PDA

View Full Version : Mark Sanford on CNN right now



jdmyprez_deo_vindice
06-08-2009, 04:57 AM
bailout talk
jdmyprez_deo_vindice
06-08-2009, 04:58 AM
Talking about the SC Supreme Court forcing him to accept the money and why he is so opposed to it.
jdmyprez_deo_vindice
06-08-2009, 04:58 AM
he seems irritated and with good reason
malkusm
06-08-2009, 06:16 AM
Are he and Palin the only governors to refuse bailout money? Seems to me there was another one...
werdd
06-08-2009, 06:23 AM
Are he and Palin the only governors to refuse bailout money? Seems to me there was another one...

Perry did as well
max
06-08-2009, 06:40 AM
Sanford, Perry, Jundal, and Palin are all PHONIES...

they refused bailout money only because they plan to run in 2012....


Don't get sucked in by these ambitious frauds...neo-cons talking the libertarian talk...
Elwar
06-08-2009, 06:48 AM
Did he say anything about setting off an EMP on Congress?
haaaylee
06-09-2009, 11:50 AM
here is him on Glenn Beck from yesterday:

YouTube - Stimulus Money "Jammed down South Carolina's Throat" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_3PwHfH44E)

fox and friends:

YouTube - Governor Mark Sanford on Fox and Friends (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXahyRcaS4Y)
ctiger2
06-09-2009, 11:56 AM
A Paul/Sanford ticket would be nice for 2012. RP speaks highly of MS.
Spike
06-09-2009, 05:55 PM
America can do so much better than Sanford.

These are revolutionary times that call for revolutionary leaders, and Sanford is definitely not a revolutionary. A good politician? Yes. Honest? Maybe. But he hasn't shown what it takes, which is the fearlessness that Ron Paul, and Jesse Ventura has.

If they're not an independent candidate then it's not worth paying any attention to them.
eduardo89
06-09-2009, 06:38 PM
America can do so much better than Sanford.

These are revolutionary times that call for revolutionary leaders, and Sanford is definitely not a revolutionary. A good politician? Yes. Honest? Maybe. But he hasn't shown what it takes, which is the fearlessness that Ron Paul, and Jesse Ventura has.

If they're not an independent candidate then it's not worth paying any attention to them.

Thing is...we need someone the mainstream is familiar with and someone with experience. Yes, Ventura was governor, but he's not (vice)presidential material. People won't vote for him, he's too far out there. Sanford would be nice to have on the Paul ticket, people know him, he's quite popular and he seems to be quite a good, honest politician.

Sanford would be a great running mate.
Spike
06-09-2009, 06:45 PM
Thing is...we need someone the mainstream is familiar with and someone with experience. Yes, Ventura was governor, but he's not (vice)presidential material. People won't vote for him, he's too far out there. Sanford would be nice to have on the Paul ticket, people know him, he's quite popular and he seems to be quite a good, honest politician.

Sanford would be a great running mate.

I know where you're coming from, but forget kowtowing to the crowd. We are the mainstream, it just depends on how forceful and eloquent we are.

Was MLK mainstream when he started his campaign? Was Ghandi mainstream? Was Rosa Parks mainstream? If we do the right thing, and support the right leaders, then people will naturally come.

None of the great visionary men were mainstream. They created a movement and people came to them.

If you want conventional politics, then I guess you're right, Sanford would make a good candidate. But we must throw conventional politics out the window since it isn't working.