Chieftain1776
05-21-2009, 09:45 AM
So after debating over GITMO Special Ed tries to defend the blatant omission of the "Pelosi claims CIA lied" story from the NYTimes front page. It's pathetic to see him flailing around to defend the NYT as a hyper partisan denying the obvious bias. The desperate flailing starts @6:00.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/#30864598
Also-- for the sake of argument-- wouldn't the "average American" Schultz heralds be more concerned about GITMO prisoners in their community or decentralizing the Ag Dept? What would his all knowing "majority" oppose on a ballot? Don't be surprised if he finds someway to justify his opposition to the "majority" when his policies are threatened.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/#30864598
Also-- for the sake of argument-- wouldn't the "average American" Schultz heralds be more concerned about GITMO prisoners in their community or decentralizing the Ag Dept? What would his all knowing "majority" oppose on a ballot? Don't be surprised if he finds someway to justify his opposition to the "majority" when his policies are threatened.