Stu Rothenberg call me a "Ron Paul wacko" in a bitter e-mail exchange! LOL!

[max]

Noted political hack Stuart Rothenberg took some cheap shots at Peter Schiff, so I wrote him an E-mail...to which he actually responded!

He called me a wacko and told me to have a nice life!!!...LOL We're getting to these guys...

Here's my e-mail....followed by his response:

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:06 PM, xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
************************************************** ****************************
Stu,

When Schiff runs, and wins, you will look as foolish as all those other clowns who laughed at him when he predicted the housing bubble would burst.

How dare you question Schiff's patriotism with that wise-crack about him not voting in 20 years. What the hell is there to choose from? Both parties are infected with Keynesian cancer and crony corruption.

You are a fool Stu, and you've inspired me to work even harder for Peter Schiff's campaign. New Jersey isn't too far from Connecticut, and I'll be going door to door with literature exposing Chris Dodd for the piece of crap that he is.

Dont tell me I have no business in CT...the Senate is now a Federal...not a state,... institution. ...whether we like it or not. Chris Dodd is in my pocket, so I have every right to work against him.

Here, learn some real economics.....
www.TomatoBubble.com

************************************************** ***************************************

Re: Chris Dodd is scary...not Peter Schiff‏
From: Stuart Rothenberg (stu.rothenberg@gmail.com)
Sent: Sat 6/20/09 9:59 PM
To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Instead of working for Schiff, you might go back to school to lean how to read.

I never questioned Schiff's patriotism. I merely noted that voters expect that their elected officials -- and candidates for office -- vote. Maybe you don't, but most sane people do.

As for your decision to go to Connecticut to work for Peter, why should I care? Go ahead. Move there. More your family -- if you have one. Quit your job -- if you have one. I talked to dozens of Howard Dean supporters who moved to Iowa to help him win the Iowa Caucuses. Look how well he did there!

As for looking foolish, I'm not worried. Look in the mirror. You sound like one of those Ron Paul wackos (emphasis added by OP) who e-mailed me promising that Dr. Paul would win the Iowa Caucuses and go on to win the GOP nomination. He sure did great, didn't he?

So you hate Dodd and both parties. Big deal. I'm not defending them. All I'm saying is that Schiff is not going to win the Senate. But go ahead, knock yourself out. It beats counting black helicopters and talking about how terrible the Federal Reserve is.
(emphasis added by OP)

Have a nice life.

SR

[KCIndy]

I say... this Rothenberg chap does seem to be a very nasty and unpleasant fellow, does he not?

[sluggo]

Who the hell is Stuart Rothenberg???

[Anti Federalist]

Who is Stu Rothenberg and why should I give a fuck?

[max]

Who the hell is Stuart Rothenberg???

Not generally known to the public....but the Rothenberg Report is very well known among DC insiders...pure Establishment man

Rothenbergs shots at Schiff are an early indicator of how much the Establishment hates Schiff..

http://www.rothenbergpoliticalreport.blogspot.com/

[sluggo]

Oh, I see.

For 197 bucks a year, you can pay Stuart Rothenberg to provide you with the same insightful commentary on politics and society that any half-bright American could get from about an hour of surfing the major news networks on any given day?

Stuart,

I'm impressed. You could probably sell ice cream to an eskimo.

[sluggo]

Something tells me that Stu doesn't get that many emails.

Let's change that. :D

[max]

oh, i see.

For 197 bucks a year, you can pay stuart rothenberg to provide you with the same insightful commentary on politics and society that any half-bright american could get from about an hour of surfing the major news networks on any given day?

Stuart,

i'm impressed. You could probably sell ice cream to an eskimo.

lol!....

[sluggo]

Stuart Rothenberg gives me the confidence to declare myself a "Washington insider."

[LibertyEagle]

I say, give 'em hell, Max! :D

[max]

I say, give 'em hell, Max! :D

I'm surprised he actually read my letter and responded so harshly.

He's fairly "elite"...I'm flattered that he would humble himself to write to a serf.

[MCockerill08]

My email to him below

[max]

[QUOTE=MCockerill08;2175470]My email to him below:

(P.S. sorry to the truthers, [who while vastly outnumbered in the overall grassroots somehow spam up every thread 9/11 is ever mentioned on.] I think you're full of shit, and I make that CLEAR in this email.)

************************************************** ***********************************
Nice letter!

But in attacking 9/11 truth you act no different than Stu does in attacking Schiff.

Unless you can give a plausible explanation for this video, you should not mock 9/11 truth;

WTC7 - This is an Orange (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3898962504721899003)


...u might also want to explain this away too...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

and explain this away too...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/mar/19/september11.iraq


and if cant....then ...then maybe your cherished "official version" of 9/11 is "full of shit"

[MCockerill08]

[QUOTE=MCockerill08;2175470]My email to him below:

(P.S. sorry to the truthers, [who while vastly outnumbered in the overall grassroots somehow spam up every thread 9/11 is ever mentioned on.] I think you're full of shit, and I make that CLEAR in this email.)


Nice letter!

But in attacking 9/11 truth you act no different than Stu does in attacking Schiff.

Unless you can give a plausible explanation for this video, you should not mock 9/11 truth;

WTC7 - This is an Orange (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3898962504721899003)


...u might also want to explain this away too...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

and explain this away too...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/mar/19/september11.iraq


and if cant....then ...then maybe your cherished "official version" of 9/11 is "full of shit"

Doubting a government story is one thing. (and a GOOD thing) Create dubious conspiracies is irresponsible and turns people off from our movement.

Ron Paul has said it himself- "don't talk about 9/11 'truth' because it hurts me (and the movement)."

We know the state is guilty of mass murder and the global recession, and have overwhelming evidence to support this. (1, 2)

Why dwell on dubious conspiracy theories like 9/11 "truth" when they scare potential converts to radical libertarianism off, for a SENSELESS REASON. I agree that we can't water down the message, but the radical, anti-war, anti-state, pro-liberty/free market, RP message has nothing to do with 9/11 truth, and neither does libertarianism.

This is Ron Paul forums. You can call people out on infowars for not being "true" info "warriors" if they doubt the conspiracy, but 9/11 truth has NOTHING to do with our movement and our leader repudiates it.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance135.html (1)
http://www.thomasewoods.com/books/meltdown/ (2)

YouTube - Ron Paul on 9/11 Truthers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGyhlNY0y1k)

[DapperDan]

At least he said have a nice life. So he's not fully a jackass heh.

[max]

OK...but you didn't explain those three items for me....

the reason I "dwell" on them is because 3000 of my countrymen were murdered that day, and the culprits went free!

let's start with the video clip....what do you see? Honestly.

[MCockerill08]

OK...but you didn't explain those three items for me....

the reason I "dwell" on them is because 3000 of my countrymen were murdered that day, and the culprits went free!

let's start with the video clip....what do you see? Honestly.

My parents are scientists so I'm a bit hard to convince about anything. In your clip I see nothing conclusive whatsoever.

Some of the suspected hijackers probably are alive! The state screws up all the time in its 'criminal justice.' That is no evidence of anything.

Again, it's GREAT to doubt a government's official explanation, but it's irresponsible to claim AS FACT, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that what most people believed about 9/11 is a lie when the attacks caused MASSIVE suffering and death. We already know about the murder (and I don't use that word lightly) of hundreds of thousands in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the ripoffs known as 'bailouts' and 'federal reserve money creation-' why not focus on persuading others through credible assertions backed by CREDIBLE (rather than circumstantial) evidence?

[max]

My parents are scientists so I'm a bit hard to convince about anything. In your clip I see nothing conclusive whatsoever.

Some of the suspected hijackers probably are alive! The state screws up all the time in its 'criminal justice.' That is no evidence of anything.

Again, it's GREAT to doubt a government's official explanation, but it's irresponsible to claim AS FACT, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that what most people believed about 9/11 is a lie when the attacks caused MASSIVE suffering and death. We already know about the murder (and I don't use that word lightly) of hundreds of thousands in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the ripoffs known as 'bailouts' and 'federal reserve money creation-' why not focus on persuading others through credible assertions backed by CREDIBLE (rather than circumstantial) evidence?

U see nothing conclusive? Dude, a 47 story skyscraper turned into dust and came down at the speed of gravity in a neat little pile! You telling me a fire caused that????

If your parent are scientists, you might be interested in this http://physics911.net/

or this http://stj911.org/

The physics of the official 9/11 story is IMPOSSIBLE....Until 9/11 is exposed, the wars which it spawned will NEVER cease