Freeper thread shows they are NOT wanting to turn "left"

[WRellim]

from: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2125559/posts

My favorite quote (about 2/3 of the way down):

McCain was a big tent skidmark on Republican underwear.
It’s time to bleach!
Note: I just thought it would be interesting to see what the "gut reaction" was over on the Freeper site. If you read the poster -- he's a wishy-washy "strategery" type. But reading the responses is enlightening, what the majority are saying (without actually saying it) is that the F'd up and needed (and NEED) a Ron Paul type candidate/leader.

And I DO find the "backlash" against McCain to be pure pleasure (admittedly in a schadenfreude way). :eek:

[Doktor_Jeep]

from: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2125559/posts

My favorite quote (about 2/3 of the way down):

McCain was a big tent skidmark on Republican underwear.
It’s time to bleach!
Note: I just thought it would be interesting to see what the "gut reaction" was over on the Freeper site. If you read the poster -- he's a wishy-washy "strategery" type. But reading the responses is enlightening, what the majority are saying (without actually saying it) is that the F'd up and needed (and NEED) a Ron Paul type candidate/leader.

And I DO find the "backlash" against McCain to be pure pleasure (admittedly in a schadenfreude way). :eek:



I like the skidmark comment...


hey! We can call them the Skidmark party!!!!!!!


I am copyrighting that!! Nobody touch it! I got a lawyer on retainer!

[Doktor_Jeep]

here is a nugget from that thread that made me laugh:


"Log Cabin Republicans know all about pitching a big tent."


har har!

[WRellim]

Go http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2125559/posts?q=1&;page=51


Post #76 includes this statement (from a FREEPER!!!):


Bush ran as a Conservative, but governed as a Globalist Bakerite. Any attention he gave to the base was incidental. There has not been a Conservative Republican in the run for the White House since Reagan- All have been Bakerites- All have been Globalists, including McCain.

And scroll down to post # 86 by a user nicknamed nathanbedford is this work of complete and total WONDERMENT (it's like watching a chimp learn to use a tool!):


As we conservatives drag the remnants of our movement into the wilderness with no idea how we will emerge or whether we will ever emerge as an electoral force in America which is recognizable by my generation, we must inevitably engage ourselves in the most soul- searing inquiry of what went wrong. This will be an agony but equally it will be effective only to the degree that it hurts. It will not succeed without bloodshed. There must be finger-pointing and bloodletting. We must carve to the bone. The process must be Darwinian. Those whose ideas are false must be bayoneted on the trial.


The object is to find our soul - nothing less. In a come to Jesus sense we must get absolutely clear what it means to be a conservative. Only at this point do we look to the tent flaps and open them. Those who cannot subscribe to the hard-won consensus, to a confession of faith as to what is a conservative, should walk out through that flap. Those who are attracted from the outside to the core message of conservatism should be encouraged to walk through the flap and enlarge the tent. What the left wants us to do is to expand the census in the tent prematurely and thus turn a movement into a menagerie. The Soul-searching must be conducted by conservatives without the earnest ministrations from liberals like those of Politico. This article, of course, has nothing whatever to do with explaining why Republicans lost 2008 election across the board, it has everything to do with first efforts by the left to sabotage the rebuilding process on the right which must be done exclusively by the right.


We have not lost the 2008 election because we were excessively partisan while Obama was enlightened and transcendental. We actually lost the election because George Bush and Karl Rove betrayed the soul of conservatism. A party without its soul is like an army which does not believe in itself, it cannot win the next contest. A party which had abandoned its principles and so lost the last two elections and frittered away both its power as the ruling coalition and its status as the majority philosophy of the nation, cannot expect to swell its ranks by recruiting to a lost cause. The party must first know what the cause is and only then can it recruit. To again borrow the military analogy, a party like an army disintegrates without a mission. Armies are assigned missions but a political party finds its mission only through soul-searching.


As this process occurs we will be told by the left that only a big tent party can win and that to become a big tent one must move to co-opt the center. That is not how it works. That is the reverse of the way it works. The center is not peopled by voters with fixed notions about the exercise of power who wait for one of the great political parties to surrender their values and embrace the tempered and resolute opinions of the middle. That happens with splinter parties but not with the mushy middle. When an unaffiliated voter bestirs himself to enter the polling booth he is confronted with one of two options: right or left. He does not consider who has moved the farthest geographically from right to the left or left to right any more than he commits because of his own long held political beliefs. He votes for the fella who best tickles his fancy at the moment. Put more charitably, he votes for the candidate who persuades that he is the best, and has the best to offer.


If we as conservatives do not believe that we have the best to offer we should get out of the business. A candidate, like a party, who is centered on his philosophy has integrity and is persuasive. And that philosophy must first have a vertical spiritual component which finds expression and out working in a horizontal governing philosophy.


Because of his race, Obama was asked only to demonstrate that he could walk and talk like a president. Obama has won the middle, not because he pandered to them, which he did, but because he had the wind at his back.


As John McCain reverts from titular head of the Republican Party to United States Senator, it falls to the rest of us to contrive a governing philosophy which he, unfortunately, did not own and therefore could not bequeath to us. We had such a legacy from Ronald Reagan but we squandered it. We must construct our own. We must do it in the wilderness. We must do it unaided by intermeddling liberals. Their's is the serpent's way, the easy way, a pander to the superficially popular, the accommodation to the middle. The bed of birth has always been a bed of pain. The pain must be embraced if we are to receive a new life.


Seriously folks, go digging and lurking in freeperland during the next few days...

;)

[me3]

What a waste of time.

These guys are talking about adopting principle to win elections, not principles because it is a noble and rational way to live their lives.

And I didn't see Ron Paul mentioned once. Just that drug running war criminal Reagan. MORE NATIONALISM! MORE FASCISM!

SIG HEIL PALIN!

[lucius]

from: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2125559/posts

My favorite quote (about 2/3 of the way down):

McCain was a big tent skidmark on Republican underwear.
It’s time to bleach!
Note: I just thought it would be interesting to see what the "gut reaction" was over on the Freeper site. If you read the poster -- he's a wishy-washy "strategery" type. But reading the responses is enlightening, what the majority are saying (without actually saying it) is that the F'd up and needed (and NEED) a Ron Paul type candidate/leader.

And I DO find the "backlash" against McCain to be pure pleasure (admittedly in a schadenfreude way). :eek:

Good to see you back! Enjoy the posts.

[Pete]

Well, FR is not ready to welcome me back yet:


Your posting privilege has been revoked.

Reason:
troll

Good to see ya, WRellim. :)