PDA

View Full Version : Pretty Interesting Survey about where Americans are ideologically




Chieftain1776
11-14-2008, 05:46 PM
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2008/11/the_clubs_nationwide_election.php

Here are some questions:

Q: Regardless of whom you plan to vote for, if Barack Obama won the presidential election, and if Democrats won very large majorities in both houses of Congress, which of the following phrases would best describe how you would feel?

* Satisfied: 28.8%
* Uneasy: 27.4%
* Frightened: 21.8%
* Thrilled: 17.5%
* DK/Refused: 4.6%

Q: Congress recently approved a $700 billion plan to purchase bad debts from and invest in banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions. Some people think this was good because it could prevent bank failures and other severe economic problems. Other people think this was bad because it places the financial burden on taxpayers for the risky moves that these businesses undertook. Which of those viewpoints comes closer to your own?

* Bailout was good: 32.6%
* Bailout was bad: 49.1%
* DK/Refused: 18.3%

Q: In general, do you think the federal government is trying to do too many things that are better left to individuals, families, and businesses; or, do you think the federal government should do more to solve the country's problems?

* Does too many things: 53.9%
* Should do more: 39.1%
* DK/Refused: 7.0%

Q: All things being equal, which type of candidate for Congress would you be more likely to vote for? A candidate who wants to reduce overall federal spending, even if that includes cutting some money that would come to your district. Or a candidate who is willing to increase overall spending on federal programs and grow the federal budget, in order to get more spending and projects for your district.

* Cut spending: 66.3%
* Bring projects: 23.4%
* DK/Refused: 10.4%

Q: Which do you think is a better goal for federal government economic policy: Spreading wealth from higher income people to middle and lower income people; or creating economic conditions that give all people opportunities to create wealth through their own efforts?

* Spreading wealth: 21.3%
* Better econ condition: 73.1%
* DK/Refused: 5.6%

Q: Would you agree or disagree with the following statement? "The Republicans used to be the party of economic growth, fiscal discipline, and limited government, but in recent years, too many Republicans in Washington have become just like the big spenders that they used to oppose."

* Agree: 80.6%
* Disagree: 13.0%
* DK/Refused: 6.4%

These 12 districts have the following significant characteristics:

* All were House seats that were held by Republicans going into this election (5 by incumbent Republicans seeking reelection; 7 open seats left by retiring Republicans incumbents.)
* The districts were distributed evenly throughout the country: 3 in the Northeast; 3 in the South; 3 in the West; 3 in the Midwest.
* The districts were evenly distributed by party affiliation: 37% Republican, 40% Democrat; 19% Independent/Other.
* In 2004, President Bush carried all districts with a narrow average of 53%.
* On Election Day 2008, Democrats were elected to replace Republicans in all but one of these 12 districts (Minnesota-03).

dannno
11-14-2008, 05:51 PM
Absolute insanity.


http://www.gameshownation.com/Other/survey_says.jpg


Ron Paul should have won this election hands down.



We only have the media to blame now. The people already agreed with Ron Paul, they just didn't have a chance to hear what he has to say. The media is the only tool to get this out to people. When we tried to get the word out we looked crazy because it wasn't something coming from the MSM. How could they trust us?

nate895
11-14-2008, 06:01 PM
I could have told you that. Though, I am very happy with the validation. Ron Paul and the rest of the movement has been vindicated.

humanic
11-14-2008, 06:44 PM
Interesting stuff. Thanks for posting!

Expatriate
11-14-2008, 06:58 PM
I still think most of the primaries were tampered with and Ron Paul did much better than we think he did. I know certain people say that is a "kooky" thing to believe, but have we forgotten about this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKQEQ7qHvgM)? NH was the only state whose primaries I saw investigated to any extent. I would bet money the other states had a lot of the same shenanigans occur.

Before the next election you need to ensure the primary process in your respective state is bulletproof. Otherwise we will end up with the Two Stooges again.

jonahtrainer
11-14-2008, 07:22 PM
Ron Paul should have won this election hands down.



We only have the media to blame now. The people already agreed with Ron Paul, they just didn't have a chance to hear what he has to say. The media is the only tool to get this out to people. When we tried to get the word out we looked crazy because it wasn't something coming from the MSM. How could they trust us?

Ultimately the people are to blame. Why anyone trusts the MSM is beyond me.

jkm1864
11-14-2008, 10:16 PM
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to vote. I can't believe they said FREE TRADE was good. What sort of koolaid are these people drinking. The question even mentioned free trade caused jobs to go over seas and they still voted that it was good. The people must have been stupid welfare people that don't understand that if there is no jobs there is no welfare. Oh we need a split in this country for the responcible and another country for the socialist lazy bumms.

nate895
11-14-2008, 10:19 PM
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to vote. I can't believe they said FREE TRADE was good. What sort of koolaid are these people drinking. The question even mentioned free trade caused jobs to go over seas and they still voted that it was good. The people must have been stupid welfare people that don't understand that if there is no jobs there is no welfare. Oh we need a split in this country for the responcible and another country for the socialist lazy bumms.

Free trade is good, assuming that it is with countries who have free trade with us. We should strive to have free trade agreements (not managed trade agreements like we have with NAFTA and CAFTA) with every country on Earth.

Chieftain1776
11-14-2008, 10:24 PM
http://www.ronpaullibrary.org/topic.php?id=12

Ron Paul's problem is with "free trade" deals that are made by a combination of corporate, big labor and political interests and that can be reversed on political whim (look up the Obama waffling where he said one thing in the primaries and his advisers said another).