60 min MSM Leaks out true message of Freedom

[bossman068410]

60 min MSM Leaks out true message of Freedom

YouTube - True News 37: Mainstream Anarchism!?! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZNG-53P8Zg)

Watch the whole thing It's short and sweet :)

[Young Paleocon]

lawlz, Stef just loses his shit

[bossman068410]

Just like contracts passed between nations.
just a roll of toilet paper being passed from ass hole to ass hole.

[Andrew-Austin]

Your political "representative" made a decision on your behalf without your consent, you damn anarchist. What were they supposed to do, ask for your opinion, or just say their not acting on your behalf at all? Thats crazy talk, the whole fabric of our society would collapse.

[bossman068410]

Your political "representative" made a decision on your behalf without your consent, you damn anarchist. What were they supposed to do, ask for your opinion, or just say their not acting on your behalf at all? Thats crazy talk, the whole fabric of our society would collapse.

So your rights come from the Government?

[JaylieWoW]

I <3 him!! :D

[ravedown]

its a bit of a stretch to think that even if the lawsuit is successful and the people of Ecuador win, that it will create anything close to a precedent for litigation here in the U.S. or Canada.

[bossman068410]

its a bit of a stretch to think that even if the lawsuit is successful and the people of Ecuador win, that it will create anything close to a precedent for litigation here in the U.S. or Canada.

Think about it..
That lawer is representing the people of the land.
a seperate representation of Government within a government.

[silverhawks]

I just dropped my Cheerios.

:eek:

[silverhawks]

its a bit of a stretch to think that even if the lawsuit is successful and the people of Ecuador win, that it will create anything close to a precedent for litigation here in the U.S. or Canada.

Remember that the Founding Fathers saw the People and the Government as separate, distinct entities.

The Constitution is just a piece of paper, the original contract between the American People (as represented at the time by the Founding Fathers) and the Government - which defines and precisely limits the terms to which they can represent us. It's the only one "we the people" actually put our name to.

According to the Founders themselves we can void and redefine the terms of the contract if the government that arose after them becomes tyrannical, in order to safeguard our future security. We can do this as necessary, as long as there is a good reason to do so, in order to seek an ever more perfect union...

Our rights as listed in the BoR are integral and unalienable, and the document itself does not grant us the rights; we gain them at the moment of our creation. If anything, the BoR is a reminder of self-evident truths, which tells the Feds to get their scheming little hands off, and to not even try to oppress the integral rights of the American people - or else. Think of the BoR as a set of clauses to the contract, that if broken, void the entire thing.

That also means we can void any unjust law passed under such government, because "We The People" did not put our names to any of it. Only the government did.

I think that's what he's getting at, anyway.

[RevolutionSD]

This is fantastic and proves the whole point about anarcho-capitalism.

Thanks for posting!

[silverhawks]

Your political "representative" made a decision on your behalf without your consent, you damn anarchist. What were they supposed to do, ask for your opinion, or just say their not acting on your behalf at all? Thats crazy talk, the whole fabric of our society would collapse.

That's not what he's saying.

"We the People" precisely defined the terms under which government could represent us in the Constitution. Those are the terms under which we chose to give consent to be governed.

Any document after that is paper written by government, that must adhere to the terms of the original contract in order to be binding.

If a law falls within the guidelines set by those terms; fine, its legal and binding.

If it falls outside of those terms, then no, its really not binding on us; and we the people cannot be held accountable to it. At that point, we have the right and duty to void the first contract, fire our representatives, and add to it to draw up a new, improved contract with a new, improved government, one that will hopefully stick to their terms better than the last.

That's not anarchy. That's limited government.