Wolfowitz as President of the World Bank. The nomination is subject to approval by the Bank's Board of Directors

The World Bank thing is kinda funny. Small world, huh? Anyways that's not really my point. My point is the Iraq war was being planned at least back in the 90s and the men who planned it - as luck would have it - are now in power. Wesley Clark proved further in his discussion that the Iraq war was not about taking out a country who is a threat to America....are the other six countries a threat to America? If they are then I ask, why? Perhaps Ron Paul might accuse our "bad foreign policy". No other reason I can think of.

Of course these countries aren't threats to us, especially if we can take them all out in 5 years. The motive behind these neocon globalists is control, that's all I can think of.

Maybe some of you guys can shed some light on this. :confused:

UtahApocalypse
06-03-2007, 03:43 PM
Didnt we send some missiles into Somalia this week? This all seems to true :(

Delivered4000
06-03-2007, 03:46 PM
That's a bit scary, but I trust the American people won't let them.

And guess what, if they do, it will all be in America's name. The outside world won't see it as neo-cons screwing them, they will see that America is screwing them. "And if we ignore that, we ignore that at our own risk"

IrrigatedPancake
06-03-2007, 04:00 PM
Yes, the government did send some missiles into Somalia a few days ago. It had also been funding the Ethiopian group that is trying to overthrow the current Somalian government for several months and I guess our government's still doing that.

NMCB3
06-03-2007, 04:24 PM
The whole plan is true, its out there to read by anyone who wants too. The neoconservatives are very dangerous to the world and to our liberty. Most of the establishment Democrats have the same policy. When they are talking about their war on a tactic (terrorism) going on for generations they are dead serious. Do you think America will ever be the same after that?

The decision to effect regime change in Iraq became official policy during the Clinton Administration, I guess 911 gave them a opportunity to do it. :)

lynnf
06-03-2007, 05:22 PM
Hmmm, 2001 - that was six years ago. Seems their little agenda got slowed
down a little or even stopped. Too bad our military had to pay the ultimate price for it.

Lynn

tnvoter
06-03-2007, 06:22 PM
Clinton Authorized regime change in Iraq in 1998 too, right?

Bob Cochran
06-03-2007, 06:33 PM
I've been saying for years that a better policy would be to disengage, bring our troops home, and concentrate on rebuilding our economy.

But, we say very clearly to the world that any terrorist acts perpetrated against American and Americans, wherever they may be, will be met with the most devastating consequences.

We especially should communicate to nation-states that are known to support terrorism that if a major terrorist act is traced to a group that has received aid comfort from their government, that their government and their military forces will be destroyed, period.

In street talk, the message would be, "Look, we're gonna leave you alone, but if you decide it's a good idea to mess with us at any point in the future, we are going to unload so much whup-ass on you, that you will wish you had never been born."

But we don't go around intervening nor occupying other countries.

wwycher
06-03-2007, 06:37 PM
The whole plan is true, its out there to read by anyone who wants too. The neoconservatives are very dangerous to the world and to our liberty. Most of the establishment Democrats have the same policy. When they are talking about their war on a tactic (terrorism) going on for generations they are dead serious. Do you think America will ever be the same after that?

The decision to effect regime change in Iraq became official policy during the Clinton Administration, I guess 911 gave them a opportunity to do it. :)

It is time to effect a regime change here. These people are nuts.
Viva La Ron Paul Revolution.

wwycher
06-03-2007, 06:40 PM
I can't blame Iran for wanting nukes. If Pakistan did'nt have em' we would have invaded them as well. Where did he go? That slippery Osamma that we gave a 2 month head start to.

RonPaul4President
06-03-2007, 06:46 PM
Clinton Authorized regime change in Iraq in 1998 too, right?

Just as Bush is a mouthpiece for the world elite, so was Clinton and his predecessors. Both paties are owned by global wealth. They are puppets of pure evil. Ron Paul wants to seperate the U.S. government from these money changers. Go Ron. Status quo in the White house means status quo on your paycheck tax deductions. Your income taxes directly fund WAR. Sorry for getting OT.

rg123
06-03-2007, 06:48 PM
I do not remember which speach in the house it was in 98 but Ron said that the Clinton admin had the plans to go to war in iraq in 98 I believe it can be foud in the library

ChooseLiberty
06-03-2007, 07:04 PM
Gotta love when the generals are calling BS on the neocons. Ever get the feeling Bush and his neocons have meetings where they sit around and flip the bird at the Constitution or just in the general direction of the US citizen/voters. They should all be forced to serve in combat in Iraq without the proper equipment like the dirty dozen.


Full interview -

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/02/1440234&mode=thread&tid=25

slantedview
06-03-2007, 11:14 PM
This is an interesting interview. Thanks for sharing.

Give me liberty
06-07-2007, 02:05 AM
Clinton Authorized regime change in Iraq in 1998 too, right?

Dont forget serbia.

First iraq in 1998 then Clinton went for
Serbia in 1999

Teaching The Untaught
06-07-2007, 05:14 AM
People are saying that the plan has slowed down and that may be the case. However it has defiantly not ground to a halt - if its true.

The Lebanese army is currently engaged in conflict with "Islamic Militants" in Palestinian refugee camps. How difficult would a secret mission to engage Lebanon in a state of civil war, with the view of installing a "friendly government" be?

If that happens then Syria would probably go the same kind of way.

CIA operatives and special forces are currently working inside Somalia tracking down "Al Qaeda" suspects. North Keora are currently funding and supplying weapons to the Ethopians - with the knowledge, and blessing, of the US government - who are also in Somalia. With the countries background full fledged civil war is to be expected. If not under way already.

Even if it doesn't happen that way an attack on Iran could be the key to the over throw/occupation of all of those countries. If an attack on Iran is launched - by either the US or Israel - Hezbollah, who are currently digging themselves in and rearming, will attack Israel. Iran and possibly Syria will also attack Israel and US interests. This will be the smoking gun for an American, British, Israeli - and anyone else who wants to join in - occupation of a majority of the Middle East.

joenaab
06-07-2007, 09:01 AM
It's great to see others aware of the how the world really works. Not all the dots are being connected here, but a pretty accurate picture is being painted.

This is first and foremost a multi-decade offensive to seize control of the world's oil & gas resources, as well as other mineral and natural resources. Don't fall for the stories about "weapons of mass destruction" or "potential to make nuclear weapons" or "rooting out terrorism at its source". This is how they sell what they do. It might help to research the subject of "Peak Oil".

Also, consider the possibility that the anglo-saxon crime syndicate that's grown up around commercial banking, central banking, fossil fuels, military-industrial complex, pharmaceuticals (made from oil), and control of mainstream media, are in fact the secret sponsors of much of the world's terrorism. That they, via the covert agencies of the U.S., England, Europe and Israel, - recruit, arm and train the very people who are sold to us as "enemies" and "terrorists". It's all a show. Don't fall for it.

Finally, do some research into the area of glabal population reduction, which is a top tier priority for this global crime syndicate and an integral part of what they are doing in the middle east and africa. for example, Henry Kissenger has spoke openly for decades about the need to reduce the world's population by the billions, and he's not talking about over the course of a century or two.

IrrigatedPancake
06-07-2007, 10:29 AM
This is very interesting, but a bit out of line with this board. Maybe an admin could move this to another board to avoid derailing this one?

LibertyEagle
06-07-2007, 10:32 AM
I can't blame Iran for wanting nukes. If Pakistan did'nt have em' we would have invaded them as well. Where did he go? That slippery Osamma that we gave a 2 month head start to.

As Dr. Paul has indicated, if a country has nuclear bombs, we subsidize them; if they do not, our government apparently feels free to go in and overthrow their government.

Clearly I'm paraphrasing, but I think you get the point.

Mort
06-07-2007, 11:18 AM
He saw this after 9/11 in 2001. We seem to be quite a bit behind schedule.

SeekLiberty
06-07-2007, 12:43 PM
Just as Bush is a mouthpiece for the world elite, so was Clinton and his predecessors. Both paties are owned by global wealth. They are puppets of pure evil. Ron Paul wants to seperate the U.S. government from these money changers. Go Ron. Status quo in the White house means status quo on your paycheck tax deductions. Your income taxes directly fund WAR. Sorry for getting OT.

Besides taxes, remember the "inflation tax", where the the "Federal" "Reserve" System issues unlimited fiat money out of thin air, steals our wealth for the benefit of the elite of and for the State.

Broadlighter
06-08-2007, 01:06 AM
Listen to Ron Paul's 11 part speech to Congress from July 10, 2003. You can view it on YouTube or you can go to my blogsite www.broadlight.blogspot.com (http://www.broadlight.blogspot.com) . You can also listen to the same speech on www.ronpaulaudio.com (http://www.ronpaulaudio.com)

On my site, look under the "Neo-Conservatism Is Neither" blogs. The first part begins farther down the page. It starts getting really interesting on Part 5 where Ron Paul articulates the philosophy of Neo-Conservatism. I think he nails it really good, yet most of the congressmen were probably just ignorning him.

I'd like to add another moniker to describe this murderous ideology. I call it Progressive Neo-Conservatism. I don't want to leave the admitted socialists out of that tent.

moostraks
08-28-2012, 09:50 PM
bump...interesting read considering the countries named. Google search country name with us drones brings some interesting results...

ninepointfive
08-28-2012, 09:51 PM
nice resurrection

moostraks
08-28-2012, 10:05 PM
nice resurrection thanks...I am fact finding for a particular discussion I am having elsewhere and doing some searching through really old threads.

ninepointfive
08-28-2012, 10:20 PM
thanks...I am fact finding for a particular discussion I am having elsewhere and doing some searching through really old threads.

Yeah, this really became true. And there's a lot more to come true, which is a little scary.

Feeding the Abscess
08-28-2012, 10:37 PM
And then he goes and hosts that Stars and Stripes abomination.

rockandrollsouls
08-28-2012, 10:45 PM
That's unbelievable. :(

Republicanguy
08-29-2012, 06:16 AM
Ofcourse Iraq, 2/3's of the world's oil lays there. Richard Cheney said that himself back at the end of the century. American hegemony is an energy monopoly.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN9UXuaWBO4&NR

Heinberg's fifty minutes, filmed in 2007 I imagine.