PDA

View Full Version : bin Laden just as dangerous as he was before 9/11




dude58677
09-09-2007, 03:42 PM
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=49750&cl=4029209&ch=61492&src=news

Shink
09-09-2007, 03:46 PM
Whoever refuses to question that tape is a fool.

derdy
09-09-2007, 03:54 PM
These guys did great work on the Bin Laden 'confession' tape.

http://teamliberty.net/id475.html

Also, here's what William Cooper had to say about Bin Laden June, 2001

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy4EyBstOsA

lucius
09-09-2007, 03:54 PM
If you liked this...you must watch,

War and Globalization:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490&q=war+and+globalization&total=330&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

These terrorist plan in decade+ timelines...

derdy
09-09-2007, 03:59 PM
If you liked this...you must watch,

War and Globalization:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490&q=war+and+globalization&total=330&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

These terrorist plan in decade+ timelines...

EDIT: Nevermind. It's working
For some reason your link is broke, but I was able to get the url while replying to your post
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490&q=war+and+globalization&total=330&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

Man from La Mancha
09-09-2007, 03:59 PM
If Bin Laden was as dangerous as people say, with his or his friends money they could of already bought a black market nuke and drive in a Mexican truck or a ship offshore by now and blown it up, but i think they know it will just give the neocomms an excuse to start Armageddon.

.

Manible
09-09-2007, 04:01 PM
These guys did great work on the Bin Laden 'confession' tape.

http://teamliberty.net/id475.html

Also, here's what William Cooper had to say about Bin Laden June, 2001

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zy4EyBstOsA

That second video is fucking nuts. Is that stuff true, can you post sources and whatnot for me to run through?

derdy
09-09-2007, 04:12 PM
That second video is fucking nuts. Is that stuff true, can you post sources and whatnot for me to run through?

what do you mean by that? are you looking for william cooper's original short-wave radio broadcast from that day?

Shink
09-09-2007, 06:49 PM
Any more good info?

JohnnyFreedom
09-09-2007, 07:13 PM
The only thing dangerous about Bin Laden is that he's in bed with our current President. The thing that really scares me about Bin Laden is how nuts people get when this "boogeyman" pops his head out every time there is a hot issue on the floor.

Last time it was around election time.

This time, he's popped up again...hmm...what's going on this time? Oh...that pesky progress report that Patreaus is about to give. This time, when the boogeyman came knocking though, it appears that he's been neutered eh? Every report on every mainstream news site I see says "Bin Laden impotent"

When Bushy addresses the nation, watch for this language. "We have marginalized Bin Laden via the war on terror. His power is dwindling and his hands are tied...the surge did this...the surge is workin" etc etc etc.

bah...

blazin_it_alwyz
09-09-2007, 07:34 PM
what do you mean by that? are you looking for william cooper's original short-wave radio broadcast from that day?

How did he die? That is sad, are you telling me, that they just came and killed him because of what he knew?

Revolution9
09-09-2007, 08:04 PM
How did he die? That is sad, are you telling me, that they just came and killed him because of what he knew?

Yes. Cooper was a debriefing Senior NCO which meant he did the heavy lifting and collating of data and interaction with those he debriefed and handed it off to hs superior officers. If you can get a book written in 1991 called "Behold A Pale Horse" that is a good place to start to get a grip on what he knew and why they killed him. Back in the early 90's the book was considered the tinfoil hat wearers bible but doggone it..nearly every scenario described and conspiracy pointed out unfolded as he claimed. He hated the NWO and considered himself a morally stanced warrior for the Christ principle.

Here is a 4 hour and 40 minute video of Bill on the topics of that book

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-729985813912005672

Best Regards
Randy

dseisner
09-09-2007, 08:07 PM
Bin Laden isn't dangerous, Bush is.

Richandler
09-09-2007, 08:09 PM
The mainstream media has not shown the bin Laden video fully. If they did. They would notice that the video stops while a voice over continues. The voice over section starts basically when he starts mentioning current events. Very suspicious. Also side-by-side comparisson bin Laden doesn't look the same and I believe the black beard is a distraction.

dude58677
09-09-2007, 08:19 PM
Bin Laden isn't dangerous, Bush is.

Yes, Bush is dangerous and so has American foreign policy since Woodrow Wilson, but so is bin Laden is in the same position as he was in Afghanistan during the 90's. He is in the mountains with terror training groups. The United States is in Iraq while ignoring bin LAden. During the 90's the United States was bombing Baghdad while ignoring bin LAden. Bin LAden's threat is being undermined now like it was in the 90's. The difference? OBL is in a country that has nukes which were purchased by a man named AQ Kahn who is in Pakistan and hates the US as much as OBL.

The 9-11 attacks were planned for 5 years and OBL could have been plotting something very serious for the last few years.

PS, here is AQ Kahn:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Qadeer_Khan

derdy
09-09-2007, 09:25 PM
How did he die? That is sad, are you telling me, that they just came and killed him because of what he knew?

here's a documentary on him

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2829245257205113781&q=the+hour+of+our+time&total=1770&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0


Yes, Bush is dangerous and so has American foreign policy since Woodrow Wilson, but so is bin Laden is in the same position as he was in Afghanistan during the 90's. He is in the mountains with terror training groups. The United States is in Iraq while ignoring bin LAden. During the 90's the United States was bombing Baghdad while ignoring bin LAden. Bin LAden's threat is being undermined now like it was in the 90's. The difference? OBL is in a country that has nukes which were purchased by a man named AQ Kahn who is in Pakistan and hates the US as much as OBL.

The 9-11 attacks were planned for 5 years and OBL could have been plotting something very serious for the last few years.

Bin Laden is probably dead. The fact that he pops up whenever it is most convenient to reinforce the "War of Terror" or distract people from other crimes of this administration should be plainly obvious that he is a tool of the state (that being the US) Any terror attacks of significant proportion cannot be carried out without the knowledge of our intelligence apparatus. See my first two links on the first page of this thread.

The most ridiculous aspect of this whole thing is that actual terroriist attacks have not occured in America, just terrorism by the administration through the 4th branch of the government, the media. If they really wanted to take the wind out of the sails of terrorism, they would not promote it 24 x7, 365 on the News networks.

If there were real terrorists in this country, they could easily aquire ak-47's or other weapons on the black market (or buy them legally) and walk into a shopping malls across the country and kill as many people as possible. Random cities, random times, spread througout the course of the past six years. The effect would be chilling.

They wouldn't wait six years when the American people are losing their resolve in and start seeing the "War of Terror" as a farce to pull of some spectacular attack that would be much more complicated, and thus, less likely of success, than they would implement the formerly described scenario.

OBL is supposedly in a country that we subsidize as well. How's that for irony? If OBL is alive, your tax dollars are making your way to him via the Pakistani ISI.


Just my two cents

Shink
09-09-2007, 09:37 PM
Yes. Cooper was a debriefing Senior NCO which meant he did the heavy lifting and collating of data and interaction with those he debriefed and handed it off to hs superior officers. If you can get a book written in 1991 called "Behold A Pale Horse" that is a good place to start to get a grip on what he knew and why they killed him. Back in the early 90's the book was considered the tinfoil hat wearers bible but doggone it..nearly every scenario described and conspiracy pointed out unfolded as he claimed. He hated the NWO and considered himself a morally stanced warrior for the Christ principle.

Here is a 4 hour and 40 minute video of Bill on the topics of that book

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-729985813912005672

Best Regards
Randy

That reminds me; has anyone ever actually proven the Report From Iron Mountain to be false? (for those who don't know what I'm talking about, it was written back in the 60's apparently by some high up gov't officials admitting that perpetual war was one of their biggest goals...and look where we are now)

lucius
09-09-2007, 10:21 PM
That reminds me; has anyone ever actually proven the Report From Iron Mountain to be false? (for those who don't know what I'm talking about, it was written back in the 60's apparently by some high up gov't officials admitting that perpetual war was one of their biggest goals...and look where we are now)

That 'hoax' is batting about 800... ;)

Geronimo
09-10-2007, 04:58 AM
Latest Bin Laden Video Is a Forgery: All References to Current Events Are Made During Video Freeze

by George Maschke
Sun Sep 9th, 2007 at 06:10:31 AM EST

Osama Bin Laden's widely publicized video address to the American people has a peculiarity that casts serious doubt on its authenticity: the video freezes at about 1 minute and 36 58 seconds, and motion only resumes again at 12:30. The video then freezes again at 14:02 remains frozen until the end. All references to current events, such as the 62nd anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombing of Japan, and Sarkozy and Brown being the leaders of France and the UK, respectively, occur when the video is frozen! The words spoken when the video is in motion contain no references to contemporary events and could have been (and likely were) made before the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

The audio track does appear to be in the voice of a single speaker. What I suspect was done is that an older, unreleased video was dubbed over for this release, with the video frozen when the audio track departed from that of the original video. The video may be downloaded as a 677 mb MPEG file here (http://ia341242.us.archive.org.nyud.net/3/items/aqAQq/s.MPG).

http://ia341242.us.archive.org.nyud.net/3/items/aqAQq/s.MPG

dude58677
09-10-2007, 05:56 AM
here's a documentary on him

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2829245257205113781&q=the+hour+of+our+time&total=1770&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0



Bin Laden is probably dead. The fact that he pops up whenever it is most convenient to reinforce the "War of Terror" or distract people from other crimes of this administration should be plainly obvious that he is a tool of the state (that being the US) Any terror attacks of significant proportion cannot be carried out without the knowledge of our intelligence apparatus. See my first two links on the first page of this thread.

The most ridiculous aspect of this whole thing is that actual terroriist attacks have not occured in America, just terrorism by the administration through the 4th branch of the government, the media. If they really wanted to take the wind out of the sails of terrorism, they would not promote it 24 x7, 365 on the News networks.

If there were real terrorists in this country, they could easily aquire ak-47's or other weapons on the black market (or buy them legally) and walk into a shopping malls across the country and kill as many people as possible. Random cities, random times, spread througout the course of the past six years. The effect would be chilling.

They wouldn't wait six years when the American people are losing their resolve in and start seeing the "War of Terror" as a farce to pull of some spectacular attack that would be much more complicated, and thus, less likely of success, than they would implement the formerly described scenario.

OBL is supposedly in a country that we subsidize as well. How's that for irony? If OBL is alive, your tax dollars are making your way to him via the Pakistani ISI.


Just my two cents

The video and the situation in Pakistan proves why Ron Paul is right about American foreign policy and why we shouldn't bomb IUran, occupy Iraq, and stop supporting Israel.