Dems Won't Get 60 Seats; Saxby Chambliss Wins Run-off

[Knightskye]

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/12/02/ac.king.ga.senate.cnn

[mport1]

Why is this good news? Both candidates are just as bad. Neither of them are pro-liberty.

[tonesforjonesbones]

It is good for checks and balances. I'm glad Saxby won. i hope Al Franken rots ..tones

[Knightskye]

Why is this good news? Both candidates are just as bad. Neither of them are pro-liberty.

Saxby winning isn't the good news. The numbers are, though.

[nobody's_hero]

I hate to burst your bubble, knightskye, but the liberals did get the 60th seat. :(

It was gonna happen no matter which of these two clowns won. This was a mock run-off election between same-sides, portrayed to the public as an actual and very important choice.

Ron Paul did say that the Republican party makes a better minority party than a majority party—Republicans tend to get lazy and careless when they hold a majority.

[Scribbler de Stebbing]

The Democrats may not have a partisan super-majority, but they'll still have a voting super-majority.

[paulitics]

I'm sure it will be called "bipartisanship". Necons and neolibs working together against its citizens.

[Jeremy]

Why is this good news? Both candidates are just as bad. Neither of them are pro-liberty.

because Dems won't get 60 seats.... duhhhhh


now a Republican can still filibuster and stop some communist thing from the dems

[tonesforjonesbones]

Yes the GOP sure needs the power of filibuster with Obama's crew. tones

[Aratus]

both of them will think its THEIR efforts who were the tip-over!:eek:

[Real_CaGeD]

"They" have all the senate seats.