Obama Flips On Israel

[angelatc]

According to a blog we all hate (http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/16/obama-will-back-saudi-peace-plan/), Obama has flip-flopped on Israeli policy. Or he was pandering to AIPAC.


Barack Obama has decided to base his diplomatic approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on the Saudi peace plan, the Times of London reports today. A “senior Obama adviser” tells the Times that Obama will back the plan that divides Jerusalem into two capitals and pulls Israel back to pre-1967 borders.

Apparently, Obama has changed his position from his speech at AIPAC. In early June, he told the Israeli-supporting political action group that Jerusalem “must remain undivided,” drawing thunderous applause and roars of criticism later from Palestinian groups. Within hours, Obama retreated to the Bush administration position — that Jerusalem should be left to the two sides to negotiate in the final settlement.

Welcome to Obama 3.0 on Jerusalem. Now he has switched sides to the exact opposite of what he argued at AIPAC.

Imagine that.

[fedup100]

He won't last long if he keeps flopping, the moussad handlers will hand him his head on a stick, literally, as they did Kennedy. There are 3 things that no American puppet President is allowed to touch:

1. Israel
2. The IRS and or Federal Reserve (they, Israel own it )
3. The media (they control it )

[sevin]

What the hell is he thinking? Why all the flip-flopping? I'm so confused. Is he a puppet taking orders, or is he just stupid?

[JoshLowry]

Sounds like the guy who wrote the timesonline article is not a very credible source.


You know, I was starting to get concerned, and then I saw the byline.
Ed, it’s Uzi Mahnaimi (http://www.yourish.com/2008/07/13/5090). He’s the renowned author of the story that claimed Israel was building a “genetic weapon” that would target only Arabs. He’s the one that predicted Israel would invade Syria for, like, the last three summers in a row. He’s the one that said that Hamas was going to invade Israel from Gaza. He’s the one that said the U.S. was on the verge of attacking Iran.
Doesn’t matter that he has a byline with Sarah Baxter. He has no credence. None. I don’t believe this story, either.


:confused:

[lodge939]

Every US President has tried to solve the Middle east problem. None has succeeded.

[Zera]

Well hopefully he sticks to this flip.

[unconsious767]

I tend to believe his actions above what a dubious source has to say about him. I mean he just picked Rahm Israel Emanuel as his chief of staff, come on.

[LibertyEagle]

Sounds like the guy who wrote the timesonline article is not a very credible source.



:confused:


He’s the renowned author of the story that claimed Israel was building a “genetic weapon”
As I recall, doing this kind of thing was discussed in the PNAC documents also.

[eOs]

It is necessary for any want-to-be president to suck at the teet of AIPAC to be elected.

[lucius]

As I recall, doing this kind of thing was discussed in the PNAC documents also.

Pretty chilling read:

"And advanced forms of biological warfare
that can “target” specific genotypes may
transform biological warfare from the realm
of terror to a politically useful tool."

p. 60, PNAC, Rebuilding America's Defenses: http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

Download this must read.

[dannno]

Every US President has tried to solve the Middle east problem.

That's like, your opinion, man..

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A5339-2002Mar22?language=printer

[HOLLYWOOD]

That's like, your opinion, man..

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A5339-2002Mar22?language=printer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46-9lPG-4T0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46-9lPG-4T0)

I actually like this tune and of course uitar!

BTW, remember the movie True Lies? hmmm