PDA

View Full Version : Help me discuss why the New Deal was not a success




hugolp
02-12-2009, 11:31 AM
Hi

I am debating with a guy why the New Deal was not a success. He is saying that the GDP grew under Rooselvelt. I suspect it has to do a lot with goverment spending through debt expansion and inflation. Where can I find the numbers to answer?

Thanks

Hugo

Truth Warrior
02-12-2009, 11:46 AM
FDR SCANDAL PAGE
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/fdr.html (http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/fdr.html)

MrNick
02-12-2009, 11:52 AM
This debate has come up quite a bit in my college classes.

Truth Warrior
02-12-2009, 11:55 AM
This debate has come up quite a bit in my college classes. I knew that the new "brainwashed" socialists just had to be coming from somewhere. ;) :rolleyes:

Pennsylvania
02-12-2009, 11:56 AM
This debate has come up quite a bit in my college classes.

It's come up quite a bit on this forum too :D

hugolp
02-12-2009, 11:56 AM
FDR SCANDAL PAGE
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/fdr.html (http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/fdr.html)

Thanks, but I was looking just for raw economic data.

Hugo

Truth Warrior
02-12-2009, 11:58 AM
Thanks, but I was looking just for raw economic data.

Hugo If he's a Keynesian he'll probably just kick your butt with it. ;) Play a "different" game. :)

Acala
02-12-2009, 11:59 AM
The GDP is not an accurate measure of economic prosperity. For one thing, it includes government spending. It is also not properly adjusted for inflation.

Truth Warrior
02-12-2009, 12:01 PM
Bernanke: Federal Reserve caused Great Depression
Fed chief says, 'We did it. very sorry, won't do it again'
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59405 (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59405)

hugolp
02-12-2009, 12:15 PM
The GDP is not an accurate measure of economic prosperity. For one thing, it includes government spending. It is also not properly adjusted for inflation.

Yes, thats exaclty why Im looking for the numbers.

Hugo

theoakman
02-12-2009, 12:34 PM
Hi

I am debating with a guy why the New Deal was not a success. He is saying that the GDP grew under Rooselvelt. I suspect it has to do a lot with goverment spending through debt expansion and inflation. Where can I find the numbers to answer?

Thanks

Hugo

the New Deal started in 1933. If it was such a success, why wasn't the depression over for another 10 years?

amonasro
02-12-2009, 12:43 PM
I posted a paper here (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=178995) that goes over some of the New Deal programs and why there were unsuccessful. It's a great read--short and very informative.

shocker315
02-12-2009, 01:12 PM
Explain that the Depression only ended when savings (the real measure of wealth) increased. Not government spending (GDP). Savings increased because citizens withheld spending and rationed goods and services during WW2. Thus...(when they did spend after government ended that war)...they did so out of their own savings rather than going into DEBT through borrowing from a bank.

A recession happens when there is too much debt. It is natural market forces working to encourage savings, (people spend less, thus savings grow) as explained by Schiff dozens of times. If taxes are cut savings can grow even more rapidly. Governments don't want the recession to happen and ecourage more debt financed spending to maintain the boom, thus they make it worse in the long run (depression).

http://www.maxgladwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/personal_savings_rate_1.jpg

theoakman
02-12-2009, 01:16 PM
Explain that the Depression only ended when savings (the real measure of wealth) increased. Not government spending (GDP). Savings increased because citizens withheld spending and rationed goods and services during WW2. Thus...(when they did spend after government ended that war)...they did so out of their own savings rather than going into DEBT through borrowing from a bank.

A recession happens when there is too much debt. It is natural market forces working to encourage savings, (people spend less, thus savings grow) as explained by Schiff dozens of times. If taxes are cut savings can grow even more rapidly. Governments don't want the recession to happen and ecourage more debt financed spending to maintain the boom, thus they make it worse in the long run (depression).

http://www.maxgladwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/personal_savings_rate_1.jpg

nonsense, evil savers destroy an economy. How dare you save money to spend it on a later date!

hugolp
02-12-2009, 02:27 PM
I posted a paper here (http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=178995) that goes over some of the New Deal programs and why there were unsuccessful. It's a great read--short and very informative.

Thanks, I used some of the data in your paper to answer.


Explain that the Depression only ended when savings (the real measure of wealth) increased. Not government spending (GDP). Savings increased because citizens withheld spending and rationed goods and services during WW2. Thus...(when they did spend after government ended that war)...they did so out of their own savings rather than going into DEBT through borrowing from a bank.

A recession happens when there is too much debt. It is natural market forces working to encourage savings, (people spend less, thus savings grow) as explained by Schiff dozens of times. If taxes are cut savings can grow even more rapidly. Governments don't want the recession to happen and ecourage more debt financed spending to maintain the boom, thus they make it worse in the long run (depression).

http://www.maxgladwell.com/wp-conten...ngs_rate_1.jpg

I used your graph as well, very convincing.


nonsense, evil savers destroy an economy. How dare you save money to spend it on a later date!

I know, fucking chinese fucking the world economy with their savings... :rolleyes:

Hugo