PDA

View Full Version : LOL: Ron Paulers Sign on MichelleMalkin.com




angelatc
03-10-2009, 06:10 PM
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/10/going-galt-continued/

Scroll down......

:)

He Who Pawns
03-10-2009, 06:17 PM
How dare Malkin invoke libertarian ideas, when she's the biggest neocon, pro-Bush hack out there.

angelatc
03-10-2009, 06:56 PM
How dare Malkin invoke libertarian ideas, when she's the biggest neocon, pro-Bush hack out there.

No she wasn't. She's a war monger for sure, but a fiscal conservative. She berated Bush on his spending habits incessantly.

But she blasted Ron Paul, so I thought it was rather amusing to see a Revolution sign up on her site.

The revolution is alive!

I will say that it chaps my backside a bit to see people in tri-corner hats getting lauded now, but laughed at when "we" were doing it.

Watching the vid - just saw a www.campaignforliberty.com sign flash by too.

He Who Pawns
03-10-2009, 07:23 PM
No she wasn't. She's a war monger for sure, but a fiscal conservative. She berated Bush on his spending habits incessantly.

No she did not. She's a total fraud who bought in completely 100% to the neocon lies, and helped spread them. She barely paid lip service to those fiscal conservative issues. Did she call Bush a "socialist" when he passed prescription drugs or no child left behind?? NO. Don't fall for her fake libertarianism and phony fiscal conservatism now. She had eight years under Bush to prove herself, and she FAILED.

She's a fraud.

RonPaulFanInGA
03-10-2009, 07:26 PM
How dare Malkin invoke libertarian ideas, when she's the biggest neocon, pro-Bush hack out there.

Neocon war monger? Yes.

Pro-Bush hack? No. Malkin spoke out hard against Bush many times; mainly on illegal immigration and spending.

He Who Pawns
03-10-2009, 07:31 PM
Neocon war monger? Yes.

Pro-Bush hack? No. Malkin spoke out hard against Bush many times; mainly on illegal immigration and spending.

I don't care. Any person with any common sense at all would speak out against illegal aliens. Again, show me one instance of her calling Bush a socialist when he passed prescription drugs or no child left behind?? She calls Obama a socialist every day, so let's see some evidence of your claim that she attacked Bush on his spending and socialism, or the fact that he was driving us trillions into debt. Malkin was too busy waving the flag, promoting the unpatriot act, and running cover for the fact that bush was fighting two wars on borrowed chinese money.

angelatc
03-10-2009, 07:51 PM
No she did not. She's a total fraud who bought in completely 100% to the neocon lies, and helped spread them. She barely paid lip service to those fiscal conservative issues. Did she call Bush a "socialist" when he passed prescription drugs or no child left behind??

Uh, she actually did.


April 2005: MAKING FISCAL CONSERVATIVES CRINGE
By Michelle Malkin • April 28, 2005 11:38 PM

From tonight’s Bush press conference, regarding the dreadful No Child Left Behind Act: http://michellemalkin.com/2005/04/28/making-fiscal-conservatives-cringe/


CREEPING SOCIALISM IN HEALTH INSURANCE
By Michelle Malkin • October 23, 2004 06:41 AM

Policymakers on both sides of the aisle are buzzing about the latest idea to expand the federal government’s role in health insurance (New York Times, “Momentum Builds for U.S. Role in Paying Highest Health Costs“).
Evidently, there is an emerging consensus among Beltway health policymakers that it’s not enough that the feds provide or subsidize health [...] http://michellemalkin.com/2004/10/23/creeping-socialism-in-health-insurance/


There's plenty of reasons to hate her, but her support of Bush's spending isn't one of them.

UtahApocalypse
03-10-2009, 07:54 PM
No she did not. She's a total fraud who bought in completely 100% to the neocon lies, and helped spread them. She barely paid lip service to those fiscal conservative issues. Did she call Bush a "socialist" when he passed prescription drugs or no child left behind?? NO. Don't fall for her fake libertarianism and phony fiscal conservatism now. She had eight years under Bush to prove herself, and she FAILED.

She's a fraud.

Heaven forbid anyone wake up and change there minds!!! I mean why the hell would we want any new people to join into the revolution??

He Who Pawns
03-10-2009, 08:00 PM
Heaven forbid anyone wake up and change there minds!!! I mean why the hell would we want any new people to join into the revolution??

I welcome people who genuinely change their minds. I have applauded Glen Beck's recent opening of his eyes, because I believe it's genuine. But make no mistake, Malkin is the enemy, and she is a brainwashed fraud who will never truly wake up from the neocon lies she helps to spread. Mark my words on that.

angelatc, if you claim that Malkin blasted Bush as a socialist, please post the evidence here to back those claims up. Links.

slacker921
03-10-2009, 08:04 PM
I just dropped by hotair.com and was shocked to see Atlas Shrugged on the main page.. it links to this article about Catholic hospitals that may shut down (http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/10/yes-we-can).

It is frustrating to see things getting co-opted and repurposed by the neocons. They're building the "fiscal conservative" bandwagon 24/7 and yet you know full well they won't let go of the War on Terror. Have they really changed their minds? Have they "signed on"? ... Bush was running on a "fiscal conservative" platform in 2000 and 2004. McCain called himself a "fiscal conservative" last year (and then voted for the stimulus checks and the TARP bailout).

angelatc
03-10-2009, 08:05 PM
I welcome people who genuinely change their minds. I have applauded Glen Beck's recent opening of his eyes, because I believe it's genuine. But make no mistake, Malkin is the enemy, and she is a brainwashed fraud who will never truly wake up from the neocon lies she helps to spread. Mark my words on that.

angelatc, if you claim that Malkin blasted Bush as a socialist, please post the evidence here to back those claims up. Links.

I put just put two links in my previous post.

It's ok if you don't like her. I don't like her all that much either. But I think that before Obama is all done with is, we will be more alike on foreign policy than we are different.

SHe has a lot more conservatives in her corner than we do. It's sad but true.

angelatc
03-10-2009, 08:06 PM
I just dropped by hotair.com and was shocked to see Atlas Shrugged on the main page.. it links to this article about Catholic hospitals that may shut down (http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/10/yes-we-can).

It is frustrating to see things getting co-opted and repurposed by the neocons. They're building the "fiscal conservative" bandwagon 24/7 and yet you know full well they won't let go of the War on Terror. Have they really changed their minds? Have they "signed on"? ... Bush was running on a "fiscal conservative" platform in 2000 and 2004. McCain called himself a "fiscal conservative" last year (and then voted for the stimulus checks and the TARP bailout).

No they have not changed. THey're all excited about Jindal in 2012. Ugh.

angelatc
03-10-2009, 08:09 PM
Heaven forbid anyone wake up and change there minds!!! I mean why the hell would we want any new people to join into the revolution??

No, she'll never be one of us., and I don't mean to impy that she is. I just like to post comments there about Mark Sanford.

I agree with her on conservative issues, but I think we all know you can't truly be conservative and support the Iraq war. She will never change on that, and neither will I.

He Who Pawns
03-10-2009, 08:17 PM
I put just put two links in my previous post.

It's ok if you don't like her. I don't like her all that much either. But I think that before Obama is all done with is, we will be more alike on foreign policy than we are different.

SHe has a lot more conservatives in her corner than we do. It's sad but true.

Those links were a joke. A two sentence blurb about no child left behind? Like I said, she barely paid lip service to those issues. She's a total fraud and a clueless neocon hack.

angelatc
03-10-2009, 08:20 PM
Those links were a joke. A two sentence blurb about no child left behind? Like I said, she barely paid lip service to those issues. She's a total fraud and a clueless neocon hack.

Whatever.

He Who Pawns
03-10-2009, 08:23 PM
Whatever.

Exactly. So stop praising neocon frauds like Malkin here and all will be well.

johnrocks
03-10-2009, 08:26 PM
I remember articles like this on her site.

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/10/the-spanish-language-panderfest-sprinkled-with-ron-pauls-blame-america-act-we-create-the-chavezes-of-the-world-we-create-the-castros-of-the-world/
I think I'l pass on Malkin. Of course if she says something good that I support that will help the cause then great, the primary is still fresh in my mind though and people like her,Laura Igraham, Hannity and Michael "aluminum" Steele were not exactly fans if you all recall.

angelatc
03-10-2009, 08:27 PM
Exactly. So stop praising neocon frauds like Malkin here and all will be well.

Bite me. I'll say what I choose here, until Josh or Bryan tell me I'm no longer welcome. Might I suggest you figure out the "Ignore" function if you don't like my posts.

angelatc
03-10-2009, 08:29 PM
I remember articles like this on her site.

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/12/10/the-spanish-language-panderfest-sprinkled-with-ron-pauls-blame-america-act-we-create-the-chavezes-of-the-world-we-create-the-castros-of-the-world/
I think I'l pass on Malkin. Of course if she says something good that I support that will help the cause then great, the primary is still fresh in my mind though and people like her,Laura Igraham, Hannity and Michael "aluminum" Steele were not exactly fans if you all recall.

I'll go really slooow for the reading impaired.

The article that you lined to is what made my original post somewhat humorous.

And did you read it? She was mocking every single one of the candidates for not being conservative enough.

Back then, there were hardly any comments on her blog supporting Paul. These days, it runs much higher.

He Who Pawns
03-10-2009, 08:36 PM
Bite me. I'll say what I choose here, until Josh or Bryan tell me I'm no longer welcome. Might I suggest you figure out the "Ignore" function if you don't like my posts.

No, but I did figure out the "report" function.

angelatc
03-10-2009, 08:38 PM
No, but I did figure out the "report" function.

That's nothing to brag about, little man!

I'll use the ignore function then, and this will end with your whimper. Bye!

He Who Pawns
03-10-2009, 08:53 PM
That's nothing to brag about, little man!

I'll use the ignore function then, and this will end with your whimper. Bye!

Haha... have fun.... go kiss up to your "conservative" hero Malkin. :rolleyes:

You obviously have trouble when someone points out that you are wrong about something.

johnrocks
03-10-2009, 08:59 PM
I'll go really slooow for the reading impaired.

The article that you lined to is what made my original post somewhat humorous.

And did you read it? She was mocking every single one of the candidates for not being conservative enough.

Back then, there were hardly any comments on her blog supporting Paul. These days, it runs much higher.

I wasn't knocking you for submitting this thread angelatc, we are all on the same team so to speak, there are things I agree with her on and there are things that I don't, that isn't what irritates me with her or the others I mentioned, there are going to be differences, what irritated me was all the crap ;for a lack of a better word; that she,Hannity and others tossed at him during the campaign, that really sticks to my inner being and may be there permanently, we shall see I suppose.

Conza88
03-10-2009, 10:22 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_WN7YtZjtQQE/SYyRcve2OCI/AAAAAAAAA18/9r88fuDnSr0/s400/riker-facepalm.jpg


TAXES ROSE UNDER BUSH, INFLATION ROSE, SPENDING ROSE.

Yet you heard FUCK all from Malkin and the rest of the scum.

What changed? Answer me that. WHAT CHANGED?

You are delusional if you think Malkin "woke up" or converted. Totally and utterly deranged.

What you will now see from the Media (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=177088)

Wadesc
03-10-2009, 10:31 PM
Lost all respect for Michelle Malkin. Slander, double standards, warmonger. We are supposed to forgive her why?

Ron Paul folks need to be more careful, after this election, all the former neo-cons and hacks are trying to hoist your flag... I personally don't want to have anything to do with them.

Sort of like how Fox has become the Anti-Status Quo Channel. *rolls eyes*

He Who Pawns
03-10-2009, 10:54 PM
In many ways, I see Malkin as a much greater enemy to freedom than a random lefty socialist. At least with the lefty, you know what you're getting up front and they will admit that they want bigger government and collectivism. With a snake like Malkin, they actually trick good people with good small-government instincts and twist them to support a dangerous big-government, big-religion, international neocon warmongering agenda. Neocon frauds like Malkin have done tremendous damage to the "conservative" movement.

And then to see her attempt to jump on the libertarian/Rand movement really boils my blood.

speciallyblend
03-11-2009, 04:43 AM
In many ways, I see Malkin as a much greater enemy to freedom than a random lefty socialist. At least with the lefty, you know what you're getting up front and they will admit that they want bigger government and collectivism. With a snake like Malkin, they actually trick good people with good small-government instincts and twist them to support a dangerous big-government, big-religion, international neocon warmongering agenda. Neocon frauds like Malkin have done tremendous damage to the "conservative" movement.

And then to see her attempt to jump on the libertarian/Rand movement really boils my blood.

yeah malkin is just not trustworthy, she blew it!!

she has a lil good about her,but the rest spoils it all!!!

malkin has along way to be trusted by anyone.

she sometimes talks the talk but rarely walks the walk!

angela i trust you more then i trust malkin!!

JP2010
03-11-2009, 11:01 AM
No she did not. She's a total fraud who bought in completely 100% to the neocon lies, and helped spread them. She barely paid lip service to those fiscal conservative issues. Did she call Bush a "socialist" when he passed prescription drugs or no child left behind?? NO. Don't fall for her fake libertarianism and phony fiscal conservatism now. She had eight years under Bush to prove herself, and she FAILED.

She's a fraud.

She should be used to spread our message

Crowish
03-11-2009, 11:25 AM
Lost all respect for Michelle Malkin. Slander, double standards, warmonger. We are supposed to forgive her why?

Ron Paul folks need to be more careful, after this election, all the former neo-cons and hacks are trying to hoist your flag... I personally don't want to have anything to do with them.

Sort of like how Fox has become the Anti-Status Quo Channel. *rolls eyes*

Agree 100%.

Chieftain1776
03-11-2009, 11:26 AM
I can't find it but I'm almost 100% sure I read that Malkin said she voted for the Libertarian Party(!) candidate Harry Browne in 1996 .

No joke...too bad I can't find it now.

My how things change....

Chieftain1776
03-11-2009, 11:29 AM
Just found it:

TAE: Are you comfortable wearing the "conservative" label?

MALKIN: Oh, absolutely. I started out more of a social conservative than an economic conservative, and then there was a period where I called myself a libertarian before I called myself a conservative. I voted for the Libertarian Party candidate Harry Brown for President in 1996.

http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-5264457/Michelle-Malkin-as-a-book.html

or here's (http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:pVAlfsAZN0MJ:goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-5264457/Michelle-Malkin-as-a-book.html+%22the+american+enterprise%22+%22I+voted +for+the+Libertarian+Party+candidate+Harry+Brown+f or+President+in+1996%22&hl) the cache

slacker921
03-11-2009, 11:38 AM
Malkin voted for Harry Brown in 1996? Good God.. what a flip flopper. "Libertarian" to neoconservative and now a .. umm.. I'm not even sure what to call a neoconservative who now pretends to be fiscally conservative even though they went right along with the massive spending of Bush/McCain.

Ten bucks says she still has a "W" sticker or a McCain/Palin sticker on her car.

heavenlyboy34
03-11-2009, 11:44 AM
How dare Malkin invoke libertarian ideas, when she's the biggest neocon, pro-Bush hack out there.

Hannity's worse, IMHO. :p:mad:

angelatc
03-11-2009, 11:46 AM
Malkin voted for Harry Brown in 1996? Good God.. what a flip flopper. "Libertarian" to neoconservative and now a .. umm.. I'm not even sure what to call a neoconservative who now pretends to be fiscally conservative even though they went right along with the massive spending of Bush/McCain.

Ten bucks says she still has a "W" sticker or a McCain/Palin sticker on her car.

Apparently you folks do not actually read her columns, and are just making things up to fit your positions. She's written pages and pages and pages criticizing Bush and McCain for their non-conservative spending and immigration positions.

And none of this really has anything to do with the intent of the thread, which is that I found it humorous that she accidentally let a Ron Paul sign appear on her site.

Carole
03-11-2009, 12:43 PM
Remember when?

FoxNews Hit Piece Ron Paul, Alex Jones and 911 Truth May 16
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_qUvgfzuPM


h ttp://ronpaul.meetup.com/boards/thread/3077890

Michelle Malkin (www.michellemalkin.com/) and other Fox 'News' agents are advocating the blackballing of Ron Paul from future GOP Presidential Debates.

Here's a partial transcript of a Fox 'News' video of a conversation between John Gibson (JG) and Michelle Malkin (MM) demonstrating a proof of the statement above.

David Sadler
www.david-sadler.org

See the video segment here:
http://www.foxnews.co...

The Big Story w/ John Gibson (Fox 'News' video)
2007.05.16

JG: "The Big Outrage. Presidential heavyweight Rudy Giuliani vs. Congressman Ron Paul. The duo <snip> ... So called 9-11 truth movement <snip> ... It's a jaw dropper to see it in the Republican debate."

MM: "It is and it doesn't belong there [GOP debates]. I'm glad this moment provided great TV for Fox News. It was a very instructive exchange, but Ron Paul really has no business being on stage as a legitimate representative of Republicans because the 9-11 truth virus is something that infects only a very small proportion of people that would identify themselves as conservative or Republican and as you say John this is far more prevalent - this strain of 9-11 truther virus - on the left and in much of the mainstream of the Democratic Party as that Rasmussen (spell) poll showed."

JG: "Why, why did 35% of Democrats believe it, and I think it's another 26% haven't quite made up their mind about it?"

MM: "Well, I think part of it is what Charles Krauthammer has previously called Bush Derangement Syndrome
(
http://www.townhall.c...
).
I think that pathology has taken hold among many Democrats who would consider themselves mainstream and anything they could do to suspect or blame him for America's problems and particularly the terrorist attack they are willing to believe. I think a lot of it is just plain ignorance and then there's a paranoid strain on the left. I talked about this in my book Unhinged ah tin-foil hat wearers who indulge in this kind of fantacy where America bears the blame for global jihad."

JG: "Michelle, Rosie talks about this kind of stuff all the time on The View and The View has a large audience. Would this notion be as prevalent as it is if there weren't prominent people like Rosie and Charlie Sheen and others constantly talking it up?"

MM: "Well, they certainly do bear blame for mainstreaming it. Rosie O'Donald and Alec Baldwin and Charlie Sheen I believe. But it's there on the Internet and these people are absolutely rabid and are impervious to reason or logic and it great that we have magazines - publications like Popular Mechanics that are out there slogging every day. There are a lot of blogs as well that have been debunking a lot of these 9-11 conspiracy theories. This war is going on on places like youTube and social networking places, but I think it's incumbent on mainstream news outlets to debunk these people and I don't think you see nearly enough of that outside of Fox News.

JG: "Part of this 9-11 truth movement says the United States attacked the Pentagon with missiles and a plane did not hit it. I have never been able to understand how the 9-11 truthers then explain where is American flight 77 and where are all those people. Have you ever heard them try to explain that?"

MM: "You know, I try not to spend too much time in these cesspools. But it is worth taking a visit to places like these WTC7 sites and students and scholars for truth. And I note that Ron Paul has basically aligned himself with these people. He appears with students for truth on campus and he's appeared on radio shows like 9-11 conspiracy nut, Alex Jones, and I would hope that that would disqualify him next time around from appearing on stage with other Republicans."

JG: "We shall see. Fox News contributor and syndicated columnist, Michelle Malkin. Be sure to check out michellemalkin.com and hothair.com. Michelle, thanks a lot."
Edited by User 4,183,845 on May 17, 2007 9:19 PM

slacker921
03-11-2009, 01:05 PM
Apparently you folks do not actually read her columns, and are just making things up to fit your positions. She's written pages and pages and pages criticizing Bush and McCain for their non-conservative spending and immigration positions.

And none of this really has anything to do with the intent of the thread, which is that I found it humorous that she accidentally let a Ron Paul sign appear on her site.

I've read her columns, and skimmed some of her books in the book store. Over the years Malkin has consistently stood by by the neoconservative agenda. Taking her seriously now because she's a "fiscal conservative" is much like taking McCain seriously when he says he's a fiscal conservative. Spending hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars blowing up a country and rebuilding it because there might be a boogeyman there is NOT fiscally conservative.

And you're missing the point - it's not at all humorous to see a Ron Paul sign on her site. It was not by accident. It's a sign of what's to come. The neoconservatives are trying desperately to get the fiscal conservatives on their side. The neocons are NOT going to change their agenda, and yet many conservatives will support them merely to oppose the Democrats.

speciallyblend
03-11-2009, 01:05 PM
Apparently you folks do not actually read her columns, and are just making things up to fit your positions. She's written pages and pages and pages criticizing Bush and McCain for their non-conservative spending and immigration positions.

And none of this really has anything to do with the intent of the thread, which is that I found it humorous that she accidentally let a Ron Paul sign appear on her site.

better to vote for harry browne then the 2 party idiots that were running!!

Harry Browne is also the reason why i was open to Ron Pauls Message.

me and my wife like what malkin says sometimes;)

malkin has along way to go though:)

purplechoe
03-11-2009, 02:15 PM
Apparently you folks do not actually read her columns, and are just making things up to fit your positions. She's written pages and pages and pages criticizing Bush and McCain for their non-conservative spending and immigration positions.

And none of this really has anything to do with the intent of the thread, which is that I found it humorous that she accidentally let a Ron Paul sign appear on her site.

I used to read her columns as well as listen to Ingrahm on the radio. Trust me, these people are not conservatives!

angelatc
03-11-2009, 02:18 PM
You people are hopeless.

No wonder libertarians can't win anything.

It's pretty fucking sad to see more open hostility on this site than on hers. In trying to fight them, you've become them.

Congratulations.

purplechoe
03-11-2009, 02:24 PM
You people are hopeless.

No wonder libertarians can't win anything.

It's pretty fucking sad to see more open hostility on this site than on hers. In trying to fight them, you've become them.

Congratulations.

Keep making your cute comments sweetheart! :rolleyes: It seems like you still don't understand the game. "Congratulations" on your failure!

speciallyblend
03-11-2009, 02:45 PM
You people are hopeless.

No wonder libertarians can't win anything.

It's pretty fucking sad to see more open hostility on this site than on hers. In trying to fight them, you've become them.

Congratulations.

angela we loves you. the problem is malkin herself, yes she makes some good points ,but she doesn't walk the walk or talk the talk!


yes i can say some good things about her,but overall she has alot more talking and action to do before I EVER TRUST HER!

that is her problem not mine!!

heavenlyboy34
03-11-2009, 02:46 PM
You people are hopeless.

No wonder libertarians can't win anything.

It's pretty fucking sad to see more open hostility on this site than on hers. In trying to fight them, you've become them.

Congratulations.

I think the problem is more "bored teenager who fiddle on the internets syndrome" than libertarians. ;) :rolleyes:

Lovecraftian4Paul
03-11-2009, 04:36 PM
Most people now styling themselves "fiscal conservatives" are, as an old saying about the Holy Roman Empire used to go, neither conservative nor fiscally responsible. Malkin can go straight to hell. Call her what she is: neo-fascist, neo-Stalinist--anything goes so long as a Republican is in office. Never forget that she tried to bar Ron Paul from the debates. Never forget that she would have no problem spending untold trillions on huge wars, so long as a Republican like Bush is at the helm leading them.

He Who Pawns
03-11-2009, 06:35 PM
Apparently you folks do not actually read her columns, and are just making things up to fit your positions. She's written pages and pages and pages criticizing Bush and McCain for their non-conservative spending and immigration positions.

And none of this really has anything to do with the intent of the thread, which is that I found it humorous that she accidentally let a Ron Paul sign appear on her site.

What a joke. When I asked you to put up the evidence, you pasted two worthless little lip service blurbs about "No child left behind is not really a good idea" or whatever. Pathetic.

Obviously you are buying Malkin's charade trying to shift toward libertarianism and fiscal conservatism now that the political winds seem to be shifting in that direction.

Make no mistake: Malkin is a fraud who was one of the main foot soldiers in the neocon raping of this nation. She is only changing her tune now because she can see the writing on the wall and wants to keep herself relevant so she can keep making money on her stupid, kneejerk books.

He Who Pawns
03-11-2009, 06:41 PM
Hannity's worse, IMHO. :p:mad:

No way. At least Sean Shamnity comes right out and admits he's a neocon. He doesn't even pretend to support most liberty issues. He doesn't quote Rand. He comes right out and says, "I'm for god, country and endless wars!"