Uncle Emanuel Watkins
04-07-2009, 11:40 AM
When tyranny has no money, it counterfeits it. When it loses control over an economy, it creates a new one. Tyranny doesn't earn its money, it takes it.
When we talk of an economy, we include tyranny. Yet tyranny rarely seriously loses as the people do because losing a political campaign is more like losing a mere game to them. In other words, losing tyrannies prosper even during defeat. On the other hand, the people never win anything even in a winning campaign; rather, the people only win in the types of political movements that exist outside of campaigns. These movements reestablish their Civil-Purpose over legal-precedence.
While campaigns are all about the legal precedence involved with the filthy business of pimping and whoring, or the exploitation that tyranny exercizes against the best interests of the people, American movements are about returning people to their ideal Civil-Purpose.
While tyranny has power, the American people have been given a greater power. That narrow power was crafted by our Founding-Fathers and then given to us as our right to divorce tyranny when needed so that we can remarry ourselves to a more perfect government.
Ironically, this has made America a symbolic whore in the eyes of much of the world.
The people's power has been made impotent recently by fallacies spread by sophist-like neoamericans. Their claims are always similar that the people have more than the narrow power they inherited and that they should exercize it in order to gain more of it than they need.
Yet in American political theory, the people shouldn't desire to hold power but to only utilize it over themselves in such a way that they can live freely under it. In other words, tyranny should be utilized as a necessary evil with its sole purpose being to serve the people.
Our Founding-Fathers acheived this idea in their crafting of both The Declaration of Independence, our divorce decree from tyranny, and in The Constitution, our marriage decree to a more perfect government, when they acted not as the gentlemen they truly were; but, acted instead on the behalf of the lowly people. Legally speaking, one cannot interpret a new marriage decree to a more perfect government without first interpreting why such is justified in the prior divorce decree.
So, the American system was set up not by rulers but by unofficial people. This trick established the people's Civil-Purpose above all legal-precedence whether that be the past traditions, the long held rituals which persecuted us, or the future occurences, any new schemes which might be crafted by tyranny to endanger out posteriety.
When we talk of an economy, we include tyranny. Yet tyranny rarely seriously loses as the people do because losing a political campaign is more like losing a mere game to them. In other words, losing tyrannies prosper even during defeat. On the other hand, the people never win anything even in a winning campaign; rather, the people only win in the types of political movements that exist outside of campaigns. These movements reestablish their Civil-Purpose over legal-precedence.
While campaigns are all about the legal precedence involved with the filthy business of pimping and whoring, or the exploitation that tyranny exercizes against the best interests of the people, American movements are about returning people to their ideal Civil-Purpose.
While tyranny has power, the American people have been given a greater power. That narrow power was crafted by our Founding-Fathers and then given to us as our right to divorce tyranny when needed so that we can remarry ourselves to a more perfect government.
Ironically, this has made America a symbolic whore in the eyes of much of the world.
The people's power has been made impotent recently by fallacies spread by sophist-like neoamericans. Their claims are always similar that the people have more than the narrow power they inherited and that they should exercize it in order to gain more of it than they need.
Yet in American political theory, the people shouldn't desire to hold power but to only utilize it over themselves in such a way that they can live freely under it. In other words, tyranny should be utilized as a necessary evil with its sole purpose being to serve the people.
Our Founding-Fathers acheived this idea in their crafting of both The Declaration of Independence, our divorce decree from tyranny, and in The Constitution, our marriage decree to a more perfect government, when they acted not as the gentlemen they truly were; but, acted instead on the behalf of the lowly people. Legally speaking, one cannot interpret a new marriage decree to a more perfect government without first interpreting why such is justified in the prior divorce decree.
So, the American system was set up not by rulers but by unofficial people. This trick established the people's Civil-Purpose above all legal-precedence whether that be the past traditions, the long held rituals which persecuted us, or the future occurences, any new schemes which might be crafted by tyranny to endanger out posteriety.