PDA

View Full Version : Stormfront members disillusioned Ron Paul is not a white nationalist




Paulitician
11-13-2008, 05:33 PM
Because Ron thinks we're stronger for embracing diversity (http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=540575)

Didn't these dodos know that Ronnie is philosophically for complete open borders [at least that's how he ran in '88 but has since changed his position for pragmatic reasons] and finds racism "ugly"? Just felt like pointing this out for the lulz :D

dannno
11-13-2008, 05:40 PM
LOL


It's like being in a room full of Archie Bunkers with no Meatheads to yell at.

-Yongrel



At least a few people in there are sensible, but the majority seem pretty bigoted.

Gosmokesome
11-13-2008, 05:48 PM
This is gold

Cowlesy
11-13-2008, 05:51 PM
Well they're fascists and could care less about freedom, so I think this is par for the course for those bozos.

Just more confused children.

LibertyEagle
11-13-2008, 05:54 PM
Didn't these dodos know that Ronnie is philosophically for complete open borders [at least that's how he ran in '88 but has sinced changed his position for pragmatic reasons]

Yeah, because he knows that a country without borders is no country at all.

StateofTrance
11-13-2008, 05:58 PM
Because of these racist, high-quality, cave living, hate-mongering morons, Ron Paul lost some supporters who voted for Obama in the end. Fuck 'em.

And fuck you for "defending them" in the spirit of "freedom of speech"

Paulitician
11-13-2008, 06:05 PM
Yeah, because he knows that a country without borders is no country at all.
I should have probably worded that differently. He didn't believe in having any restrictions on immigration.

dannno
11-13-2008, 06:11 PM
And fuck you for "defending them" in the spirit of "freedom of speech"

:confused:


I'll defend their freedom of speech

http://bp3.blogger.com/_8kXsPIEkJZI/RyifKsITY9I/AAAAAAAAALU/Z865QdgzBe4/s400/The-kitten-defend-oneself.jpg


Edit:

Oh, u said defending "THEM" in the "spirit of".. .hmm.. I suppose..

Paulitician
11-13-2008, 06:26 PM
Also, I think it was a year ago on PBS that Ron Paul said he didn't want racist (particularly white supremacist) support, hehehehe

Ah, here's the clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gKXyBgr24c

I guess they missed the memo...

mport1
11-13-2008, 06:31 PM
Yeah, because he knows that a country without borders is no country at all.

Great, the idea of countries is silly.

Paulitician
11-13-2008, 06:37 PM
Great, the idea of countries is silly.
yeah I agree

AbolishTheGovt
11-13-2008, 06:47 PM
LOL! This is my favorite quote from that thread:

"American WN's put their faith in Putin, and now in [Ron Paul]. Neither of them wanted to be our saviours, so stop treating them as such.. "

Umm... Lacking any sort of coherent political philosophy much?

vodalian
11-13-2008, 06:50 PM
"It would appear the Mr Paul has turned out to be just another snake oil salesman. I am sorry I ever gave a dollar or spent hours in support of his campaign.

Campaign for Liberty my ass.

Just another DC SOB leading us down the road to hell. "



LOL. So because Ron Paul (or a ghost writer) says he embraces diversity, he is now a snake oil salesman who is leading us down the road of hell, even though Ron Paul has always implied that he is not a white nationalist, how can he be if he is for individual liberty? Look at how frequently he talks highly of Martin Luther King, yet one comment about diversity causes them to go apeshit?

Paulitician
11-13-2008, 06:54 PM
LOL! This is my favorite quote from that thread:

"American WN's put their faith in Putin, and now in [Ron Paul]. Neither of them wanted to be our saviours, so stop treating them as such.. "

Umm... Lacking any sort of coherent political philosophy much?
Hahahaha. Their political philosophy is basically "go white race, go!"

newyearsrevolution08
11-13-2008, 06:59 PM
Yeah, because he knows that a country without borders is no country at all.

Yes but borders do not mean walls or fences either.


We need borders but people always try and assume it to be a separatist movement or isolationism. Those on stormfront have their opinion just like everyone else does according to this great country and why is it that so many so called "Freedom lovers" are so quick to trash ANY OTHER thought or ideals that are different than their own? Not seeing what the difference is at all.

Who cares what some nazi's think?
Who cares what some black panther wannabe thinks?

that is their own right and if they look at ron paul as a person who can allow them to enjoy their freedoms and rights to their own point of view then by all means let them call him as they want. Thats just one opinion that differs from many others.

who cares.....

As long as you don't HARM, HURT or reduce someone elses rights then I don't care if you walk around with a "I hate whitey" flag in front of me.

SouthGeorgia61
11-13-2008, 07:16 PM
i cant believe these morons have a forum to discuss there racist BS

Lucille
11-13-2008, 07:16 PM
Stormfront members disillusioned Ron Paul is not a white nationalist

Good. I hope they're so distraught that they kill themselves.

newyearsrevolution08
11-13-2008, 08:06 PM
Good. I hope they're so distraught that they kill themselves.

Nothing screams true freedom then to hope people commit suicide based on having different views than you.

Just because some of these people actually ACT on the bullshit they spew doesn't mean ALL of them turn their BELIEFS AND VIEWS into violent acts.

Could it be that some of them want to keep their culture, keep to their own and live as they want to. Is that something that should be looked down upon?

Don't assume I care for racist pricks though lol, I am just saying just like I don't care for homosexuality personally I have plenty of gay friends. That is their life and I live mine but why should I hope someone kills themselves simply because they might have a "far from normal" point of view? I just don't get the point in hating racists, seems pointless and I see the same hatred people spew towards them to be the same crap they toss on others.

ItsTime
11-13-2008, 08:11 PM
http://zapfu.com/files/fxjwyvhvdbmhnb3jae0w.gif (http://zapfu.com/)

QueenB4Liberty
11-13-2008, 08:37 PM
i cant believe these morons have a forum to discuss there racist BS

I agree.

Sir VotesALot
11-14-2008, 06:02 PM
I agree.

Thanks for your input, QueenB4Liberty! Maybe you should change your name now?

Sir VotesALot
11-14-2008, 06:04 PM
Because Ron thinks we're stronger for embracing diversity (http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=540575)

Didn't these dodos know that Ronnie is philosophically for complete open borders [at least that's how he ran in '88 but has since changed his position for pragmatic reasons] and finds racism "ugly"? Just felt like pointing this out for the lulz :D

LOL



Oh wait I agree with them never mind. Diversity IS a hoax.

dannno
11-14-2008, 06:19 PM
Thanks for your input, QueenB4Liberty! Maybe you should change your name now?

rOFL

Expatriate
11-14-2008, 07:11 PM
Great, the idea of countries is silly.


yeah I agree

Still, countries allow the advantage of compartmentalization. IMO, they are like bulkheads in a ship. If the whole globe was under a world government, where could you go to escape the tyranny when it came? Or were you joking? :confused: My sarcasm detector is broken today.

libertarian4321
11-14-2008, 07:23 PM
Because Ron thinks we're stronger for embracing diversity (http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=540575)

Didn't these dodos know that Ronnie is philosophically for complete open borders [at least that's how he ran in '88 but has since changed his position for pragmatic reasons] and finds racism "ugly"? Just felt like pointing this out for the lulz :D

The uneducated, jobless, loser racists (yeah, I know, thats redundant) who hang out at "stormfront" aren't known for their scintillating intellect...

Minuteman2008
11-14-2008, 07:37 PM
I believe there's little evidence that diversity is all it's cracked up to be. It's a very safe slogan to spout off and much appreciated by the opinion makers in the country, though. Are we truly better off as a nation since the racial composition has been radically altered? The most diverse state in the nation, California, has fallen from (I believe) 10th rated in education to 48th. And the state is drowning in debt.

I also believe that "embracing diversity" is really in direct contradiction to the pursuit of individual liberty and a colorblind society. If skin color truly doesn't matter, then what is there to embrace one way or the other?

Without getting hateful and referring to folks who dare to question the pro-diversity rhetoric as knuckle-dragging morons, what specific evidence is there that we've benefitted from it as a nation? Certainly the gay rights movement didn't benefit from it where in California black folks and Hispanics voted as a majority for the ban on gay marriage (blacks voted 70% to 30& for), while whites as a majority opposed it. While that's one small example, some of the people most likely to cheerlead diversity are doing so in opposition to their own interests.

I still maintain that individual liberty and colorblindness is the real answer here, and maybe even an honest assessment of whether or not actually celebrating diversity and multiculturalism is beneficial.

CapitalistRadical
11-14-2008, 07:40 PM
Diversity is racism. White Power is racism. Only individualism is not racism. The thinkers of old, in the 1960s, understood this.

FrankRep
11-14-2008, 08:31 PM
I don't get it. Stormfront thought Ron Paul was secretly racist or something?

ItsTime
11-14-2008, 08:33 PM
http://zapfu.com/files/fxjwyvhvdbmhnb3jae0w.gif (http://zapfu.com/)

:eek:

The_Orlonater
11-14-2008, 08:37 PM
Yes but borders do not mean walls or fences either.


We need borders but people always try and assume it to be a separatist movement or isolationism. Those on stormfront have their opinion just like everyone else does according to this great country and why is it that so many so called "Freedom lovers" are so quick to trash ANY OTHER thought or ideals that are different than their own? Not seeing what the difference is at all.

Who cares what some nazi's think?
Who cares what some black panther wannabe thinks?

that is their own right and if they look at ron paul as a person who can allow them to enjoy their freedoms and rights to their own point of view then by all means let them call him as they want. Thats just one opinion that differs from many others.

who cares.....

As long as you don't HARM, HURT or reduce someone elses rights then I don't care if you walk around with a "I hate whitey" flag in front of me.


Why we care? Because they are hate-mongering imbeciles who aren't very popular and when a group like that lies about Ron Paul being some white nationalist than that sways people away from us. We'd like some more Ron Paul supporters, please.

newyearsrevolution08
11-14-2008, 09:00 PM
I don't get it. Stormfront thought Ron Paul was secretly racist or something?

due to b.s. writings that were done on his newsletter as well as I think a vote or two of his that were about "rights".

It is just the same as someone voting against something called the "save the children from rapists" act and voting against it due to unconstitutional standings versus a "moral" ground and everyone assuming you feel that rapists should be able to keep doing what they are doing.

People who only look on the surface whether with a person, a bill or a vote deserves everything they get.

Like that damn patriot act... what you aren't a patriot! lol

damn sheeple can assume all they want BUT what is the point in hating them for their views? It seems like it is exactly the same deal, don't call it reverse racism lol....

dwdollar
11-14-2008, 09:47 PM
So you guys adore the founding fathers right?

None of you realize that they were just a tiny bit racially aware?

;)

I'm not picking any side. I'm just pointing out the obvious. (Or what I thought was obvious).

BeFranklin
11-14-2008, 10:19 PM
Because Ron thinks we're stronger for embracing diversity (http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=540575)

Didn't these dodos know that Ronnie is philosophically for complete open borders [at least that's how he ran in '88 but has since changed his position for pragmatic reasons] and finds racism "ugly"? Just felt like pointing this out for the lulz :D

Umm, yeah until next election! We donated to him nahnahnah :rolleyes::cool:

Kludge
11-14-2008, 10:27 PM
So you guys adore the founding fathers right?

Who are "you guys"?

I dislike many of the founding fathers. George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and Federalists in general are able to evoke grimaces from me when mentioned. Henry Clay and his cronies piss me off as well, but that isn't until the next "political generation".

angelatc
11-14-2008, 10:32 PM
Also, I think it was a year ago on PBS that Ron Paul said he didn't want racist (particularly white supremacist) support, hehehehe

Ah, here's the clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gKXyBgr24c

I guess they missed the memo...

Sometimes Paul worshippers are as deaf as Obama worshippers. How many times did he say that he wasn't going to run 3rd party?

literatim
11-15-2008, 03:22 AM
The replies seem pretty mixed.

werdd
11-15-2008, 07:07 AM
I should have probably worded that differently. He didn't believe in having any restrictions on immigration.

He doesnt support any restrictions on immigration, but he wants to eliminate the incentives to come over here. Welfare, free healthcare, etc. If those things were eliminated then the free market would welcome cheap labor. In the words of the man, they are scapegoats of our socialist welfare system.

Flash
11-16-2008, 02:35 PM
I believe there's little evidence that diversity is all it's cracked up to be. It's a very safe slogan to spout off and much appreciated by the opinion makers in the country, though. Are we truly better off as a nation since the racial composition has been radically altered? The most diverse state in the nation, California, has fallen from (I believe) 10th rated in education to 48th. And the state is drowning in debt.

I also believe that "embracing diversity" is really in direct contradiction to the pursuit of individual liberty and a colorblind society. If skin color truly doesn't matter, then what is there to embrace one way or the other?

Without getting hateful and referring to folks who dare to question the pro-diversity rhetoric as knuckle-dragging morons, what specific evidence is there that we've benefitted from it as a nation? Certainly the gay rights movement didn't benefit from it where in California black folks and Hispanics voted as a majority for the ban on gay marriage (blacks voted 70% to 30& for), while whites as a majority opposed it. While that's one small example, some of the people most likely to cheerlead diversity are doing so in opposition to their own interests.

I still maintain that individual liberty and colorblindness is the real answer here, and maybe even an honest assessment of whether or not actually celebrating diversity and multiculturalism is beneficial.

Just check out this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMSS2qoLdoA

Natalie
11-16-2008, 02:45 PM
The replies on there are too funny! I can't believe these people really think like this. And post about it on the web! HAHAHA