PDA

View Full Version : Do you argee or disagree with the post below?




dude58677
01-29-2009, 02:56 PM
Violating the Constitution is a penalty of perjury under article 6 and this applies to judicial officers as well as they are only in for times of good behavior and violating the Constitution is not good behavior. We need to get Ron Paul Repuplicans to become local police chiefs so they can issue fines or asset forfeiture against anyone who violates the Constitution. It is a crime against the public as the acts of perjury fall into all jurisidictions and also because everyone is affected by these unconstitutional laws. Vincent Buglisio suggested prosecuting George Bush for murder over the Iraq War. Let's do the same for the Constitution.

I know we are focusing on Presidential elections or on Congressional elections but justice needs to be served to people who's lives have been ruined by these criminal actions. With the American people being as dumb as they are, the media being complicit, the RNC/DNC leadership advocating this corruption, politicians not listening to Ron Paul even when he proves them wrong time and time again, and unfair treatment to third parties. We cannot wait for an election to bring justice or hope that only money bombs is going to do the job.



Constitionalists often gripe about the Constution being trampled upon but no one is doing anything about this. They rightfully acknowledge that most government actions are illegal but when the issue of actually bringing the criminals to justice is brought up they decline and give many excuses such as there is no authority or that it will hurt the repuation of the constitutional movement or that constitutionalists claim that two wrongs don't make a right. The truth is that evil prevails when good people do nothing to stop bad people. We have gave 30 years of diplomacy(the libertarian/Constitution party started 30 years ago) with these piles of crap (public officials who violate the Constitution). Enough is enough.

It is true that there has been the common law movement and citizen arrests have been made for constitutional violations. The common law movement also known as the posse comatius movement has issued commercial liens, citizen arrests, and even created their own private courts. However, the Feds cracked down on this and called it "organized crime" when in reality the Feds are part of organized crime such as constitutional perjury. Karl Rove has faced citizen arrest at least four times but he ended up evading it and the media referred to the people issuing the arrest as "kidknappers". There have been towns in past years that have voted to arrest public officials if they walk into their town even if they know they will not. This is why it is better to issue asset forfeiture or fines otherwise it will be taken as a symbolic gesture by the constitutional perjurs.

There have been actual arrests of public officials for things like illegal campaign contributions. Tom Delay was arrested for this and indicted for this and as stated before Vincent Bugilisio in his book "The Prosectution of George W Bush for murder" declared that George Bush should be tried in an American courtroom for his war in Iraq for 4,000 counts of murder. This is a huge start but we need to go a step further by issuing asset forfeiture and fines against public officials even federal judicial officers for violating the US Constitution as a crime of perjury under article 6 and make it widespread.

So what is the case against the IRS for Constitutional perjury? The preamble to the Bill of Rights states that "in order to prevent the misconstruction or abuse of power, further restrictive clauses shall be added". This means that the Bill of Rights is inteded to limit the enumerated powers of the government listed in the Constitution even if they enacted after the Bill of Rights were as none of the Bill of Rights were "hereby repealed" in later amendments. The 16th anendment does give Congress the power to tax on incomes from whatever source derived but the ninth and tenth amendment in concurrence with the preamble to the Bill of Rights prohibit Congress to tax for no reason, tax for political gestures such as paying their fair share, tax to pay for unconstitutional programs, tax for unconstitutional debts, and for wasteful spending. The IRS has done most of these things under the Clinton Administration, the only reason the surplus existed was because Clinton wasn't spending the taxed money. The IRS is also guilty on the part of the political gestures as they advocate on their website “Even after IRS enforcement efforts and late payments, the government is being shortchanged by over a quarter-trillion dollars by those who pay less than their fair share. People who aren’t paying their taxes shift the burden to the rest of us.” When they talk about burdening the population by some not paying taxes, they are guilty of forcing everyone to pay for unconstitutional programs. Last they are guilty of making everyone pay for an unconstitutional debt as the Federal Reserve charges the government interest rates on money the Fed lends to the federal goverment. The national debt is at nine trillion dollars and the IRS is demanding that everyone in America pays it off. Finally, the IRS is guilty of taxing for wasteful spending as we have this national debt. The constitutional perjury criminals allege that wasteful spending is subjective but the nine trillion dollar debt is not subjective.



In addtion to Supreme Court Justices, Federal Judges, Presidents, Congressional law makers, being issued fines and asset forfeiture for violating the Constitution. Defense contractors or employees of H&R Block also need to be issued fines for aidng and abetting these constitutional perjurors for profit.



Does someone need to be arrested for advocating big government or violation of the Constitution? No, this is free speech but if they are taking part in doing it or making a profit from it by aiding and abetting it then that person deserves to have their assets seized as they have done to victims of the past.

It is sherriff's and local police chiefs that need to enforce the Constitution by issuing fines and seizing assets. They must be in contact with credit agencies or bill collectors for assistance. Unitl this happens on a widespread scale, we will never se a free America. It is that simple.

Anti Federalist
01-29-2009, 03:02 PM
Agree with the concept.

Follow through will be tougher.

Even as a sheriff, you will be told you have "no standing" when it comes to court.