Summary: Obama is ineligible to be President

[EastWindRain]

Please help support www.obamacrimes.com

Here are the facts relating to Obama's lack of qualifications to be president:

1. The law from 1952-1986 (Obama was born in 1961) states that to an American Citizen and one alien parent in wedlock, the American parent must have resided in the US for 5 years beyond the age of 14 (or the age of 19) Mr. Obama's mother was 18 when he was born, so OBAMA DOES NOT QUALIFY.
http://travel.state.gov/law/info/info_609.html
Obama's parents were NOT MARRIED when he was born, his father was married to a KENYAN WOMAN.
http://www.stop-obama.org/?p=137

2. Obama’s step-sister and Obama claim he was born in different hospitals.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOzFl-Gm_Kc
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83113

3. He went to school in Indonesia where only Indonesian citizens could go to school there so he gave up his citizenship if he had it and therefore must be an immigrant or an illegal alien who should be deported.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOzFl-Gm_Kc

4. His black grandmother said he was born in Kenya.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvbknlC69bQ&feature=related
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78931

5. Obama refuses to release his birth certificate.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOzFl-Gm_Kc

6. There is tourist site in Kenya where they believe Obama was born.
Video removed by YouTube www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqOLREmCJOo&feature=related
Thank God for WNTube.net http://www.wntube.net/play.php?vid=1396

7. The certificate of live birth he has shown on the internet is a fraud because the seal on certificate of live birth in Hawaii is not present on the certificate of live birth, the race of the child on the certificate of live birth said African when the term Negro or Mulatto would be listed for a half black person at that time, the island of birth and time of birth is the same place and time listed for the sample document.
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81943
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvbknlC69bQ&feature=related
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12956.htm

8. Obama did not have a United States passport until 2005 which is necessary for a United States citizen to travel overseas.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81943

9. Obama’s mother was seen in Seattle [on] the same [day] he was born which makes very little sense for a mother of a new born baby to do unless she was coming in from another country.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Dunham

10. If Obama really was born in the United States why doesn’t he release his birth certificate?
(And end all this controversy? Why? Because he doesn't have one! That's why!)

11. Obama legally admitted that he is not eligible to be president because when you refuse to respond to a lawsuit you legally admit the story is true.
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78671

12. Obama has spent $800,000 on legal fees to prevent the release of his birth certificate when he could make a copy for only $10-$15 dollars
www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7KO2bUOb4k&feature=related

13. Obama was once a citizen of Kenya.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/29/fight-smears-website-admits-obama-was-kenyan-citizen-wheres-msm

14. Obama used an Indonesian passport in 1981
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=72656

15. The courts refused to look at the merits of the case in every lawsuit that was tossed out relating to his citizenship was because the person filing the lawsuit could not prove damages or the person was not qualified to demand the information according to the court.
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=79086

16. Forensics experts have concluded that his certificate of live birth was printed on a computer even though they used typewriters in 1961.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvbknlC69bQ&feature=related

17. No witnesses have come forward affirming his birth event though it would be very rare for a white woman to give birth to a half-black child in 1961.
www.uslaw.com/is_obama_natural_born_citizen

18. Non-citizens were able to receive a certificate of live birth in 1961 in the state of Hawaii.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvbknlC69bQ&feature=related

19. Factcheck.org has a conflict of interest because Factcheck.org is owned by an organization Obama served on the board on.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOzFl-Gm_Kc

20. A certificate of live birth does not prove that someone is a United States citizen.
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81943

21. Kenyan Ambassador To U.S. Admits Barack Obama Was Born In Kenya
Removed by YouTube www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqOLREmCJOo&feature=related
Thank God for WNTube.net http://www.wntube.net/play.php?vid=1396

22. The certificate of life birth also does not contain hospital address, attending physician and age of mother.
www.chicagotribune.com/media/acrobat/2008-12/43669993.pdf

23. Hawaii Department of health will not affirm Obama was born in United States.
www.chicagotribune.com/media/acrobat/2008-12/43669993.pdf

24. Legal affidavits state Obama was born in Kenya.
www.chicagotribune.com/media/acrobat/2008-12/43669993.pdf

25. In 1965 Obama’s mother relinquished whatever citizenship she had when she married an Indonesian and became an Indonesian citizen.
www.chicagotribune.com/media/acrobat/2008-12/43669993.pdf

26. There is no record of him being born in a hospital in Hawaii including the two different hospitals he and his sister claim he was born in.
www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm
Look at December 4th, 2008

27. Imam claims Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya.
www.talkshowamerica.com/2008/11/mombasa-imam-to-release-obamas-birth.html

28. Obama’s mother gave up her citizenship.
www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm
Look at November 21st, 2008

29. Obama never swore allegiance to the United States that he needed to attain United States citizenship.
www.uslaw.com/is_obama_natural_born_citizen

30. Obama is ineligible because he has dual citizen because of his father’s citizenship. "British, and a citizen of the United States, at birth.
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82833

31. Obama’s certificate of live birth is a fraud because the background color does not match the color of the pixels between the letters.
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81943

32. There is no second fold line on the certificate of live birth that would be needed to mail the certificate of live birth.
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81943

33. The resolution of the border does not match the resolution of the rest of the document on the certificate of live birth.
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81943

34. The border year does not match the year of the signature and stamp of the document.
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81943

35. Obama refuses to release the following documents to prove his eligibility to be president:
Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released
Certificate of Live Birth -- Released --
www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm#Polarik#Polarik

Counterfeit Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Soetoro adoption records -- Not released
Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released
Punahou School records -- Not released
Selective Service Registration -- Released --
www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLies.htm#SelectiveService
Occidental College records -- Not released
Passport (Pakistan) -- Not released
Columbia College records -- Not released
Columbia thesis -- Not released
Harvard College records -- Not released
Harvard Law Review articles -- None (maybe 1, unsigned?)
Baptism certificate -- None
Medical records -- Not released
Illinois State Senate records -- None
Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost
Law practice client list -- Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles – None
www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm November 23rd, 2008

36. Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 when it was illegal to enter as a U.S. citizen.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-says-he-visited-pakistan-in-1981
www.pak-times.com/2008/07/10/obamas-larkana-cnnection/
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=72656

37. There is no evidence Obama went through immigration after becoming a citizen of Indonesia.
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80710

38. His own choice for Secretary of commerce former Governor of New Mexico Bill Richardson admitted he’s an immigrant!
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83114
www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5OUdj_YIpo

39. Obama’s friend Odinga was involved in the kidnapping of Jerome Corsi to prevent Corsi from investigating Obama
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=83984
Kenyan government imposes gag order on Obama family to prevent people from asking about Obama
www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=84172

41. If one parent is not a citizen then there children are not natural born citizens
www.timesexaminer.com/content/view/896/45/

42. Kenya government has no record of Obama or his father
www.kenya.go.ke/index.php?searchword=Obama&option=com_search&Itemid

43. The Kenya government has documents about Obama but will not show them.
www.trueobamafacts.com 29 Nov 2008 Point 3

44. Kenya declares a holiday for Obama. Why would a country declare a holiday for a foreigner?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7710394.stm

Those are the facts Obama is not eligible to be president under the constitution. Therefore he is foreigner trying to occupy the U.S. government!:mad:
Please sign this petition (which now has over 195 000 signatures) for the courts to investigate Obama's eligibility.
www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81550

[smithtg]

bump

[tonesforjonesbones]

Yes...the reason the Supreme court has refused so far has nothing to do with the facts of the case, but jurisdiction. If they can get the technical issues straightened out...maybe they will listen. tones

[mrsat_98]

http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/jan2009/nancy12.htm


Very interesting...



Ok?Now I see the big picture! byy Tom Waite
The Bear on Dec 26 2008 | Filed under: Election 08’

In my previous analysis of the Berg v. Obama Supreme Court case (re: Obama's birth certificate), I said that the Supreme Court Justices were very sly by scheduling a January 9th conference date in order to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari. Because just one day earlier, congress is to open up the Electoral College’s sealed votes from each state, count the votes and declare a presidential winner. But now there is a new development, which seems very perplexing at first, but I believe I can shed light on this news and reinterpret it as a sign of political chess. [?]

Jeff Schreiber (the person running this blog), is a law student and he can’t fathom the reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s decision to set a date to discuss Berg’s injunction that is well after the time congress will have counted the Electoral College’s votes. In doing so, Jeff feels this conference on January 16, 2009 to discuss Berg’s injunction will be a moot issue.

However, I see it differently, the Justices of the Supreme Court aren’t sequestered in some castle. The Justices know exactly what the issues are and are constantly being bombarded with similar legal applications to be considered regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility for president. As I’ve mentioned in a previous post, if the Justices wanted to dismiss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari they could have, but they deliberately chose to discuss it 24 hours after congress officially counts the Electoral College’s votes; reason being Berg’s issue of standing will now be valid! Once Obama officially wins the national vote (via the counting of Electoral College’s votes), Berg’s issue of harm being done to him by Obama now becomes legally valid it is no longer theoretical; thus Berg does have legal standing!

Now in a political game of chess, the Supreme Court’s maneuvring of the January 9th date to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari can be seen as a move of check against Obama. Obama is now in a corner but still can move his king chess piece and similarly with the Writ of Certiorari, Obama still could refuse to deliver evidence proving he was born in United States. I understand why the Justices set a date one week later (January 16) to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes, this move can be seen as check and mate! Meaning Obama’s king can’t move in any direction on the chessboard, thus he’s trapped and has lost the game!

Setting a date to discuss the injunction on preventing congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes isn’t a moot issue; in this context any judgement is retroactive! So that even if congress has counted the Electoral College’s votes and have declared Obama the presidential winner; if the Supreme Court finds Obama ineligible to be a presidential candidate, they can retroactively cancel the results of the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

And that’s why the Supreme Court is allowing for a January 16th conference on Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s vote on January 8th. It’s not a moot issue, it’s a very deliberate political game of entrapment or as in chess it can be seen as a move of checkmate. Because the Supreme Court is basically giving Obama no wiggle room to manoeuvre and escape from the January 9th’s conference of Berg’s Writ of Certiorari. The Supreme Court is ultimately saying to Obama, if you don’t hand over your evidence to us on January 9th, you will be forced to hand over your evidence to us on January 16th, otherwise we’ll retroactively cancel the results from the Electoral College’s votes that were counted back on January 8th!

[bojo68]

The best part is, if it goes down that way, every congresscritter will have been proven to have violated their oath of office.....:)

[lynnf]

http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/jan2009/nancy12.htm


Very interesting...



Ok?Now I see the big picture! byy Tom Waite
The Bear on Dec 26 2008 | Filed under: Election 08’

In my previous analysis of the Berg v. Obama Supreme Court case (re: Obama's birth certificate), I said that the Supreme Court Justices were very sly by scheduling a January 9th conference date in order to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari. Because just one day earlier, congress is to open up the Electoral College’s sealed votes from each state, count the votes and declare a presidential winner. But now there is a new development, which seems very perplexing at first, but I believe I can shed light on this news and reinterpret it as a sign of political chess. [?]

Jeff Schreiber (the person running this blog), is a law student and he can’t fathom the reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s decision to set a date to discuss Berg’s injunction that is well after the time congress will have counted the Electoral College’s votes. In doing so, Jeff feels this conference on January 16, 2009 to discuss Berg’s injunction will be a moot issue.

However, I see it differently, the Justices of the Supreme Court aren’t sequestered in some castle. The Justices know exactly what the issues are and are constantly being bombarded with similar legal applications to be considered regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility for president. As I’ve mentioned in a previous post, if the Justices wanted to dismiss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari they could have, but they deliberately chose to discuss it 24 hours after congress officially counts the Electoral College’s votes; reason being Berg’s issue of standing will now be valid! Once Obama officially wins the national vote (via the counting of Electoral College’s votes), Berg’s issue of harm being done to him by Obama now becomes legally valid it is no longer theoretical; thus Berg does have legal standing!

Now in a political game of chess, the Supreme Court’s maneuvring of the January 9th date to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari can be seen as a move of check against Obama. Obama is now in a corner but still can move his king chess piece and similarly with the Writ of Certiorari, Obama still could refuse to deliver evidence proving he was born in United States. I understand why the Justices set a date one week later (January 16) to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes, this move can be seen as check and mate! Meaning Obama’s king can’t move in any direction on the chessboard, thus he’s trapped and has lost the game!

Setting a date to discuss the injunction on preventing congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes isn’t a moot issue; in this context any judgement is retroactive! So that even if congress has counted the Electoral College’s votes and have declared Obama the presidential winner; if the Supreme Court finds Obama ineligible to be a presidential candidate, they can retroactively cancel the results of the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

And that’s why the Supreme Court is allowing for a January 16th conference on Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s vote on January 8th. It’s not a moot issue, it’s a very deliberate political game of entrapment or as in chess it can be seen as a move of checkmate. Because the Supreme Court is basically giving Obama no wiggle room to manoeuvre and escape from the January 9th’s conference of Berg’s Writ of Certiorari. The Supreme Court is ultimately saying to Obama, if you don’t hand over your evidence to us on January 9th, you will be forced to hand over your evidence to us on January 16th, otherwise we’ll retroactively cancel the results from the Electoral College’s votes that were counted back on January 8th!


or, alternatively, it could just be that there were no conferences scheduled during the holidays. yes, judges enjoy their holidays, too!

look at the SC website and you'll find the distribution dates and conference dates, note it jumps from Dec 12 to January 9 as I've excerpted below! now, maybe they could have called an emergency conference, but what are the odds during holiday?


http://www.supremecourtus.gov/casedistribution/casedistributionschedule.html

DISTRIBUTION DATE CONFERENCE
NOVEMBER 26, 2008 DECEMBER 12, 2008


DECEMBER 3, 2008 JANUARY 9, 2009
DECEMBER 4, 2008 JANUARY 9, 2009

or, you could just look at the calendar - conference days marked in green

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/08termcourtcalendar.pdf


you be the "judge" (at least of this)

lynn

[EastWindRain]

Everyone should write a letter to the U.S. Supreme Judges. Does anyone have a template letter written up yet? Pastor Manning is asking for 20 Million people to write a letter.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wm5Y9LeNDTI&feature=channel_page

[EastWindRain]

Welcome to Obama Crimes

Urgent – Write Letters to Supreme Court Justices

Case of Berg vs. Obama, U.S.S.C. Case No. 08-570, in the U.S. Supreme Court has been scheduled for two [2] Conferences [January 9th and 16th, 2009].

The Justices of the Supreme Court will read letters sent to them. Let them know how important it is for them to hear our case; how “standing” is important on the issue of Obama’s qualifications; how we are headed for a “Constitutional crisis” if Obama’s qualifications are not resolved; how important it is to follow “our Constitution;” and how Obama’s records: his original ‘vault’ birth certificate, immigration records when he as Barry Soetoro [adopted in Indonesia] returned to Hawaii in 1971, if any, and any change of name Court records are necessary as Obama might be an illegal alien, not only not qualified to be President, but a fraud as U.S. Senator from Illinois.

Write one [1] letter to the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court (names are listed below), make nine [9] copies and put them in nine [9] separate envelopes, addressed to each Justice, and then place them into one [1] manila envelope and mail to:

U.S. Supreme Court
1 First Street, N.E
Washington, D.C. 20543

Supreme Court Justices

Chief Justice John Roberts

Associate Justices:

Samuel A. Alito
Clarence Thomas
Antonin Scalia
Anthony M. Kennedy
David H. Souter
John Paul Stevens
Stephen G. Breyer
Ruth Bader Ginsberg

Note: Any communications received by the U.S. Supreme Court via e-mail or fax are thrown away. The U.S. Supreme Court will not take telephone messages for the Justices. All communications to the U.S. Supreme Court must be done in writing and sent to them by way of U.S. mail, UPS, Federal Express, etc.
www.obamacrimes.com

[mrsat_98]

http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2008/09/obamas-real-father-connecting-dots.html

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/Kaleokualoha

So what if ?

[EastWindRain]

Exactly What IS a Natural Born Citizen?

YouTube - Exactly What IS a Natural Born Citizen? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEnaAZrYqQI&eurl)

Obama Vs. Constitution (60 Sec. TV Ad)
YouTube - Obama Vs. Constitution (60 Sec. TV Ad) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYdk26ezVio&eurl)

[nodope0695]

I'm with ya, buddy! I spread the word at every opportunity. I just posted two threads on this very topic. Keep up the good work!

[EastWindRain]

Obama's birth certificate sealed by Hawaii governor
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=79174


Birth Certificate Lawsuit - Obama can't be President
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0q1twiyRpN4

OBAMA BORN IN KENYA SAYS GRANDMA !!
YouTube - OBAMA BORN IN KENYA SAYS GRANDMA !! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSgdbiuIVBc)

Sarah Obama Reveals Barack Obama Was Born In Kenya
YouTube - Sarah Obama Reveals Barack Obama Was Born In Kenya (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGWcD5OHm08&feature=related)

Kenyan Ambassador admits Obama born in Kenya
YouTube - Kenyan Ambassador admits Obama born in Kenya (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH4GX3Otf14)

Obama Is Not A Natural Born U.S. Citizen And Is Therefore Ineligible For The Presidency / Documentary Video
Obama Citizenship: I Invented The Internet (Ep. 6: October Surprise)
YouTube - Obama Citizenship: I Invented The Internet (Ep. 6: October Surprise) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA6_k3NtXZs) (4.4 MILLION VIEWS)

Leaders within the Black community don't even support Obama the Fraud.
Produce the Dog Gone Birth Certificate
YouTube - Produce the Dog Gone Birth Certificate (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJc6uczdhE0)