Poll: Most Annoying Neo-con Personality?

[paulaholic]

I vote Ben.

[Tin_Foil_Hat]

I voted other.....MARK LEVIN...I can't stand that weeny.

[1000-points-of-fright]

Tie between Mark Levin and Michael Savage.

[derdy]

Why isn't there an "all of the above"?

[Blowback]

That was a really really tough pick.

[NPursuit357]

Hannity easily wins. He's the dumbest of the bunch and just spews the same regurjitated crap.

[buffalokid777]

Should have added some more choices,

Mark Levin (My #1 choice)
John Gibson
Michelle Malkin

[Triton]

If Hannity isn't a fake, he is pathologically self-deluded. Rush - I think there's hope for him.

[bbachtung]

"Personality" is a pretty generous description for most of the people on the list.

[they walked in line]

I voted Hannity, but I don't consider any of those people to be neo-cons in the true meaning of the term; rather, they're mostly partisan Republican types who've fallen for the neo-con line concerning foreign policy. A list of actual neo-cons would include names such as Bill and Irving Kristol, Charles Krauthammer, Norman Podhoretz, Michael Ledeen, Richard Perle, David Frum, etc.

[wgadget]

Too bad Medved's not on there...He'd probably come in a close second to Hannity.

[Mordechai Vanunu]

Hannity by far. O'Reilly is 2nd.

[Shellshock1918]

Rush and Sean aren't neo-cons, they are just mentally trapped in the GOP v Dem paradigm.

[Chester Copperpot]

I voted other.....MARK LEVIN...I can't stand that weeny.

Me too.. Ben Ferguson is annoying.. but hes just a little dutch boy,. But that Mark Levin.. geez.. what a fucking annoying voice... makes my skin crawl

[yaz]

Should have added some more choices,

Mark Levin (My #1 choice)
John Gibson
Michelle Malkin

omg michelle malkin would have gotten my vote. ugh. sean hannity 2nd.

[paulitics]

Michelle malkin: she writes books justifying internment camps.

[LibertyOfOne]

Michelle Malkin by a long shot. That woman is a total authoritarian scumbag.

[they walked in line]

Michelle Malkin by a long shot. That woman is a total authoritarian scumbag.

Definitely.
I don't know why VDare bothers to carry her column.

[RevolutionSD]

hannity easily the dumbest AND most arrogant of the bunch.
Glenn Beck to me takes a close second.

[RevolutionSD]

Michelle malkin: she writes books justifying internment camps.

Oh yeah! Malkin is even worse than Hannity! She's ignorant, arrogant, and vile all in one!

[they walked in line]

Oh yeah! Malkin is even worse than Hannity! She's ignorant, arrogant, and vile all in one!

Ha!

If I remember correctly, the subtitle of Malkin's book defending internment camps is... In Defense of Internment.

If nothing else, you can't accuse her of not being forthright!

[CurtisLow]

G. All of the above

[Kregener]

After a massive internal struggle choosing between Hannity, O'Reilly and Limbaugh, I chose Hannity.

Because he is as dumb as a bag of bricks.

[SwordOfShannarah]

Michelle Malkin by a long shot. That woman is a total authoritarian scumbag.

Agreed Agreed Agreed!! She is the worst IMO. Pure fascism. But to be fair I want to see all of them hung for treason.

[CJLauderdale4]

Sean Hannity hands down...

No education, and still claims a desire to educate people...

on what? How to drop out of NYU and have radio fall in your lap???

[fluoridatedbrainsoup]

I voted Ben because he promotes war at the perfect age to enlist. I want his mop top on the front lines.

[TheEvilDetector]

You really sould put the psychopath of psychopaths on the list
Bill Kristol in that poll

[Mesogen]

Ann Coulter

[Mesogen]

You really sould put the psychopath of psychopaths on the list
Bill Kristol in that poll

Ok, you're right. I change my vote.

Bill Kristol is the most irritating and annoying neocon out there.

His slimy smarminess gives him the edge.

[TheEvilDetector]

Ok, you're right. I change my vote.

Bill Kristol is the most irritating and annoying neocon out there.

His slimy smarminess gives him the edge.

He is criminally insane just like Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Libby and Abrams.

Those were/are committing treason against US.

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/24/kristol-stretch-year

According to : http://www.humangenome.org/iraq/reasons.asp

"Chronology:

1992 Paul Wolfowitz Published “Defense Planning Guidance” within DoD suggesting removal of Saddam by force

1996 IASPS Published “Clean Break” paper as part of the “A New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000:” (http://www.iasps.org/strat1.htm) report prepared and signed by Perle, Fairbanks, Feith, Wurmser and 5 other members of IASPS; and was delivered to Israeli Prime Minister by Perle on July 8, 1996.

1996 Wurmser publishes report “Coping with Crumbling States: A Western and Israeli Balance of Power Strategy for the Levant” (http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat2.htm) [same web server as www.iasps.org]

1996 Series of editorials and articles in the Media (by Perle, Wurmser) about the entire region should be under military control in order to make Israel safer and why starting with Saddam is a good idea.

1997 PNAC was founded by Kristol and Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Libby, Abrams.

1997 -1998 PNAC started authoring reports and studies suggesting that removing Saddam is good start for “America” and helps U.S. to secure the Oil in the Middle East and thus dominate the World, etc.

1998 PNAC (Wolfowitz, Perle, Abrams, Rumsfeld, Bolton) started pressuring Clinton government for removal of Saddam.

1999 David Wurmser publishes Book: “Why Removing Saddam Matters to U.S./Israel”

2000 Quiet period due to presidential campaign and elections

2001 (before 9/11) Nearly all of the Regime Change crowd are on the White House payroll under Cheney, within the first 2-3 months of after Bush settles in the White House."

[Zydeco]

Other -- Ben Shapiro.