PDA

View Full Version : Wow! 9th Circuit Court actually upholds the law!!!




Chosen
03-11-2009, 09:27 AM
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2009/03/09/daily34.html



Ninth Circuit upholds Arizona employer sanctions law
Phoenix Business Journal - by Mike Sunnucks

Other Matching Articles for
"illegal immigration"

* IFCO Systems workers charged in immigration case [01/23/2009]
* Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Obama, Holder won't dissuade immigration raids [12/18/2008]
* Homeland Security pick gains support from immigration groups [12/12/2008]
* > More Search Results

A federal appeals court backed up an Arizona law to punish employers that hire illegal immigrants.

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed lower court rulings that kept the Legal Arizona Workers Act in place. Business groups and Hispanic activists had challenged the law in court saying it lacks due process provisions and puts the state and county prosecutors in the federal role of enforcing immigration laws.

The sanctions law allows county prosecutors...CONT

The view by the court, which is the correct one, is contrary to the views held by open borders advocates and members of ethnic nationalist socialist hate groups. The entirety of the democratic party is opposed to employer sanctions. The neocons are opposed to employer sanctions.

noxagol
03-11-2009, 09:59 AM
Stop those 'evil' employers who are not higher government approved workers at government approved wages!

Chosen
03-11-2009, 10:02 AM
Stop those 'evil' employers who are not higher government approved workers at government approved wages!
How can you make a statement like that and have a Rothbard quote in your signature? Libertarians are for workplace enforcement and no welfare.

Idiot.

TonySutton
03-11-2009, 10:06 AM
I think he was being sarcastic

Chosen
03-11-2009, 10:08 AM
I think he was being sarcastic
Hard to tell given the amount of lower intellectual tier anarchists and closet authoritarian utopians who have moved onto the board.

If so, I apologize.

noxagol
03-11-2009, 10:32 AM
Yes, that was sarcasm. A business should be allowed to hire anyone they want, for any reason they want, for any compensation they want. Of course, the would be employee would have to accept the terms before employment.

And real libertarians are not for workplace enforcement, they are against government intervention, which is what immigration laws are.

angelatc
03-11-2009, 10:34 AM
I agree with Ron Paul. Do away with entitlements before you open the borders.

Chosen
03-11-2009, 10:35 AM
Yes, that was sarcasm. A business should be allowed to hire anyone they want, for any reason they want, for any compensation they want.
Apologies then for missing the "sarcasm" that seems to be misdirected and indicates that my initial perception of your comment as anti-law was correct.

Chosen
03-11-2009, 10:36 AM
I agree with Ron Paul. Do away with entitlements before you open the borders.
RON PAUL DOES NOT WANT TO OPEN THE BORDERS, WHAT PART OF HIS SAYING CLOSE THE BORDER AND BUILD A WALL DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?

With all due respect, do you just think that by projecting your own beliefs on someone will make it so?

Chosen
03-18-2009, 10:12 AM
RON PAUL DOES NOT WANT TO OPEN THE BORDERS, WHAT PART OF HIS SAYING CLOSE THE BORDER AND BUILD A WALL DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?

With all due respect, do you just think that by projecting your own beliefs on someone will make it so?
Why is it that some of the Ron Paul supporters continually try and project their own ideas onto him? He has clearly stated what he stands for-the rule of law-not this emma goldman (intentionally uncapitolized) anarchist fantasy some seem to attribute to him...

noxagol
03-18-2009, 12:40 PM
He may not be for open borders, but he does identify the correct problem with immigration, and that is the welfare state. If we did not have a welfare state, then immigration would not be nearly as bad as it is now. The people coming here would have to work for what they get instead of being able to freeload on the rest of us, same as anyone else. He also correctly identifies immigration as a scapegoat for poor economic times.