PDA

View Full Version : Coming Soon: Gov't Interrogating Your Child




ronpaulforprez2008
12-11-2008, 04:33 PM
Please give a round of applause to this very informed, honest and brave journalist...

UK is the Beta site for this legislation. Don't fool yourselves..... as this will be coming to the USA in the near future.

Has your child been CAFed?
How the Government plans to record intimate information on every child in Britain
By Eileen Fairweather
Last updated at 9:15 AM on 07th December 2008
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1092513/Has-child-CAFed--How-Government-plans-record-intimate-information-child-Britain.html



....under sinister new guidelines, officers must assess all children they encounter – including while ‘searching premises’ – for a police database called MERLIN


Since April 1, hundreds of thousands of State employees, from police to teachers, youth and nursery workers, social workers and sports coaches, have been entitled to interrogate children aged up to 19, using the ‘Common Assessment Framework’ (CAF), a creepy, eight-page, 60-section questionnaire.

CAF includes eyewateringly intimate questions about children’s sexual behaviour, their family’s structure, culture and religion, their views on ‘discrimination’, their friends, secret fears, feelings and family income, plus ‘any serious difficulties in their parents’ relationship’.

How has such a terrifying intrusion into private life crept, almost unnoticed, under the radar? The answer is New Labour has cleverly packaged CAF as an aid to ‘child protection’ and delivering better services as part of its Every Child Matters project (ECM).


ECM claims that nearly half of Britain’s 11 million children have ‘additional needs’, so must continuously be assessed for the giant database at the Government’s Department for Schools and Families.

CAF questionnaires will be kept until they are 19, or for 75 years if they have been in care, and can be accessed electronically by hundreds of thousands of staff in other agencies.


Incredibly, parental consent is not often required for this intrusion into children’s lives. Youngsters from the age of 12 are deemed mature enough to agree to being CAF-ed – whatever their parents’ objections. But campaigners stress that families should teach their children to say No: submitting to CAF is, currently at least, voluntary. The Government claims that the database will identify children at risk of poverty, abuse or future criminality. But since when did filling in endless forms release funds for frontline services, rather than divert them?

By bizarre coincidence – or not – this assault on treasured British notions of privacy and propriety was devised by the woman responsible for Britain’s most notorious social-work scandal. ECM was launched in September 2003 by Margaret Hodge, Tony Blair’s shocking choice as Britain’s first Children’s Minister.

Her main ‘qualification’ was being his pal and running Islington Council when its 12 children’s homes were awash with paedophiles and sympathisers of the ‘Left-wing’ Paedophile Information Exchange. This campaigned for sex to be legalised with children from the age of four.


One can only wonder how many Pervy Petes within childcare today will relish being actively invited to ask children about their sexual behaviour (CAF seemingly views this as normal), the ‘sleeping arrangements’ at home and how they feel about ‘changes to their body’.

I [this is the Journalist talking here] have been exposing child-abuse scandals for nearly 20 years and believe that this new Stalinist bureaucracy will not save a single child. Many of the paedophiles I exposed in Hodge’s homes ‘groomed’ children for eventual abuse through precisely such questions. Hodge claimed that constant State monitoring of children was justified by the Victoria Climbie scandal.

lucius
12-11-2008, 04:53 PM
Good stuff, the EU is the vanguard of this type of social engineering. This is the injunction phase that Lord Bertrand Russell wrote about: from 55 years ago by Nobel Prize winner & Fabian scientist/socialist, in his 'Impact of Science on Society', p. 50-51, a treatise on a scientific dictatorship:

"Fichte laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished, But in his day this was an unattainable ideal: what he regarded as the best system in existence produced Karl Marx. In future such failures are not likely to occur where there is dictatorship. DIET, INJECTIONS and INJUNCTIONS will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy, because the government will tell them that they are so. A totalitarian government with a scientific bent might do things that to us would seem horrifying. The Nazis were more scientific than the present rulers of Russia, and were more inclined towards the SORT OF ATROCITIES than I have in mind..."

Quite a verbose prig:

"Gradually...the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton."

More of his pearls:

"...I do not believe that dictatorship is a lasting form of scientific society--unless (but this proviso is important) it can become world-wide."

"...modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called "education" ... It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment... Where all children go to school, and all schools are controlled by the government, the authorities can close the minds of the young to everything contrary to official orthodoxy... The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated."

Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught falsehoods in school. And the person that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.? -- Plato

Like watching a train wreck in slow motion...

nate895
12-11-2008, 04:55 PM
I propose we invade Great Britain in order to spread liberty and democracy.

J/K

ihsv
12-11-2008, 04:57 PM
I propose we invade Great Britain in order to spread liberty and democracy.

J/K

:D

InterestedParticipant
12-11-2008, 05:01 PM
just reading thru the article, I found this tasty bit which I just had to post...



Why? One reason is simply to control people. Many of today’s New Labour MPs are ex-Marxists and radical feminists who still believe that the family poses the greatest potential opposition to the strong State.

The Government’s decreed desirable ‘outcomes’ for children are so frighteningly broad that many decent parents could find themselves labelled failures or abusers.

Everyone involved with children – including volunteers, and police on raids – is now expected to use the Government’s ‘Pre-Assessment Checklist’, to see if they are achieving these five ‘outcomes’ – being healthy, staying safe, enjoying life, making a ‘positive contribution’ and achieving ‘economic well-being’.

Even parents working desperately hard to feed their children and keep them safe could be classified as failing them. The questionnaire asks if children’s parents are ‘over-protective’, and whether work leaves them ‘too tired to pay attention to your needs’. CAF practitioners are also taught specifically to ask if parents ‘promote a healthy lifestyle’ and oppose ‘bullying and discrimination’.

Stuff this! How about we invade Washington, DC and install a Constitutional Republican form of Gov't.

ShannonOBrien
12-11-2008, 10:17 PM
George Orwell was only off by a couple decades it seems.

lucius
12-12-2008, 11:20 AM
scientific dictatorship = NWO policy agenda...bump

ronpaulforprez2008
12-12-2008, 03:44 PM
scientific dictatorship = NWO policy agenda...bump
Lord Russell additions are excellent. Unfortunately, it seems as if all your hard work, research and understanding falls on deaf ears here.

Malakai
12-12-2008, 04:21 PM
Stuff this! How about we invade Washington, DC and install a Constitutional Republican form of Gov't.

The Declaration of Independence encourages us to do this hehe.

Our founders rocked =)

heavenlyboy34
12-12-2008, 04:31 PM
The Declaration of Independence encourages us to do this hehe.

Our founders rocked =)

Jeffersonians FTW!! :D:)

lucius
12-12-2008, 08:41 PM
Lord Russell additions are excellent. Unfortunately, it seems as if all your hard work, research and understanding falls on deaf ears here.

I think there are more lurkers than realize and when the friendly-face falls off the fascism: one will hope it will become more pertinent.