PDA

View Full Version : White Supremacists in the military




yongrel
07-10-2009, 11:21 AM
From Reason.com
http://reason.com/blog/show/134711.html

Southern Poverty Law Center Exposes White Supremacists in the Military
Bill Flanigen | July 10, 2009, 12:40pm


According a new report to be released today by the watchdogs at the Southern Poverty Law Center, dozens of members of the neo-Nazi networking website "New Saxon" (go find the link yourself) describe themselves as active-duty members of the U.S. armed services in their online profiles.

In other words: Some of those in armed forces are also those who burn crosses—at least on the Internet. (Zack de la Rocha almost nailed it, I guess.)

The Stars and Stripes reports:

On Friday, the [Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)] will present its findings to key members of Congress who chair the House and Senate committees overseeing the armed forces and urge them to pressure the Pentagon to crack down.


“In the wake of several high-profile murders by extremists of the radical right, we urge your committees to investigate the threat posed by racial extremists who may be serving in the military to ensure that our armed forces are not inadvertently training future domestic terrorists,” Morris Dees, SPLC co-founder and chief trial counsel, wrote to the legislators. “Evidence continues to mount that current Pentagon policies are inadequate to prevent racial extremists from joining and serving in the armed forces.”

One servicemember on the site announced that he had been in the Army for five years, and that he "will do anything to keep our master race marching." Comments like these suggest more than just casual racism—a lot of the content seems like the expression of deeply-held beliefs by committed white supremacists. The whole thing is disturbing even if it's probably not very widespread.

The U.S. military's policy against racial extremism in the ranks is similar to its policy regarding homosexuality. Both policies are framed as safeguards against forces—racism and sexual tension—that could undermine unit cohesion.

Since "don't ask, don't tell" was implemented in 1993, about 12,000 servicemen have been discharged for revealing their homosexuality. The lackadaisical enforcement of the ban on white supremacism means that few, if any, white supremacists have gotten the boot. Which is more dangerous to unit cohesion: a gay man, or a neo-Nazi?

jmdrake
07-10-2009, 11:26 AM
I fell out with the SPLC when they attacked what they called "false patriots" for exposing the racist "Good Old Boy round up". The SPLC are the white supremacists.

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=365

pcosmar
07-10-2009, 11:28 AM
Southern Poverty Law Center Exposes

Lost me right there.
I am aware that there are racists in the military, Also in politics, education, business, entertainment, arts, etc
Racists exist
the SPLC is full of them.

gls
07-10-2009, 11:30 AM
"Reason" magazine is terrible. I'd rather read Newsweek; at least those guys don't pretend to be libertarians.

acptulsa
07-10-2009, 11:38 AM
A better headline would be, as military scrapes bottom of barrel to keep Israel's neighborhood safe, the ADL's minions grow nervous about the bottom of the barrel becoming empowered.

I might share that concern, though I'm more inclined to believe that they'll learn tolerance during their service because someone of a different melanin content is very likely to save their asses. But mostly, I just love it when an evil plan goes awry.

TonySutton
07-10-2009, 11:53 AM
Their investigations uncovered people "saying" they are active duty on a website??!?!?!

omg, that must certainly be true :P

I am sure a certain percentage of people in the military might have views in line with white supremacists but I doubt it is much different than the percentage in the population at large.

__27__
07-10-2009, 11:57 AM
In other news a bear shit in the woods.


Did you really need someone to "expose" this for you? The military is nothing more than a cross section of our population. There are white supremacists, there are gang bangers, there are dope heads, there are communists, there are socialists, there are neo-cons, there are liberals, there are libertarians, there are anarcho-capitalists, there are anarcho-syndicalists.........

UnReconstructed
07-10-2009, 12:05 PM
some of its bullshit

before I went to group they told me there was a high percentage of white supremacists... and once I got there, I never met anyone like that

but _27_ is right, there are all kinds in the military

Cowlesy
07-10-2009, 12:12 PM
The mini-series on HBO called Generation Kill (one of the actors was one of the actual men in the unit) shows how this subject comes up a lot. You have a large group of amp'd up guys going into combat, and that breeds all sorts of one-upmanship and "who's the bigger dog in the pen" attitudes. I'm sure there are racists of all sorts there, but it seems they get along fine because like ACPTulsa said, one day it could be someone with a different skin color saving their ass.

GreenCardSeeker
07-10-2009, 12:49 PM
"Exposures" like these are pure hate, witch hunts aiming at controlling people.. In Sweden, they've been able to marginalize large portions of the population that way, it's simply fascism. The ADL and SPLC are embarrassments for America, clearly unamerican organizations. The people doing the "exposures" are the real supremacists and extremists.

Liberty Star
07-10-2009, 03:25 PM
I caught a glimpse of couple of scenes of this war movie about first Iraq war (1991?) on FX last night that starred Jamie Foxx has some kind of group leader. In the scene, one the soldiers does some weird stuff - right after rolled into Iraq from Kuwait he is portrayed as someone who is anxious to get some kill on "rag heads", he jumps with joy when when some planes above are shown heading deeper into Iraq and he starts jumping with joy saying 'we're gonna bomb some rag-heads". In next scene he is shown trying to desecrate a dead burnt Iraqi's body, other soldiers give him dirty looks and try to pull away.

If such a depictioin is not totally fictional, how could someone possibly know if he was a "white supremacist", a "jewish supremacist" or some regular guy who just had something hit him really hard at some point in his life?

catdd
07-10-2009, 03:29 PM
"The SPLC are the white supremacists."

That is true.

Cowlesy
07-10-2009, 03:43 PM
My favorite movie involving White Supremacists was Blue Brothers when Jake and Elwood drive across the bridge making all the nazis jump in the river hahaha

Lord Xar
07-10-2009, 03:43 PM
....

pcosmar
07-10-2009, 04:31 PM
My favorite movie involving White Supremacists was Blue Brothers when Jake and Elwood drive across the bridge making all the nazis jump in the river hahaha

For your viewing pleasure.

YouTube - The Blues Brothers - Nazis Scene (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhozx819izU)

Athan
07-10-2009, 04:33 PM
lol the splc. What a bunch of traitors.

Eric Arthur Blair
07-10-2009, 04:37 PM
So according to the SPLC

A soldier who won't date black people=white supremacist
A soldier who kills black people=American hero

CRAZY

LibertyEagle
07-10-2009, 04:40 PM
http://www.alipac.us/article-4073-thread-1-0.html

Objectivist
07-10-2009, 04:44 PM
I wonder if they'll crackdown on gang bangers in the military?

Conservative Christian
07-10-2009, 04:56 PM
"Reason" magazine and the SPLC = credibility of Bozo the clown.

I don't doubt that a miniscule percentage of white servicemen are radical racists, just like a small percentage of BLACK servicemen are radical racists.

The question that should be asked is---do these remarkably small groups constitute some sort of threat to the U.S. military, to which the answer is---BWAHAAAAHAAAAA! :D

Conservative Christian
07-10-2009, 05:00 PM
"New Saxon".

Hmmmm. The name just seems to have that "We're a FedGov front group" ring to it. ;)

Liberty Star
07-10-2009, 05:07 PM
http://www.alipac.us/article-4073-thread-1-0.html

From that link:


March 26, 2009

ALIPAC is issuing a national advisory to all local, state, and Federal law enforcement agencies and officers, along with all DHS Fusion Centers, a warning against any reliance upon faulty and politicized research issued by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and Anti Defamation League (ADL).

A national scandal emerged in Missouri, after their MIAC Fusion Center issued an eight page document which made many false claims. The documents attempted to politicize police and cast suspicion on millions of Americans. The 'Missouri Documents', as they came to be called, listed over 32 characteristics police should watch for as signs or links to domestic terrorists, which could threaten police officers, court officials, and infrastructure targets.

Police were instructed to look for Americans who were concerned about unemployment, taxes, illegal immigration, gangs, border security, abortion, high costs of living, gun restrictions, FEMA, the IRS, The Federal Reserve, and the North American Union/SPP/North American Community. The 'Missouri Documents' also said potential domestic terrorists might like gun shows, short wave radios, combat movies, movies with white male heroes, Tom Clancey Novels, and Presidential Candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin!

So ADL was involved in defining these "characteristics"?

Incredible who low they could sink.

Steeleye
07-10-2009, 09:54 PM
I wonder if they'll crackdown on gang bangers in the military?

I read in Army Times (I think) about a decorated NCO who had been to Iraq once or twice who was beaten to death during a gang initiation over in Kaiserslautern.

revolutionary8
07-10-2009, 10:02 PM
The SPLC was listed as a resource source in the MIAC document
http://www.alipac.us/article-4073-thread-1-0.html

THIS

wtf is wrong with you yongrel? I read the first sentence of your post, and then I make myself read more to give you "the benefit of the doubt", and now, I'm doubtful.
So basically, we've come full circle. ;) I had a hard time "warmin' up to ya" in the first place. lol

Here's a clue and a summary:
any rat bastard that labels me as a Terraist can suck my ass. Including you.

revolutionisnow
07-10-2009, 10:07 PM
why is any white group supremacist, but any jewish, black or hispanic group pride?

tax dollars go to and politicians give speeches for the other groups

Optatron
07-10-2009, 11:44 PM
exposes? Like it's a crime?

Putting some people in the spotlight while they're doing a job?

Sounds like naming gays and weak to give them a hard time.

But yeah, we have no right to privacy, especially when you're serving with your life on the line.

Optatron
07-10-2009, 11:47 PM
why is any white group supremacist, but any jewish, black or hispanic group pride?

tax dollars go to and politicians give speeches for the other groups

because whites are, and have been the majority, so it's wrong for them to ask for more, it's right for minorities to want to be equal or better.

literatim
07-10-2009, 11:51 PM
because whites are, and have been the majority, so it's wrong for them to ask for more, it's right for minorities to want to be equal or better.

Majority where? Whites are a minority on the planet.

revolutionary8
07-10-2009, 11:51 PM
because whites are, and have been the majority, so it's wrong for them to ask for more, it's right for minorities to want to be equal or better.
You are fucking JOKING, aren't ya?
(INSERT moment of "tolerance")

revolutionary8
07-10-2009, 11:54 PM
because whites are, and have been the majority, so it's wrong for them to ask for more, it's right for minorities to want to be equal or better.
An "agent provocateur"... Never heard of THAT. ;)

FAIL
AND YOU SUCK BIG BALLS ,HOPE YOU GET FIRED.;)

revolutionary8
07-11-2009, 12:03 AM
exposes? Like it's a crime?

Putting some people in the spotlight while they're doing a job?

Sounds like naming gays and weak to give them a hard time.

But yeah, we have no right to privacy, especially when you're serving with your life on the line.

you are FUCKED UP.
just thought I'd point that lil' "tid bit" out. ;)

Optatron
07-11-2009, 12:17 AM
http://www.alipac.us/article-4073-thread-1-0.html

doesn't mean they don't publish good things sometimes, right?

Optatron
07-11-2009, 12:18 AM
Majority where? Whites are a minority on the planet.

in America, and Europe, at least that's what all these minority ethic political groups tell me, why would they lie?

Optatron
07-11-2009, 12:19 AM
You are fucking JOKING, aren't ya?
(INSERT moment of "tolerance")

duh!

revolutionary8
07-11-2009, 12:42 AM
lol

Optatron
07-11-2009, 12:45 AM
lol

laugh? provacateur?

make up your mind

literatim
07-11-2009, 12:49 AM
in America, and Europe, at least that's what all these minority ethic political groups tell me, why would they lie?

You mean whites are a majority in the countries they created? Wow, I never knew.

Optatron
07-11-2009, 12:52 AM
You mean whites are a majority in the countries they created? Wow, I never knew.

never thought you'd ask either.

the question was, why aren't other racial groups hateful, or bad, or supremacist and only whites are held to a higher standard?

ANSWER : because whites founded these countries so it's not OK for them to demand more, it's OK for minorities in these white dominant countries to demand better.

revolutionary8
07-11-2009, 12:57 AM
never thought you'd ask either.

the question was, why aren't other racial groups hateful, or bad, or supremacist and only whites are held to a higher standard?

ANSWER : because whites founded these countries so it's not OK for them to demand more, it's OK for minorities in these white dominant countries to demand better.

I suppose you'd give us the "2/3rds" rule as evidence..

plus....

ITS A TRAP.

literatim
07-11-2009, 01:18 AM
never thought you'd ask either.

the question was, why aren't other racial groups hateful, or bad, or supremacist and only whites are held to a higher standard?

ANSWER : because whites founded these countries so it's not OK for them to demand more, it's OK for minorities in these white dominant countries to demand better.

I see. So other peoples can come to countries whites created and demand more than whites themselves get?

Optatron
07-11-2009, 01:20 AM
I see. So other peoples can come to countries whites created and demand more than whites themselves get?

that's what I was taught in school, yes.

literatim
07-11-2009, 01:38 AM
that's what I was taught in school, yes.

So what happens when whites become the minority in the countries they created in a few decades?

Optatron
07-11-2009, 01:45 AM
So what happens when whites become the minority in the countries they created in a few decades?

depends on what schools teach then

revolutionisnow
07-11-2009, 07:27 AM
so can whites move to Japan or India and start white groups there? since then they'll be a minority?

also- there are many black/asian/hispanic groups that have absolutely nothing to do with rights, just things to do with pride in their culture, would those types of groups be acceptable for whites, as long as they make sure they don't ask for any rights?

Danke
07-11-2009, 07:19 PM
Yongrel, your shit got old a long time ago. Your recent drive-bys just make it all the more obvious. Just go away already. Don't you just love hobnobbing with our social betters in D.C? Isn't that enough for you?

Danke
02-07-2010, 10:31 PM
bump

BlackTerrel
02-08-2010, 01:20 AM
Why'd you bump this?