PDA

View Full Version : London Protesters Threaten Bankers, Evoke Executions




Rael
03-27-2009, 11:43 AM
London Protesters Threaten Bankers, Evoke Executions (Update2)
Share | Email | Print | A A A

By Thomas Penny and Brian Lysaght

March 27 (Bloomberg) -- Mark Barrett, a professional tour guide, spent last Saturday painting Barack Obama’s election catchphrase “yes we can” on a banner that protesters will carry as they try to occupy London’s financial district April 1.

Barrett is helping organize a protest outside the Bank of England, one of several called to express anger against banks and bankers and mark the arrival in London of leaders of the Group of 20 nations -- including Obama, now president.

“We want a very English revolution,” he says from a café near his home in north London. “The first English revolution in 1649 was about winning sovereignty for parliament over the king.” Now, protesters are campaigning for sovereignty for everyone.

All police leave has been canceled to increase security and financial workers have been told to wear casual clothes amid warnings that protests could turn violent.

“There are a lot of hacked-off people,” said Mike Bowron, commander of the City of London Police. “There’s potential for disruption and certain individual groups see violence as their raison d’etre.”

The global economic slump has raised unemployment to more than 2 million in the U.K., with more people joining jobless rolls last month than at any time since 1971. The economy shrank 1.6 percent in the fourth quarter, the most since 1980, and there is growing anger at the more than 40 billion pounds ($58 billion) the government has injected into ailing banks while insuring 585 billion pounds more in risky assets.

Beheading Charles I

Class War, an anarchist newspaper, has produced a special edition to promote the protest with an image of former Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc CEO Fred Goodwin, whose house was vandalized this week, on a guillotine under the headline “Ready to Riot.” Another shows people dancing around a fire with the slogan “How to keep warm in the credit crunch -- Burn a Banker!” Public anger erupted at Goodwin’s 703,000 pounds annual pension after RBS was bailed out by the government.

The English Revolution culminated with the beheading of Charles I in 1649, ending the so-called divine right of kings in England. Today’s protesters say they draw inspiration from 17th century radicalism.

Four marches will converge on the Bank of England at midday on April 1 for a protest the organizers call “Financial Fools Day.” At the same time, there are plans for a blockade of the European Climate Exchange, in Bishopsgate, to protest against the market in carbon emissions.

Clog Up the Roads

“There’s an avowed intention on their behalf on the 1st of April to stop the City either by just clogging up the roads and preventing people getting into work or, if they’re allowed to, getting into some of those institutions,” said Commander Bob Broadhurst of the Metropolitan Police, who is in charge of the policing operation.

“What we’re seeing is unprecedented planning amongst protest groups,” he told reporters on March 21. “There are some clever, innovative people with lots of ideas.”

Police, who are detailed to provide security for the world leaders attending the April 2 G20 summit at the Excel Conference Centre in east London, will also have to deal with a labor union-organized protest march to Hyde Park tomorrow, demonstrations at the conference center itself and an anti-war march on the U.S. Embassy.

Around 10,500 officers will be available during the week and policing costs will be around 7.2 million pounds, Broadhurst said.

Tighter Security

City of London authorities are advising businesses to beef up security and protect building entrances and loading bays to thwart protesters who may attempt to break into buildings. The City district has around 300,000 workers, mostly in financial services, and contains JP Morgan Chase & Co.’s and Merrill Lynch & Co.’s European headquarters as well as large buildings of RBS and Deutsche Bank AG.

The organizers of the demonstrations in the financial district, who are expecting “several thousand” people to turn up, say they want them to be non-violent protests.

“We are organizing a peaceful creative demonstration with music, a carnival, parades and theater,” Barrett said. “I’ll be amazed if some individuals don’t act in ways considered to be violent, but it’s not something organizers are encouraging.”

Stewards will tell protesters to sit down if violence breaks out to show that it is only a minority involved, Barrett said. “We see the state and the finance system as being the violent part of this in the way that economic policy affects people around the world, dislocates them from the land and damages the environment,” he said.

Climate Exchange

The group planning to protest at the Climate Exchange say they will arrive outside its building at 62 Bishopsgate on April 1, pitch tents, string up bunting and set up a “climate camp,” which they expect to block the road. They hope to stay for 24 hours and there will be workshops, games and a farmers market, spokeswoman Mel Evans said.

“We want a space to discuss these issues and to take action to see some changes being made for the benefit of people across the world, not just a couple of bankers,” Evans said.

Sara Stahl, the exchange’s marketing manager, said it was company policy not to comment on the protests.

Spoof FT

A group of protesters have produced a spoof edition of the Financial Times newspaper, which was handed out at railway stations today. It imagines the headlines in 2020 and how the events of the G20 summit will be viewed in the future.

Chris Knight, a professor of anthropology at the University of East London, was suspended from his job yesterday after he told the British Broadcasting Corp. that “we’re going to be hanging a lot of people from lampposts” on April 1 “and I can only say let’s hope they are just effigies.”

Knight was suspended “pending investigation,” the university said. Knight didn’t immediately respond to an e-mail message.

The Bank of England, founded in 1694, has been the target of demonstrators before, according to the Bank’s Web site. In 1780 the bank, known as the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street, was provided with a military guard after it was threatened by a mob during anti-government riots. This was only discontinued in 1973.

There is also a history of protest at the Excel Centre, where the G20 leaders will meet, and campaigners believe it was chosen in place of the palaces and historic buildings of central London because it is easier to protect.

“It’s privately owned land and it’s very, very easy to close off so it’s easy to impose the sort of security which you can’t in central London,” said Kaye Stearman, of the Campaign Against the Arms Trade, which opposes the arms fairs held at the center. “It’s very difficult to protest.”

Some campaigners are traveling from mainland Europe for the demonstrations and, after London, plan to head for Strasbourg, France, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization conference. “It’s the beginning of the season,” Barrett said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Thomas Penny in London at tpenny@bloomberg.net; To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Lysaght in London at blysaght@bloomberg.net.

Kludge
03-27-2009, 11:49 AM
Mark Barrett, a professional tour guide, spent last Saturday painting Barack Obama’s election catchphrase “yes we can” on a banner that protesters will carry as they try to occupy London’s financial district April 1.

I've been rendered speechless. I've been touching my face in an awkward pattern for the past three minutes trying to form a coherent thought.

danberkeley
03-27-2009, 11:52 AM
Dont forget that, historically, the "anarchist" have been "anracho-communists" or "anarcho-socialists".

Valli6
03-27-2009, 11:59 AM
Hmm. Obama just had a meeting with a bunch of bank CEOs (around noon, Friday). When they came out, a large group of them were being interviewed live, acting all smiley, friendly, and caring. I guess it was a little PR, so we won't be inclined to kill them too.

ItsTime
03-27-2009, 12:01 PM
Why shouldnt we be mad at the both the bankers and the lawmakers?

Nationwide
03-27-2009, 12:17 PM
Absolutely. When are people here in the US gonna realize it's the bankers?
They control our money (thru the FED), our Congress, our Judges.
And to top it all off, every April 15th we pay the interest on their loans with a 1/4 of our pay? Nosiree, not this year: http://www.losthorizons.com/tax/Warriors.htm

Remember, it's not the government itself that oppresses us. It's the corrupt, banker-controlled people within it that can, and will, be brought to justice.
http://news.indytruth.org/archive/2008/0623-const.html

Cowlesy
03-27-2009, 12:28 PM
I've been rendered speechless. I've been touching my face in an awkward pattern for the past three minutes trying to form a coherent thought.

Their level of misguidedness is extremely disturbing.

Johnnybags
03-27-2009, 12:52 PM
Not necessarily with violence but its obvious, the international bankers have spent every last dime in the UK, and we are close here. Fed bought some more bonds today I heard. Direct theft.

Cowlesy
03-27-2009, 12:53 PM
Not necessarily with violence but its obvious, the international bankers have spent every last dime in the UK, and we are close here. Fed bought some more bonds today I heard. Direct theft.

They want a socialist revolution.

Johnnybags
03-27-2009, 12:57 PM
They want a socialist revolution.

They already are socialists, the money is gone and government prints it for whatever it sees fit. By the time they actually get what they want or think they did, they'll actually get nothing because the inflation from printing money will just take it back. They'll figure it out eventually.

moostraks
03-27-2009, 01:01 PM
"Judge Gary thinks the unrest referred to to be of so serious a nature that it threatens revolution. No honest student doubts the seriousness of the unrest, nor does he doubt that there is a real cause for it. The cause is supplied by the Money Trust, and its allied interests, but in the face of its supreme importance we, here in this House, are kept from giving the matter the proper consideration because of petty politics and personalities.

I share Judge Gary's views that there is "unrest." We all know that there is unrest. But those of us who have had the time and desire to study the actual conditions and search for a remedy, know that a revolution is not the remedy We do not believe in violence, and while there may at times be an excuse for violence, it is never justified. There are no conditions now that should lead to violence, but there are conditions that should enlist a more serious consideration of this Money Trust problem, and the economic problems, than the House .g.ves to them. The failure of the Members to take a sufficiently statesmanlike view of the existing conditions even furnish the cause for the very thing that Judge Gary fears. It was a similar indifference that caused the French Revolution, and even a revolution would be better than decay."

Charles August Lindbergh from his " arguments made before the Rules Committee for the purpose of securing the appointment of a special committee to investigate the Money Trust." this was regarding the aldrich plan predecessor to the federal reserve.


Interesting how history repeats itself, eh???

Johnnybags
03-27-2009, 01:06 PM
"Judge Gary thinks the unrest referred to to be of so serious a nature that it threatens revolution. No honest student doubts the seriousness of the unrest, nor does he doubt that there is a real cause for it. The cause is supplied by the Money Trust, and its allied interests, but in the face of its supreme importance we, here in this House, are kept from giving the matter the proper consideration because of petty politics and personalities.

I share Judge Gary's views that there is "unrest." We all know that there is unrest. But those of us who have had the time and desire to study the actual conditions and search for a remedy, know that a revolution is not the remedy We do not believe in violence, and while there may at times be an excuse for violence, it is never justified. There are no conditions now that should lead to violence, but there are conditions that should enlist a more serious consideration of this Money Trust problem, and the economic problems, than the House .g.ves to them. The failure of the Members to take a sufficiently statesmanlike view of the existing conditions even furnish the cause for the very thing that Judge Gary fears. It was a similar indifference that caused the French Revolution, and even a revolution would be better than decay."

Charles August Lindbergh from his " arguments made before the Rules Committee for the purpose of securing the appointment of a special committee to investigate the Money Trust." this was regarding the aldrich plan predecessor to the federal reserve.


Interesting how history repeats itself, eh???

always ultimately devalues it for cronyism. Is human nature that cannot be tamed.