The World's Economy is Moving Away from Existentialism towards that of Tyranny

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

As the economy of the United States goes, so the world goes. This is because the U.S. government was designed to be people based with their contentment existentially central in purpose. The formal documents of both The Declaration of Independence and The U.S. Constitution established the self-evident and the unalienable Civil-Purpose of the people over the long established legal-precedence of tyranny.

[Truth Warrior]

Yeah, just around and about the time of the Federalist cabal coup of 1789, wasn't it? :p :rolleyes: 13 states to Global Empire in only 220 years. :p

Empire ON!!! < GAG! >



http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i304/Truth_Warrior/us_vs_world.gif

BTW, how are the Canadians, Mexicans and the Swiss doing? ;)


"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

Yeah, just around and about the time of the Federalist cabal coup of 1789, wasn't it? :p :rolleyes: 13 states to Global Empire in only 220 years. :p

Empire ON!!! < GAG! >



http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i304/Truth_Warrior/us_vs_world.gif

BTW, how are the Canadians, Mexicans and the Swiss doing? ;)


"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson

What does this have to do with that which is self-evident and unalienable, and that which acknowledges government as an imperfect tyranny?

[Truth Warrior]

What does this have to do with that which is self-evident and unalienable, and that which acknowledges government as an imperfect tyranny? The D of I and the Federalist's CONstitution are VERY different documents and types. How may times does the word POWER appear in the CONstitution? How about the words liberty, rights, freedom, individual or peace?

Or your favorites, happiness and contentment? :rolleyes:

Aside from that minor and irrelevant TRIVIA, not really too much.<IMHO>

Nice duck and dodge on the questions there, BTW. ;) What do you consider a PERFECT tyranny? Any historical examples, aside from European? :D


Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution — and What It Means for America Today
http://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=346 (http://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=346)

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

The D of I and the Federalist's CONstitution are VERY different documents and types. How may times does the word POWER appear in the CONstitution? How about the words liberty, rights, freedom, individual or peace?

Or your favorites, happiness and contentment? :rolleyes:

Aside from that minor and irrelevant TRIVIA, not really too much.<IMHO>

Nice duck and dodge on the questions there, BTW. ;) What do you consider a PERFECT tyranny? Any historical examples, aside from European? :D


Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution — and What It Means for America Today
http://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=346 (http://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=346)

Please don't try to speak down to me like a lawyer or, worse yet, a European stranger. Any normal human being understands that the interpretation of a new marriage contract to a more perfect government, the U.S. Constitution, is dependent on juxtaposition to the old divorce decree away from tyranny, the Declaration of Independence. Just how is this not legal?
Your reference to power is a reference to tyranny. This is a reference to that "doing" which governments do to manipulate people around. Our founding-fathers referenced a new power which the American people hold as self-evident and as an unalienable right. In other words, we don't have to be manipulated to the national dinner table.
If you don't believe in such a simple idea, please move to Canada.

[Truth Warrior]

Please don't try to speak down to me like a lawyer or, worse yet, a European stranger. Any normal human being understands that the interpretation of a new marriage contract to a more perfect government, the U.S. Constitution, is dependent on the old divorce decree away from tyranny, the Declaration of Independence.
Your reference to power is a reference to tyranny. This is a reference to that "doing" which governments do to manipulate people around. Our founding-fathers referenced a new power which the American people hold as self-evident and as an unalienable right. In other words, we don't have to be manipulated to the national dinner table.
If you don't believe in such a simple idea, please move to Canada. My reference to "POWER" was a question. How many times mentioned in the CONstitution? Now that we may be back on track. How many times are self evident and inalienable mentioned.

T J wrote the D of I. Hamilton was in leader of the cabal. They were arch enemies. Somebody is off track here, and I don't think it's me.

I LOVE simple ideas when they are TRUE. Your's are neither simple nor true.<IMHO>

[Uncle Emanuel Watkins]

My reference to "POWER" was a question. How many times mentioned in the CONstitution? Now that we may be back on track. How many times are self evident and inalienable mentioned.

T J wrote the D of I. Hamilton was in leader of the cabal. They were arch enemies. Somebody is off track here, and I don't think it's me.

I LOVE simple ideas when they are TRUE. Your's are neither simple nor true.<IMHO>

Please define "natural law" as it pertains to constructing a scientific conclusion? Be mindful that only the physical sciences existed during that time.
A "more perfect" government is one that recognizes government as a necessary evil.
The people weld the greatest power but only when it is limited 1) to divorcing a tyrant when the conscience of such authority fails to recognize that which is self-evidently true and unalienably a natural right, and 2) to marrying themselves to that of a more perfect government -- one in which its conscience will recognize that which is self-evidently true and unalienably a natural right for every human-being. The people can't be denied that which is self-evidently true and unalienably a natural right but they can become disillusioned into thinking that they have a right to a greater power than that which is already theirs naturally.

[Truth Warrior]

Please define "natural law" as it pertains to constructing a scientific conclusion? Be mindful that only the physical sciences existed during that time.
A "more perfect" government is one that recognizes government as a necessary evil.
The people weld the greatest power but only when it is limited 1) to divorcing the tyrant when his or her conscience fails to recognize that which is self-evidently true and unalienably a natural right, and 2) to marrying themselves into a more perfect government which will recognize that which is self-evidently true and unalienably a natural right for every human-being. The people can't be denied that which is self-evidently true and unalienably a natural right but they can become disillusioned into thinking that they have a right greater in power than that which is naturally theirs. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pretentious (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pretentious)

Thanks for again merely making and reconfirming my above point. :D

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/natural+law (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/natural+law)

Truth and REALITY are often not bound by human scientific conclusions, du jour. :rolleyes:

Keep it simple. ;) It's the intelligent thing to do.<IMHO>