Knightskye
01-13-2009, 12:40 AM
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=10534817
State Sen. Kent Rogert of Tekamah lauded the MacBook Air's added mobility and ease of use.
"They're great," Rogert said. "It fits inside my jacket."
Right, I'm sure he only carries a suitcase when he's meeting with lobbyists.
For those of you who haven't looked at the specs of the MacBook Air:
- One USB port.
- No optical drive (CD, DVD, etc.)
But wait, it gets worse:
So you can spend $1800 dollars to get a drive-less, ethernet-devoid, connectivity crippled notebook with mono audio, an ancient hard drive, dubious processing speed (1.6 GHz), and a general lack of options. They won't even trust you to change the battery! This should tell you what they think of the average consumer. Just be glad you didn't spend $3400 to pick up the SSD and a 0.2 GHz bump. Oh, and the 5 hours of battery life is nothing to write home about either, especially in a stripped-down product. Suddenly being the "thinnest laptop" seems like a shitty trade-off.
http://www.logictv.com/blog/2008/1/15/Why_We_Hate_the_MacBook_Air_77.aspx
I suggest reading the rest of the blog entry.
Anyone have a less expensive idea that would have gotten them more bang for the taxpayer's buck?
By the way, that was $106,680 (plus shipping, I imagine) they spent on those laptops.
State Sen. Kent Rogert of Tekamah lauded the MacBook Air's added mobility and ease of use.
"They're great," Rogert said. "It fits inside my jacket."
Right, I'm sure he only carries a suitcase when he's meeting with lobbyists.
For those of you who haven't looked at the specs of the MacBook Air:
- One USB port.
- No optical drive (CD, DVD, etc.)
But wait, it gets worse:
So you can spend $1800 dollars to get a drive-less, ethernet-devoid, connectivity crippled notebook with mono audio, an ancient hard drive, dubious processing speed (1.6 GHz), and a general lack of options. They won't even trust you to change the battery! This should tell you what they think of the average consumer. Just be glad you didn't spend $3400 to pick up the SSD and a 0.2 GHz bump. Oh, and the 5 hours of battery life is nothing to write home about either, especially in a stripped-down product. Suddenly being the "thinnest laptop" seems like a shitty trade-off.
http://www.logictv.com/blog/2008/1/15/Why_We_Hate_the_MacBook_Air_77.aspx
I suggest reading the rest of the blog entry.
Anyone have a less expensive idea that would have gotten them more bang for the taxpayer's buck?
By the way, that was $106,680 (plus shipping, I imagine) they spent on those laptops.