PDA

View Full Version : Racism's cure found in private sector




bobbyw24
07-13-2009, 04:53 AM
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/13/racisms-cure-found-in-private-sector/

Racism's cure found in private sector

Andrew Breitbart

ANALYSIS/OPINION

The most unsettling news story of the last week came out of Philadelphia, where a group of black and Hispanic children of elementary-school age paid for the right to swim at a private suburban club and were denied the experience without cause and publicly humiliated in the process.

While the Rev. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton cry racism too often and make a mockery of their cause by exploiting events for their personal gain, sometimes old-fashioned bigotry does rear its ugly head in America.

In this instance, the Valley Club's president confirmed our worst fears when he offered something far from an exculpatory explanation. "There was concern that a lot of kids would change the complexion ... and the atmosphere of the club," John Duesler said in his initial statement.

Some campers claim to have overheard at least one parent fretting about the sudden influx of 65 minority children at the mostly white club.

True or not, these children were clearly wronged and it's hard to believe that race didn't play a significant part in their being tossed from the suburban club on their very first field trip.

Bigotry is not a partisan issue, and to be sickened by this story is the proper human response. America's original sin of slavery and the stain of Jim Crow make a bad situation almost viscerally unbearable - and warrant a conclusive remedy. This, unfortunately, is our country's long-term burden.

Many members of the private swim club, removed from its director's idiotic move, now find themselves in the unenviable position of working round-the-clock to defend themselves and their previously unblemished club. Even neighbors of the institution have taken to the media to distance themselves from the awful act.

"I think they're knuckleheads up there," said John Fenton, a local. "I don't know how you can do that to little kids."

Whenever legitimate acts of bigotry occur, they should be exposed to the light of day. The media and the legal system - fueled by public outrage - can do the rest. In this case, substantial national and even international news coverage of the Valley Club incident is beginning the process of making the campers whole.

Racism is so unwelcome in America these days, government is no longer the most effective mechanism to thwart it. The common sense of good-hearted citizens is enough to shame culprits to relent. Modern institutions have filled the void where organizations like the NAACP have become more and more irrelevant - and hopelessly partisan - in confronting bigotry.

Facebook and Twitter, powerful social media tools, worked so quickly that Mr. Sharpton and Mr. Jackson didn't have time to book their flights to Pennsylvania. Good Samaritans came out of the woodwork to offer the campers opportunities such as cooking lessons from local chefs and classes from professional filmmakers and other artists. Nearby Girard College has offered its swim facilities to the kids for free.

"So much goodness is coming out of an awful situation," said Alethea Wright, director of the Creative Steps camp. "This is wonderful."

While racism does exist, it is no longer the natural order, nor is it representative of the majority. Otherwise, this story would not have played out the way it did.

The eradication of racism in this country has best transpired when the media exposes the bad behavior and private citizens act to remedy it. Of course, Creative Steps and the individual campers still have legal recourse in this instance, and given the public outrage generated, the Valley Club is likely in a settling mood.

As Mr. Duesler and the members of the Valley Club found out this week, there are no incentives in 21st-century America for racism, and there are fewer and fewer hiding places for bigotry's last holdouts.

But it also shows that the American people are far better at meting out justice and delivering a punishment than charlatans like Mr. Jackson and Mr. Sharpton, or even groups like the NAACP. With President Obama in office, America has shown more than good faith that we are heading down the right road toward racial tolerance, and the universal public expression of support for the Creative Steps campers only underscores this point.

• Andrew Breitbart is publisher of the news portals Breitbart.com and Breitbart .tv. His latest endeavor, Big Hollywood (http://big hollywood.breitbart.com), is a group blog on Hollywood and politics from the center-right perspective.

Objectivist
07-13-2009, 04:56 AM
Did you hear the report of the club director and his word on the matter?

brandon
07-13-2009, 05:43 AM
Hell, If i paid to belong to a small nice swim club with my neighbors and friends I wouldn't want 65 inner city kids coming there either.

Objectivist
07-13-2009, 04:45 PM
As a former Lifeguard Instructor and Swim Coach I'm laughing my ass off over this entire bamboozle.

Liberty Star
07-13-2009, 04:53 PM
Results were rendered null and void after it was discovered that the private company that conducted this research did not have sufficient "diversity" among its employees to meet federal standards.

specsaregood
07-13-2009, 05:06 PM
./

revolutionisnow
07-13-2009, 05:14 PM
Is Creative Steps a racist club also? Why was the entire group black?

specsaregood
07-13-2009, 05:17 PM
//

dannno
07-13-2009, 05:24 PM
Why do you find it funny?

I think it is a shame; but I do support the right of the swim club to make up their own admission rules to their private property.

Did you read the article?? Of course we support their right to do that, but they are still wrong, they are still sick individuals and have now been called out and shamed by the PUBLIC rather than being forced by GOVERNMENT.. and that is a GOOD thing. Do not defend these sick people (brandon..) for their racist behavior.


If I belonged to that suburban swim club I would quit and never pay them another cent. I hope most of the members quit and leave the swim club bankrupt. That's called a free market solution to stupid racist actions. That is the entire point of this thread.

dannno
07-13-2009, 05:25 PM
Hell, If i paid to belong to a small nice swim club with my neighbors and friends I wouldn't want 65 inner city kids coming there either.

Ya, the difference is that THEY PAID too.

It wasn't based on whether they paid or not, or what neighborhood they live in, it was based on the color of their skin.

specsaregood
07-13-2009, 05:28 PM
Did you read the article?? Of course we support their right to do that, but they are sick individuals and have now been called out and shamed by the PUBLIC rather than being forced by GOVERNMENT.. and that is a GOOD thing. Do not defend these sick people (brandon..) for their racist behavior.

I'm in complete agreement. I just didn't understand what the person I replied to thought it was "LMAO" funny. I guess one could find it funny how the racists were publicly shamed about it. They were stupid for sure, should have made up some BS about firecodes or something. At the same time I am completely unsurprised.

brandon
07-13-2009, 05:30 PM
Ya, the difference is that THEY PAID too.

It wasn't based on whether they paid or not, or what neighborhood they live in, it was based on the color of their skin.

My point was I don't care if they paid and I don't care if they're black, white, or yellow. I lived in inner-city Philly for a while, and the kids there are generally disrespectful, undisciplined brats. One time a group of about 5 10 year olds threw rocks at me while I was walking down North Broad street minding my own business. I wouldn't want to have a crew of 65 mini-thugs invade somewhere I go to relax.

Golding
07-13-2009, 05:34 PM
I'm a little confused on the time line of the payment and the rejection. Did they refuse the kids' money? If that's the case, I don't see this as a racist act. None of the clubs I know of around here rent out areas like that either. It's either pay to be a member entirely (which probably in of itself has some age restrictions), or find somewhere else to go.

If they took the payment, then told the kids to go away when they showed up to swim, then maybe there's an argument.

But even then, the unfair move against them may not have so much to do with the fact that they were black and hispanic as it might have to do with the fact that they were kids. The actual members probably would object once they realize one corner of the pool is a little warmer than the other.

specsaregood
07-13-2009, 05:38 PM
I'm a little confused on the time line of the payment and the rejection. Did they refuse the kids' money? If that's the case, I don't see this as a racist act. None of the clubs I know of around here rent out areas like that either. It's either pay to be a member entirely (which probably in of itself has some age restrictions), or find somewhere else to go.


They accepted payment. The kids came one day. They returned the payment.

dannno
07-13-2009, 05:55 PM
My point was I don't care if they paid and I don't care if they're black, white, or yellow. I lived in inner-city Philly for a while, and the kids there are generally disrespectful, undisciplined brats. One time a group of about 5 10 year olds threw rocks at me while I was walking down North Broad street minding my own business. I wouldn't want to have a crew of 65 mini-thugs invade somewhere I go to relax.

Well I support the right to remove the inner city kids if they break the rules, being loud and obnoxious, running around (don't run around the pool!), etc..