Uncle Emanuel Watkins
02-28-2009, 02:13 PM
When something is offical it has legal-precedence, but the United States wasn't created by such qualified business. Rather, our Founders intentions were to establish Civil-Purpose over legal-precedence. So, rather than they take up the roles of ruling officers when establishing our nation, they acted instead on the behalf of the people when they wrote both The Declaration of Independence, the people's divorce from tyranny, and The U.S. Constitution, our new marriage to a more perfect government.
While judges will often claim that certain matters don't have legal precedence, the U.S. court system is divided up into civil and legal matters. Compared to other nations in the world, the United States is unique in that it was created with a Civil-Purpose.
Our nation's fabulous wealth originated from this Civil-Purpose and not vice-versa. Rather than trying to save our economy we should be trying to establish Civil-Purpose over legal-precedence.
While judges will often claim that certain matters don't have legal precedence, the U.S. court system is divided up into civil and legal matters. Compared to other nations in the world, the United States is unique in that it was created with a Civil-Purpose.
Our nation's fabulous wealth originated from this Civil-Purpose and not vice-versa. Rather than trying to save our economy we should be trying to establish Civil-Purpose over legal-precedence.