And in other News

[pcosmar]

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=axEnb_LXw5yc&refer=home


April 3 (Bloomberg) -- Global leaders took their biggest steps yet toward a new world order that’s less U.S.-centric with a more heavily regulated financial industry and a greater role for international institutions and emerging markets.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5g3nKFaPdy-7cfukcqtB6xgjVWGww

Experts are digesting the G20's "historic" trillion-dollar bid to pull the world out of recession after Gordon Brown hailed the creation of a "new world order".

http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=New+world+order

Does anyone else see this a significant? :confused:

[dgr]

They have al ready changed the name it is now TRANS NATIONAL, NOT ONE WORLD ORDER

[pcosmar]

They have al ready changed the name it is now TRANS NATIONAL, NOT ONE WORLD ORDER

A skunk by any other name.
Stinks the same.

[TheConstitutionLives]

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=axEnb_LXw5yc&refer=home


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5g3nKFaPdy-7cfukcqtB6xgjVWGww


http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=New+world+order

Does anyone else see this a significant? :confused:


- Is this all you talk about? No one says there isn't a NWO agenda. The problem is there's a thousand different answers for what IT is.

[pcosmar]

- Is this all you talk about? No one says there isn't a NWO agenda. The problem is there's a thousand different answers for what IT is.

So you don't think that a One World Government is significant? Or is your purpose to promote it?:confused:

[TheConstitutionLives]

So you don't think that a One World Government is significant? Or is your purpose to promote it?:confused:

- One government ruling the planet is inevitable whether theres an agenda pushing it or not. The world is getting smaller and smaller with population increases and advancement of technology, particularly world impacting weaponry. No, I'm not promoting it but it's the natural direction.

[JK/SEA]

- One government ruling the planet is inevitable whether theres an agenda pushing it or not. The world is getting smaller and smaller with population increases and advancement of technology, particularly world impacting weaponry. No, I'm not promoting it but it's the natural direction.


Oh i don't know about that. We have 50 states in this country, each with its own form of local government, and it seems to be working relativly well. Plus the fact i'm not going to let the U.S. Constitution be shredded. Fact.

[pcosmar]

- One government ruling the planet is inevitable whether theres an agenda pushing it or not. The world is getting smaller and smaller with population increases and advancement of technology, particularly world impacting weaponry. No, I'm not promoting it but it's the natural direction.

No
It is not a natural direction.
It is a highly engineered direction. It has been the goal and purpose of The Fabian Society for nearly a hundred years.It has been the purpose of aristocratic families since the American and French revolutions.

It was warned of.2000 years ago. Regardless of your faith or lack thereof, The warnings are there.

I will resist it, I believe it is contrary to freedom and contrary to nature.

[TheConstitutionLives]

Oh i don't know about that. We have 50 states in this country, each with its own form of local government, and it seems to be working relativly well. Plus the fact i'm not going to let the U.S. Constitution be shredded. Fact.


- But most people are ignorant and want big government. Our 50 states have less and less sovereignty the older this country gets. If what I said is not true then wouldn't those 50 states be gaining sovereignty instead of losing it? Governments growing gradually is the natural order of governments. I'm not saying to not resist it. We must resist it but it IS the natural progression of governments. They grow so big and/or corrupt that they eventually implode. A government's lifespan consist of growing, not shrinking.

[pcosmar]

- But most people are ignorant and want big government. Our 50 states have less and less sovereignty the older this country gets. If what I said is not true then wouldn't those 50 states be gaining sovereignty instead of losing it? Governments growing gradually is the natural order of governments. I'm not saying to not resist it. We must resist it but it IS the natural progression of governments. They grow so big and/or corrupt that they eventually implode. A government's lifespan consist of growing, not shrinking.

No again.
People have been taught big Government.
Nature tends to be family or tribal, Local government.
It was before the 1900s. that is about he same time the Socialists began infecting our country.
This has been taught and engineered.

[TheConstitutionLives]

Nature tends to be family or tribal, Local government.


- You're proving my point. If 1 million people magically appeared on an island at the same time with zero outside influence they would naturally gravitate into groups and eventually government(s). They don't stay to themselves. They form groups and upon these groups rules are set and governments are born. This is a natural progression.

[Cowlesy]

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=axEnb_LXw5yc&refer=home


http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5g3nKFaPdy-7cfukcqtB6xgjVWGww


http://news.google.com/news?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=New+world+order

Does anyone else see this a significant? :confused:

Thanks for the post Brother --- I had not read this articles yet.

[donnay]

- You're proving my point. If 1 million people magically appeared on an island at the same time with zero outside influence they would naturally gravitate into groups and eventually government(s). They don't stay to themselves. They form groups and upon these groups rules are set and governments are born. This is a natural progression.

Wow--that hurt my head. :eek:

[silverhawks]

- One government ruling the planet is inevitable whether theres an agenda pushing it or not. The world is getting smaller and smaller with population increases and advancement of technology, particularly world impacting weaponry. No, I'm not promoting it but it's the natural direction.

The only world government that can conceivably exist in the world of today is a totalitarian superstate. We cannot agree within the borders of our own countries; we still have social differences within every nation; we still have distrust and tension with our neighbours.

Every region on Earth has different concerns, wholly incompatible with the laws and edicts of other nations - there is no one size fits all law for Earth.

To accelerate and force this process is pure INSANITY, and arrogance of the worst kind, and will only lead to the oppression and death of millions, perhaps billions. These...people...are megalomaniacs, drunk on power. The solace we have is that tyranny ALWAYS falls, when people realise they outnumber the government.

Take a good look at the process of European Union integration, an undemocratic forced process where the people have all but lost the sovereignty of their nations as their politicians have handed them over as member states - look at the economic destruction and social rifts it has opened up across Europe. Already economists are predicting it will fall within two decades, taking Europe with it: now imagine that across the whole world.

The only way we will ever have a world government is through a co-operation of free nations, not forced unity and integration for the purposes of control.

And finally...does this man not look like every single dictator and madman throughout history?

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/media/ALeqM5g2F9gX5c6JVVtYQpOwtIXE5zPVDA

These people wear their corruption on their faces.