PDA

View Full Version : Senate-Passed Bill Would Bring Sunlight To Fed: 95 to 1




JP2010
05-08-2009, 01:00 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/08/senate-passed-bill-would_n_199402.html

A last-minute amendment to the bankruptcy reform bill passed in the Senate Wednesday opens the Federal Reserve to congressional scrutiny.

The amendment was pushed by Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, the highest ranking Republican on the finance committee, and quietly breezed through 95 to 1. Grassley said that his measure wasn't aimed at limiting the Fed's independence, but that Congress just wanted to know a little bit about what it's doing. [UPDATE: In response to the justifiably, curious, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) was the lone no vote.]

The proposal is, said Grassley, "an important reform for holding the entities involved in the massive taxpayer-funded economic bailout accountable to the public."

The oversight power would only apply to Fed involvement with a specific private firm, such as its actions to assist J.P. Morgan Chase's purchase of Bear Stearns, provide financing for Bank of America and Citibank, and its various moves related to American International Group.

No similar measure is in the House version of the bill, so conference negotiators will determine whether it makes the final package headed to Obama's desk.

The Federal Reserve has created three opaque companies called Maiden Lane I, Maiden Lane II and Maiden Lane III. The companies are holding toxic assets purchased by the Fed, though there's no way of knowing how those assets are performing, because Congress has no oversight authority.

On Thursday, a coalition of 61 liberal and libertarian organization called for that to change. Liberal groups OMB Watch and Public Citizen joined FreedomWorks and Campaign for Liberty, among others, in drafting a letter published in the Washington Times, pressing the issue of Fed secrecy.

"The Federal Reserve has created and dispersed trillions of dollars in response to our current financial crisis. Americans across the nation, regardless of their opinion on the bailouts, want to know where that money has gone and exactly how much has been spent," it reads.

The movement to bring sunlight into the Fed is splaying in from the political corners, gradually closing in on the center. Sen. Bernie Sanders, a self-described socialist, is pushing the issue, as is Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), a libertarian. Paul's bill now has 134 cosponsors in the House, including, on the right, Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), head of the conservative Republican Study Committee and on the left, Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), former head of the liberal Progressive Caucus. Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.), ranking member of the Financial Services Committee and Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (D-S.D.), a leader of the 'centrist' Blue Dog Democrat coalition. The bill, H.R. 1207, has picked up 79 members since Congress returned from its recent recess.

acptulsa
05-08-2009, 01:07 PM
That must have been the amendment vote. I'm showing the nays as Bunning, Gregg, DeMint and both Inhofe and Coburn. Kennedy, Johnson (SD) and Rockefeller either abstained or were absent.

The bill includes a bunch of things, including mortgage data collection, HUD funding and rural housing loans.

Elwar
05-08-2009, 01:09 PM
For some reason I'm skeptical that this bill is a watered down version with no teeth to country HR 1207 before it can pick up steam...

So that they can say..."well, we already passed that in the Senate, there's no need for it now"

bigronaldo
05-08-2009, 01:12 PM
Excellent! Great to see the liberals on that site backing our bill. If only we could convince their elected officials to get on board, as well.

Elwar
05-08-2009, 01:13 PM
Looking closer, this doesn't sound too encouraging:

"Except as provided under paragraph (4), an officer or employee of the Government Accountability Office may not provide to any person outside the Government Accountability Office any document or name described under subparagraph (B) if that document or name is maintained as confidential by the Board, the Federal Open Market Committee, the Federal Advisory Council, or any Federal reserve bank."

So...if the Federal Reserve doesn't want anyone outside of the GAO to see something, all they need to do is mark something confidential.

Elwar
05-08-2009, 01:21 PM
"Except as provided under paragraph (4), an officer or employee of the Government Accountability Office may not provide to any person outside the Government Accountability Office any document or name described under subparagraph (B) if that document or name is maintained as confidential by the Board, the Federal Open Market Committee, the Federal Advisory Council, or any Federal reserve bank."

any document relating to--


transactions for or with a foreign central bank, government of a foreign country, or nonprivate international financing organization;

deliberations, decisions, or actions on monetary policy matters, including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, and open market operations; or

the name of any foreign central bank, government of a foreign country, or non-private international financing organization associated with a transaction described under clause (i)(I).



But...down lower it does say that this section shall not:
authorize an officer or employee of an agency to withhold information from any committee or subcommittee of jurisdiction of Congress, or any member of such committee or subcommittee; or
limit any disclosure by the Government Accountability Office to any committee or subcommittee of jurisdiction of Congress, or any member of such committee or subcommittee.

So, at least people in Congress can see what's going on.

http://dsws-was-here.blogspot.com/2009/05/should-we-support-senate-amendment-1021.html