PDA

View Full Version : Justice Roberts Agrees to hear Obama Cases!




tonesforjonesbones
01-08-2009, 08:48 AM
Press Release from Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ 01.07.09.


Good news,

Chief Justice John Roberts agreed to hear my case Lightfoot v Bowen, challenging eligibility for presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. He distributed the case to the full conference of the Supreme Court. The timing of this decision by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, is absolutely remarkable. On January 7, one day before the January 8 vote by Congress and Senate, whether to approve or object to the electoral vote of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, as president of the United States, Chief Justice Roberts is sending a message to them: "Hold on, not so fast, there is value in this case, read it. Hawaiian statue 338 allows Foreign Born children of Hawaiian Residents to obtain Hawaiian Birth Certificates, it allows one to get Hawaiian Certification of Life birth based on a statement of one relative only, without any corroborating evidence. You need to investigate, you need corroborating evidence. If only one Congressman or one Senator presents a written objection, then there has to be a formal investigation by the joint session of Congress and Senate. During this investigation original birth certificate from Hawaii will be subpoenaed. All other pertinent documents will be subpoenaed: Obama's immigration records, any and all passports from Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain; University enrollment records, showing if he was enrolled in US schools and universities and received financial aid as a foreign exchange student from Indonesia or Kenya. All of it can be subpoenaed and obtained within a day or two. Each and every member of US Congress and Senate owes it to 320 million American citizens to do his due diligence and demand all necessary records. When American servicemen are told to risk their lives defending Constitution of this country against all enemies, foreign and domestic, each and every Congressman and each and every Senator can spend a day or two of their time defending this Constitution, reviewing necessary documents, in order to see if Barack Hussein Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, if he is a citizen at all." This is the message that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is sending to them, and if they are not listening, there has to be a massive petition drive to recall them. Truth will come out, no matter how many millions Obama is spending to hide it.

Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQ
drorly.blogspot.com
dr_taitz@yahoo.com

No. 08A524
Title: Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants
v.
Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State

Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S168690)
Share

:D

Uriel999
01-08-2009, 08:53 AM
Awesome!!! I would love to see the One removed. :D Oh man think how embarrassing that would be for him.

MRoCkEd
01-08-2009, 08:54 AM
Wow, there would be riots

mconder
01-08-2009, 09:07 AM
Wow, there would be riots

Seriously...this country would fall apart at the seems if "The One" doesn't get to serve a full term. I know people close to me who are endured to him the way a teen is to a rock star or a religious zealot is to his prophet.

Pepsi
01-08-2009, 09:11 AM
Post your letters to Congress. You can use the Action center to send them to Congress to get them to Challenge Barack Obama's certification as the next President of the United States. You can use the action center to send both e-mail and faxes. They do the certification later today at 1`eastern time

http://capwiz.com/fconl/dbq/officials/


If the Constitution doesn't mean precisely what it says, then America is no longer a nation under the rule of law.

A nation no longer under the rule of law is, by definition, under the rule of men.

Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution clearly stipulates "No person except a natural born Citizen" shall be eligible to serve as president of the United States . That statement has clear meaning.

I urge you to take this matter most seriously – and judge it only on the clear, unambiguous words of the Constitution: A president must, be a "natural born citizen" of the United States .

The 14th Amendment does not convey the status of “natural born Citizen” in its text. It just conveys the status of “Citizen”. And it’s very clear that in the pre-amendment Constitution, the Framers made a distinction between a “Citizen” and a “natural born Citizen”. The requirement to be a Senator or Representative is “Citizen”, but the requirement to be President is “natural born Citizen”.

From the 14th Amendment:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.”

But even as to this conveyance of citizenship, those who were responsible for drafting the 14th Amendment made it clear that - to them - the meaning of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” meant subject only to the jurisdiction thereof.

If you agree that this clear constitutional requirement still matters,than Congress must use its authority to the objection to Barack Obama’s certification as the next President of the United States until it has been secured that he is in fact eligible to take office. The counting of electoral votes by Congress is January 8, 2009.

There is grave, widespread and rapidly growing concern throughout the American public that this constitutional requirement is being overlooked and enforcement neglected by state and federal election authorities. If the Supreme Court falls to dispel all doubt that America 's next president is truly a natural born citizen of the United States, than Congress must.

I am asking that you file a WRITTEN objection to Barack Obama’s certification as the next President of the United States until it has been secured that he is in fact eligible to take office.




or

If the Constitution doesn't mean precisely what it says, then America is no longer a nation under the rule of law.

A nation no longer under the rule of law is, by definition, under the rule of men.

Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution clearly stipulates "No person except a natural born Citizen" shall be eligible to serve as president of the United States. That statement has clear meaning, and the Supreme Court of the United States is one of the controlling legal authorities in ensuring that the Constitution is enforced – even if doing so may prove awkward.

Throughout American history, the Constitution has served as the very foundation of our system of governance,
If you truly believed in the Constitution, you would stand up and challenge Barack Obama's Confirmation on the basis of his ineligibility in accordance with Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution as well as the definition unanimously accepted by the Senate when it passed SRS-511.

SRS-511 passed under the guise that a Natural Born Citizen must be born of two US citizen parents. If this is the standing definition agreed upon by the Senate, and upheld by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution, then it is your sworn duty to object to Barack Obama’s certification as the next President of the United States.

There is grave, widespread and rapidly growing concern throughout the American public that this constitutional requirement is being overlooked and enforcement neglected by state and federal election authorities. If the Supreme Court falls to dispel all doubt that America 's next president is truly a natural born citizen of the United States, than Congress must.

I am asking that you file a WRITTEN objection to Barack Obama’s certification as the next President of the United States until it has been secured that he is in fact eligible to take office.

tommyzDad
01-08-2009, 09:18 AM
Seriously...this country would fall apart at the seems if "The One" doesn't get to serve a full term. I know people close to me who are endured to him the way a teen is to a rock star or a religious zealot is to his prophet.

Cuz you know....."There can only be One."

http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/1962/highlander01pa9.png

http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/8301/theonelv1.png

:p

Oh, this person is just ecstatic that his son shares his birthdate with the election night on which "The One" was "chosen".

http://coyotecottage.com/

Pepsi
01-08-2009, 09:35 AM
another one.



Our republic is facing a troubling challenge to its constitution because of deep concerns that have surfaced about the eligibility of the President elect to be President. We appeal to you to help us focus attention of the nation on this important potential violation of the constitution. In addition, a sitting member of the US Congress is able to influence the process in a positive manner. You are in a unique and historic position.

I am asking that you file a WRITTEN objection to Barack Obama's certification as the next President of the United States until it has been secured that he is in fact eligible to take office.

Article 2, Section1 of the Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for President:
"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

In print and widely read by the Framers and the citizens of this land at the time was a writing by Emmerich de Vattel, (1758) entitled "The Laws of Nations". In it, he defined natural born citizens:

The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

John A. Bingham, chief architect of the 14th Amendment's first section, considered the proposed national law on citizenship as:
"simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…" (March 9, 1866)

Despite popular belief, the 14th Amendment does not convey the status of "natural born Citizen" in its text. It just conveys the status of "Citizen". And it's very clear that in the pre-amendment Constitution, the Framers made a distinction between a "Citizen" and a "natural born Citizen". The requirement to be a Senator or Representative is "Citizen", but the requirement to be President is "natural born Citizen".

From the 14th Amendment:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside."

But even as to this conveyance of citizenship, those who were responsible for drafting the 14th Amendment made it clear that - to them - the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" meant subject only to the jurisdiction thereof.

Mr. Obama, under this clear language, is not a natural born citizen of the United States of America. This language requires his father to have been a US citizen at the time of Obama's birth in 1961. His father was instead a British citizen. Obama was subject to the jurisdiction of Great Britain as a result of the British law in 1961 which made him a British subject/citizen by virtue of being born to a male British citizen.If he was born in Hawaii, as he claims, then he is at best a citizen by virtue of Congressional Acts in effect in 1961, hence a naturalized citizen.

The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times and under all circumstances.

Ex Parte Milligan (1866), 71 U.S. 2; 18 L. Ed. 281; 1866 U.S. LEXIS 861; 4 Wall.

Thomas M. Cooley, in his great work on "Constitutional Limitations," says:

"A Constitution is not made to mean one thing at one time, and another at some subsequent time, when the circumstances may have changed as perhaps to make a different rule in the case seem desirable. A principal share of the benefit expected from written Constitutions would be lost, if the rules they establish were so flexible as to bend to circumstances, or be modified by public opinion."

"The meaning of the Constitution is fixed when it is adopted, and is not different at any subsequent time."

I urge you to uphold the oath you took when you were chosen by the citizens of this great state to faithfully discharge the duties of your office. Complicity in what can best be described as a fraud on the American people is not a legal option for you.

Rael
01-08-2009, 09:39 AM
Wow, there would be riots

So?

I'm well armed, so are most freedom lovers.

libertarian4321
01-08-2009, 11:33 AM
If only one Congressman or one Senator presents a written objection, then there has to be a formal investigation by the joint session of Congress and Senate.

Well, today is the day that Congress certifies the electoral votes.

Has any member provided a written objection?

If not, and the vote is certified, its "game over" for those trying to overturn the results of the election.

Note that the SCOTUS won't even be scheduling this for consideration until AFTER the inauguration.

I suspect its their way of placating Taitz and the others on the fringe for the time being- once Obama is in office, they'll just blow her off (refuse to hear the case) like they did with Berg and the others.

Zippyjuan
01-08-2009, 11:36 AM
This case was already rejected once by Justice Kennedy back in December.
http://www.uslaw.com/library/Obama_Citizenship/Lightfoot_v_Bowen_Denied_Justice_Kennedy_Resubmitt ed_Chief_Justice_Rob.php?item=326761

Athan
01-08-2009, 11:38 AM
Press Release from Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ 01.07.09.


Good news,

Chief Justice John Roberts agreed to hear my case Lightfoot v Bowen, challenging eligibility for presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. He distributed the case to the full conference of the Supreme Court. The timing of this decision by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, is absolutely remarkable. On January 7, one day before the January 8 vote by Congress and Senate, whether to approve or object to the electoral vote of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, as president of the United States, Chief Justice Roberts is sending a message to them: "Hold on, not so fast, there is value in this case, read it. Hawaiian statue 338 allows Foreign Born children of Hawaiian Residents to obtain Hawaiian Birth Certificates, it allows one to get Hawaiian Certification of Life birth based on a statement of one relative only, without any corroborating evidence. You need to investigate, you need corroborating evidence. If only one Congressman or one Senator presents a written objection, then there has to be a formal investigation by the joint session of Congress and Senate. During this investigation original birth certificate from Hawaii will be subpoenaed. All other pertinent documents will be subpoenaed: Obama's immigration records, any and all passports from Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain; University enrollment records, showing if he was enrolled in US schools and universities and received financial aid as a foreign exchange student from Indonesia or Kenya. All of it can be subpoenaed and obtained within a day or two. Each and every member of US Congress and Senate owes it to 320 million American citizens to do his due diligence and demand all necessary records. When American servicemen are told to risk their lives defending Constitution of this country against all enemies, foreign and domestic, each and every Congressman and each and every Senator can spend a day or two of their time defending this Constitution, reviewing necessary documents, in order to see if Barack Hussein Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, if he is a citizen at all." This is the message that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is sending to them, and if they are not listening, there has to be a massive petition drive to recall them. Truth will come out, no matter how many millions Obama is spending to hide it.

Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQ
drorly.blogspot.com
dr_taitz@yahoo.com

No. 08A524
Title: Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants
v.
Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State

Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S168690)
Share

:D

I'll believe it when I see it.

christagious
01-08-2009, 11:39 AM
When are people going to realize that pursuing this is useless? The powers that be don't give a rat's ass about the Constitution, this would really give them an excuse to further declare the Constitution as an outdated piece of paper and call for a Constitutional Convention. This isn't going to go anywhere, Obama's going to be President for at least the next four years, get over it. Even if he was found ineligible, they would cover it up or shrug their shoulders and say "oh well, too late now".

Feenix566
01-08-2009, 11:45 AM
Press Release from Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ 01.07.09.

Chief Justice John Roberts agreed to hear my case Lightfoot v Bowen, challenging eligibility for presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. He distributed the case to the full conference of the Supreme Court.

Can anybody very the accuracy of these statements? Did Chief Justice Roberts actually do this?

KevinR
01-08-2009, 11:52 AM
I hope this is finally heard...

And if there is riots, I'm buying an Obama shirt to blend in >_> Unless it's purely race riots though, then i'd probably need to move away from the DC area...

angelatc
01-08-2009, 12:00 PM
If only one Congressman or one Senator presents a written objection, then there has to be a formal investigation by the joint session of Congress and Senate.

So? Who is going to do this? And I disagree that the electoral decision would solidify Obama's position. I think that he would be removed if he didn't resign. Putting it off until after the inauguration would give Biden the office though.

angelatc
01-08-2009, 12:01 PM
This case was already rejected once by Justice Kennedy back in December.
http://www.uslaw.com/library/Obama_Citizenship/Lightfoot_v_Bowen_Denied_Justice_Kennedy_Resubmitt ed_Chief_Justice_Rob.php?item=326761

I believe it was rejected by another Justice before that, too.

Pepsi
01-08-2009, 12:01 PM
Congress is doing it now

Feenix566
01-08-2009, 12:16 PM
Eligibility issue to follow Obama into Oval Office
Supreme Court sets 'natural born' conference to follow inauguration

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: January 08, 2009
12:14 am Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily



A legal challenge that alleges Barack Obama isn't a "natural born" citizen and therefore constitutionally ineligible to be president of the United States will follow the Democrat into the Oval Office, with a U.S. Supreme Court conference on the dispute set after the Jan. 20 inauguration.

The court's website today announced that a fourth case on the issue will be reviewed by justices Jan. 23.

The court previously heard two cases in conference – private meetings at which justices consider which cases to accept – and denied both Cort Wrotnowski and Leo Donofrio full hearings.

The court now has a conference scheduled Friday on a case raised by attorney Philip Berg, with another conference on a matter related to the same Berg case on Jan. 16. Then today the court website revealed the case Gail Lightfoot et al v. Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State, will be heard in conference Jan. 23.


http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=85595

Pepsi
01-08-2009, 01:13 PM
No one Challange, did they skip that part?

Zippyjuan
01-08-2009, 01:47 PM
Congress is doing it now
Rejecting it? Every case so far has been rejected.

demolama
01-08-2009, 02:32 PM
Seriously...this country would fall apart at the seems if "The One" doesn't get to serve a full term. I know people close to me who are endured to him the way a teen is to a rock star or a religious zealot is to his prophet.

You are just upset because he has an official inauguration poster :p

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2009-01-07-shepardobamaposter.jpg

tonesforjonesbones
01-08-2009, 02:37 PM
I am VERY disappointed that Ron Paul did not step up to the plate. This was his chance to really stand behind the constitution. It only takes ONE to challenge. He didn't. :(

RideTheDirt
01-08-2009, 02:39 PM
I am VERY disappointed that Ron Paul did not step up to the plate. This was his chance to really stand behind the constitution. It only takes ONE to challenge. He didn't. :(
I am also very dissapppointed
Scared to be "laughed out of congress"
Wow, champion of the the Constitution...?

demolama
01-08-2009, 02:43 PM
Lets see... call out Obama now.. which still requires a Senator to go along with it( good luck with that)... and have millions of Obama supporters hate you... or in 4 years take the mislead Obama supporters who are now hating the Obama presidency of lies and win the election of 2012 with them?

I don't know about you... but the safer bet is the one he chose.

tonesforjonesbones
01-08-2009, 02:49 PM
Well, does he walk the talk? tones

decatren
01-08-2009, 02:50 PM
I think that there are some things that are worth being pursued and some aren't when it comes to RP at least at this time. I think if RP comes out accusing obamas citizenship, then alot of people around the country will be disappointed and divided, especially since there is such a huge hype about obama rite now. Not everyone knows what we know. on the other hand paul constantly bashes the fed and its plocies because people can relate to them and say yeah, he is right, maybe there is something there. i think he is not saying anything because 1. there are already a bunch of law suits pending in the supreme court and 2. maybe he wants people to come to their own conclusion on this matter later on
While RP is trying to get more people interested in economy and the fed and the big gov't and expose their fails to everyone, strategically speaking it would most likely not be a good move for him. Have to let obama fail a few times, make him weaker in people's eyes, then expose his fails and throw citizenship into the mix. my 2 cents.

devil21
01-08-2009, 02:55 PM
Here's what I don't get. What real difference does it make even if Obama is denied the Presidency? Wouldnt Biden just step in instead? That doesnt change anything at all. Same people, same administration....and Hillary is one step closer to the office.

I understand the Constitutional effect and Im all for sticking to the document but other than that, what point does all this serve? Can someone explain please.

Zippyjuan
01-08-2009, 03:01 PM
It is just some people upset with the outcome of the election. It will do nothing to get their "guy" in office.

Tatsit
01-08-2009, 03:12 PM
My 2cents - 1st I think the supreme court is using this as a way to finally settle the dispute and put it to rest in their minds...

2nd - Let's say Obama is denied the office - then what? They re-hold the elections? They let Biden take it instead?

I hope they kick bush out - let congress run things while they hold the elections over --- but I know, I am probably dreaming.

devil21
01-08-2009, 03:14 PM
It is just some people upset with the outcome of the election. It will do nothing to get their "guy" in office.

And thats what I dont understand. Its not like McCain wins all of a sudden. The guy got hammered in both the popular and electoral vote and shouldnt win anyway. If anything, Im even more concerned that it may allow GWB to stay in office! Which ironically people have been predicting (while gnashing their teeth)him finding a way to stay longer than his 2 terms. This could end up being his ticket.

Zippyjuan
01-08-2009, 03:40 PM
Bush's term is up. No extensions.

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
01-08-2009, 04:04 PM
Press Release from Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ 01.07.09.


Good news,

Chief Justice John Roberts agreed to hear my case Lightfoot v Bowen, challenging eligibility for presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. He distributed the case to the full conference of the Supreme Court. The timing of this decision by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, is absolutely remarkable. On January 7, one day before the January 8 vote by Congress and Senate, whether to approve or object to the electoral vote of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, as president of the United States, Chief Justice Roberts is sending a message to them: "Hold on, not so fast, there is value in this case, read it. Hawaiian statue 338 allows Foreign Born children of Hawaiian Residents to obtain Hawaiian Birth Certificates, it allows one to get Hawaiian Certification of Life birth based on a statement of one relative only, without any corroborating evidence. You need to investigate, you need corroborating evidence. If only one Congressman or one Senator presents a written objection, then there has to be a formal investigation by the joint session of Congress and Senate. During this investigation original birth certificate from Hawaii will be subpoenaed. All other pertinent documents will be subpoenaed: Obama's immigration records, any and all passports from Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain; University enrollment records, showing if he was enrolled in US schools and universities and received financial aid as a foreign exchange student from Indonesia or Kenya. All of it can be subpoenaed and obtained within a day or two. Each and every member of US Congress and Senate owes it to 320 million American citizens to do his due diligence and demand all necessary records. When American servicemen are told to risk their lives defending Constitution of this country against all enemies, foreign and domestic, each and every Congressman and each and every Senator can spend a day or two of their time defending this Constitution, reviewing necessary documents, in order to see if Barack Hussein Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, if he is a citizen at all." This is the message that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is sending to them, and if they are not listening, there has to be a massive petition drive to recall them. Truth will come out, no matter how many millions Obama is spending to hide it.

Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQ
drorly.blogspot.com
dr_taitz@yahoo.com

No. 08A524
Title: Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants
v.
Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State

Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S168690)
Share

:D

As power brokers serving the people, we need to learn when we are wasting our time and energy.

Rael
01-08-2009, 06:25 PM
I am VERY disappointed that Ron Paul did not step up to the plate. This was his chance to really stand behind the constitution. It only takes ONE to challenge. He didn't. :(

This should tell you something. This thing about him not being a NBC is just a bunch of crap, and Ron Paul knows it.

youngbuck
01-08-2009, 07:08 PM
So?

I'm well armed, so are most freedom lovers.

It'd be interesting to see a rioting mob of Obama worshipers head down my street. :D

Rael
01-08-2009, 07:20 PM
It'd be interesting to see a rioting mob of Obama worshipers head down my street. :D

Hehe. Watching them flee in terror would be even more interesting.

devil21
01-08-2009, 08:05 PM
Have no fear! Spider-Man will save Obama's day!

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20090108/capt.9091300f755e4d9f85757c4fa3c64f89.obama_spider _man_wx106.jpg

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090108/ap_en_ot/obama_spider_man

Good lord, can we get any more pathetic?

Pepsi
01-08-2009, 08:30 PM
He if we can have a blimp, let him have his occult comic