PDA

View Full Version : Lou Dobbs: U.S. Govt. Helping to Fund Iran Nuclear Projects




socialize_me
11-02-2008, 03:18 PM
http://digg.com/world_news/Lou_Dobbs_U_S_Govt_Helping_to_Fund_Iran_Nuclear_Pr ojects

itsthepathocrats
11-02-2008, 03:41 PM
nm

IPSecure
11-02-2008, 03:47 PM
Umm, we always fund our "enemies." Or would it be more appropriate to say that we always create our "enemies," then go to war with them, then rebuild them?

We built up Japan & Germany BEFORE and AFTER WWII

We just paid to send our industry to China and develop their economy. Hmm, wonder what's coming next? I think Biden told us in his recent 'Gird you Loin' talk.


Well said...

socialize_me
11-02-2008, 03:47 PM
Umm, we always fund our "enemies." Or would it be more appropriate to say that we always create our "enemies," then go to war with them, then rebuild them?

We built up Japan & Germany BEFORE and AFTER WWII

We just paid to send our industry to China and develop their economy. Hmm, wonder what's coming next? I think Biden told us in his recent 'Gird you Loin' talk.

lol...we're not going to attack China.

Truth Warrior
11-02-2008, 03:49 PM
I wouldn't be surprised AT ALL. :rolleyes:


"The system is corrupt, beyond redemption, and is not worthy of my support!"

Anti Federalist
11-02-2008, 04:02 PM
I wouldn't be surprised AT ALL. :rolleyes:


"The system is corrupt, beyond redemption, and is not worthy of my support!"

Yeah, me either.

And yet again, another example of the MSM being, in this case, years late to the party.

Us "CT"ers have been on this topic for years, along with ABB (Donald Rumsfeld on the board at the time) building, with US dollars, NK's nuclear plants.

Problem, Reaction, Solution. Just another day in the Empire of Evil.:mad:

IPSecure
11-02-2008, 04:07 PM
This is a little dated... Any update?

Are we still funding this?

Truth Warrior
11-02-2008, 04:19 PM
Yeah, me either.

And yet again, another example of the MSM being, in this case, years late to the party.

Us "CT"ers have been on this topic for years, along with ABB (Donald Rumsfeld on the board at the time) building, with US dollars, NK's nuclear plants.

Problem, Reaction, Solution. Just another day in the Empire of Evil.:mad:

And the "sheeple" still sleep. :p :rolleyes: GRRRRR!

HOLLYWOOD
11-02-2008, 04:32 PM
And the "sheeple" still sleep. :p :rolleyes: GRRRRR!

MIC creates and funds terror, war, and their continued life blood of a $ 1+ TRILLION a year in WAR and Weapons. Here's who first brought it up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY) <=== IKE's MIC speech.

The 5 star General of World War II stated it best on his exist speech from the Presidency in Janurary 1961, Dwight "IKE" Eisenhower.

http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html (http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html)

IV.

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present
and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

Truth Warrior
11-02-2008, 04:36 PM
MIC creates and funds terror, war, and their continued life blood of a $ 1+ TRILLION a year in WAR and Weapons. Here's who first brought it up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY) <=== IKE's MIC speech.

The 5 star General of World War II stated it best on his exist speech from the Presidency in Janurary 1961, Dwight "IKE" Eisenhower.

http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html (http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~hst306/documents/indust.html)

IV.

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present
and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

"The system is corrupt, beyond redemption, and is not worthy of my support!"