Chosen
01-18-2009, 11:46 AM
We have all suffered the obvious, bloated and at times purely narcissistic articles of the New York Times. This paper generally challenges Pravda as the authoritarian voice for collectivists, with nearly all of their editorialist's re-contextualizing or spinning current events in favor of any tyrant or oligarch which carries the banner for cultural Marxism. This paper has been exposed in the past few years as plagiarist, politically interventionist, and an intentional withholder of information. Many began to stroll away from the paper when they exhibited a fetish for terrorists and their sympathizers after 9-11.
Nothing accelerated their decline more than their support of open borders, illegal aliens from Mexico and pro-Amnesty politics. In this regard they differed little from the daily news rags posted in public reading spaces in former Soviet controlled countries. The only competition, as a willing propaganda outlet for tyranny, was generally the Wall Street Journal. At least the WSJ was predictable, it had slowly become a RINO cheerleader with strings being pulled by anti-sovereign trans-national corporations like PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Mintz-Levin etc. Both periodicals have a unified goal approached by different philosophies, now it appears the NYT will forgo salvaging any remaining ounce of credibility to possibly become a public influence tool of Mexican interests.
Astounding losses in revenue from advertisers pulling their dollars away from the declining times has compounded their problems. Consumers hate purchasing things they don't like, businesses do not want to be associated with things that their consumers hate. This simple math has escaped the NYT. Martyrdom does weird things to common sense and their image of themselves as carriers of the Marxist torch has done nothing for their debt. Affluent White, Jewish and Affirmative Action writers on the collectivist fringe probably do value the false victimhood-how great their sacrifice on the altar of mans needs.
Times of financial distress always provide opportunity for the predator, yet in the New York Times case they need only to seek the bankroll of good friend, Carlos Slim. This giant holds a monopoly on the Mexican telecom industry, with shares in all Mexican media and cellphone companies. Under his financing Mexican multimedia outlets have been able to seek financing to wage war against the United states by providing their illiterate viewers with a constant stream of hate and propaganda. His bankrolling of MeCha, a nationalist socialist Mexican hate group, his support of Lulac and other aztlan lobby groups and the less than small fact he is the 2nd richest man in the world (valued at $60 billion) indicate the obvious direction of the NYT under his controlling influence. Imagine if Israel owned major media outlets in Saudi Arabia, or vice versa? Imagine if Germany owned all of our radio stations in 1935? This is the magnitude of this power shift.
The implications are great for liberty, the only real change for Americans is that the propagandistic orientation of the NYT will now just be overt. I welcome this as we can now point directly to the control, rather than having to point by point break down and expose the NYT. It will be easy to say, of course they wrote that, they are controlled by Carlos Slim-Mexican Fascist.
Original News Story (http://www.nypost.com/seven/01182009/news/regionalnews/brother__can_you_spare_a_times_150654.htm)
Nothing accelerated their decline more than their support of open borders, illegal aliens from Mexico and pro-Amnesty politics. In this regard they differed little from the daily news rags posted in public reading spaces in former Soviet controlled countries. The only competition, as a willing propaganda outlet for tyranny, was generally the Wall Street Journal. At least the WSJ was predictable, it had slowly become a RINO cheerleader with strings being pulled by anti-sovereign trans-national corporations like PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Mintz-Levin etc. Both periodicals have a unified goal approached by different philosophies, now it appears the NYT will forgo salvaging any remaining ounce of credibility to possibly become a public influence tool of Mexican interests.
Astounding losses in revenue from advertisers pulling their dollars away from the declining times has compounded their problems. Consumers hate purchasing things they don't like, businesses do not want to be associated with things that their consumers hate. This simple math has escaped the NYT. Martyrdom does weird things to common sense and their image of themselves as carriers of the Marxist torch has done nothing for their debt. Affluent White, Jewish and Affirmative Action writers on the collectivist fringe probably do value the false victimhood-how great their sacrifice on the altar of mans needs.
Times of financial distress always provide opportunity for the predator, yet in the New York Times case they need only to seek the bankroll of good friend, Carlos Slim. This giant holds a monopoly on the Mexican telecom industry, with shares in all Mexican media and cellphone companies. Under his financing Mexican multimedia outlets have been able to seek financing to wage war against the United states by providing their illiterate viewers with a constant stream of hate and propaganda. His bankrolling of MeCha, a nationalist socialist Mexican hate group, his support of Lulac and other aztlan lobby groups and the less than small fact he is the 2nd richest man in the world (valued at $60 billion) indicate the obvious direction of the NYT under his controlling influence. Imagine if Israel owned major media outlets in Saudi Arabia, or vice versa? Imagine if Germany owned all of our radio stations in 1935? This is the magnitude of this power shift.
The implications are great for liberty, the only real change for Americans is that the propagandistic orientation of the NYT will now just be overt. I welcome this as we can now point directly to the control, rather than having to point by point break down and expose the NYT. It will be easy to say, of course they wrote that, they are controlled by Carlos Slim-Mexican Fascist.
Original News Story (http://www.nypost.com/seven/01182009/news/regionalnews/brother__can_you_spare_a_times_150654.htm)