PDA

View Full Version : Mitch Daniels - Future of the GOP?




axiomata
05-16-2009, 04:14 PM
http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/14/obama-republican-party-baby-boomer-opinions-columnists-mitch-daniels.html

Posted to gauge LF's thoughts about this guy.


The Future Of The GOP
Peter Robinson, 05.15.09, 12:01 AM ET

This past Saturday, Mitch Daniels, the Republican governor of Indiana, delivered a commencement address at Butler University. Unlike nearly every other commencement address you'll read about this spring, Daniels' speech was good--witty, profound, pointed, moving.

(The first part of the commencement address can be found here; the second, here.)

It was so good, it proved hope remains for the GOP.

Daniels began by contrasting the students in his audience with members of his own generation, the baby boomers. "You have taken the first savvy step on the road to distinction, which is to follow a weak act," he said. "As a group, we [baby boomers] have been self-centered, self-absorbed, self-indulgent and all too often just plain selfish."

Daniels condemned the economic profligacy of the baby boomers in detail. "We have spent more and saved less than any previous Americans," he said.

"Year after year ... we ran up deficits that have multiplied the debt you and your children will be paying off your entire working lives ... [W]e voted ourselves increasing levels of Social Security pensions and Medicare health benefits, but never summoned the political maturity to put those programs on anything resembling a sound actuarial footing."

"In sum," Daniels said, "our parents scrimped and saved to provide us a better living standard than theirs. We borrowed and splurged ... It's been a blast. Good luck cleaning up after us."

Daniels then performed a feat rare among politicians: He talked about social issues without sounding either apologetic or preachy.

"Our parents," he said, "formed families and kept them intact, even through difficulty, 'for the sake of the kids.' To us [baby boomers], parental happiness came first. We often divorced at the first unpleasantness, and increasingly just gave birth to children without the nuisance of marriage. 'Commitment' cramps one's style, don't you know? Total bummer."

"Please, be judgmental," Daniels continued. (In the text the governor's press office released, those italics are his.) "As free people, we agree to tolerate any conduct that does no harm to others, but we should not be coerced into condoning it. Selfishness and irresponsibility in business, personal finances or in family life are deserving of your disapproval. Go ahead and stigmatize them."

Be judgmental? Stigmatize bad behavior? An elected official said that? He did indeed. And the audience gave him a standing ovation.

Which brings us to the GOP.

Republicans in Washington may have adopted a hopeless, frozen crouch, but out in the states, plenty of Republican governors are displaying self-confidence. Instead of shrinking from the message of limited government and personal responsibility, they're proclaiming it. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota. Haley Barbour of Mississippi. John Hoeven of North Dakota. Jon Huntsman of Utah. Rick Perry of Texas. Mark Sanford of South Carolina. Sarah Palin of Alaska.

And Mitch Daniels of Indiana.

In 2005, his first year in office, Daniels turned out Indiana's first balanced budget in eight years, transforming the $600 million deficit he had inherited into a $370 million surplus. In 2007, he enacted a health care plan that extended coverage to more than 130,000 uninsured Indianans, giving them health care savings accounts. And in 2008, Daniels signed into law a tax reform that capped property taxes at 1% of assessed value for homes, 2% for rental properties and 3% for businesses, giving Indiana among the lowest property tax rates in the nation. Although the governor partially offset this measure by raising the sales tax from 6% to 7%, this year alone, Hoosiers will receive a net tax cut of several hundred million dollars.

Daniels has about him none of the star quality of President Obama. He speaks with the flat tones of the Midwest. He is physically unprepossessing. He looks earnest.

But if you want to see a politician who knows how to connect with voters, go to YouTube, look over a few of Daniels' recent speeches and click on a couple of his campaign ads. Whereas last year Barack Obama carried Indiana by just one point, Mitch Daniels swept to a second term by 18.

"Our current baby-boomer president," Daniels told the students at Butler University, "has written two eloquent, erudite books, both about ... himself."

Who knows? By 2012, the country may be ready for a no-nonsense, straightforward candidate who doesn't hold with self-involvement--or big government.

part 1 of commencement speech:

YouTube - Butler Commencement Part I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsMUXcy_-Os)

max
05-16-2009, 04:42 PM
talk is cheap...lets see Mitch daniels take an ax to the Indiana state budget...

then i'll be impressed

silverhawks
05-16-2009, 04:42 PM
Mitch Daniels on the Issues (http://www.ontheissues.org/Mitch_Daniels.htm)

How is it that someone runs for Governor, yet has almost NOTHING on record regarding his political stances?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_Daniels


Previously he was the Director of the Office of Management and Budget under George W. Bush and also worked for Eli Lilly and Company.

So Bush and Big Pharma...

Athan
05-16-2009, 04:57 PM
It had to be said. (Doesn't include you Ron Paul supporters though)

KCIndy
05-17-2009, 12:40 AM
I live in Indiana, and personally I'm not much of a Mitch Daniels fan.

In a way, he reminds me of ol' GW Bush (Daniels worked in the Bush administration - his campaign slogan, "My Man Mitch!" came from GW Bush calling him that). He can talk like a conservative and make it sound good, but in reality the way he has governed is nowhere close to that.

He literally sold off Indiana's toll road under the name of "privatization" even though it was nothing like a libertarian-style version of privatization. Instead, it was more like a "fire sale" in which the state no longer has any rights to the way the road is run for seventy years. Now a lot more citizens in Indiana flinch and react very negatively whenever anyone brings up the idea of privatizing any government functions.

His administration made a mess of property tax assessments, causing property taxes to rise so drastically that it was costing people their homes. He fixed it - sort of - by rolling back property taxes with the promise of "no new taxes".... and then raising the Indiana state sales tax.

I could go on, but you get my general drift. The guy is hardly a Republican, and definitely NOT in the Ron Paul school of thought.

axiomata
05-17-2009, 01:33 AM
Thanks for the local perspective.

I wasn't familiar with him before, and the article painted him in a positive light, I just wanted to run him through the LF grinder and see what was left.