dude58677
05-30-2007, 04:18 AM
MS# 1145712
Dear Dr. Allen,
Thank you for sending a Letter-to-the-Editor to Science. We have read
over
your contribution, but will not be able to publish it in the magazine.
We
are letting you know as a courtesy in case you wanted to seek another
outlet
for your letter.
Please do not reply to this email, as it will not be read by Science.
Unfortunately the volume of submissions precludes specific discussions
about
individual submitted letters.
Sincerely,
The Editors
Science Magazine
The article MS# 1145712 was stated that online polls were unscientific because they are self-selected with no cross section as it was obvious that there was a huge discrepancy between online polls and telephone polls concerning Ron Paul.
Dear Dr. Allen,
Thank you for sending a Letter-to-the-Editor to Science. We have read
over
your contribution, but will not be able to publish it in the magazine.
We
are letting you know as a courtesy in case you wanted to seek another
outlet
for your letter.
Please do not reply to this email, as it will not be read by Science.
Unfortunately the volume of submissions precludes specific discussions
about
individual submitted letters.
Sincerely,
The Editors
Science Magazine
The article MS# 1145712 was stated that online polls were unscientific because they are self-selected with no cross section as it was obvious that there was a huge discrepancy between online polls and telephone polls concerning Ron Paul.