PDA

View Full Version : Socialists Say The Darndest Things




humanic
11-13-2008, 01:19 AM
I had the unfortunately experience of having an instant message conversation with a socialist Obama supporter this evening. Here are some quotes:

ON ECONOMICS
"there is no free market"
"free markets don't exists
"a market exists because of rules
"free markets = corporatism... same exact thing"
"you get rid of all regulations and government and you have corporatism... that's what ron paul wants"
"a freemarket... is what bush and cheney dream of"
"a market cannot exist without a government
"I believe in regulated capitalism"
"I also believe in science. I think our universities should be the highest funded institutions of our society"
"we need to hold capitalism at bay"

ON INDIVIDUALISM AND COLLECTIVISM
"we as humans need to understand that we have to think as a whole"
"humans are a collective species"
"individualism means fuck your neighbor, me first"

ON REPUBLICS
"a republic is a society of elites ruling over peasants"

ON THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
"The point of government is a pact between the people to pitch in a bit of money to make everyone's lives better, and to decide on an order of things"

ON MONEY
"I think money is always created out of thin air... what makes gold valueable?"
"we don't have fiat money"
"our money is not fiat money"
"fiat means the money is pegged to national production and natural resources"

ON CONSERVATISM VS LIBERALISM
"conservatives believe people are naturally evil inside and that the government, being a collection of people, is evil... liberals believe that individuals are actually good, when they know all the facts. That the people can be trusted with decisions."

ON "FREE" COLLEGE
"Do you think college should be free for people that get 3.0 and up?... how about a 3.25?... that's pretty damn good... it would be paid for by the people that are like, 40"

ON "CHANGE"
"I would love to see an America with only middle class people... no rich, no poor... not matter how smart or "powerful" you are...there would be strati however ...but for the most part it would not span further than (in today's dollars) between 50 - 200k /year"

ON GLOBAL WARMING
"you do believe in global warming, right?... I mean you can recognize real science when you see it... global warming is the product of an increase of greenhouse gasses based on our burning of fossil fuels over the past 150 years"

ON LIBERTARIANISM
"i'm aware of the teachings of Ayn Rand, Alan Greenspan, Globalism, Free trade. that's libetarianism"
"libertarianism is a fantasy... it's an ideal and a false one at that..."
"I think that libertarianism is extremely, and dangerously short sighted and selfish"

ON TAXATION
"if you work for a steel mill you make a wage... that wage should not be taxed. however, the owner of that steel mill should be taxed heavily."

ON WOLRD GOVERNMENT
"as much as it would horrify you, I am a believer in a world government"

ON REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH BEING OK WHEN OBAMA DOES IT:
HIM: and I agree that he punked out on the telecom bill and the bailout
HIM: I think though, on the bailout
HIM: his plan was to give the money to the president, confident that he would be presdient
ME:: and that makes it ok?
HIM: well I think he can use much of the money to help out individual home owners

ON RICH PEOPLE
HIM: I'm against free markets
HIM: I believe in a marketplace with strict regulations
ME:: regulated by whom?
ME:: by you, no doubt
HIM: democracy
...
HIM: informed debate
HIM: graduated taxes
HIM: the exchange of ideas
HIM: in a free press
HIM: not a free market
HIM: free market implies no regulations
HIM: I believe in regulated capitalism
HIM: I also believe in science. I think our universities should be the highest funded institutions of our society
HIM: not our military
ME:: there are regulations: everyone has an inalienable right to life, liberty, and property, and no one can use force or fraud to take those away
HIM: I think people should be paid to learn
ME:: paid by who?
HIM: through taxes from rich people
ME:: how rich?
HIM: over 3.2 million per year
ME: : so you, the social engineer, or you and a "democratic mob", decide who is rich, how much of their own money they get to keep, and what the money that is taken from them ought to be spent on
HIM: wait wait wait
HIM: their own money?
ME: yes
HIM: ok so when William McGuire made $2.7 Billion in one year from United Healthcare
HIM: that was his money
HIM: he earned it.
ME: : did he steal it from anyone?
HIM: yes.
ME: : how?
HIM: first of all, denying claims
ME: : was he contractually obligated to approve the claims?
HIM: after collecting thousands in premiums
HIM: who would have made him make a contract of that sort?
HIM: we have deregulated the health insurance industry
HIM: since Reagan
ME: : well, when people chose to sign up for his health care, they were entering into an agreement. what did that agreement entitle them to? did he violate it?
HIM: ok so what would you propose?
HIM: no health insurance at all?
ME: : well, im asking an honest question
ME: : did he?
HIM: let me ask you this
ME: : if not, then it's his money. if he did, then it's not
HIM: how is it his money?
HIM: he did nothing to earn it
ME: : it was voluntarily given to him
HIM: no
HIM: it was given to company to offset risk
ME: : voluntarily
...
HIM:why should one man be worth 2.78 billion a year?

ON BRAINWASHING
"who could possibly have brainwashed me to be socialist? I've been a brainwashed capitalist my whole life until I was 19 when I learned real history"

american.swan
11-13-2008, 01:35 AM
You REALLY had that conversation???

It hurts my mind just reading half of it. I couldn't finish it.

I wouldn't have been able to get through a few messages much less all of that.

When I was a DEM I thought the government was a good place to send money to help people. Try giving him examples of when Government is the problem. That's what convinced me. Constitution and Government doesn't work. Or maybe try that on another liberal who isn't so communist.

humanic
11-13-2008, 01:43 AM
You REALLY had that conversation???

It hurts my mind just reading half of it. I couldn't finish it.

I wouldn't have been able to get through a few messages much less all of that.

Yes, those are exact quotes from him. It was an immensely obnoxious conversation.


When I was a DEM I thought the government was a good place to send money to help people. Try giving him examples of when Government is the problem. That's what convinced me. Constitution and Government doesn't work. Or maybe try that on another liberal who isn't so communist.

I agree that it's a good approach, but it's clear after this conversation that he's so far gone (as you implied) that it's just not worth my energy. He is openly Marxist. I could convert ten more moderate "leftists" in the time it takes to convert him alone.

yokna7
11-13-2008, 11:28 AM
-quote:
ON REPUBLICS
"a republic is a society of elites ruling over peasants"

that seems to be apt.:(

danberkeley
11-13-2008, 11:38 AM
yeah. in college, it is taught that "free markets" cant work without government. even in my political science "textbook" it says that. that is probably why virtually all the PoliSci degrees that go into government believe that the government must regulate the economy.

ShowMeLiberty
11-13-2008, 11:44 AM
Ouch - that was a painful conversation, but you did very well, humanic.

One of "HIM"'s comments:


ON CONSERVATISM VS LIBERALISM
"conservatives believe people are naturally evil inside and that the government, being a collection of people, is evil... liberals believe that individuals are actually good, when they know all the facts. That the people can be trusted with decisions."

See, I think it's just the opposite. It's the liberals (socialists) who believe that people won't do the "right" thing unless government forces them to do it. True conservatives and libertarians believe that if government gets out of the way, people will be happy to voluntarily support social causes they believe in.

An article of interest I happened upon a couple of days ago, "Communism on the Rise" (http://www.jbs.org/index.php/jbs-news-feed/3899), suggests that socialism / communism is becoming very fashionable among those who were born after the fall of the Berlin Wall (in other words, those with no actual memory of the USSR and the Cold War).

Fox McCloud
11-13-2008, 11:51 AM
There's a friend of mine who's a "progressive", though, at the same time, his ideas are quite Marxist in nature...either way, he's a socialist through and through.

I've had extensive discussions with him on economics, why there should be a Free Market with little to no regulation, etc. Naturally he disagrees. Heck, one time I debated him on the effects of the minimum wage and how it put people out of work and increased the price of products for everyone....so everyone is penalized, and the person who earns minimum wage is getting not benefit, as the increase in product pricing wipes out the increase of the wage.

Ultimately, he got backed in a corner and said that there has to be a "balance" to thing and that it was acceptable to put low-skilled persons and some teenagers out of work for the benefit of others.....as for the price increases? He could never counter that; he simply short-circuited on the logic side and said "Well, we Australians are used to the higher prices by now, so it doesn't matter".

It's really not worth my time with him; he's so far gone I dare-say he's impossible to convert at this point.

So I think you're making a wise decision in not trying to convert him; at one point in time it just requires too much energy for the benefit you get (if any).

and always remember "Extremism...in defense of liberty is no vice. And I would also remind you that moderation....in pursuit of justice....is no virtue".

dannno
11-13-2008, 11:53 AM
People are so brainwashed. Tell them to stop repeating what they are hearing on the news. The news is owned by GE and they are brainwashing them into corporatism. Corporatism is where corporations control the government OR the government controls corporations. It really has the same effect in the end.

What a fucking tool.

strapko
11-13-2008, 11:55 AM
He is a fucking moron.

JeNNiF00F00
11-13-2008, 12:33 PM
I have heard these exact quotes before from peeps before and it is very annoying. This is where I feel that its a waste of time to worry about these people. WTSHTF these people will not realize whats hit em. I just think its time to start looking out for ourselves and family who are on board. Does that make me a bad person? Not if I have warned people. I'm not letting anyone take me down with them because they are too naive to what is at stake.

humanic
11-13-2008, 12:36 PM
Ouch - that was a painful conversation, but you did very well, humanic.

Thank you. You should have seen the whole conversation.. I cut out most of my responses to those insane comments in the OP in order to keep it reasonably short. Here's a few more excerpts:


(10:50:28 PM) HIM: and I support the nationalization of the Fed.
(10:50:47 PM) ME:: nationalization of the Fed is a non-solution
(10:50:51 PM) ME:: it needs to be abolished
(10:50:59 PM) HIM: No one printing money at all?
(10:51:04 PM) ME:: absolutely not
(10:51:14 PM) HIM: only small private banks with individual currency?
(10:51:18 PM) HIM: like in the 1700s?
(10:51:26 PM) HIM: state money?
(10:51:32 PM) ME:: constitutional money
(10:51:39 PM) HIM: federal money
(10:51:41 PM) HIM: nationalized money
(10:51:48 PM) HIM: nationalize the fed
(10:51:55 PM) HIM: make it a part of the treasury
(10:51:56 PM) ME:: no, not fiat money created by the federal governemnt
(10:51:59 PM) ME:: they dont have the authority to do that
(10:52:08 PM) HIM: according to the chinese they do
(10:52:12 PM) HIM: or we'd be broke
(10:52:18 PM) ME:: the problem isnt so much who created the money out of thin air but that it's done at all
(10:52:29 PM) HIM: well I disagree with that
(10:52:30 PM) ME:: if you returned to constitutinoal money it would end the warfare state
(10:52:34 PM) HIM: I think money is always created out of thin air
(10:52:37 PM) ME:: because they couldnt turn on the printing press to fund it
(10:52:46 PM) HIM: what makes gold valueable?
(10:52:55 PM) ME:: the free market
(10:52:57 PM) ME:: people
(10:53:00 PM) ME:: people make gold valuable
(10:53:02 PM) HIM: take away the word free
(10:53:04 PM) HIM: there is no free market
(10:53:11 PM) ME:: not in this country
(10:53:09 PM) HIM: a market exists because of rules

* * *

(10:54:36 PM) HIM: by the way we don't have fiat money
(10:54:40 PM) HIM: we have money based on debt
(10:54:55 PM) HIM: fiat means the money is pegged to national production
(10:55:01 PM) HIM: and natural resources
(10:55:19 PM) ME::: our money is pegged to national production?
(10:56:08 PM) HIM: no our money is made from debt
(10:56:11 PM) HIM: our money is not fiat money
(10:56:32 PM) ME::: yes, it is
(10:56:55 PM) ME::: federal reserve notes are fiat currency
[note: 46 second pause]
(10:57:41 PM) HIM: ok I'll grant that
(10:57:46 PM) ME::: haha
(10:57:48 PM) ME::: yeah you will, cause it's a fact
(10:57:54 PM) HIM: either way it's based on debt, not on production
(10:57:57 PM) HIM: it's an idea
(10:58:04 PM) HIM: same as every other currency, including gold
(10:58:12 PM) HIM: gold is only worth what we say it's worth
(10:58:20 PM) ME::: we, as in everyone
(10:58:27 PM) ME::: billions of people
(10:58:30 PM) HIM: same as a rock, same as a shell, same as cotton paper
(10:58:36 PM) HIM: humans
(10:58:37 PM) ME::: exactly, you're arguing my point for me
(10:58:44 PM) ME::: that's how gold gets its value
(10:58:49 PM) ME::: but not FRNs
(10:58:54 PM) ME::: and that doesnt change if you nationalize the fed
(10:58:55 PM) HIM: well no
(10:59:05 PM) HIM: it's the same
(10:59:22 PM) HIM: the ability for a body to print money that doesn't exist should be illegal
(10:59:24 PM) HIM: we can agree on that
[note: this contradicts his response to what I said at 10:52:18]

* * *

(11:07:06 PM) HIM: a social safety net that keeps everyone from falling into abject poverty
(11:07:11 PM) HIM: the general Welfare
(11:07:27 PM) HIM: How does it benefit society if you have no money?
(11:07:39 PM) HIM: Maybe you're stupid.
(11:07:43 PM) HIM: maybe you can only work as a trash man
(11:07:47 PM) HIM: does that mean you shouldn't have a house?
(11:07:50 PM) ME:: trash men don't get paid?
(11:07:50 PM) HIM: and a car to get to work?
(11:07:59 PM) HIM: well should they not get a living wage?
(11:08:02 PM) HIM: enough to have a family?
(11:08:26 PM) ME:: sure, if you want other people to be unemployed and make no money at all


See, I think it's just the opposite. It's the liberals (socialists) who believe that people won't do the "right" thing unless government forces them to do it. True conservatives and libertarians believe that if government gets out of the way, people will be happy to voluntarily support social causes they believe in.

Exactly. :cool:

pcosmar
11-13-2008, 12:45 PM
A conversation like that would make me ( a normally peaceful person) want to punch someone.

I think I would have given up on it sooner.

JeNNiF00F00
11-13-2008, 01:06 PM
Ummm..so maybe you should ask your friend what he thinks would happen to the standards of living if he took, say a person who worked in a grocery store as a bag boy and equaled out the salary of say an architect. A person with no mental capacity could work as a bag boy, however you need lots of education and mathematical skills to become an architect. In the long run you would end up with a shit load of bagboys, and a shitload of buildings would be falling down because you would have no architects to build any. All in all there needs to be competition between people in order for standards to rise. Heck id love a job that I could get shitfaced and bag groceries and make as much as an architect!

humanic
11-13-2008, 01:38 PM
yeah. in college, it is taught that "free markets" cant work without government. even in my political science "textbook" it says that. that is probably why virtually all the PoliSci degrees that go into government believe that the government must regulate the economy.

Exactly. And guess what: He has a PoliSci degree. Surprise!

I too have observed that people with PoliSci degrees (or college kids who are majoring in PoliSci) are usually the absolute worst people to talk about politics and economics with. They're brainwashed as socialists and close-minded know-it-alls.

Fox McCloud
11-13-2008, 02:18 PM
The Fed is nationalized.....contrary to what a lot of people say, it's not a "private central bank", but it's not exactly public either; it's quasi-public, quasi-private.

Besides, if the Treasury controlled it, it would do nothing different; as a matter of fact, it might make the whole process easier for the government to "print up" money. Recall with Lincoln and the Continental Congress; there was no regulator of the interest rates; it was just "need money? HERE! *prints* Not enough? HERE! *prints*"; I'd imagine under a Treasury run monetary system, it'd be very similar.

Ultimately all fiat money is based upon debt; sure, it can be interest free, but that doesn't mean it's still not based upon debt; a loan for $100,000 with 0% interest is still a debt that must be payed.

the whole "living wage" thing is totally fallacious, if you ask me; as I detailed earlier.

Santa Fe has the highest minimum wage in the country, at $10.50 an hour currently; in January 1, 2009 it will be indexed to the CPI each year there-after; talk about disastrous!

I don't have time to read through all of this, but apparently, this shows that by them doing this, it has caused unemployment and other negative impacts on the local economy: http://www.epionline.org/studies/yelowitz_12-2005.pdf

Conza88
11-13-2008, 05:45 PM
ON INDIVIDUALISM AND COLLECTIVISM
"we as humans need to understand that we have to think as a whole"
"humans are a collective species"
"individualism means fuck your neighbor, me first"

Dark City (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSpowoKqSzc) - send it to him... let's see what he thinks about Humans needing to think as a whole...

If he doesn't change his tune after this.... may he be sent to the Gulags first, for he is way more deserving.

Paulitician
11-13-2008, 05:52 PM
"a freemarket... is what bush and cheney dream of"
Their actions of anti-free market economic interventionism defintely suggests so :rolleyes:

Xenophage
11-13-2008, 05:55 PM
Is this a conversation between you and an 8 year old?

humanic
11-13-2008, 05:58 PM
Is this a conversation between you and an 8 year old?

I wish. He's 24 and has a degree in Political Science.

Also, for the record, this guy is not one of my friends. He used to date a friend of mine, and now he sends me random messages about politics from time to time.

tonesforjonesbones
11-13-2008, 06:09 PM
Useful idiot.

Is this what universities are teaching these days? QUICK! Ya''lll go get your money back! Tones

The_Orlonater
11-14-2008, 10:36 AM
This thread made me think of an idea, a gameshow with this title.

humanic
11-14-2008, 10:54 AM
This thread made me think of an idea, a gameshow with this title.

© ;)

Conza88
11-14-2008, 07:25 PM
^ Video idea easily viral if well done...

"Socialists say the dardnest things"

lmao... too much footage to choose from

Both republicans and democrats can be targeted..

The_Orlonater
11-14-2008, 07:27 PM
^ Video idea easily viral if well done...

"Socialists say the dardnest things"

lmao... too much footage to choose from

Both republicans and democrats can be targeted..

Capitalism "exploiting" people for fairness through comedic humor! ;)

I love it.