PDA

View Full Version : Who ARE These People?




Truth Warrior
01-22-2009, 05:03 AM
Who ARE These People?


by Paul Hein (http://www.lewrockwell.com/hein/mailto:augenph@netscape.net)

It’s true, in theory, that the people of the United States elect their presidents. In fact, presidents receive a minority of the vote, but the winner’s minority is greater than the loser’s, so there is some truth in the statement that the people – from the choices they’ve been given – have elected a president.

It’s hard to understand, however, how the people could elect someone they didn’t know. But it happens. A number of years ago, someone from the Libertarian Party (to which I did not, and still do not belong) called me and asked if I would allow my name to be placed on the ballot for the state senate, on the Libertarian ticket. I was assured it was simply to have a presence on the ballot; I would not need to campaign, nor would I receive any funding to do so, if I wanted to. I agreed, and did not give a single speech, distribute a single flyer, or post a single yard sign. After the election, the Secretary of State sent me the official results, and I had gotten 11% of the vote! I was amazed.

Of course, one isn’t likely to be elected with 11% of the vote. But how well do the voters know the winners? Do they know them at all? The question arose in my mind during the inaugural ceremonies of Barack Obama.

Obama was a state senator in Illinois from 1997 until 2004. That hardly made his a household name. Most people, I suspect, are barely able to name their state senators or representative, and could hardly name any others. Obama achieved a degree of national prominence when he was elected U.S. Senator in January 2005, an office which he held until winning the Democratic presidential nomination in November of 2008. A meteoric rise: from obscurity to President of the United States in four years, and even during those four years, his was hardly a well-known name.
The Obama example is not unique. Jimmy Carter was governor of Georgia from 1971 until 1975. Does that make him familiar to most Americans? How many Americans could name the present governor of Georgia? Yet, in 1977, Carter became the 39th President of the U.S. Another extremely rapid rise on the political ladder of success.

Bill Clinton’s story is similar. He was elected governor of Arkansas in 1978, and defeated for re-election in 1980. He won the governorship back in 1982, and remained in office until elected to the presidency in 1992.

The dates, of themselves, don’t tell the full story. What tends to explain how comparatively unknown and undistinguished politicians can be catapulted into the White House may lie in the political connections they made, and the organizations they joined. Having the "right" (usually left!) connections is important for any candidate, of course, even one as well-known as John McCain, or John Kennedy. And a compliant media can be counted upon to keep an approved candidate’s name in the evening news, and on the cover of popular magazines, until people forget that until yesterday they’d never heard of him.

We’ve seen TV "reality" shows wherein singers of modest to no talent audition for the chance to become the nation’s next singing sensation. A similar process may take place, though without the attendant publicity, where high public office is concerned. If a young man presents a good appearance, can talk well, and think on his feet, he may attract the attention of king – rather – president, makers. And if he can utter the usual hackneyed platitudes and tired generalities while seeming to actually believe them, he’s likely to be high on the list.

During the inauguration, the political commentators and news anchors repeated, as a mantra, the expression "peaceful transfer of power." They made it sound as though the U.S. is the world’s only country where civil war doesn’t follow every election. They were obviously – ludicrously, in my opinion – enamored of the idea that former political enemies could greet each other with such cheerful expressions, and hearty handshakes, even though representing a "transfer of power."

Phooey! The players may be on different teams, but they’re all in the same league. A real transfer of power is not simply a new name on the door. The plantation owner may sell the plantation, but the slaves are still enslaved.

If Ron Paul had been elected, THAT would have been a change of power, so, obviously, it could not be allowed. The last thing that the president makers desire is a change, although they encourage the people, election after election, to expect some sort of gratifying change that will solve all the problems of society.

And, judging by the crowd at Obama’s inauguration, they’ve been right.

January 22, 2009


Dr. Hein [send him mail (http://www.lewrockwell.com/hein/mailto:augenph@netscape.net)] is author of All Work & No Pay (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0911805044/lewrockwell/), which is out of print, but may occasionally be obtained on eBay.


Copyright © 2009 LewRockwell.com


Paul Hein Archives (http://www.lewrockwell.com/hein/hein-arch.html)


Find this article at:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/hein/hein203.html

kathy88
01-22-2009, 06:01 AM
Thanks for a wonderful read. WELCOME BACK. You were missed.

zach
01-22-2009, 07:18 AM
You're back!! Sweet. :D

Awesome article.

heavenlyboy34
01-22-2009, 07:49 AM
Phooey! The players may be on different teams, but they’re all in the same league. A real transfer of power is not simply a new name on the door. The plantation owner may sell the plantation, but the slaves are still enslaved.

This is my favorite line from the piece. ;):D Thanks for the post, and I'm glad you're back sensei.

Zippyjuan
01-22-2009, 02:14 PM
What- no mention of Texas Governor Bush who came from nowhere- other than being his father's son? California Governor Ronald Reagan? Governors seem to get elected more often than senators because they are viewed by voters as being more "outside" the policital circles in Washington. By this measure, Obama is a rarity- elected as a Senator. LBJ was a Senator but got the job on the deah of John F. Kennedy who was also a Senator runing against other Senators. Nixon was a Representativee and Senator as well as Vice President. Bush Senior (HW) was a vice president. His limited term in the Senate made him more of an outsider than Hillary Clinton and John McCain. They had a harder time getting elected because people were very unhappy with the way things were going in Washington and wanted somebody different in there- McCain and Clinton were too much of insiders for many voters.


What tends to explain how comparatively unknown and undistinguished politicians can be catapulted into the White House may lie in the political connections they made, and the organizations they joined. Having the "right" (usually left!) connections is important for any candidate
Following FDR, we have had seven Presidential terms served by Democrats (not counting part of FDR's term served by Truman as a full term) and nine served by Republicans. Hardly a long list of "left' leaners. And I did include Obama in the count. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States Of the ten presidential terms prior to Obama, only three (Carter and two Clinton) were Democrats. It is not the "left" who has controlled things.

Truth Warrior
01-22-2009, 02:37 PM
What- no mention of Texas Governor Bush who came from nowhere- other than being his father's son? California Governor Ronald Reagan? Governors seem to get elected more often than senators because they are viewed by voters as being more "outside" the policital circles in Washington. By this measure, Obama is a rarity- elected as a Senator. LBJ was a Senator but got the job on the deah of John F. Kennedy who was also a Senator runing against other Senators. Nixon was a Representativee and Senator as well as Vice President. Bush Senior (HW) was a vice president. His limited term in the Senate made him more of an outsider than Hillary Clinton and John McCain. They had a harder time getting elected because people were very unhappy with the way things were going in Washington and wanted somebody different in there- McCain and Clinton were too much of insiders for many voters.


Following FDR, we have had seven Presidential terms served by Democrats (not counting part of FDR's term served by Truman as a full term) and nine served by Republicans. Hardly a long list of "left' leaners. And I did include Obama in the count. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States Of the ten presidential terms prior to Obama, only three (Carter and two Clinton) were Democrats. It is not the "left" who has controlled things.

Now do the US Congress control for the very same years. :p :rolleyes:

lucius
01-22-2009, 03:32 PM
Hey stranger...welcome back.

Truth Warrior
01-22-2009, 03:39 PM
Hey stranger...welcome back. Talk about short term memory attention span. :rolleyes: I was ONLY gone for two weeks. :p

Thanks! :D

Zippyjuan
01-22-2009, 03:41 PM
The original topic was Presidents and who decides who gets the job. I have shown that those have been predominantly Republican- not the "left" or Democrats.

So what about Congress? Congressional terms are two years- the Senate term is six years but one third get voted on every two years. Since I looked at ten presidential terms of four years, that would corespond with twenty two year congressional terms. I am getting my information from here:
http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgovernment/l/bl_party_division_2.htm

Of those 20 congresses (starting in 1969. four were divided- one party in control of one house and another party in control of the other (three had Republicans in the Senate and one had Democrats in the Senate- that one case for the Democrats was actually a 50-50 split until Sen. James Jeffords (R- VT) declared he was no longer Republican but independent).

Of the remaining sixteen terms, we had five controlled by Republicans and eleven by Democrats.

This too is a one- sided look at who is in power because the power of Government in the US is not exclusively in the President or exclusively in the Congress. A more important clue to there being somebody or group in power behind the scenes is to look at how many of these periods had only one party in control of both the President and the Congress. Using the same data as before, we have had only five congressional terms with one party in charge of all three. Two were Republican and three were Democratic so that is pretty close to an even split. Ten years out of forty.

If you consider the last 30 years (starting with 1979) Republicans have controlled two of the three power centers for eighteen years vs 12 for the Democrats (not including the current crew of Obama and the new congress but that is all Democratic just as it was in 1979 so changing it to include Obama changes nothing in this number). Again, no "left" control. The pendulum of power swings back and forth.

Truth Warrior
01-22-2009, 03:59 PM
The original topic was Presidents and who decides who gets the job. I have shown that those have been predominantly Republican- not the "left" or Democrats.

So what about Congress? Congressional terms are two years- the Senate term is six years but one third get voted on every two years. Since I looked at ten presidential terms of four years, that would corespond with twenty two year congressional terms. I am getting my information from here:
http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgovernment/l/bl_party_division_2.htm

Of those 20 congresses (starting in 1969. four were divided- one party in control of one house and another party in control of the other (three had Republicans in the Senate and one had Democrats in the Senate- that one case for the Democrats was actually a 50-50 split until Sen. James Jeffords (R- VT) declared he was no longer Republican but independent).

Of the remaining sixteen terms, we had five controlled by Republicans and eleven by Democrats.

This too is a one- sided look at who is in power because the power of Government in the US is not exclusively in the President or exclusively in the Congress. A more important clue to there being somebody or group in power behind the scenes is to look at how many of these periods had only one party in control of both the President and the Congress. Using the same data as before, we have had only five congressional terms with one party in charge of all three. Two were Republican and three were Democratic so that is pretty close to an even split. Ten years out of forty.

If you consider the last 30 years (starting with 1979) Republicans have controlled two of the three power centers for eighteen years vs 12 for the Democrats (not including the current crew of Obama and the new congress but that is all Democratic just as it was in 1979 so changing it to include Obama changes nothing in this number). Again, no "left" control. The pendulum of power swings back and forth.

The Difference between Democrats and Republicans
http://differencebetweendemocratsandrepublicans.com/ (http://differencebetweendemocratsandrepublicans.com/)

Compare 1900 to 2000. The bottom line NET stampede left ( socialist ) is blatantly obvious to anyone that even bothers to look. :p :rolleyes:

"Socialism in America will come through the ballot box."
by: Gus Hall
[Arvo Gustav Halberg ] (1910-2000) leader of the Communist Party USA and its four-time U.S. presidential candidate
Source: in an interview with the Cleveland Plain-Dealer (1996)

heavenlyboy34
01-22-2009, 04:03 PM
The Difference between Democrats and Republicans
http://differencebetweendemocratsandrepublicans.com/ (http://differencebetweendemocratsandrepublicans.com/)

Compare 1900 to 2000. The bottom line NET stampede left ( socialist ) is blatantly obvious to anyone that even bothers to look. :p :rolleyes:

"Socialism in America will come through the ballot box."
by: Gus Hall
[Arvo Gustav Halberg ] (1910-2000) leader of the Communist Party USA and its four-time U.S. presidential candidate
Source: in an interview with the Cleveland Plain-Dealer (1996)

LMAO!! That is a very well researched and written book! ;):D

phill4paul
01-22-2009, 04:27 PM
WB TW! :) Post some pics of your vacation.:p

Truth Warrior
01-22-2009, 04:36 PM
WB TW! :) Post some pics of your vacation.:p

http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i304/Truth_Warrior/TroRab_1.gif


http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i304/Truth_Warrior/TROJANRABBIT.jpg


j/k

heavenlyboy34
01-22-2009, 04:43 PM
you made a trojan bunny! :D

phill4paul
01-22-2009, 05:13 PM
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i304/Truth_Warrior/TroRab_1.gif


http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i304/Truth_Warrior/TROJANRABBIT.jpg


j/k

Thanks so much for that. I have a vacation coming up in a coupla years. I need to know your travel agent.:p:D:D

Truth Warrior
01-22-2009, 06:05 PM
Thanks so much for that. I have a vacation coming up in a coupla years. I need to know your travel agent.:p:D:D I'm pretty much of a home body, by nature. ;) :D

Truth Warrior
01-22-2009, 06:10 PM
you made a trojan bunny! :D

I've also started breeding these:

http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i304/Truth_Warrior/KillerRabbit.jpg

j/k ;)