PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Supreme Court Denies Last Pending Berg Case




Bradley in DC
01-21-2009, 09:01 PM
http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/21/us-supreme-court-denies-last-pending-berg-case/

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Last Pending Berg Case
January 21st, 2009
On January 21, the U.S. Supreme Court unsurprisingly denied Phil Bergís request for a stay, in Berg v Obama, 08A505. That is the last aspect of that particular case that had been in the U.S. Supreme Court. Phil Berg has been the nationís most energetic proponent of the idea that the Courts should examine President Obamaís qualifications.

Matt Collins
01-21-2009, 09:24 PM
hmmm I didn't see that coming a mile away:rolleyes: :(:mad:

hillbilly123069
01-22-2009, 03:28 AM
Just get ready for the thunder.

libertarian4321
01-22-2009, 10:40 AM
hmmm I didn't see that coming a mile away:rolleyes: :(:mad:

Yup, this was a hopeless attempt to overturn the results of the election and was doomed to failure.

Oppose his policies (and not all of them, folks, only the bad ones), don't waste your efforts on hare brained schemes to remove President Obama from office.

Matt Collins
01-22-2009, 11:03 AM
Yup, this was a hopeless attempt to overturn the results of the election and was doomed to failure.

Oppose his policies (and not all of them, folks, only the bad ones), don't waste your efforts on hare brained schemes to remove President Obama from office.
Yes because determining the eligibility for the highest office holder in the land is of no consequence... :rolleyes:

libertarian4321
01-22-2009, 03:20 PM
Yes because determining the eligibility for the highest office holder in the land is of no consequence... :rolleyes:

There is a Constitutional process to do just that, however, none of these lawsuits seems to care about the correct way to do it. There are three points at which a candidate can be challenged- the last being when congress counts the electoral votes. He was never challenged at any of those points, hence, it is too late to challenge him according to the Constitution.

If you live by the "exact letter of the Constitution", you must be willing to die by the same when it goes against you...

Matt Collins
01-22-2009, 04:47 PM
There is a Constitutional process to do just that, however, none of these lawsuits seems to care about the correct way to do it. There are three points at which a candidate can be challenged- the last being when congress counts the electoral votes. He was never challenged at any of those points, hence, it is too late to challenge him according to the Constitution.What are the first two?


If you live by the "exact letter of the Constitution", you must be willing to die by the same when it goes against you...I absolutely agree.

gaazn
01-22-2009, 04:47 PM
Hitler wasn't a natural born German citizen either. So what's the big deal?

lynnf
01-24-2009, 05:52 PM
http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/21/us-supreme-court-denies-last-pending-berg-case/

U.S. Supreme Court Denies Last Pending Berg Case
January 21st, 2009
On January 21, the U.S. Supreme Court unsurprisingly denied Phil Bergís request for a stay, in Berg v Obama, 08A505. That is the last aspect of that particular case that had been in the U.S. Supreme Court. Phil Berg has been the nationís most energetic proponent of the idea that the Courts should examine President Obamaís qualifications.


that would only be the last Berg case before the SC at that time -- the actual Berg v Obama case is still before the 3rd Circuit working its way to the SC. the only thing that was denied was the request to stay the inauguration.

lynn