OLD: KY Media calls us "Paultards" and "Rand will never be an elected official in KY" [Archive]

HarryBrowneLives

07-10-2009, 07:40 PM

Isn't this just some blogger with a hard-on... :D

... and it's likely a very small one at that. Just ignore and move on. Wouldn't want to increase his hits on that little obscure page.

Him and others like him in the GOP will have a much harder time busily defending their guy The Democrat to the rank and file. If I were running ads for Rand's campaign that's exactly how who and what I would be doing when the time comes.

specsaregood

07-10-2009, 08:10 PM

Isn't this just some blogger with a hard-on... :D

Exactly, this guy obviously figured out that talk smack about Rand and us generates hits. Ignore him and allow him to wallow in his muck alone and without attention.

RonPaulFanInGA

11-07-2010, 01:13 PM

h XXp://pageonekentucky.com/2009/07/09/thursday-evening-dept-of-countin-campaignin/

Bump!

What was that again about Rand Paul having massive support inside Kentucky?.....Too bad for them that he’ll never be an elected official in Kentucky.

wizardwatson

11-07-2010, 01:18 PM

Bump!

Nice find.

Never say never.

BamaFanNKy

11-07-2010, 02:41 PM

Exactly, this guy obviously figured out that talk smack about Rand and us generates hits. Ignore him and allow him to wallow in his muck alone and without attention.

Other than the fact it's one the most read blogs in Kentucky. When he links my blog my readership #s go insane.

Also, fair to note.... he's the blogger that Dr. Paul gave a shout out to in the last debate. Jake is actually pretty fair with Dr. Paul and makes fun of the more comical posts we make on here.

EDIT: Just realized I replied to a post over a year and a half old. hahaha

acptulsa

11-07-2010, 03:32 PM

EDIT: Just realized I replied to a post over a year and a half old. hahaha

Good. We're entitled to some 'I told you so' action.

BamaFanNKy

11-07-2010, 03:36 PM

Good. We're entitled to some 'I told you so' action.

Oh, you don't think I emailed this to Jake already. hahaha. He's actually pretty good dude on a personal level.

ItsTime

11-07-2010, 03:49 PM

Amazing Amazing. Time for some crow...

Matt Collins

11-07-2010, 04:04 PM

Good. We're entitled to some 'I told you so' action.

http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x93/sonicspikesalbum/Campaign%20VI/Toldja.jpg

JohnGalt23g

11-07-2010, 04:13 PM

We are all outlaws in the eyes of (liberal) America...

acptulsa

11-07-2010, 04:19 PM

We are all outlaws in the eyes of (liberal) America...

You making this up or are you quoting the Jefferson Airplane song Volunteers of America?

YouTube - Jefferson Airplane - Volunteers (with Lyric) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SboRijhWFDU&safety_mode=true&persist_safety_mode=1)

And you know--we are very proud of ourselves.

Promontorium

11-07-2010, 05:54 PM

klamath

11-07-2010, 06:11 PM

Seems people around here like to burn bridges. Same kind of assinine actions that drove so many away from RP in 08.

BamaFanNKy

11-07-2010, 06:44 PM

JohnGalt23g

11-07-2010, 07:30 PM

You making this up or are you quoting the Jefferson Airplane song Volunteers of America?

YouTube - Jefferson Airplane - Volunteers (with Lyric) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SboRijhWFDU&safety_mode=true&persist_safety_mode=1)

And you know--we are very proud of ourselves.

It's actually We Can Be Together , off of the Volunteers album.

Everything they say we are, we are.

CasualApathy

11-07-2010, 09:58 PM

Hahahahahaaaahaahahaaa!

ha!

Promontorium

11-07-2010, 11:19 PM

That's gonna convince him to come over and be fair (Like he has been) to our candidate. Bravo!

If it makes you feel any better, I'd say that to his face. And I'd go to jail beating his ass if that's what it took. I live in California. I don't ever win anything. ever. Socialism.

Anti Federalist

11-07-2010, 11:56 PM

I left a comment that won't pass moderation. In reply to Jake's smartass comment I wrote:

"Yeah Jake, it says more about the dipshit naysaying author who dismissed a campaign before it began due to being a biased scumbag like you. Enjoy your fail asshole."

LOL, they posted it:

#

Joshua // Nov 7, 2010 at 7:51 pm

Yeah Jake, it says more about the dipshit naysaying author who dismissed a campaign before it began due to being a biased scumbag like you. Enjoy your fail asshole.
#

7 jake // Nov 7, 2010 at 7:57 pm

Yeah, that’s right, I was the only person who dismissed Rand Paul. Totally all alone.

Are you fucking retards for real?

How quickly you folks forget who worked to bring the Conway realities to the mainstream’s attention.

Fucking idiots.

silverhandorder

11-08-2010, 12:43 AM

Oh fuck him. One guy on our side = RPF?

low preference guy

11-08-2010, 01:11 AM

Oh fuck him. One guy on our side = RPF?

????

Promontorium

11-08-2010, 02:08 AM

LOL, they posted it:

That reply is hilarious. If he had tried taking the high road I'd feel bad.

RM918

11-08-2010, 05:52 AM

Everyone blathers on about how great this guy is, but he continuously uses grade-school level insults to refer to us at all times. The guy can't seem to take dealing with us without mentally checking himself by using pejoratives, and he gets into a huge tizzy and starts freaking out the moment we give him guff back? What the hell is his problem?

If he wants to dish it out, he should be able to take it. If that's the kind of narrative he wants to have with us, he shouldn't bitch when we treat him the same as he treats us.

BamaFanNKy

11-08-2010, 06:14 AM

Yep. You guys showed him. So, which one of you two helped expose Jack to advance the cause of liberty?

I'll wait to see how you influenced the media or the narrative against Jack Conway. That'll be the true sign of "showing him."

silverhandorder

11-08-2010, 06:43 AM

????

He takes one statement and replies it as if the entire RPF made this statement.

BamaFan I wouldn't bash him but the guy does not seem like he wants to make friends with us.

BamaFanNKy

11-08-2010, 07:35 AM

He takes one statement and replies it as if the entire RPF made this statement.

BamaFan I wouldn't bash him but the guy does not seem like he wants to make friends with us.

haha. I make statements like this at my blog (not about here but "mole") because I know it generates traffic. You guys need to realize Jake is not on our side politically but, he's at least willing to smack his own side as well.

My only point is, going over there to talk crap is really dumb since the campaign used his outing Jack as fodder to win. He's got great website traffic and we have people acting like jack asses after a win, which kinda proves the left's point.

sailingaway

11-08-2010, 08:19 AM

klamath

11-08-2010, 09:37 AM

He takes one statement and replies it as if the entire RPF made this statement.

BamaFan I wouldn't bash him but the guy does not seem like he wants to make friends with us.

Someone went and threw dirt in his face for a comment he made a year and a half ago. This isn't a new statement of his.

specsaregood

11-08-2010, 09:48 AM

^^ this

Why on earth did someone bump this old thread to begin with? This was months ago.

I take you have never held down an opponent you have just bested and farted in their face just to make a point?

sailingaway

11-08-2010, 10:40 AM

I take you have never held down an opponent you have just bested and farted in their face just to make a point?

Uh, check.

Promontorium

11-08-2010, 06:19 PM

Someone went and threw dirt in his face for a comment he made a year and a half ago. This isn't a new statement of his.

If the retort were made a year ago, it would have been rhetoric.

Saying it now is science.

It's like going back after a campaign and looking at the polls to see which pollsters were accurate, this way we acknowledge who is wrong, and ignore their waste of text assertions.

As was said, the fart in the face of the loser is quite important. It's the same reason stories sometimes finish with "The End".

Also, I didn't, and have never spoken for RPF. Nor even alluded to this website to anyone ever. I only speak for myself, especially considering I always feel like the outsider here in almost every way.

low preference guy

11-08-2010, 07:02 PM

He takes one statement and replies it as if the entire RPF made this statement.

I didn't see the word "RPF" in his reply.

low preference guy

11-08-2010, 07:04 PM

Why on earth did someone bump this old thread to begin with? This was months ago.

I didn't bump the thread but a thread with a statement like this absolutely deserves a bump.

What was that again about Rand Paul having massive support inside Kentucky? And what was that about the Paultards not going batshiz insane any time anyone questions their beloved Dear Leader? We apparently published a “hit piece” when we questioned Paul’s motives. Too bad for them that he’ll never be an elected official in Kentucky

lol!

JoshLowry

11-08-2010, 07:24 PM

LOL, he probably thinks that Joshua comment is mine. I comment there from time to time.

He exposed Jack a number of times. I think he thought of Rand as being just more status quo.

Jake, we'd love to work together on some issues!

Edit: It'd help if we were civil on both sides and dropped the insults.

klamath

11-08-2010, 11:09 PM

If the retort were made a year ago, it would have been rhetoric.

Saying it now is science.

It's like going back after a campaign and looking at the polls to see which pollsters were accurate, this way we acknowledge who is wrong, and ignore their waste of text assertions.

As was said, the fart in the face of the loser is quite important. It's the same reason stories sometimes finish with "The End".

Also, I didn't, and have never spoken for RPF. Nor even alluded to this website to anyone ever. I only speak for myself, especially considering I always feel like the outsider here in almost every way.
When you fart in the face of the conquested you will not just have a defeated person you will have a enemy with a bitter hatred of you biding his time to get his tat in. A good part of what percipitates repeated wars. WWII was the result of the fart in the face the brits and the french gave the Germans after WWI.

kylejack

11-08-2010, 11:12 PM

When you fart in the face of the conquested you will not just have a defeated person you will have a enemy with a bitter hatred of you biding his time to get his tat in. A good part of what percipitates repeated wars. WWII was the result of the fart in the face the brits and the french gave the Germans after WWI.
Yeah, gloating to some columnist is pretty much the same thing as creating Hitler, I see what you mean!

specsaregood

11-08-2010, 11:13 PM

RonPaulFanInGA

11-09-2010, 12:00 PM

Yeah, gloating to some columnist is pretty much the same thing as creating Hitler, I see what you mean!

Yeah really. :rolleyes:

After every election is the time to go back and find all the old "why [insert loser's name here] will win" or "[insert winner's name here] is toast and has no chance" and laugh.