PDA

View Full Version : "Windfall Profits" Tax Would Cause Price Increases




nickcoons
11-24-2008, 06:49 PM
http://www.nickcoonsforcongress.com/blog/view.php?id=23

It was argued pre-election that we must impose a windfall profits tax on oil companies, and the idea is likely still part of President-elect Obama's economic plans. The rationale is that oil companies make too much money, so they need to pay more. Or, they are gouging us, and it's right for us to reclaim what is ours.

There are several practical factors here that are overlooked, not the least of which is that increasing taxes on businesses causes price increases for consumers, and this is no different for oil companies.

Most states and municipalities impose what's called a Transaction Privilege Tax, often referred to as a sales tax, when items are purchased for consumption. Contrary to what many may think, this tax is imposed on the business, not the consumer. If a store sells an item for $100 which incurs a sales tax of $8, the government requires that the business pay the $8. There is no requirement that an individual must pay sales tax. But just as this tax imposed on businesses is passed on to consumers, so too would an additional tax on oil companies. We would see this not only as increased prices at the pump, but also as an increased price in anything we buy that requires the use of oil for energy for production and/or transportation. For the most part, that would be everything.

Even in good years, oil companies make less than 10% profit margin, which is relatively low compared to most any other industry in the world. These windfall profits are looking at a narrow picture, which don't take into account many years where oil companies invest billions into new drilling sites and actually incur losses until they are able to refine and sell the end product.

And if we want to look at windfall profits, let's look at how government is profiting from oil. Local, state, and federal taxes of oil are approximately three times greater than the profits of all of the oil companies combined. If we want to save money not only at the pump but also on April 15th, we should lower taxes in order to lower overhead, and we should reduce government subsidies to oil companies. This would have the positive side-effect of putting alternative energy sources on a level playing field and allowing them to grow naturally as they would in a freer market.

heavenlyboy34
11-24-2008, 06:53 PM
It would also complicate business planning, IMO. The beaurocrats will probably invent an insane amount of tax code that would hinder an entrepreneur or businessman from properly gaguing risk. :( (i.e. I might not make certain good decisions out of fear that I might subject myself to "winfall profits" and the subsequent thievery/taxation)

satchelmcqueen
11-24-2008, 08:09 PM
you are correct sir. government makes tons more through taxes than oil companies make in profit. another thing for government to screw up for us. they need to lift some of their own taxes and leave the oil companies alone.

nickcoons
11-24-2008, 08:09 PM
It would also complicate business planning, IMO. The beaurocrats will probably invent an insane amount of tax code that would hinder an entrepreneur or businessman from properly gaguing risk. :( (i.e. I might not make certain good decisions out of fear that I might subject myself to "winfall profits" and the subsequent thievery/taxation)

Additionally, a large sum of money is spent by businesses each year in "tax planning", which is money wasted that can otherwise be put to productive use.

Businesses often make decisions, especially in November and December, about how to spend their earnings specifically to receive a certain tax benefit instead of what might be the most productive use of those resources. This is a clear negative side-effect of central economic planning, which we'll no doubt see more of in the coming years.